Microsoft Claiming Term "App Store" As Generic

John Biggs

Biggs is the East Coast Editor of TechCrunch. Biggs has written for the New York Times, InSync, USA Weekend, Popular Mechanics, Popular Science, Money and a number of other outlets on technology and wristwatches. He is the former editor-in-chief of Gizmodo.com and lives in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn. You can Tweet him here and G+ him here. Email him directly at... → Learn More

Wednesday, January 12th, 2011

Microsoft wants to call their app store an App Store, but Microsoft wants to call their app store an App Store, but Apple thinks different. The term, used by Apple for almost as long as the iPhone has been around, is a registered Apple trademark. Microsoft, on the other hand, finds the term “app store” to be completely generic and not subject to trademark control.
From the filing:

“Any secondary meaning or fame Apple has in ‘App Store’ is de facto secondary meaning that cannot convert the generic term ‘app store’ into a protectable trademark,” write lawyers for Microsoft in a motion for summary judgment, filed yesterday with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. “Apple cannot block competitors from using a generic name. ‘App store’ is generic and therefore in the public domain and free for all competitors to use.”

Apple, on the other hand, says the name is protected and has been used in the “trade press” consistently over the past two years. Apple is also claiming that “app” is also short for Apple, something I’ve never, ever thought when hearing the term.

That said, why can’t Microsoft just build out an “application souk” or a “program bazaar?” It’s not like anyone will call it anything other than an “app store” in daily conversation anyway.

via TechFlash

blog comments powered by Disqus