DARPA Contest Winners Prove Shredders Aren’t Quite As Safe As You Think

John Biggs

Biggs is the East Coast Editor of TechCrunch. Biggs has written for the New York Times, InSync, USA Weekend, Popular Mechanics, Popular Science, Money and a number of other outlets on technology and wristwatches. He is the former editor-in-chief of Gizmodo.com and lives in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn. You can Tweet him here and G+ him here. Email him directly at... → Learn More

Monday, December 5th, 2011
Solved_v4

DARPA’s Shredder Challenge, a contest to reconstruct documents from a slurry of shredded paper, has been solved, suggesting that my grandmother may be barking up the wrong tree when she shreds the Campmor catalog. Three scientists with experience in computer vision and mobile technology, Otavio Good, Luke Alonso, and Keith Walker, scanned each chunk for unique characteristics that allowed them to reconstruct the documents automatically on screen. They then put the pages back together by hand.

Their team won a $50,000 prize.

The contest consisted of five different documents (you can try a demo here but rest assured the real ones were a bit harder) and teams were a race to reconstruct them as quickly as possible.

So should gam-gam – or you – keep shredding documents? Good told the New Scientist:

So with DARPA’s documents reconstructed, are shredders now insecure? No, says Good. “The challenges that DARPA gave us were actually simple compared to if you have a bin full of lots of shredded pieces of paper. Reconstructing these documents was not easy at all. I don’t think you have much to worry about with your shredded documents.”

Looks like your secrets are safe… for now.