The Facebook Imperative
Marc Benioff
Feb 24, 2010

Editor’s note: This guest post is written by Marc Benioff, chairman and CEO of salesforce.com. In it, he explains why enterprise software should take its cues from Facebook and become more social.

I quit my job at Oracle in 1999 because I couldn’t stop thinking about a simple question: “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Amazon.com?” Why couldn’t applications be run from a simple website, without software or hardware to install, and pricy consultants to hire? Why couldn’t we just compute in the Internet, or the cloud, and get away from the data center and all its complexity. Simply put, I wanted to simplify the enterprise. It was a pretty straight-forward idea, but from the confines in which I sat, there wasn’t anything close to a straight-forward solution.

That vision led to the founding of salesforce.com. But the enterprise world wasn’t ready for Amazon.com, or eBay, or Yahoo, or any of the innovative services that were changing the way consumers bought, sold, or communicated. I tell this story in my book Behind the Cloud and can’t help but note that the factors at play 10 years ago—an inspiring service, wide skepticism, and phenomenal potential—mirror where we are today. But it’s no longer Amazon that frames the questions or gives us the answers.

In this decade, I’ve become obsessed with a new simple question: “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook?” As we were focused on bringing enterprise computing into the modern age, Facebook redefined the values of consumer computing and helped ignite the social phenomenon. The compelling aspect of feeds, profiles, and groups, amplify the service’s stickiness. So does its functionality on a mobile device like an iphone—necessary to secure a service’s status as a “killer app.” Facebook is where I start my day to find out what my friends and family are doing. It’s where I go to see the important events in my social life. Everything I care about and need to know is pushed to me—and it requires no work on my part.

What does the social revolution mean for business, though? So far it hasn’t meant much. Currently, our methods of collaboration are defined by Lotus Notes or Microsoft SharePoint, but these tools haven’t kept up with the changing times. They were conceived before anyone knew what a “newsfeed” was. (In fact, Notes was conceived before Mark Zuckerberg was!) Today, realtime information is possible, which has changed everything: How people consume information has changed, how people learn things about each other has changed, and how people stay current has changed. Most of all, our expectations around immediacy have changed.

Now, we need to take this idea to our businesses. We need to transform the business conversation the same way Facebook has changed the consumer conversation. Market shifts happen in real time, deals are won and lost in real time, and data changes in real time. Yet the software we use to run our enterprises is in anything but real time. We need tools that work smarter, make better use of new technology (like the mobile devices in everyone’s hands), and fully leverage the opportunities of the Internet.

New realtime cloud applications, platforms, and infrastructure offer the path to redefine the future of collaboration. Now in beta, Salesforce Chatter takes the best of Facebook, Twitter, and other social leaders, for instance, and applies it to enterprise collaboration—making people more productive and businesses more competitive. I already see it working: I have an enterprise desktop where without any effort I can learn about what my team is focusing on, how my projects are progressing, and what deals are closing. It is fundamentally changing the way our organization collaborates on product development, customer acquisition, and content creation—making it all easier than ever before.

We are on the precipice of a major shift in our industry. It stems from a change we badly needed and the once-in-a-decade question we had to ask. And this time, we are all ready for the answers. Luckily, this time, I don’t have to leave my job to find out what they are.

Advertisement
  • Related Topics
Advertisement
  • Yohanes

    Doesn’t Yammer already do something pretty similar to this? How integrated will Chatter be with the rest of your products and will it be focused on your core sales customers?

  • http://www.nustik.com nustik

    I unfortunately do not subscribe to this simply because some “things” were meant to stay a certain way. Enterprise should NOT be social just because it COULD be social. As it is, there’s a lot of underbelly socialness happening as a result of partners, competitors, affiliates, colleagues, ex-colleagues swirling around Facebook and it makes for a pretty incestuous environment.

    Trying to flip enterprise on its head and make it social would do nothing but create a sloppiness that could never work. Moving to the web from monolithic software is one thing – moving to a overtly social environment to conduct enterprise “activities” is another.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=802974618 Ming Yong

    The premise that Marc spoken about regarding why enterprise social could not be more social like facebook is exactly the reason why I started my company Socialwok -a business social networking service for Google Apps. Our users use Google Apps account to login into Socialwok, share messages, files and existing Google Docs/Calendar from Gmail. (http://socialwok.com/tour_gapps)

    I believe Salesforce chatter is quite disruptive – connecting business applications + social feeds as it brings together salesforce trapped data and connects that to a social process. There are also other interesting platforms where business data is trapped like Google Apps.

    Google Buzz also brings an interesting dimension. At Socialwok, we are vey excited about Buzz. It extends Socialwok’s capabilities even more. Big announcements coming from us on feed based sharing on the enterprise + buzz :-) Keep updated from our blog http://blog.socialwok.com

    Ming

    Disclosure: I am CEO of Socialwok (http://socialwok.com/tour), Business Social Networking for Google Apps. We provide to businesses in general in particular Google Apps users the ability to do microblogging, collaboration using feeds.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=802974618 Ming Yong

    Yohanes,
    Yammer doesn’t even do anything close to what Salesforce chatter is doing. Salesforce chatter is quite powerful because it connects business applications & process to the feed format. Yammer is a walled garden like most current enterprise microblogging services.

    It is for this reason why Socialwok when we started wanted to tied in with existing workflows of businesses like email, Google Docs, etc. This distinction is quite important.

    Ming

  • Microsoft

    im tired of reading about the “social revolution.” its so annoying. there is no revolution, just people killing more time on facebook chatting about jersey shore. no revolution

  • fb sucks

    “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook?”

    Because Facebook isn’t enterprise software. It’s written in a crap language, PHP and then hacked into C++ through an interpreter because Facebook doesn’t want to hire employees who know a enterprise scalable language, instead they want to keep 500 developers on staff making 60k because they learned PHP in school and don’t know their ass from their elbow about business.

  • McBro

    I think this post is even too obscure for the Techcrunch audience! Is there a salesforce blog somewhere this could have been posted on?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=16404762 James Gillmore

    To me it seams it’s all about the fact that a larger application like salesforce can send customized tweets to chatter for specific events. So each event triggers a different type of tweet that is represented with relevant meta-data in the chatter stream. That seams to be the crux of what’s going on here. So for example, if a sales rep closes a deal, the tweet will have info about who the deal was closed with and how much. If a new employee was hired, it might provide some background info about the person. All in the stream. i.e. just like how Facebook has different types of stream posts for events, photos, apps, status updates, etc.

    Marc, am I wrong? What in terms of precise features define Chatter?

  • http://www.krazier.com Zebb

    Good read, Facebook is a great way to bring in information about many of the people I know (close and distant). Bringing this type of experience to a company could be a huge step forward on how business are run.

  • F

    Nice ad for Behind The Cloud and Salesforce. Douche.

  • http://www.hireright.com kyle

    we would love to beta test chatter at HireRight.

  • http://www.nashvillehype.com Paul

    I’m curious of your thoughts on how something like Chatter will change the idea of productivity in the workplace. It seems every now and then some egghead will release a ‘finding’ that tells how much time/productivity in the workplace is lost to things like FB and Twitter — and yet it seems that Chatter’s operational theme is based on these same productivity zapping concepts.

    Essentially I’m asking is it more productive to DO the work, or Chatter about the work being done?

  • stanfordgym
  • http://rizkiharit.wordpress.com Rizki Harit

    I rather ask “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Google?”

  • kyle

    paul,

    i think the idea is that chatter will open more doors to do more work.

  • Joe Shamann

    Yup. I agree 100% w/ Ming here. Collaboration that isn’t integrated into the CRM/Service/Enterprise system you spend ALL your time in is just a separate, isolated island.

    Its completely different. If SFDC can truly execute on this vision, it’ll transform the value provided by its enterprise software.

    Its about being able to have better awareness about the things that are happening around you inside the company/application as you go about your daily work.

    If they can’t execute….well thats a wrap.

  • dude

    Wow, this is a thinly veiled advertisement for Salesforce & Salesforce Chatter. Why not just say “Editor’s Note: This is an advertisement and not journalism.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1225249 Kenny Mendes

    I agree. People get used to using applications that are dead simple to use, like Facebook, Flickr, and Youtube…when we go to work, we don’t want to be held back by ancient software with 1990′s user interfaces and cumbersome product manuals.

    That’s where I think products from Salesforce for CRM, Box.net for content management, and Gmail for communication can make a huge difference.

    (Full disclosure, I work at Box.net…and we’re hiring!)

  • http://www.udtek.com udtekadapter

    Why isn’t all enterprise software like Amazon.com?

    Why is all enterprise software like Amazon.com?

    Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook?

    Why is all enterprise software like Facebook?

    http://www.udtek.com/laptop-ac-adapter-c-2.html

  • bah

    No offence, but I could have sworn this was TechNews, Not TechSalesPitch

  • sweet

    Actually, you’re wrong.

    It’s not thinly veiled at ALL. I’d say it’s outright blatant.

  • sk

    look at the chinese shamelessly plugging his startup. dude, once is enough

  • Really

    How much did Salesforce.com pay to get this posted?

  • allenhsieh

    if a blogger gets paid to promote something, it’s advertising and disclosure is adviced.

    what is this post then? it sure is advertising except here the blogger let the advertiser blog about the product himself…

    this post is very very very questionable…

  • Steve Young

    Running out of incontinence pads, are we?

  • Darrel Rodham

    No surprise the MS guy doesn’t get what 300M people do almost everyday…

    If it ain’t Windows …

  • Darrel Rodham

    Everyone who has big, new ideas and talks about them alot (or forms companies around them) has lots of referenceable material and it would be much more weird if he didn’t reference what he’s already written or created along the lines of his writing here.

    Or maybe you’ve never been in a position to understand that dynamic …

  • Rine

    I concur with what the writer of this post is pointing out, that in the future, cloud computing will be part of our lives.. It may held some problems and security issues but it’ll increase the productivity of the whole internet class in terms of business and sales.

    And that’s why google is starting to do it today, on their future agendas.

  • JoeInsider

    GO MARC! Software SUCKS!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=7300758 Ted Blosser

    I was a sfdc user at my last company and this is exactly what was missing. although it was a very good tool, sfdc was lacking the stickiness to return to it on a daily basis because it didn’t provide enough value as a sales tool alone. if you integrate social conversation into it, i would rather go there every couple hours compared to my company home page that gets updated only once a day with a couple articles. that would then lead me to actually use the core functionality of sfdc more often as well. great strategy

  • Everyone is a critic

    This should have instead been posted on TechShill

  • http://eskokilpi.blogging.fi/2010/02/24/laptops-tablets-and-mobile-phones/ Productivity and mobile devices « Esko Kilpi on Interactive Value Creation

    [...] The fastest immediate increase in productivity comes from either learning touch type or using voice and video as means of input. Perhaps the keyboard of the future is speech combined with transcription? Anyway, the productivity software of tomorrow needs to be interaction based. The most efficient productivity suit of tomorrow may well be a combination of Twitter, blogs and Facebook. [...]

  • Steve

    Ah, the abused art of the thinly veiled advertisement guest blog post finally reaches TechCrunch – good job sir.

  • Spin Doctor

    Congratulations to the Salesforce.com PR team, what a great placement.

  • cease

    the main disagreement, is there is so much noise in social stream that it will be impossible for anyone to get work done. Even emails… to go through every single one every time it get sent.. would render a person useless.. now imagine that times 100 with a social stream thats pushed to you.

    agree.. this article should be taken down for the blatant ad for not only salesforce, but the book also. He clearly could of spoken about this concept without mentioning the book or salesforce products

  • Moe Glitz

    At the end of the day is Chatter going to be productive for any Company that uses it, or is it going to be totally unproductive.
    After all socialising normally means leisure time and thats not good for any Company.

    Chatter could be an interesting tool for the Enterprise, but it is not the be all or end all for businesses that want to work in the cloud.

    But with the right magic sauce, the cloud would change the way businesses and consumers interact online. Thereby crushing the power of Search Engines and making current passive websites seem so 1990′s.

    My magic sauce is almost ready. Now all I need is a good chef and a top team.

  • http://www.wiredreread.com Theis Søndergaard, Wired Reread

    I like the fundamental question in this post.

    Just a small fun fact: The big ol’ bag of software we know as Lotus Notes actually started out as a message-board and spawned an online community, so “They were conceived before anyone knew what a “newsfeed” was. (In fact, Notes was conceived before Mark Zuckerberg was!)”, isn’t quite true :-)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Lotus_Notes#History

  • Etrigan

    I think Mark has a point. For some reason, the direction of innovation in tech seems to be from consumer to enterprise apps.

    W’ve seen the streaming, real-time interface adopted not just in the likes of Facebook, but in Linkedin as well. Bearing in mind that SAP doesn’t even have a workflow notification system (letting you know for example when a transaction is awaiting your approval), this is a good idea.

    I can see when logging into enterprise software, a notification stream letting you know who has done what, what targets have been reached, what is awaiting your action, when new customers /contracts have been signed, month-end processes completed, etc.

    I do think this is the new UI frontier for enterprise apps.

  • Bill

    Agreed that FB is ALWAYS broken, application development decisions are questionable at best (removing/loosening certain privacy restricting features), and that their support arm is totally non-existent. The IDEA of FB is marvelous. If they knew how to write UIs that were not “hostile” it would be very useful. I admit to using it, but only because “everyone” is there. I am constantly seeking a new interface. Good cloud apps should try to better their customer’s experience.

  • http://www.techticles.com Milo

    nobody really cares about the social aspect in the enterprise. Companies are so obsessed with productive work that has a direct impact to the bottomline. A social software in the enterprise just promotes unproductive work, labor union and the works.

    Good luck with your chatter, sure you’ll get some market share but that’s it, you won’t make a dent on SharePoint.

    http://www.techticles.com/why-chatter-of-salesforce-com-wouldnt-nudge-sharepoint.page

  • Chad D.

    Marc – it sounds like you’ll have a decision to make should Facebook ever add some CRM functionality. Will you continue to login to 2 platforms… or will you converge onto 1as you’ve done with your social life?

    I already know your answer… and the Facebook / CRM idea is probably far far off. But be careful what you wish for… Facebook is the Internet.

  • Andrew

    Very lame. This might as well be a paid advertisement.

  • http://condiminds.tumblr.com Lucila

    I agree with you at some point! I work developing social media solutions for enterprises, but we have one thing very clear: Enterprises are all different, social solutions have to be designed for each one specially, there is no magic ‘formula’ that can make a development work for every company the same way. And sometimes, for some companies, social solutions just wont work. With that in mind, you have to analize each company and try to design the best solution. Even if it doesn’t include your services. :S

  • http://shop.worldconnect.me Bill Ritsch

    Completely agree with this. I am a process improvement advisor and could totally see a specific threaded comments system in two areas. Orgs that have a heavy engineering component to their sales process and Hospitals. Even new electronic order entry systems in hospitals for patient’s orders do not effectively or efficiently communicate what needs to be done and when it is completed. Yammer and the folks that make the handheld “twitter/FB” posting only devices could improve both productivity and quality in Healthcare. It’s just that most of us old folks in decision making capacities don’t get it :P

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=759468688 Vishwa Malhotra

    Completely echo and agree with Marc’s thoughts on this.

    Having experienced first hand the point around enterprise desktop where without any effort I can learn about what my team is focusing on, how my projects are progressing etc.,, is super engaging and productive.

    Communication and Collaboration being real time is the key vehicle that makes businesses run on steroids!

    I am glad that the industry is getting to use and learn about tools that are super important to our daily work lives.

    Vishwa
    http://www.engagesmart.com

  • http://eduk8.com Nicholas

    The problem is that in some companies, large consulting groups who have been clients for example, people are scattered around the world. Part of the job is figuring out who is who, and how projects get completed.

    The days of walking down the hall are over for more advanced organizations. That does not mean that something like this will work or fit. Time will tell. Not al groups have to be social to accomplish an agenda. But, Salesforce is also established in a market that requires high rates of socialization.

  • http://t3n.de/news/facebook-salesforce-marc-bienoff-267835/ Enterprise 2.0: „Warum ist Unternehmenssoftware nicht wie Facebook?“ fragt Salesforce.com-Chef Bienoff » t3n News

    [...] mit der (noch) gearbeitet werde. Das jedenfalls sagt der Salesforce.com-Chef Marc Bienoff in einem Gastbeitrag auf TechCrunch. Darin wirft er einen Blick in die Zukunft der Unternehmens-Software und meint, sie müsse so [...]

  • http://eduk8.com Nicholas

    That’s his job! Relax… He was complementary of Salesforce’s effort further up stream, so he is not being a shill.

    That said, have you heard about how we are trying to make education social?

  • http://eduk8.com Nicholas

    What is interesting is that he is correct in the sense that we are still groping, trying to find efficient ways to be social in such contexts. How do I not blow half a day like yesterday! Part of the efficiency lies in the fact that it takes less time to work collaboratively.

    But, my guitar teacher very simply had me look in the mirror as I played, and he said, “I don’t even have to be here. You just solved all of he problems.” Insight like that takes another person with different experiences, even if I may solve the problem myself.

    We have to find out if the 300 million are lemmings or explorers.

  • http://eduk8.com Nicholas

    Some years back I was wrote about a feed system that would tag individual “posts” with two or more pieces of information — what it was and who it got shared with. Twitter came along with a blatant disregard for privacy and as usual showed that my ideas were too complex.

    I would still like to see some of those tools, but simplicity in action seems to be picked up much more quickly than facilitating search.

  • http://eduk8.com Nicholas

    I will agree. However, I did get a few decent ideas from the discussion, so it may be worth it after all…

  • http://unexia.com Unexia

    I was actually very intrigued by this article’s title and by the reputation of the author. It may or may not have been the intention (I suspect it was), but this really came across as a new form of press release.

    The subject matter in this article could have been far more insightful. I think it would have been better had he not spoken about Chatter, but rather in terms of the value of a Facebook-like type of model only.

    Maybe it’s just me …

  • http://www.appliedeye.com/cms Adi

    I dont know muc abiut salesforce chatter but being a facebook application developer i do think what marc says is right.

    There is difference between enterprise and facebook though, facebook is about people, enterprise is about processes.

    if i had the money I would create a platform where a enterprise gets its own social network where initially atleast all it would have is people and then allow outside developers to build applications around those people.

  • http://www.skill-guru.com skillguru

    I can hear one word CHANGE !!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=500420440 Brad Nickel

    Exactly! I mean come on TechCrunch was this a paid advertisement and I missed the notation from the Editor?

    Article Summary: The world is becoming social, my company has more overpriced stuff you should use to feel social at work. I am brilliant!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=500420440 Brad Nickel

    The point is it is one big blatant promotion for his products. I got no value nor did anyone else from the pontification.

  • randy

    TechCrunch, is this a paid blog entry?

  • http://crmfyi.com Jeff Grosse

    If you want in on the beta, you can email iwantchatter(at)salesforce(dot)com.

  • http://waterwordsthatwork.com Environmental Writing Guy

    So I use Salesforce.com for my own practice and I like it a lot. But isn’t this “guest post” really just a press release for his own service? Where’s the real insight here?

  • http://www.geirfreysson.com/2010/02/salesforce-facebook-and-amazon/ Salesforce, Facebook and Amazon « Geir Freysson – The Internet Industrialist

    [...] Benioff, founder of Salesforce.com, posted an article on Techcrunch today titled “The Facebook Imperative“. In it he writes about what drove him to found Salesforce.com: I quit my job at Oracle in [...]

  • toddq

    I think broadband penetration has been too low here in the US for cloud computing to work effectively.

    Standard broadband plans here in america are very slow to what I experienced in Korea.

  • http://blog.transmitit.com/2010/02/marc-benioff-1999-why-isn%e2%80%99t-all-enterprise-software-like-amazon-com/ Transmit – the blog » Marc Benioff, 1999: “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Amazon.com?”

    [...] Benioff, founder of Salesforce.com, posted an article on Techcrunch today titled “The Facebook Imperative“. In it he writes about what drove him to found Salesforce.com: I quit my job at Oracle in 1999 [...]

  • Ricky

    Nice infomercial disguised as a guest post

  • allstock23

    Agreed, sk. Ming Yong what the hell do you have to say for yourself?

  • http://broadstuff.com/archives/2114-Lotus-Notes-was-conceived-before-Mark-Zuckerberg.html broadstuff

    “Lotus Notes was conceived before Mark Zuckerberg”…

    Interesting article from Salesforce.com’s Marc Benioff about why Enterprise Social media software is so cr*p. The headline we used – “Lotus Notes was conceived before Mark Zuckerberg” – says it all really, but he makes some other points: We need to …

  • jack

    In addition to being a blatant plug for SFDC and Chatter, it’s also a tactical diversion from Yammer’s press conference/product update later today. Nice preemptive tactic. Also, I’m surprised that people are shocked that Marc would plug so openly–after all, the guy has grown one of the most successful sw companies in the last decade, and has clearly influenced the direction of IT.

  • Paul E. Ester

    What makes chatter so cool is it’s integration with the awesome pre-existing content management module. I wish FB had half the features.

  • John K

    “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Google?”

    – Because Google doesn’t get backwards compatibility. Try using any of their API’s and you’ll see they regularly break a core tenet of API best practices “support backwards compatibility”.

    They don’t get enterprise yet – they are used to doing whatever they want, breaking existing customers & partners in the process.

  • http://www.austingunter.com Austin Gunter

    I love the focus on making enterprise software more like Facebook. The hardest thing about making enterprise sales was always the lack of intrigue in the software.

    No matter how good it was, it was almost never exciting, and people have a hard time spending money on stuff that they don’t find exciting.

  • emschles

    I cannot agree more. I believe Chatter will take hold and spread like wildfire; first and foremost when each student has access to a platform license (http://thehigheredcloud.com)

    Once that occurs then students can access their eTextbooks, Lectures On Demand and digitized university library resources all related specifically to classes, faculty and semesters instead of proprietary eBook platforms.

    Back to Chatter – Clearly, the most adept group of users [students] will benefit from Chatter; as will the universities that seek their interest and participation through out the ‘student life cycle’. Imagine the power of Chatter for Students (and Higher Ed in general) – who can now share; classes, study groups, assignment projects, social interests, curricula, career aspirations and experiences, content, research; join common groups as members of specific Colleges, departments, upperclassmen, Freshman, Sophomores, frats, sororities ……. in a SECURE environment that is flexible enough for personalization; all while taking advantage of a common security and data model. And, because the interface is familiar – the learning curve is about a half a minute !!!

    And what about those student graduates? Now they can have a shared platform so they can stay connected to their Alma mater and each other and all those wonderful experiences they had in school. Keeping those ‘memories’ fresh, relevant and alive will insure benefits to the individuals and the institution (think Fund Raising, Career Development).

    Chatter for Students or Facebook for Business – call it what you want; its a wonderful tool to engage the student from application through the entire ‘student life cycle’

  • eric

    my prediction – there will be a social bubble at some point when they realize there really is no money in it. most non-tech companies block facebook and twitter because it distracts employees from actually doing work. i know it don’t want my employees on those sites… AND, i am the the REAL business owner with 400+ employees in 3 cities. mmm, are they going to answer the call queue or update confidential information on twitter about who they spoke to? POP!

  • Another Voice

    As innovative as a new flavour of Caffe Latte in a starbucks store.

    The latte is refreshing, at least.

  • http://iptiam.com iptiam (iPad Therefore I Am)

    The direction is completely wrong. Facebook works bcos of folks trying to share information with ppl they know. Its as simple as that. Taking that assumption for the enterprise is, plain and simple, stupid.

  • http://www.apeofsteel.com/1207/social-media-crosses-the-chasm Social Media Crosses the Chasm | Dave Concannon

    [...] has a very interesting guest post from Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce on the inspiration behind their new collaboration suite "Salesforce Chatter". [...]

  • DT

    The value of a ‘stream’ is precisely that you can dip your toes in occasionally — or not. If you miss some things, who cares, just check in later.

    That is not a good model for enterprise efficiency, where you can’t afford to miss information. You need to be able to go to the information source you need, when you want, and know the information will be there, also look at historical information etc.

    For the enterprise, good on-demand reports are more important than a stream.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=621599484 Paramendra Kumar Bhagat

    I love it when people like this guy do guest posts on TechCrunch. My thought though is, why is Facebook itself not launching a Facebook Enterprise? Whatever that might be. @jobsworth would love this post.

  • Julie Wong

    Are we now recycling old CEO keynotes , like this one from Dreamforce last year, essentially bordering on sales pitches, as TC content ?

  • dave

    did facebook really ‘ignite the social phenomenon’??? I can point to at least a few other sites, while currently not the largest anymore, laid the groundwork for social behaviors online. And while Facebook has contributed a lot to the enhancement of current social behavior, they definitely didn’t ignite it.

    “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook” you ask? Because maybe Facebook is not the best thing since sliced bread.

    How many shares did they give you? I hate reading press releases btw…c’mon TC.

  • Roscoe2020

    Shameless plug! Embarrassing for TC.

    Wouldn’t it be MySpace that really got the social network thing growing like crazy? And they are now swirling the drain. Though I guess the same thing happened between UpShot and Salesforce.com. What Benioff is best for is showing the power of marketing.

    SFDC is a great sales app, decent service, lousy marketing, and all the other crap (esp. whatever they call their developer platform these days) is a bunch of hot air.

  • http://www.davidcarpe.com dave

    sounds like a guest post designed to shill for chatter on salesforce, but fails completely to suggest any course of action for large enterprises to think about what you’re saying within the context of the larger ERA (enterprise reference architecture), particularly where they’ve invested billions in the stack, and where major holders like oracle have crapped on cloud and will push on-premise until the end of time.

    any interest in writing *not* an advertorial but perhaps a legitimate column full of ideas and actionable things versus a link to your book and more salesforce stuff? thanks!

  • http://renaissancechambara.jp/2010/02/26/links-of-the-day-367/ renaissance chambara | Ged Carroll – Links of the day

    [...] The Facebook Imperative – owes a creative debt to Clara Shih (ex-Salesforce exec) but still a good read [...]

  • http://www.podworx.com Scott Whitney

    Whew. . .no kidding. I’m all for a great sales pitch. . .but am a bit surprised to find it on TechCrunch.

    Will TC be allowing the CEO’s of SaaS companies pitch as well?

  • Tad

    It’s almost funny that TechCrunch acts so noble and bound by ethics, yet completely blast companies or PR reps which ask if they will write about their service/product in exchange for something. But here we are, again, faced with an article that offers no insight and is a blatant advertisement.

    Between this and the new MySpace debacle, I wonder why I even visit this website.

  • http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/02/26/facebook-and-business-software/ Facebook and business software

    [...] gave some PR space to Marc Benioff, CEO Salesforce and what does he do? Asks the question: ‘Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook?‘ If you’ve spent any number of years in business software you’d know this is an [...]

  • http://called2account.com/?p=5026 Facebook and business software | called2account

    [...] gave some PR space to Marc Benioff, CEO Salesforce and what does he do? Asks the question: ‘Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook?‘ If you’ve spent any number of years in business software you’d know this is an [...]

  • Brewster Barclay

    Facebook may have changed the way that people interact with each other. However, I beg to differ that it is a good software. It is one of the least intuitive interfaces I have ever dealt with. It is very difficult to move around from one function to another. You have to do multiple clicks to do anything.
    If Facebook did not benefit from the strong network effect, it would not be successful. If you were starting from scratch you would not design Facebook the way it is designed today.
    I have not had the luxury of testing Salesforce Chatter but I hope that they have not taken very much from the Facebook UI metaphor.

  • http://midiazozial.com.br/2010/02/os-impactos-das-midias-sociais-no-mundo-corporativo/ os impactos das mídias sociais no mundo corporativo | MÍDIA ZOZIAL – notícias curtas sobre mídias sociais | redes sociais | twitter

    [...] tech crunch Compartilhe esta [...]

  • http://archlever.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dickey

    Pretty easy reading through this and breaking commenters into three groups:

    1) The people who don’t care about enterprise software because it’s not in their face every day. They’re the ones who talk about “paid advertisement”, shills and so forth; completely dismissing the idea that the OP and the discussion could have any value whatsoever, but thinking highly enough of themselves that they think dissing it will bring them props;

    2) The people who are afraid of the future — and for a generation, this has included those who cling tightly to a single vendor dominant in other areas. They’re afraid of what Salesforce and Facebook are/could become because they’ve seen what the vendor THEY cling to has become;

    3) Those happy few, that band of brothers, who see the perfect vacuum with which far too much enterprise software sucks, see the way technology trends in general are moving, and pray devoutly that the latter will Do Something™ about the former quickly enough to ease their pain.

    The OP was written TO the third group, saying “don’t despair; help is on the way.” To the first group, it says “you’re irrelevant; get out of our faces, please.” And to the second? “You’re extinct; you’re the tyrannosaur that’s been shot between the eyes by a howitzer. The sooner you fall over and quit twitching, the sooner the rest of us can build a world worth having.”

    It’s unclear at this point which of the first two groups is causing the greater delay for building “that world worth having.” But working together, without admitting it, without always even being aware of it, the first two groups have managed to stifle innovation in software for a generation.

    Mission accomplished, guys; now, the rest of us have some work to do.

  • http://www.enterpriseirregulars.com/14097/enterprise-software-is-not-like-facebook-for-a-reason/ Enterprise software is not like Facebook for a reason

    [...] Marc Benioff was his usual provocateur self with his post on Techcrunch “The Facebook Imperative” where he asserted that “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook?” is the important [...]

  • http://luisgiusti.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/os-impactos-das-midias-sociais-no-mundo-corporativo/ Os impactos das mídias sociais no mundo corporativo « WEBMKT

    [...] fonte: tech crunch [...]

  • Steve Elbows

    The self-promotion aspect of this article aside, I think there are some interesting issues here.

    I work for a very small non-IT company in the UK. I tried giving them internal instant messaging but it was too soon for the company culture, a couple of years later they came to me and asked for it and its become an essential part of communication within the company.

    I also tried a messageboard but there was a problem with people not knowing how much time they were allowed to spend looking at it. We have also dabbled with the likes of Basecamp for managing some projects and it sort of worked but again it was another separate system to login to which caused some problems. If they had the sort of collaborative features the aforementioned things offer, but fully integrated into the tools they use to do their work, be it quoting, invoicing, managing customers, lead tracking etc, I think it would probably be a winner. Mind you we are old fashioned in that we dont like to use services that are hosted externally for a number of reasons so salesforce.coms offering isnt likely to be tried by us any time soon.

  • Tad

    If we’re going to break things down to their oversimplified parts, then we should look at the point of the article.

    “In it, he explains why enterprise software should take its cues from Facebook and become more social.”

    The premise?

    “Things have changed. Things are more social. There are these things called newsfeeds now.”

    Conclusion:

    “Therefore, we NEED enterprise software to be social and real-time. Coincidentally, my product meets this need which I have just created in this article.”

    Nowhere in the article did he explain why such features are beneficial or necessary other than that they have become an essential part of social, personal communication. Regardless if you think the demand is indeed existent, the article offers little insight. All the “dinosaurs” you speak of would have benefited from an insightful article explaining why such features would evolve the enterprise industry. The article is simply a plug and fails to meet its supposed objective.

    And although I’d agree with the author and you that the demand for such a service exists, the article didn’t deliver that message. It took avantage of a large reader base to promote itself.

  • http://dorasmith.x.iabc.com/2010/02/26/what-i-learned-in-social-media-this-week/ Dora the Explora » Blog Archive » What I Learned In Social Media This Week

    [...] The Facebook Imperative  Marc Benioff, chairman & CEO of salesforce.com: “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook?” As we were focused on bringing enterprise computing into the modern age, Facebook redefined the values of consumer computing and helped ignite the social phenomenon. The compelling aspect of feeds, profiles, and groups, amplify the service’s stickiness. So does its functionality on a mobile device…” [...]

  • Chris

    Man – do people really want to tell facebook how to do cloud apps…and complain how much they suck?

    Instead, ask why have they been so successful in a competitive marketplace.

    Reading some of these comments is hilarious – everyone knows better, but really, what have they done? Built any ‘cloud’ apps that are more successful than FB? Yeah. Thought so.

    Oh – and to the OP. Stop confusing technology with interface design. The question being asked is – how come users of enterprise software need days and days of training (and still can’t use the bloody thing), while facebook users simply pick up and go?

    Final point – the primary salesforce interface today IS now one of those apps that requires days of training for both admin and end use.

  • Peter J

    The problem with most enterprise software and apps is that it’s more about politics, end users, power users, and everything else. There are legacy systems still in place, mainframes, 10 year old systems, open source, ms, etc etc etc.

    Facebook is great for what it does but it really doesn’t do that much when it comes to getting users actual data. Behind the scenes they might have billions and billions of records and analytics but for the common everyday user, they don’t see any of this and don’t ever need to.

    These days for an enterprise or government entity or a hospital or non profit group common administrative assistants need to get reports to their managers, they need graphs and charts and everything else. Then the managers need some more analytics or predictions and the IT staff develop something new, the end users take a look at it and formulate their own opinions and then the managers and Executives approve or reject or ask more questions.

    And ‘in the cloud’ has been a nightmare compared to actually having the damn stuff onsite. If you use some SAAS or Cloud system the connections are slow, you don’t control your own data, half the time you have view access instead of tables in the databases, you get charged an arm and a leg for extra features that really should be normal, then things get shut down for an update without real warnings, etc etc etc.

    Services in the Cloud are great in one sense, but at the same time most of these services are miserable if you store your data in the cloud.

  • http://archlever.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dickey

    And although I’d agree with the author and you that the demand for such a service exists, the article didn’t deliver that message. It took avantage of a large reader base to promote itself.

    On rereading, and after further consideration, I’d mostly agree with you. The OP assumed that he was preaching to the choir as far as it took “the demand for such a service” as a given. He did mention some of the benefits (high-level, explorable snapshot of a ‘big picture’) but could have gone into a lot more detail on why “going social” is the only/best way to deliver those benefits.

    Recommendation for next version of this presentation: distill the OP down to 2-3 paragraphs, at most, and use it as intro/teaser for ‘this is why going social is the best option’ presentation. THAT might get a good reaction from the not-yet-converted.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1268667405 Avery Otto

    Collaboration is a 2010 imperative. And cool tools aren’t the only thing that is important, we can’t forget that the most salient factor is the people making the tools work. Here is a free esummit on Collaboration. See more:
    http://www.dynamicalsoftware.com/news/?p=85

  • http://www.softwarenewstoday.co.uk/should-all-enterprise-software-run-like-facebook Software New Today | Should All Enterprise Software Run Like Facebook?

    [...] BIZ) – That’s an interesting premise put forward by Marc Benioff, CEO of [...]

  • http://excapite.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/how-collaborative-intelligence-as-opposed-to-business-intelligence-promotes-innovation/ How Collaborative Intelligence (as opposed to Business Intelligence) promotes innovation « excapite

    [...] with a new simple question: “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook?”” – The Facebook Imperative Marc Benioff – [...]

  • http://www.enterpriseirregulars.com/14144/the-facebook-imperative-for-enterprise-software/ The Facebook imperative for enterprise software

    [...] well-known CRM and cloud computing company — and now soon-to-be social software vendor — wrote a guest post on TechCrunch late last week making the case for “why enterprise software should take its cues from Facebook and become more [...]

  • http://ShaverAssociates.net Rob

    Well I think he’s just being social. Isn’t that what we’re talking about here? Just pretend you’re on FaceBook/Twitter/SFChatter/Buzz.

    Now do you get it?

  • http://ShaverAssociates.net Rob

    Well it may “do it” for 300 million but it doesn’t solve any problems I have, nor does it entertain me either. I may look at a FaceBook site once a month. If it disappeared tomorrow I don’t think I’d notice.

    Guess I don’t hang with the cool crowd.

  • http://www.pixelbase.co.uk/?p=732 Pixelbase » This Week in SAP

    [...] died”. The argument is not new and was also reflected in recent posts by -amongst others- Marc Benioff, Vinnie Mirchandani and SAP’s Charles Zedlewski. Whilst I appreciate the long overdue look [...]

  • http://leananderp.com/?p=166 ERP Modelled on Facebook?

    [...] ERP is certainly no model for simplicity, interface design, flexibility, (you get it, this list goes on and on).  But could ERP be made better in the image of Facebook?  Marc Benioff, the founder of Saleforce, seems to think so.  In February he authored a post on Tech Crunch where he made this argument.  The link is here. [...]

  • http://www.ilcorrieredelweb.com/?p=3123 The Facebook Imperative Cannot Be Stopped | Il Corriere del web

    [...] arguing that enterprise software should be more like Facebook. Two weeks ago on TechCrunch I posted ?The Facebook Imperative,? which posed a simple question, ?Why isn?t all enterprise software like Facebook?? It was the next [...]

  • http://www.crmoutsiders.com/2010/03/10/the-consumerization-of-the-enterprise/ CRM Outsiders » Blog Archive » The Consumerization of the Enterprise

    [...] the scenario, what exactly are we in agreement on? Here is a quote from the article (actually the prequel) “We need to transform the business conversation the same way Facebook has changed the [...]

  • http://bobpartners.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/the-facebook-effect-what-does-a-cio-do/ The Facebook effect…what does a CIO do? « Best of Breed Technology Partners

    [...] weeks ago on TechCrunch I posted “The Facebook Imperative,” which posed a simple question, “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook?” It was the [...]

  • http://mjayliebs.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/consumerization-of-the-enterprise/ Consumerization of the Enterprise « Mitch Lieberman – A title would limit my thoughts

    [...] the scenario, what exactly are we in agreement on? Here is a quote from the article (actually the prequel) “We need to transform the business conversation the same way Facebook has changed the consumer [...]

  • http://www.rajajasti.com/2010/03/10/evolution-of-enterprise-software/ Evolution of enterprise software « Raja Jasti’s Blog – Renaissance Thinking

    [...] the questio: ‘why isn’t all enterpsirse software like Facebook’?. He calls it the facebook imperative which inspired salesforce [...]

  • da man

    Sales piece for salesforce?

  • http://www.gauravonomics.com/blog/salesforce-ceo-marc-benioff-insists-that-all-enterprise-software-should-be-like-facebook/ Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff Insists That All Enterprise Software Should Be Like Facebook « Gauravonomics Blog

    [...] single post!Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff on TechCrunch – Two weeks ago on TechCrunch I posted “The Facebook Imperative,” which posed a simple question, “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Facebook?” It was the [...]

  • http://www.rogerkemp.net/2010/03/12/thoughts/busy-busy-busy/ Busy busy busy « Roger Kemp's Net

    [...] – The Facebook Imperative – The Facebook Imperative cannot be stopped – Physorg.com (too many articles to list ) – [...]

  • http://erlebacher.org/2010/03/11/the-data-storage-conundrum/ The Data Storage Conundrum

    [...] people who lack interest or training in statistics and data mining.  This may be another aspect of The Facebook Imperative that Marc Benioff recently wrote about.  Companies such as Oracle, SAS, SAP, Salesforce, and Tibco [...]

  • http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/2010/03/i-wonder-what-benioff-is-thinking-about-google%e2%80%99s-apps-marketplace/ I Wonder What Benioff is Thinking about Google’s Apps Marketplace? | Software Industry Insights

    [...] discussion.  Gundotra only focused on Google’s apps and recently Benioff has been talking about why enterprise software companies aren’t more like Facebook (who Google also seems to have in their sites, although Buzz and Wave have been less than inspiring [...]

  • http://lechinh.com/2010/03/hello-ipad-hello-cloud-2/ Hello, iPad. Hello, Cloud 2. « Zero's Blog

    [...] I first suggested that the enterprise software industry has to move forward and posted an article, “The Facebook Imperative.” In 1999, I was obsessed with the question, “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Amazon.com? [...]

  • http://brianchannell.com/blog/?p=259 Hello, iPad. Hello, Cloud 2.

    [...] I first suggested that the enterprise software industry has to move forward and posted an article, “The Facebook Imperative.” In 1999, I was obsessed with the question, “Why isn’t all enterprise software like Amazon.com? [...]

  • http://starrforce.com/2010/03/salesfore-becomes-facebook-friendly-with-salesforce-content/ Salesfore Becomes Facebook Friendly with Salesforce Content | Salesforce.com & Force.com Development & Integration

    [...] February 24, 2010 Mark Benioff, Saleforce’s CEO, published an article on TechCrunch that raised the question “why isn’t all enterprise software like [...]

  • http://www.likejazz.com/archives/1510 likejazz.COM · 인트라넷 문제 이후

    [...] 소개한, The Facebook Imperative – TechCrunch 페이스북으로 대중의 눈은 높아졌는데 엔터프라이즈는 이를 [...]

  • http://lindseydonner.com/2010/03/why-should-businesses-engage-in-social-media/ » Why Should Businesses Engage in Social Media? Use Your Words: The Business of Writing

    [...] The Facebook Imperative (via TechCrunch.com) [...]

  • http://irongiving.com/2010/04/23/lessons-from-100-releases-of-cubetree/ Happy 100th Release to CubeTree! « IronGiving

    [...] part to visionaries like Marc Benioff more recently catalyzing the category by talking about the Facebook Imperative, it was quite a nascent customer market back in late 2007 even though my former professor and now [...]

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/nusret1 yuregininsesi

    I was a sfdc user at my last company and this is exactly what was missing. although it was a very good tool, sfdc was lacking the stickiness to return to it on a daily basis because it didn't provide enough value as a sales tool alone. if you integrate social conversation into it, i would rather go there every couple hours compared to my company home page that gets updated only once a day with a couple articles. that would then lead me to actually use the core functionality of sfdc more often as well. great strategy

  • sidofthesuburbs

    The whole of corporate America (sic World) – even the old dogs – have been worrying themselves about where to include recognition of social networking in business strategy. As such I have no doubt that adding Chatter (Social/business) collaboration to cloud offerings like force.com/salsefoce etc will be a killer offering. I also agree with some of the comment that this is a bit of a sales pitch from Marc. But you have to admit it is a somewhat visionary combination. I had heard a while back that these guys were "working with Facebook" but I didn't see the potential of adding this type of real time collaboration to the business app's that folks are already building and dreaming of in Salesforce.com and force.com
    Collaboration on top of business process is very frankly awesome.

  • sidofthesuburbs

    Facebook imperative?…… mmm I guess that if you're reading this then your part of the generation that lives in the world of connected everywhere, all the time, bla bla atom bomb, bla bla secret passage.
    What about the "Theory of too much Stuff" imperative?…
    And yes, just like another tag line "The iPodisation of Enterprise Technology" this does come across as somewhat consultant speak.

  • http://sproejtepudser.dk Pudsning

    Same here. I know several of my friends stay on facebook for hours a day, for me it's enough to check it once or twice a months. It's the worst time stealing application ever invented.

  • http://www.webcamwithmicrophone.org Microphone

    you are right ,sir

  • http://blog.allyis.com Ethan Yarbrough

    Marc, I’m with you in wondering why enterprises can’t or won’t adopt practices and tools more akin to the consumer products we all use in our personal lives. I think one of the roadblocks is the corporate world’s desire to impose organizational structure on everything. The power of social media tools like facebook and, perhaps to an even greater degree, Twitter is that they are self-organizing. People decide on their own who is interesting to them, who is relevant to them and who is not. I don’t see many corporations relaxing their control over information, responsibilities, security and time to let their employees self-organize around work. I want to see that, but I haven’t yet.

  • http://www.EGAFutura.com Juan Manuel Garrido

    This is want I think about Salesforce.Com Chatter:

    “Cool. Fun. Easy. Useful. Flexible. Cumbersome. Collaborative. Accessible. Straightforward. Convenient.Revolutionary.”

    Please vote for my ideas for Chatter in the Salesforce CRM Community!:

    - http://sites.force.com/ideaexchange/ideaView?id=0...
    - http://sites.force.com/ideaexchange/ideaView?id=0...

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Got a tip? Building a startup? Tell us