Apple Warns Developers Against Adding Geo Spam To Their Apps
Erick Schonfeld
Feb 5, 2010

A couple days ago, Apple put iPhone developers on notice that location-aware ads will no longer be allowed in all apps. Some observers read this as a blanket prohibition, and noted that it looks like Apple might be reserving geo ads for itself through its acquisition of Quattro Wireless.

But the notice itself only seems to ban location-based advertising from non-location-based apps.

Here’s what the notice on Apple’s Dev Center says:

If you build your application with features based on a user’s location, make sure these features provide beneficial information. If your app uses location-based information primarily to enable mobile advertisers to deliver targeted ads based on a user’s location, your app will be returned to you by the App Store Review Team for modification before it can be posted to the App Store.

We’ll see how liberally Apple chooses to apply this new guideline, but the language does not ban all geo ads. It only bans geo spam. If an app does not have a geo component as one of its core features, it can’t serve up irrelevant geo-targeted ads. This seems like a policy aimed to avoid random geo-targeted ads from popping up in games or other apps that try to enable the core location feature for ads and nothing else.

Geo-based ads are very promising, and could open up local advertising to the Web in an entirely new way. But Apple needs to set the rules of the road early to make sure that consumers are not inundated with ads that are nothing more than spam and out of context to what they are doing. If you are an iPhone developer whose app was sent back for this reason, please share your experience in comments.

Advertisement
  • Related Topics
Advertisement
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dave_Wright/500058534 Dave Wright

    Apps are going to serve up spammy, irrelevant ads regardless. At least geotargeting would have a chance at making the more relevant rather than less.

    My guess is Apple is prohibiting this for a few reasons not listed in the article:
    1. Enabling core location uses more power (less battery life), which an app developer doesn’t really care about but Apple certainly does.
    2. You get prompted when an app wants to use your location. Apple probably thinks that’s a bad user experience when the app doesn’t have any LBS features. (“why does bejeweled want my location?”)

  • http://johnbeales.com John B

    This also seems to ban any app that doesn’t have geo-features but serves advertising from adding a geographic component to its advertising.

    For example, an RSS reader that already has ads in it would be banned from showing you ads for the independent coffee shop across the street from the Starbucks you’re in. Apple is making it so that advertisers won’t have all of the tools possible to show me ads that I am most interested in, and if I’m going to be seeing ads then they might as well be interesting.

  • http://www.berryski.com H B

    Lesser ads I see, the better it is! It is quite annoying when the apps request me to access GPS with no apparent reason.

  • http://johnbeales.com John B

    While this seems like a good idea at first glance, I’m not sure it is, here’s why.

    The paragraph above seems to ban geo-ads in ads that are not location-based at their core. This means that, for example, an RSS reader that already shows ads would not be permitted to show ads for the independent coffee shop across the street from the Starbucks that you’re in.

    By removing this tool from advertisers’ toolchests Apple is making it more difficult for them to show me the ad that’s most interesting to me right now, and if I am going to see advertising, I want it to be interesting, not an ad for smileys or chemical lifestyle enhancers.

  • http://johnbeales.com John B

    So apparently it takes a while for comments to appear, or Chrome on Mac is doing too much caching. Sorry for the double post.

  • http://www.facebook.com/davebroham David Abraham

    I do find it odd when certain apps prompt for location. Like the “YouVersion” Bible app.

  • ArseneKarl

    On the other hand, when I’m in a freebie game a geo targeted ad will certainly makes me feel more pried on.

    How Apple enforce this rule will determine my feeling about it.

    For now I say less privacy concern is better.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jared_Wesley/668136520 Jared Wesley

    I would not call it geo spam if you provide relevant advertising and with geo location the ads would be more relevant. The only reason we call it spam is that the ads are not at all relevant to the receivers life.

  • Michelle

    Good. I find it extremely annoying that Grocery IQ always asks for my location with no preference to turn that off, and it never gives me anything important anyways.

  • bob

    the workaround for this will be developers adding irrelevant geo location features to their app just so they can continue to serve geo based ads…for example, Shazam (an app i love) wants my location because it tags songs with a location (for some reason)…i guess this will let them serve geo ads.

    Now imagine a bowling app asks for my location so it can plot scores on a google map back on their website (which noone will view)…and now they can serve geo ads.

    I can see a platform arising that lets developers add minuscule geo location features to their apps just so they can be able to serve geo ads.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gebadia_Smith/613518863 Gebadia Smith

    why does apple have to warn people? I mean why don’t they just make a spam indicator on app store.. we all know there are things that indicate spam.. just empower users to tweet, blog, fb and blog about spamming apps. see the thing people don’t get about what Zynga did is they hurt the overall market.. all it takes is one bad experience to make a person never buy online again.. my older sister for example had one bad experience with her mobile and she will never use it for shopping again…

    we pay for the sins of others….

  • Marc

    Speculation on Apple’s intent seems to be ranging from the innocuous to the sinister. Clarification from the source would be best. Otherwise we need to read tea leaves based on anecdotal info. Has anyone seen claification from Apple?

  • Intosh

    Preemptive move? Didn’t Apple recently buy a mobile ad network company?

  • igor

    If you would’ve read the first few sentences of the article you would’ve known that this was the first thing that was mentioned.

    Anyways, thank God for Android.

  • http://www.linkedin.com/in/synstelien Don Synstelien

    This just kills competitors for LBS. :-) Big Smile.

  • Evan

    I work at an app publishing start-up that has had millions of downloads across a few apps and I’ll chime in here with my take:

    1. Like it has been said above, this is not going to deter anyone from keeping ads in their applications and some apps may even shoehorn in some “location service” which will be awkward.The ads will just now be less relevant which is bad for the user because you may see very odd ads at times but…

    2. This is bad for developers. With price points in the iTunes store trending towards free and not many applications being more than 99 cents, many developers rely on the increase in CPMs that comes from from being able to provide more targeted advertisements. Without a high CPM, some applications just cant stay afloat – especially free ones.

    Most people in the iTunes store don’t have it in the forefront of their mind that there are real businesses trying to built around the mobile software publishing model and the way to subsidize those free apps is to agree to see advertisements. If those ads can be more relevant to you while making a little more money to pay for the cost of sustaining those apps then everyone wins – you jut may have to deal with a pop-up asking to use your location the first two times you start up the app.

    Just my 2 cents…

  • nick

    It seems like a good policy for android users as well. If an app wants access to your location for no apparent reason, just say no. Uh-oh, I just said android in iPhone news comment.

  • Eric

    This policy does not affect privacy – they won’t give you an ad based on where you are – they still know where you are.

  • Ryan

    I think this is an attempt to blunt the ability for admob (google) to leverage geolocation in their ads. This one move single-handedly depresses the value of Admob as a company.

  • http://johnbeales.com John B

    It’s true that there’s a privacy concern here, but I think that showing me relevant advertising is a good use of my location information, as opposed to keeping track of when I’m not home so that someone can rob my house.

  • http://www.nooksurfer.com NookSurfer

    I’m interested to see how this thing will pan out and what Apple plans to do.

  • Phil

    “I do find it odd when certain apps prompt for location. Like the “YouVersion” Bible app.”

    That’s to make it easy for God to find you. :D

  • http://overhrd.com Mike Mayo

    +1 haha. i found it odd that it asked for location as well

  • Me

    I don’t want minimal ads, and minimal contact with advertising firms. There is NO ad that is relevant to me. I don’t wish to share my GPS information with anyone unless it’s an essential part of the service I am receiving.

    What some folks miss is one of the major reasons people like Apple:

    A feeling that we, our machines, and our data, are safe.

  • James

    Apple is Microsofting the market. Like many others have said, spammy ads have nothing to do with LBS. This is a very evil move to crush competition to get an incremental return on Quattro. Not cool Apple.

  • Saief

    this just pure dump playing by apple… by having Geo location feature even in apps that does not have any core geo feature could make money by having Geo location ads and open more business. I use to love apple but now i am just getting fed up with their dump policy’s ” they are just killing my start-up idea. … time to move to android.

  • John Labert

    I dont understand how this work, can someone provide us with an example, include a geo based application currently used and how these ads pop up? How could someone be spammed based on geo location?

  • Ben

    There are ads you are most interested in? really? seriously?

  • Ben

    People who used to hate to share their location because they think that invades their privacy, now hate that ads can’t geo-target them.

    People who hates DRM and proprietary file format , now loves Kindle’s proprietary file format and DRM.

    People who hates flash now loves flash from the bottom of their freaking heart. LOL

    All because of Apple.
    Thanks Apple.

  • Andre

    wait!! Apple still allows apps like Foursquare / Gowalla etc. to use location based advertising, its apps that have no relevancy to geo-location, i.e. Tetris app serving geo ads….

    Am I right????? Please someone reply :))))

  • Andre

    wait!! Apple still allows apps like Foursquare / Gowalla etc. to use location based advertising, its apps that have no relevancy to geo-location, i.e. Tetris app serving geo ads….

    Am I right????? Please someone reply :))))

  • http://twalky.com Twalky

    By using the Twalky platform (http://www.twalky.com) to build location-based social networks/apps, there are many innovative ways to make money from location-based apps other than geo-locational ads on iphone.

    Althought the Twalky platform is not available to the public at the moment, anyone can register at http://www.twalky.com to seek potential business models from some of the apps created by private beta users.

  • Ben

    my Tetris app doesn’t serve ads at all…

  • http://yoshy.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/links-for-2010-02-06/ links for 2010-02-06 « 個人的な雑記

    [...] Apple Warns Developers Against Adding Geo Spam To Their Apps (tags: iphone geolocation) [...]

  • Richard

    This doesn’t make sense in the way they explain it… if an app serves spammy ads people won’t use it… Apple can’t make a judgment on what users want from their ads…

    This sounds pretty dodgy to me.

    Every time Apple tries to decide what users want it makes its Appstore marketplace less efficient and ultimately runs the risk of losing more market share to stores that don’t put those barriers in place. Sure that’s not a problem any time soon… but this is a long road with a lot of folks who want to own apps…

  • http://www.garysky.net/kindle-may-get-touchscreen-to-battle-apples-ipad.html Kindle May Get Touchscreen To Battle Apple’s iPad | Latest Apple News Blog | Apple SKY

    [...] Read more on TechCrunch [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Got a tip? Building a startup? Tell us