Jitterbit Releases Version 3.0 Of Its Open Source Data Integration Platform

Next Story

Qosmio G60: Toshiba unleashes new super-laptop

Jitterbit, a open source data and application integration company, has launched the 3.0 release of its product. The new release includes the debut of the ‘MX’ Enterprise version of Jitterbit, which the company says is designed for especially large enterprise customers. MX joins the normal Enterprise version (which should be suitable for most businesses), as well as the Jitterbit Community product, which is available for free but doesn’t come with support.

In layman’s terms, Jitterbit helps applications and systems that wouldn’t normally be able to ‘talk’ to each other do just that, and it also helps automate some of the more tedious processes involved in data management, like transferring data between applications. Users map out which fields in various applications are linked, and then Jitterbit automatically handles the synchronization regardless of which protocol is being used.

The new version adds support for use by multiple users and across multiple servers simultaneously. It also includes a plug-in manager, which allows users to leverage the library of plugins that have been built by the community (examples include plugins that add encryption schemes or can scrape data from webpages). Finally, the company says that the application has significant performance boosts, as well as added support for JDBC-based systems and HTTP Endpoints.

Jitterbit launched its 2.0 release back in August 2008, introducing a drag-and-drop interface and a new business model that charges customers for a “rock-solid” version of the product that includes support (anyone is free to try out the ‘bleeding edge’ version on their own for free, but Jitterbit won’t provide support for it). Since then things have been going quite well for the company: Director of Online Marketing Daniel Oxenburgh says Jitterbit is currently on track to double the new customers it will acquire this year versus last year. Notable clients include NASA and Continental Airlines.

Competitors to Jitterbit include SnapLogic and Talend, which raised $12 million earlier this year.

  • thought

    Nice, this looks like it has a lot of potential.

  • http://www.vidgyan.blogspot.com sundeep machado

    It seems a bit complicated.

  • http://newgadgets.dailytidbit.com/new-gadgets/jitterbit-releases-version-30-of-its-open-source-data-integration-platform/ New Gadgets | Jitterbit Releases Version 3.0 Of Its Open Source Data Integration Platform

    […] Original post by TechCrunchIT […]

  • http://benwerd.com/ Ben Werdmuller

    The fact that it’s open source leaves it open to be used for all kinds of applications all over the place. I wonder how easy it would be to get it to work as a kind of internal Yahoo Pipes, integrating locally installed web applications in a simple way. The possibilities for education, to name one market that heavily uses open source tools, would be huge. (Could Jitterbit link WordPress MU and Blackboard? Moodle and Elgg?)

  • http://www.jitterbit.com Dan Oxenburgh

    Ben, Jitterbit would connect those systems via their Web Services APIs, or in some cases LDAP. If you have the permissions, you could also connect directly to their databases.

  • johan vickworth

    Hey,
    I have tried Jitterbit and Pentaho for ETL and have found that Jitterbit has a very nice ez to use GUI for hierarchical data but Pentaho does not. Like Jitterbit’s ease. However, I am not sure, if Jitterbit is not fully mature. A simple xml output transformation of 80,000 rows of sqlserver data took way too long (2 minutes) on my 2 cpu windows box with nothing else running. Also, turning on threading/chunking actually didnt’ work. Finally, I felt that I am lacking the ‘full power’ of Pentaho when using Jitterbit like building arbitrary transformations on a canvas. Anybody else has any similar experiences?

    Don’t get me wrong – I like Jitterbit, but is it ready for the enterprise in terms of maturity, scalability, and transformation flexibility?

    jv

blog comments powered by Disqus