• Rural Cellular Association agrees: Verizon's new exclusivity deal sucks

    Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

    Greg Kumparak is the Mobile Editor at Techcrunch. Greg has been writing for the TechCrunch network since May of 2008. Greg was born just outside of San Jose, and now lives in the East Bay of California. → Learn More

    scrooge-mcduck-make-it-rain

    Just a few days ago, Verizon announced a change to the way they’d handle exclusive handset deals: rather than holding on to all of their exclusive handsets for years and years, they’d let any small carrier (defined as any carrier with under 500,000 customers) offer the same phones after a 6-month absolute exclusivity period. It was a move in the right direction, but it was still pretty terrible. Why? Go ahead. Name 3 carriers with under 500,000 subscribers. Now name one person you know on each of them. Can’t? That’s because the new deal helps pretty much nobody.

    Looks like we’re not alone in our thinking. This morning, the Rural Cellular Association, a group of roughly 100 small/medium-sized carriers, expressed their opinion on the matter:

    “”While RCA is encouraged by Verizon Wireless’ most recent exclusive handset proposal, RCA will continue to pursue modifications to the policy… The commitment does not go far enough to rectify the consumer and competitive harms caused by these agreements,” the group said. “More than 180 million of the nation’s wireless customers are unable to benefit from the new policy.”

    Hear, hear, RCA.

    [Reuters via Phonescoop]

    Tags:

    Sponsored Ads

    blog comments powered by Disqus

    Sponsored Ads

    Sponsored Ads

    Upcoming Events

    Disrupt SF 2012

    San Francisco, CA