The Reality Of PR: Smile, Dial, Name Drop, Pray.
Michael Arrington
Jul 4, 2009

One thing I hated about being a corporate lawyer at Wilson Sonsini back in the day – we got to work on really cool deals (the last deal I worked on before leaving for a startup was the AOL/Netscape merger), but we were only brought in at the very end to paper everything. We fought over the fine print in the contracts after the meat of the deal was ironed out by CEOs. Skinning and dressing whatever the hunters bring back to the cave is fine for some people. But it’s not exactly being in the middle of the action.

PR firms today aren’t much different than corporate lawyers. They are paid to perform a service. They like to think of themselves as core to the strategic action of their clients. But more often, they’re just there to spin whatever happened in the most favorable light possible. Then they smile and dial and pray for coverage. Occasionally they are called in to smother a story, which is mildly more exciting, I imagine. But when a CEO is wondering what she should do next to drive her business forward, she generally doesn’t call her PR firm for advice. Or at least I hope she doesn’t.

PR firms are apparently just as frustrated by always being in the back seat as the law firms are.

I’m fascinated by Claire Cain Miller’s article in the New York Times today about PR in general and the birth of a startup, Wordnik, specifically.

Forget the tech blogs, said investor Roger McNamee. Brew PR head Brooke Hammerling instantly acquiesced, and decided to go with a sort of guerrilla approach instead by “whispering” into the ears of prominent Twitter users like Kevin Rose, Jay Adelson and Jason Calacanis. CNET was also given the story, but it managed to eek out only a single comment.

Ms. Hammerling, while popping green apple Jolly Ranchers into her mouth, suggests a press tour that includes briefing bloggers at influential geek sites like TechCrunch, All Things Digital and GigaOM.

But Roger McNamee, a prominent tech investor who is backing Wordnik, is also in the room, and a look of exasperation passes across his face at the mere mention of the sites.

“Why shouldn’t we avoid them? They’re cynical,” he says, also noting his concern that Wordnik would probably appeal more to wordsmiths than followers of tech blogs. “That’s where I would be most uncomfortable. They don’t know the difference between ‘they’re’ and ‘there.’ ”

Without missing a beat, Ms. Hammerling changes course, instantly agreeing with Mr. McNamee’s take. “I love you for that,” she intones. “I’ll leave the tech blogs out. Let them come to me.”

Instead, she decides that she will “whisper in the ears” of Silicon Valley’s Who’s Who — the entrepreneurs behind tech’s hottest start-ups, including Jay Adelson, the chief executive of Digg; Biz Stone, co-founder of Twitter; and Jason Calacanis, the founder of Mahalo.

The result? Not much. Wordnik is flatlining at an abysmal amount of traffic. Comscore and Quantcast don’t even register the site as a blip.

Compare Wordnik to Topsy, another recently launch service. Topsy launched on TechCrunch exclusively. The domain now has 577,000 results on Google, compared to 56,000 for Wordnik. And the traffic difference is stunning:



I’d say this experiment in a pure social media launch failed.

The article goes on for pages describing Hammerling’s incredible networking skills and propensity to namedrop at every opportunity.

Ms. Hammerling’s connections have been crucial for Brew in finding and serving clients, says Ms. Cook, her business partner: “Without question, that allows us to play at a different level, because we’re not just doing P.R. and media relations; we’re connecting people at the highest level, helping deals get done.”

I know Brooke well. I guess you could say I’m one of her many thousands of “very close friends.” And I don’t dispute that she is well connected, or that those connections help her get clients.

I believe Brooke’s client have been better served if she stood up to McNamee and told him that Wordnik would have had a better launch if they hadn’t ignored the blogs that are interested in covering new startups. Instead she became a “yes woman” and told McNamee exactly what he wanted to hear.

Hammerling and her peers in the industry should help guide their clients through the minefield of journalists and bloggers, rather than simply avoid it entirely out of fear or ignorance. She isn’t in the room to drop names or “help get deals done.” She’s there to make sure the client’s news gets spread appropriately. In that they failed miserably, and the client suffered.

As cool as Kevin Rose is (and he did apparently Twitter that Wordnik was “truly amazing”), this is not a launch strategy.

Advertisement
  • Related Topics
Advertisement
  • http://melbourne.at9t.com/ 墨尔本

    PR is the key to sucess on the internet :-)

  • http://www.coolthings.com Cool Things

    How can you PR forms ignore blogs in this day and age?

  • mark

    I am sorry, but launching a tech company startup and avoiding blogs like techcrunch is absolutely insane.

  • http://www.encuentratujob.com.mx/jobCountry/JobUsa.htm John Mackenzie

    Roger McNamee doesn’t know about Tech blog’s for sure, is the only i gonna say. Blog tech Is like a baby with milk … we need it (Tech Blog’s) every day.

    John
    SAP MM consultant
    —————
    http://www.encuentratujob.com.mx/jobCountry/JobUsa.htm
    Online job seeker

  • http://www.shawnray.com/ Shawn Ray

    The fact that Wordnik sucks unshaven gorilla balls doesn’t help with the traffic stats either.

    PR and all that jazz can help, but if your product is as useful as my after workout ball sweat don’t expect much traffic.

    Build great products, promote them a bit, and the users will come if the value is present.

  • mark

    “Why shouldn’t we avoid them? They’re cynical,” he says, also noting his concern that Wordnik would probably appeal more to wordsmiths than followers of tech blogs. “That’s where I would be most uncomfortable. They don’t know the difference between ‘they’re’ and ‘there.’ ”

  • Alex

    you make it sound like techcrunch buzz would net them staying power traffic wise. Its just a shitty product that noone really cares about

  • http://www.webbyn.com/the-reality-of-pr-smile-dial-name-drop-pray/ The Reality Of PR: Smile, Dial, Name Drop, Pray. | Webbyn.com

    [...]   Webbyn.com 550+ blogs and news sources are closely tracked, and still counting! The Reality Of PR: Smile, Dial, Name Drop, Pray.0 [...]

  • http://www.crunchbase.com/person/michael-arrington Michael Arrington

    maybe. but we’ll never know. and i actually like the product, although it seems like it would be better as a pet non profit type thing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Christine_Lu/584626709 Christine Lu

    I’m going to go and whisper sweet business plans into a VC’s ear now…

  • http://HollywoodMetal.com Brendan Biryla

    PR will be the next industry to fall after newspapers as social media become more prevelent in helping firms and celebrities control their public perceptions.

    Look at how celebrities are quick to jump on Twitter to clarify misunderstandings or dispell rumors themselves without a PR firm (I don’t doubt that many celebrity accounts are controled by firms and agents but I still think there will be a paradigm shift in that regard) same with companies.

  • http://www.crunchbase.com/person/michael-arrington Michael Arrington

    disagree. we need PR more than ever. they are struggling through a transition period right now, and I’m doing my best to guide them.

  • http://dailybail.com The Daily Bail

    I for one can attest to the power of Tech Crunch, and our launch was not covered here or anywhere else. I announced our soft-launch in the comments section of 3 or 4 TechCrunch posts on January 15th and 16th of 2009…a few other spots but mostly just here.

    In June (just 4 months later) I had over 900,000 page views and had 565.000 unique visitors…

    You can see our traffic details in the link below for the first ten days of June if you doubt me, and (I would be happy to provide our google analytics numbers to dis-believeing parties by email):

    http://dailybail.com/home/the-daily-bail-makes-the-show.html

    So either I am a hell of a bailout writer or those posts I made in these comments sections made The Daily Bail famous…

    You decide.

  • http://dailybail.com The Daily Bail

    To clarify the numbers from my previous post:

    We did 900,000 page views and 565,000 uniques in June ALONE.

  • Bowlmor

    Using PR firms for any kind of launch is a waste of money. In fact the whole concept of a bang-launch is a misnomer.

    Steady progress: Drip, Drip, Drip wins the game.

  • Chris

    Yes, TC can get you a lot of traffic, but it won’t get you money.

    Traffic in today’s day and age is not worth much. They went over this at the social media business session at Google IO, and they were right.

    You WILL get traffic from TechCrunch, you WILL NOT get conversions.

    The kind of traffic you get conversions from HAS to be contextual, and that is disappearing with ad block plus ect…

    Microsoft is forcing people to shut ABP off in order to get cashback, so they are sort of attacking the problem. I actually bent over and turned ABP off to buy an ebay item with buy it now to get the dumb 8% cashback.

    But I turned it on right after.

    At any rate, people that have tracked TC traffic in analytics will know what I mean.

  • http://www.adwhirl.com Sam Yam

    AdWhirl has had a similar experience. We were in private beta for a few weeks before launching exclusively on Techcrunch in April, and interest exploded immediately afterwards. We would most certainly not be where we are now if it were not for the initial launch coverage, and especially since we did not have the financial resources to hire a PR firm at the time of our launch.

  • Bowlmor

    Exactly! Well spoken.

  • http://dailybail.com The Daily Bail

    I agree with your comments and I have not even begun to try monetizing my traffic yet. I wanted to build my audience first.

    We were recently invited to be an isocket Beta client so I’ll see how that goes with advertising.

    Tech Crunch is also doing some ad selling with isocket, fwiw. John Ramey, their CEO, is a future Ad superstar.

  • Chris

    If I was a PR person, I would do something genius like buy ads at bus stations and billboards with QR codes only, with some type of subtitle like “scan and win”

    You would get SO MUCH freaking traffic and conversions. It would drive people crazy, they would ask their coworkers to do it for them if they had some kind of lame cell phone.

    But then again I am kind of genius and normal PR people are just lame.

  • http://dailybail.com The Daily Bail

    That’s a really good idea, actually.

  • http://www.soapboxincluded.com Brandon Mendelson

    I agree Michael, but I want to point out: One of the benefit for PR folks to talk to TechCrunch and the others is not so much to appear on your blog, as nice as it is, but to appear and be discussed on all of the smaller blogs that feed off of TC’s content (as an example.)

    There’s a lot to be said about the folks blogging off of TechCrunch and the benefit they bring to these startups in their PR coverage.

  • Chris

    Thanks, I stole, erm, based it on Google’s idea. They remain a tad bit smarter than I am. But I’m still worlds smarter than any PR firm’s combined staff. Google is just exponentially smarter.

  • http://www.havocmarketing.com/ HAVOC MARKETING

    Yeah, that’s really ignorant of them.

  • Drew Robertson

    Hey dude can I like adjust my RSS feed to filter out self-serving bullshit like this. I mean. Really. Who cares?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jason_L_Baptiste/10603313 Jason L. Baptiste

    PR is a good thing. It can be had for cheap and executed by anyone whether you’re a two person startup or 2000 person company with a corporate com department. It’s just a) the lack of involvement that companies give to PR ie- heres what weve built, try to spin it b) this hope of just tweet this bitch out and give out 10 free macbook pros.

    Launching on techcrunch is a great thing. I’ve never experienced it, but it works and gets visitors according to industry friends. The problem is, many startups think it’s the ONLY thing they need to do. “What happens after the techcrunch launch?” is a question more companies need to ask. Otherwise, your next TechCrunch appearance will be a deadpool article.

  • http://www.launchwire.net Sarah

    I agree, it is hard to successfully launch a tech startup without first promoting it at techcrunch.

    However, there is LaunchWire.Net for the little people to announce their new launches.

    Sarah

  • ma

    “AOL/Netscape” merger.

    I can’t think of a single reason that happened.
    Was it insider cahoots, Arlington?

  • ma

    How long you been on the web?

  • http://www.braincomm.com Michele Clarke

    Well said. It’s not even a ‘soft launch’ strategy.

  • mrzod

    i like it when mikey posts about his experience as a lawyer and how it relates to the start-ups. thx.

  • Steven Marlin

    Roger McNamee… he’s the VC fool who poured 1/4-1/3 of their money into Palm. LOL… and he claimed that people will be switching from iPhone to Pre. And he was so silly that Palm had to issue a statement and distance themselves from him.

    And now he shows us again how foolish he is. LOL

  • Rachel

    It’s not appropriate to assume all PR people have the same skill level or go to the same lengths to develop smart, engaging communications strategies. In this day and age, very few PR people “smile and dial.” It’s more frequently about engaging and connecting with a company’s target audience in a meaningful way. As a PR person, I only ask that people remember there are good and bad practitioners as there are in any profession. I’m fortunate enough to say I am surrounded by smart, innovative PR people who would go to the ends of the planet to ensure the success of their PR programs.

  • http://siliconangle.com Mark ‘Rizzn’ Hopkins

    I’m sure Micheal enjoys being called Mikey as much as you enjoy his posts.

  • Ari Bernstein

    What other blogs besides for techcrunch are platforms to launch a website like Topsy on?

  • http://www.amanfrommars.baywords.com amanfromMars

    “PR is the key to sucess on the internet” … 墨尔本 – July 4th, 2009 at 5:40 pm PDT

    That is a fallacy. More Intelligent Content/Novel Imaginative Source leads and therefore rules for success on the Internet.

    And Sharing IT freely soon has PR Interests looking to make a Fortune from ITs Syndication/Distribution …… but that is as a second bite at an old juicy apple from a fertile tree in a whole orchard of fertile trees laden with juicy virgin fruits.

  • http://www.kitchen-bathroom-cabinet.com kbc

    ALEXA ,Accurate flow measurement it??

  • http://www.zatznotfunny.com DaveZatz

    Nice CrunchPad bit in the NYT. Maybe CrunchPR is the next step here. ;)

  • man

    I work a lot with PR firms. They usually don’t know the net, often present false web exposure numbers, but tell their customers how net savvy they are.

    The fashion industry for example uses PR firms as their actual marketing advisers as they often don’t have such capacity inside the brand.

    Once at a fashion event I heard a PR firm executive telling an online video network that the brand’s designer are not giving interviews to the net, only to TV to shows like David Letterman, the brand sells high priced fashion to twelve years old girls. I wonder how many of these girls watch David Letterman and how many spend most of its time online.

    If PR firms want to keep their business going, they need to welcome the web for all its forms.

  • Steven Marlin

    I finally finished the whole NYTimes article and I have to say that Ms. Hammerling comes of as a vapid and a sad person. She has no life and her persona seems to be the PR image that she created.

    Completely depressing how low some people go to appear important. I truly feel sorry for her.

  • steve

    mike, awesome article. this is exactly the type of insider analysis that has made TC great.

  • http://www.cuteashell.com/ Erick Laubach

    Shameless self promotion. How’s that for PR?

  • http://www.urbanonramps.com/?p=1170 U2 affirms Iranian Freedom Protestors | Urban Onramps

    [...] SMILE, DIAL, NAME DROP, PRAY: The reality of public relations por este Michael [...]

  • http://urbanministry.org/blogs/rcarrasco/?p=15 U2 affirms Iranian Freedom Protestors « Rodolpho Carrasco

    [...] SMILE, DIAL, NAME DROP, PRAY: The reality of public relations por este Michael [...]

  • http://www.netweaveonline.com NetWeave

    I’m still stuck on trying to figure out who would actually shave a gorilla’s balls to provide a comparison for sucking unshaven gorilla balls.

  • http://notsocommoncents.com Mikal Lewis

    I’m not sure if you realize this, but Mike has just proven the value of PR. I’m sure his PR agent did get him the story in the NY times.

    So by bypassing the techcrunches of the world, she got a story in the NY times, AND got TechCrunch to do a story about it, because they were called out.

    Awesome. In effect the tech blogs did come around to them.

    Great strategy, likely it won’t work again.

  • sam

    Your traffic is impressive but looking at your site, I can’t say the same for revenue or long-term prospects. Do you think three years from now, people will be fixated by daily bailout updates?

  • http://rapasasolutions01.com/29/the-reality-of-pr-smile-dial-name-drop-pray/ The Reality Of PR: Smile, Dial, Name Drop, Pray. « Public Relation

    [...] H­e­re­ is t­h­e­ origin­­a­l post­:  The­ Re­ali­ty­ Of PR: S­m­i­le­, Di­al, N­am&#173… [...]

  • http://scobleizer.com/2009/07/05/how-to-reach-normal-users-with-pr-and-with-techcrunchgigaom-et-al/ How to reach “normal” users with PR and with TechCrunch/GigaOm et al

    [...] quote, that caught my eye (it caught TechCrunch’s founder, Mike Arrington’s, too) is this one from Roger McNamee, after Brooke suggested a company’s founder talk to tech [...]

  • http://coolrulespronto.wordpress.com/2008/09/04/public-relations-vs-advertising/ Public Relations vs. Advertising: No Contest « Cool Rules Pronto

    [...] viewers, regular media is no longer guaranteed to reach them. So if you have limited resources, make sure your publicist picks outlets strategically. One horror movie blogger could prove to be more influential than reviews in all the major [...]

  • http://scobleizer.com Robert Scoble

    Mike, you might like my post about this topic. I think Roger is wrong and not because his advice was wrong, but because his reasoning behind his advice was wrong. Anyway, here’s my advice to tech execs who want to reach “normal” users: http://scobleizer.com/2009/07/05/how-to-reach-normal-users-with-pr-and-with-techcrunchgigaom-et-al/

  • Alex

    Mr. Arrington forgot to mention that Topsy had 15mil, I’m not sure this word…whatever had anything comparable. Also, comparing a startup in a hot space that is really interesting for just about everybody (to try) with a pretty much niche SITE that won’t necessarily become a business at all… is like comparing the proverbial apples and oranges.

    Not funny. Dull anthem to the self.

  • wj

    well, she did manage to get a TC coverage, didn’t she?

  • Robert N

    Dear Author of Daily Bail… can I ask you some traffic related questions via email, cos I am curious? My id is
    i(at)hack.mp …

  • Karin Hoegh

    PR stands for Public RELATIONS – maybe more PR-consultants should think about that :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter_Yared/724231792 Peter Yared

    For a site about the English language, the NYT is a much better choice than Techcrunch. The NYT has crossword puzzles, William Safire’s column on language, etc. so it is perfect for the audience. I agree with Alex above that a Twitter search engine is a completely different type of product that is much more suited to tech blogs.

  • James L. Geller

    I love that Wordnik says ‘linux’ was used alot in the 50′s…

  • http://www.servermojo.com ServerMojo

    Yet they still made it on to TC after all.. which is something most startups don’t ever manage! I suppose we’ll have to wait until next months stats are in to see if it had any significant effect.

  • Puranjay

    I’m sorry but Mike, by covering Wordnik here (which is a fantastic service, btw), you’ve demonstrated that bad PR works too.

  • Puranjay

    Plus NYT has a 15 million+ per month readership

  • http://chikabebe.com/ ChikaBebe

    im very frustrated to have some PR in my sites

  • http://amanfrommars.baywords.com/2009/07/05/090705/ C42 Quantum Control Systems …. AI @ ITs Work » Blog Archive » 090705
  • http://blog.mo.md Mohammad Al-Ubaydli

    Er, am I the only one who thinks that getting that article into the NY Times beats any number of TechCrunch mentions?

    Especially when you consider that the end users of Wordnik - people who like words and know how to use them- are more likely to be readers of NY Times than they are of TechCrunch? (I know, I know, that I too read TC rather than the NYT.)

  • Geoff

    Very disappointed. This used to be the type of post by Mike (self-serving, aggrandizing) that would cause commenters to go off. Come on people, don’t go soft now!

  • http://www.getdoorbell.com Peter Urban

    Funny, the ‘back seat driving position’ of being a professional service provider is what made me doing a startup.

  • Mark T.

    It is by the goodness of God that in our country we have those three unspeakably precious things: freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the prudence never to practice either of them.

  • http://serialhyip.com raccha

    usefull info

  • preetam mukherjee

    Hahah..yeah I read that article too and was wondering when you’d react.

    What you say is true, though- it’s undeniable that (as much as I feel like pulling your hair out at times) presented with a choice, I’d choose being featured on Techcrunch any day, over Kevin Rose’s Twitter account, all due respect.

    For example, we’ve benefited tremendously from a simple elevator pitch feature on TC, and leaving aside the sudden spurt in traffic we had around the time of the feature, we still get, until yesterday, visitors heading to our site from TC.

    Put simply, we can argue to death about whether TC has a bigger head than Kevin Rose, but it is undeniable that TC has a waaaaaaaaaaaaay longer tail than almost anyone else out there. And it’s the long tail most of us are after anyway.

    More importantly, I don’t see why it should be a Kevin Rose vs. Techcrunch argument to begin with- sounds to me like they ought to have been complementary efforts in the first place.

    ““Why shouldn’t we avoid them? They’re cynical,”- that surprised me too. Who gives a shit if they’re cynical? It’s pretty obvious that the cynicism(or bias) of an author penning an article on TC has little to no relevance to how the product/service is ultimately perceived by its customers/users.

    All in all, I have to agree with you, Michael, that this was a really lousy article…kinda misleading, in fact.

  • http://techlunch.com google's overheated server

    this calls for a t-shirt

  • http://gambolio.com alexkearns

    Michael, I have been praying that you will cover my startup – http://www.gambolio.com – for ages. When are you going to answer my prayers? ;)

  • http://www.tomedes.com Ofer

    The problem is that most PR firms say they are doing public relations but actually all they are doing is PRESS RELEASES

  • Blah

    Yes, and I’m sure they all made it to page 12F to read article X. Signal to noise and attention are often ignored when just looking at circulation numbers.

  • http://www.tomedes.com Ofer

    Best PR for a language is arranging a civil war where its widely spoken

  • http://geetarchurchy.wordpress.com matt churchill

    The challenge for PR is that there is a small group of PRs who take PR to mean Personal Relations, not Public Relations, and these are the guys who will be engaged with social media and actually building worthwhile relationships based on content and interests rather than just firing out press releases.

    It’s the job of this small (but expanding) group to try and help the PRs who are still playing by the old rules to make Mr.Arrington et al’s lives easier and more interesting.

    Sometimes as a PR you will work with a client who is offering a truly awful product that you fear no-one will touch with a big stick – however it is your job to try and get them some exposure, and the best way to do that is to be honest with you and the blogger/journalist you’re approaching and say, well what are the benefits of this product, how can we best work together to be as fair as possible to ourselves and the client.

    To clients whose ROI is measured in marks out of five, a well built relationship can be the difference between a 2/5 and a 3/5, but this can only be achieved if the PR takes the time to get to know the writer they are speaking with.

    How can you do that if you’re merely sending out a Press Release to a large list of people? You can’t, hence Personal Relations, not Public Relations.

  • don’t launch just iterate

    yep.

  • http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2009/07/05/pr-coverage-and-meta-coverage/ PR, Coverage and Meta-Coverage « Screenwerk

    [...] case widely read tech blogs were snubbed too, including TechCrunch. And Michael Arrington responds: Forget the tech blogs, said investor Roger McNamee. Brew PR head Brooke Hammerling instantly [...]

  • http://www.sampletheweb.com/2009/07/05/the-reality-of-techcrunch-coverage-it-wont-happen-for-99-of-companies/ A rhetorical analysis of three somewhat-related articles from TechCrunch, The New York Times, and Robert Scoble. — Sample the Web

    [...] Arrington reads this article, and writes a rebuttal of sorts on TechCrunch with a nice title: The Reality of PR: Smile, Dial, Name Drop, Pray. He’s taking issue not with the article itself, but with tech investor Roger McNamee’s [...]

  • http://www.caljobsource.com CalJobSource

    I’d like to be friends with Brooke Hammerling.

  • http://twitter.com/rickmurray rick murray

    Great post. Sadly, we — as an industry — continue to demonstrate that we’ve a long way to go.

  • http://dailybail.com The Daily Bail

    No…but the site is equally focused on debt and deficit issues, and those will likely stay with us for the rest of my natural life.

  • http://dailybail.com The Daily Bail

    Yes. You can contact me through the ‘contact’ button on our site. Your message will go straight to my email.

  • http://www.aafter.com Subhankar Ray

    Is adblockplus [ABP] affecting Google adword or other PPc ads?

  • http://www.dakic.com zeljko dakic

    What software you use to generate your comments? It is very good one.

  • http://shivabandaru.info shiva

    :)

  • Mike

    I was thinking the same thing. A really interesting strategy, for sure.

  • Matthew

    “Great post. Sadly, we — as an industry — continue to demonstrate that we’ve a long way to go.”

    Thats it Rick, that sums it up perfectly

  • http://jornaltecnologia.com.br/2009/07/05/6-bons-artigos-para-ler-no-domingo/ 5 bons artigos para ler no Domingo | Jornal Tecnologia

    [...] Techcrunch revida mostrando dados [...]

  • Hyloka

    I had my fill of mergers at Wilson, Sonsini myself and totally agree that although it was great to work with start-ups, it’s better to be working inside where the deals are formulated and the strategy set, rather than outside where you’re just papering what has already been decided.

  • Bklyn11217

    I’m interested in your assertion that this launch was a failure but not sure you’ve fully made your point. The news of this launch reached more than 1 mil people the 1st day. Doesn’t that qualify as success? Maybe the product is the problem….at what point do you stop blaming the publicist? And if you still think it’s the publicity, does this mean that reaching 1 mil over social media isn’t good enough? They got 40k hits as a result. Thanks.

  • http://andylark.blogs.com/andylark/2009/07/spinning-the-web.html Andrew Lark

    SPINNING THE WEB…

    Online, the NYTimes story on PR in the Valley is interesting but innocuous. In print it takes a whole new sense of import as it spreads cross the front page of the business section. A couple of observations: PR has……

  • http://www.stagetwoconsulting.com/wordpress/pr-quite-a-big-industry-to-generalize-315/ Stage Two’s blog » PR: Quite a Big Industry to Generalize

    [...] make it quite simple to understand: this industry is simply too vast to generalize.  There are PR firms and individuals who understand influence, social media, and bloggers.  There [...]

  • http://www.livedigitally.com/2009/07/05/not-all-pr-people-nor-bloggers-are-alike/ LIVEdigitally » Blog Archive » Not all PR people (nor bloggers) are alike

    [...] In summary: I’ll make it quite simple to understand: this industry is simply too vast to generalize.  There are PR firms and individuals who understand influence, social media, and bloggers.  There [...]

  • http://mathiaskarlsson.se/2009/07/05/mathias-says-2009-06-05/ mathias says – 2009-06-05

    [...] The Reality Of PR: Smile, Dial, Name Drop, Pray – What´s the true value of PR, egentligen? [...]

  • http://www.wikicity.com Pat

    Agreed w/your comments Michael, but ironically & with all due respect – would you have covered this story had you not known Brooke?

    Despite my company’s best efforts (for better or for worse) we have not been able to get a single tech blogger to cover us, & I can’t help but wonder if it is b/c we’re not “connected”.

    How does one get covered by their favorite tech blog?

  • http://www.bateman-group.com/blog Fred Bateman

    Chris, for such a genius, it’s ironic you don’t understand the difference between paid advertising and PR.

  • http://www.seanpercival.com/blog/2009/07/05/do-you-really-need-silicon-valley-pr-flowchart/ Do You Really Need Silicon Valley PR? [FLOWCHART] | Sean Percival’s Blog

    [...] TechCrunch [...]

  • Alden DoRosario

    Sweet. By the way , is there a PR firm out there that understands you? It’s really tough getting through to you :)

  • Marshall Kirkpatrick

    Fwiw, both rww and lifehacker covered wordnik’s launch and i’d humbly suggest that neither is an unimportant blog. Word nerds aren’t a large audience though. Also, i remember looking at wordnik and thinkiing it was cool.

  • Shawn Ray

    Trust me, unshaven gorilla balls are much worse (I have a lot of free time since I usually can’t find a date).

  • http://www.bateman-group.com/blog Fred Bateman

    This is the most significant coverage the high tech PR industry since the Fast Company “Power of Public Relations” cover story in Dec. 1997 (http://bit.ly/F1oml). When I think of all the smart, accomplished female PR practitioners and entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley Ms. Miller could have focused on, I’m horrified that this story is dominated by the NYC/LA-based “publicist” Brooke Hammerling. More attention should have been given to Margit Wennmachers of OutCast and Donna Sokolsky Burke of SparkPR — two women of substance who have built multi-million dollar organizations from the ground up

    Apologies to those of you who know Brooke and think highly of her ― perhaps she was misquoted. A lot. Like, every time she spoke. I’m sure she works hard and had no idea she be portrayed like a more vapid version of Samantha Jones from Sex & the City. Notice how the relationship with Larry Ellison is injected with the same amount of sexual innuendo as his previous “mentorship” of Gina Smith, the young, attractive tech journalist he appointed CEO of his network computing spin off, the New Internet Computer Company, despite the fact she had no qualifications.

    Like all publicists; however, Brooke’s skill set seems limited to media (and blogger) relations. To win and retain business for the long term requires a much more diverse service offering. Clients are demanding (and getting) a full range of integrated PR and social media marketing services. You simply cannot build a sustainable PR business on a rolodex alone.

  • http://www.kadisco.com Josh Kadis

    I’ve done my share of PR over the years. It’s a field that gets no respect but the fact is that most journalists would have a *really* hard time doing their jobs without PR people.

    As far as Wordnik goes, it’s a stretch to say that they’d be doing great if only they’d pursued coverage on TechCrunch. But it’s also not the craziest thing I’ve ever heard. I’d love to see some real data tracking the success of sites that launched on TC relative to sites that didn’t. Anyone care to compile the stats?

  • http://dctechblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/05/more-than-prayer/ More Than Prayer « a D.C. tech blog

    [...] I’ve seen across the Web so far, I think Michael Arrington at TechCrunch has offered the most interesting thoughts. I would like to focus on his larger thesis: Today, more than ever, PR people need to be strong, [...]

  • http://www.crunchbase.com/person/michael-arrington Michael Arrington

    you build a compelling product.

  • http://www.crunchbase.com/person/michael-arrington Michael Arrington

    yep, you guys saw the cnet coverage and followed. as far as i can tell, that’s where it stopped.

  • http://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/ Andy Abramson

    Mike,

    Part of the issue here is that the writer has lumped together the publicist (or a few) in the category of Public Relations.

    As well as you and I both know Brooke and some of the others in the NYT story, at the end of the day, they’re publicists, and their job is to get publicity.

    But the PR profession covers a lot more ground than publicity, but the Valley culture has pretty much ground it in to that perception.

  • http://www.wikicity.com Pat

    We’ve built one of the largest (if not the largest) wikis in the world w/over 13 million pages, organized to serve over 22K U.S. communities, which includes a moderated classified ad marketplace, a directory play on the $26 billion yellow page industry, and a hyper-local on-line newspaper for thousands of communities have historically been too small to support the legacy costs inherent to a newspaper. Granted, we’re new, but I feel like we have some compelling attributes.

    For what its worth fellow TechCrunchers, here’s my summary of our press release results:

    Postmortem Press Release Results
    In an effort to promote the official launch of WikiCity, we decided to spend $680 that we really didn’t have to publish a “US1” press release (the granddaddy of them all – PRNewswire’s most expansive U.S. distribution offering) entitled “WikiCity Launches a Hyper-Local City Wiki for Every City”. Simply put, we decided to invest in a press release because we wanted more traffic. As part of the decision process, we considered a number of factors, researched best practices, and did everything we could to determine what kind or results to expect. Despite our best efforts and growing frustration, none of the dozens of experts or reputable press release agencies we met would dare guestimate what kind of results we might experience. And therefore, it is this same frustration that has motivated me to share our press release results here with you so that if you are considering investing in a press release, you can draw upon our experiences so that you won’t have to make the decision in the dark. I’ve recapped our results below, but in summary, traffic results did not meet expectations, and the key learning was – as with many things in life – size doesn’t matter; it’s how you use it that counts.
    Traffic Results
    Not much incremental traffic, but lots of much-needed links. Unfortunately, not a single phone call or even an email inquiry from a journalist. Pathetic.
    • Incremental # of unique visitors on day of release: 150
    • Incremental # of unique visitors on day after release: 50
    • # of links / web publications: 180
    • # of phone calls from journalists: 0
    • # of email inquiries from journalists: 0
    Key Learnings
    A variety of lessons, ranked in order of importance:
    • Size doesn’t matter; it’s how you use it that counts. Even if your initial results sucked as bad as ours, recognize that a press release is a single action. It’s what you do around them that matters. Contact targeted journalists both in advance and after your press release is published, asking them if they will help share your story. Use the release as an excuse to tell everyone you know… Link the release to your blog, website, Facebook fan page, LinkedIn profile, etc.
    • Credibility: Press releases, especially when distributed through reputable agencies, can get your release published on reputable sites such as Forbes or Yahoo Finance, which search engines seem to appreciate. Beyond that, these links have already helped to lend us credibility with our partners and users, while at the same time, making it much easier to share our story with selected journalists.
    • Links from web publications: You get lots of them. (Quick math: $3.78/link)
    • Time your distribution wisely: Avoid distributing on Mondays, Fridays, when the stock market opens/closes, or when pop icons die.
    • Choose distribution wisely: We chose PRNewswire’s “US1” distribution because it was the only way we could reach small-town newspapers within the thousands of small communities we serve. However, based on the lack of inquiries from journalists, we will need to instead find other means to reach this audience. If we were to do it all over again, we would probably select an on-line only distribution.
    • Choose your press release agency wisely: Sure, each agency has a little something different to offer, but for the most part, as long as you’re distributing through the Associated Press, press release distribution is a commodity. Note: There are a lot of “free” press release services out there, and I’ll be the first to admit that they too can be used effectively to help boost credibility, but you likely won’t reach the more reputable news agencies because the freebies are generally considered “spammy”, and therefore, you won’t enjoy nearly as many back-links. Stick with PRNewswire, PRWeb, Marketwire, or Warren Buffett’s Business Wire and you should fare well. Hope this helps, and best of luck!

  • http://www.claritygroup.com Loring Barnes

    Then you have had the wrong PR advisor– because the practice of strategic business communications is far more thoughtful and multifaceted, correctly assigned to a C-level officer, and a critical enterprise commitment not only to reach intended customers, but also to listen to them. Trustful dialog is a two-way street, and the web makes this both immediate but fractured at the same time. You can learn more at: http://www.prsa.org

  • http://smallbutfearsomepixie.com/2009/07/nyt-spinning-the-web-pr-story-my-take/ small but fearsome pixie » NYT Spinning the Web PR Story: My take

    [...] Everybody is weighing in on this weekend’s NYT story on PR in Silicon Valley. If you haven’t read it, don’t waste your time or your lunch. [...]

  • http://www.crenshawcomm.com Dorothy Crenshaw

    As a professional, I was a little embarrassed by the article. It reminded me of a NY Mag profile years ago about publicists who throw parties with B and C-list celebs, as if everyone in PR is Samantha Jones of Sex And The City.
    But, more importantly, reaching influencers isn’t actually new; figures like analysts, early adopters, bloggers, and, yes, celebrities have been part of many launch programs for many years. Thata’s not news…yet the piece made it seem that influencer relations is all we do. To be a real trend story, it should have delved more deeply into how and why influencer outreach represents a real change within the profession, whether professional PR pros are being disintermediated, and the role of “traditional” media. Instead, it read almost like a puff piece about one individual.

  • http://www.insightts.com/blog/?p=3668 Breakfast briefing: BT ditches Phorm and Microsoft eyes your medical records @ Technology News

    [...] New York Times article on the new way to do public relations in Silicon Valley has the likes of Techcrunch and Robert Scoble gabbing, though they miss the crucial paradox: that the crucial PR act here is [...]

  • http://direwolff.wordpress.com direwolff

    kind of ironic to see roger say, “Why shouldn’t we avoid them? They’re cynical,”, then to see mike go off here on techcrunch rant. sort of proves roger’s point ;)

    much a do about nothin’.

  • http://underfield.wordpress.com/2009/07/05/pr-fail-of-the-week/ Wordnik, PR fail of the week «

    [...] of school boy errors with its  PR this week and were on the recieving end of a well deserved slap down from leading tech blog Techcrunch.  This was probably thequote in the New York Times that did the damage: Hammerling, while popping [...]

  • http://www.shop-bucuresti.ro/ Shop Bucursti

    No where in your rambling incoherent response did you come close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. We are all dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.
    http://www.shop-bucuresti.ro/

  • http://dressyourcellnow.com Dressyourcellnow.com

    I wonder what is this Wordnik is all about. They say you can find new exciting words and they love new words. I searched for a few names I knew and this is what I got:

    >> Real Time Twitter examples – (4 or 5 days old).

    I searched for “dressyourcell” (my Twitter username) and “michaelarrington”. You wouldn’t believe, Michael fared very badly than me. His updates were older than mine.

    Having used this so-called site that would “appeal to wordsmiths”, I wonder,

    1. What this site has for a wordsmith?
    2. Can the site not think of updating its “Real-time twitter results” or at least it should remove “realtime” from its twitter results.

    The search for “book” yielded a much satisfactory result. However, on the whole, the site is not very appealing and it is good that they did not approach you guys Michael.

  • http://www.LEADSExplorer.com Engago Team

    PR, Advertising and Social media has become a cocktail where the amounts of ingredients are very unclear as the interactions or reactions in-between are very blurred.
    Long gone have the days that a PR campaign supported by national advertising could launch any product.

  • Victor Cruz

    The NYT profile on Brooke Hammerling was really impressive; a milestone in the history of tech PR, signaling the moment when new school met old school. Message: adopt or die. Yet old school in the form of this particular NYT article can out wallpaper any single blog (until blog link syndication kicks in). So it comes down to relevance: defining what is the best channel for your target(s). You can see the PR mix should include both. There’s a bag of irony in all this. Ms Brooke’s PR strategy for Wordnik excluded print media, yet she milked the largest cow in the country.

  • http://www.briansolis.com/2009/07/pr-does-not-stand-for-press-release-equalizing-spikes-and-valleys/ PR Does Not Stand for Press Release: Equalizing Spikes and Valleys | PR2.0

    [...] If you’ve studied the behavior and ensuing results associated with retweeting and linkbacks lately, you’d be surprised to learn just how few people actually click through to interact with the shared content, let alone actually using or referring the product or service contained in the link – no matter how influential you are. Of course, the more authority and trust you possess, the more retweets and shares you earn, but the follow-through never fails to dissipate without fuel and cultivation. This observation is shared in a recent launch comparison by Michael Arrington on TechCrunch. [...]

  • yellowreindeer

    God what a horror show. You can’t just pay some hack to write a generic press release and spam it out to the masses. As a former journalist I find the sound of your product intriguing…it’s really sad that communities are losing their daily papers and when they’re gone, they’re gone forever. This is of course a massive topic in the journalism world. You should start by calling up Columbia Journalism review and a couple of other publications that cover the media. Or maybe try the NYT or Wash Post media writers. Don’t hire some stupid flak to talk to them. You know your product best, you can convey the most enthusiasm, you will never have to say, ‘uh, let me get back to you on that one.” signed, current flak

  • http://www.michaelkpate.com/ Michael Pate

    Maybe the strategy was too deliberately provoke TechCrunch and get Michael to write about how failed a strategy they used. I had never heard of the site until this post.

    The thing about following anyone on Twitter (and even those three) is that I never see everything they post in the vast sea created by the 400 people I follow.

  • http://www.wikicity.com Pat

    Unfortunately we learned the hard way, but you’re right. ‘Much appreciated advice! Gracias, Pat

  • http://www.perkettprsuasion.com pprlisa

    Mike,

    Haven’t read all of the comments yet, but wanted to say I appreciated this one and your article. THIS isn’t PR, or at least the way it should be. This is antiquated PR and I can’t believe it got coverage like this in the NYT. I can’t even bring myself to read the entire story. You give PR a hard time, but not undeservedly. It’s unfortunate that this article reinforces every bad PR stereotype that is out there.

    –Lisa (pprlisa from PerkettPR)

  • KellyWelsh

    To Mikal Lewis point above, I find it odd that TC still covered the company AND linked to their page thus helping drive traffic. I guess Brooke was right, they did come to.

  • http://www.sun-treader.com CJD

    Mike:

    You hit the most important element of the NYT article.

    Brooke Hammerling—presumably well-paid for her services—outlines a course of action pursuant to her significant experience and professional opinion. Then, when her client McNamee points out an obvious challenge inherent in every PR campaign (to paraphrase, “these pesky media folks don’t always do what we want them to do!”), she promptly retreats from her undoubtedly expensive counsel, belying its lack of value in the first place. She does not come off well.

    Hammerling later reveals her business to be SVWW (Silicon Valley’s Who’s Who) Relations, not Public Relations. There’s a big difference.

    PR continues to be misunderstood by folks on both sides of the table.

  • http://www.bluelangroup.com Julianne

    What’s that old saying? Any news is newsworthy?? Or anytime you get free PR in the NY Times or via a blog…it’s all good. Still, blogs are the future…so those people missed the boat.

  • Samthebull

    40k hits off reaching 1mil is horrible.

  • http://www.bandco.com Brianne Miller

    Dorothy – good points, you’re spot on as usual. Interesting conversations going on all over the web, sparked by this article. While I’m sorely disappointed in the article itself (yes, puff piece and yes another blow to women in PR), I’m glad the dialogue continues.

  • http://www.siteseodoctor.com/?p=1072 The Mindless PR Tweets of the Twitterati and the Baseless Response by Michael Arrington « Site Seo Doctor Blog

    [...] course, Tech Crunch founder Michael Arrington was not happy to learn that he’d been kept out of the loop on purpose (nevermind his declaration months ago [...]

  • http://seokungfuonline.com/search-engine-marketing-agency/search-engine-marketing-agency/the-mindless-pr-tweets-of-the-twitterati-and-the-baseless-response-by-michael-arrington-2/ Scottsdale SEO | The Mindless PR Tweets of the Twitterati and the Baseless Response by Michael Arrington | SEO Kung Fu

    [...] course, Tech Crunch founder Michael Arrington was not happy to learn that he’d been kept out of the loop on purpose (nevermind his declaration months ago that [...]

  • http://www.pr-squared.com/index.php/2009/07/the-7-elements-of-good-pr The 7 Elements of “Good” PR « PR-Squared

    [...] past weekend, dozens of people forwarded the NYTimes article on “PR in Silicon Valley” (and Arrington’s snarly response) to me in emails freighted with opinons and [...]

  • http://www.search-engine-optimization-help.com/2009/07/06/the-mindless-pr-tweets-of-the-twitterati-and-the-baseless-response-by-michael-arrington/ The Mindless PR Tweets of the Twitterati and the Baseless Response by Michael Arrington » Search Engine Optimization Help

    [...] course, Tech Crunch founder Michael Arrington was not happy to learn that he’d been kept out of the loop on purpose (nevermind his declaration months ago that [...]

  • http://denverprblog.com/2009/07/06/nyt-articles-starts-the-pr-dominos-falling/ NYT Articles Starts the PR Dominos Falling « Denver PR Blog

    [...] Doyle Albee analyzes tech/business blogger Dave Taylor’s response to TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington’s rant about a New York Times profile of publicist Brooke [...]

  • http://dailybail.com The Daily Bail

    I wanted to add some more detail to my answer as I get your question all the time. We have morphed quickly into the only site with daily (almost daily) updates of financial and political comedy.

    Nutshelled, we cover the Federal Reserve, political capture, Wall Street and Washington corruption, financial comedy, CNBC, the national debt and deficit issues, and the bailouts.

    I think we will safely have enough to cover as long as I am interested in continuing…

    565,000 uniques in June (just our 5th month of existence) with almost ZERO publicity tells a pretty decent story I think.

    Here are 2 recent posts to give you an idea of our content outside of the bailouts:

    Why Dylan Ratigan Left CNBC: The Audio Leakage (hilarious 45 second rant from Ratigan)

    http://dailybail.com/home/why-dylan-ratigan-left-cnbc-the-audio-leakage.html

    And Peter Schiff: ‘Of Course We’re Not Going To Pay Back The Chinese.’

    http://dailybail.com/home/peter-schiff-of-course-were-not-going-to-pay-back-the-chines.html

    People have found us and keep coming back AND sharing our stories. And I run the site entirely alone…no interns, no guest writers, nada. Just me and my own personal brand of financial pain.

    So you can make it without PR, it just takes 5 moths of 18 hour days, relentless focus on providing good content, and an intense desire to succeed.

    Thanks for your question.

  • http://alittleclarity.wordpress.org Merredith

    Why do people think “Public Relations” still means “press releases?” I’m in PR, and that’s the tiniest part of what we do at my firm. Stop the chest-beating, people; and the hand-wringing. The hardest part of PR is not the launch. It’s working with a company to find a story that someone other than the company will care about — after the company has launched. Keeping it involved in the conversations and trends where it’s relevant and being covered. (And FWIW – I agree that ignoring the tech blogs is a mistake, depending on whether they have that audience covered elsewhere)

  • http://bakercg.com/blog/2009/07/weep-for-me-im-obsolete/ Weep For Me, I’m Obsolete « When More PR?

    [...] (wait, I think it was) that “mainstream media” was lamenting the rise of the blog. Now, Michael Arrington is poo-pooing the rise of Twitter. (I happen to agree with him on social media in general, but respectfully disagree on what we PR [...]

  • http://perkettprsuasion.com/2009/07/06/the-article-i-want-to-read-on-pr/ The Article I Want to Read on PR : PerkettPRsuasion – The PerkettPR Blog

    [...] that I’m not going to give my assessment of the article or the PR strategy because a) that’s been done and b) we have a connection to one of the subjects in the article, Brooke Hammerling, in that we [...]

  • http://www.admedian.com/media_news/2009/07/06/the-mindless-pr-tweets-of-the-twitterati-and-the-baseless-response-by-michael-arrington/ The Mindless PR Tweets of the Twitterati and the Baseless Response by Michael Arrington | Media News: Internet Marketing & Online Advertisng

    [...] course, Tech Crunch founder Michael Arrington was not happy to learn that he’d been kept out of the loop on purpose (nevermind his declaration months ago [...]

  • http://marketingbysearch.com/search-marketing/the-mindless-pr-tweets-of-the-twitterati-and-the-baseless-response-by-michael-arrington/ The Mindless PR Tweets of the Twitterati and the Baseless Response by Michael Arrington | Search Marketing

    [...] course, Tech Crunch founder Michael Arrington was not happy to learn that he’d been kept out of the loop on purpose (nevermind his declaration months ago [...]

  • http://blog.seo-hardcore.com/sew/the-mindless-pr-tweets-of-the-twitterati-and-the-baseless-response-by-michael-arrington The Mindless PR Tweets of the Twitterati and the Baseless Response by Michael Arrington | SEO Hardcore

    [...] course, Tech Crunch founder Michael Arrington was not happy to learn that he’d been kept out of the loop on purpose (nevermind his declaration months ago [...]

  • http://www.seoservicesllc.com/2009/07/07/the-mindless-pr-tweets-of-the-twitterati-and-the-baseless-response-by-michael-arrington/ The Mindless PR Tweets of the Twitterati and the Baseless Response by Michael Arrington | Seo Services, LLC – Indiana based search engine optimization consultant

    [...] course, Tech Crunch founder Michael Arrington was not happy to learn that he’d been kept out of the loop on purpose (nevermind his declaration months ago [...]

  • http://optimizeguru.com/blog/?p=2743 The Mindless PR Tweets of the Twitterati and the Baseless Response by Michael Arrington | Search Engine Optimization for better search rankings

    [...] course, Tech Crunch founder Michael Arrington was not happy to learn that he’d been kept out of the loop on purpose (nevermind his declaration months ago [...]

  • http://www.draganadjermanovic.com/2009/07/07/da-li-pr-zna-sta-je-pr/ www.draganadjermanovic.com » Blog Archive » Da li PR zna šta je PR?

    [...] bio je suzdržan i pomalo (kao što je i očekivano) sarkastčan. Opet, i TechCrunch je aktualizovao PRiču. PR firms are apparently just as frustrated by always being in the back seat as the law firms [...]

  • http://blog.journalistics.com Jeremy Porter

    Does this post have a point? It looks like a poor attempt at filler content on a slow traffic day.

    Of course a tweet search engine is going to blow away a site where you can discover all the words in existence.

    You could put any PR firm on either campaign, change the entire targeting strategy and get a different result.

    Arrington knows he’ll get a lot of comments when he criticizes PR people, you’re just falling into the trap.

    I’m sure it helped on the slow news day.

  • Paula

    When a CEO is wondering what to do next it would be a smart move to call her PR firm — too few execs actually take the public’s current perceptions of their business/brands/products into account when making long-term investment decisions. And too many underestimate the value of doing a sanity check with the real world as a normal part of strat planning & R&D.

  • http://marshalsandler.com/2009/07/pr-profiling/ » PR Profiling

    [...] bankers on deals. This overstatement leads to reactions such as Mike Arrington’s blast, “Smile, Dial, Name Drop, Pray,” in TechCrunch. PR people should allow others to take the credit, because we are consultants, not [...]

  • joseph

    You can sure as hell bet politicians do this, perhaps to a fault. Whether PR is good/bad/powerful/useless is a somewhat aimless conversation without taking the proper situational context and even ‘industry’ into account.

    There are some intelligent comments in this thread but most read like school kids doing a stupid yeah-hah/nuh-ah routine. A superficial, one dimensional conversation about it doesn’t do anything for anyone.

  • http://www.webfeetim.com/blog/industry_news/public-relations-industry_news/brooke-hammerling-on-nyt-story-reporter-did-an-excellent-job/ Web Feet Integrated Marketing » Blog Archive » Brooke Hammerling on NYT Story: Reporter Did an "Excellent Job"

    [...] Michael Arrington posted his own response in which he said, “I know Brooke well. I guess you could say I’m one of her many [...]

  • Dana

    Michael, great article.

    As a PR professional I was completely disillusioned by Miller’s story, which narrowly pursued the tired, faux-sensational and wrong angle that traditional PR is dead, and that Twitter is the new deal-making tool. Miller’s angle was too obvious as she never tried to balance one publicist’s tactics with those employed by established, more successful tech PR agencies.

    The case study in this article is but one example for tech PR, and its results as a substantial promotional platform are yet to be proven.

    As an end note – self promoting publicists such as the one this story builds on, never truly have their clients’ interests at heart. Rather, they employ gimmicky tactics which will garner publicity for their firm, more than they will for their clients.

    Yes, we are all embracing Web 3.0 tools, some more than others. But to build a PR strategy on ‘celebrity whispers’ alone will not do the trick for those tech companies looking to establish a sustainable presence in a world of innovators.

  • Suasoria

    Absolutely celebrities/luminaries have PR pros managing their Twitter feeds, FB pages, and even blogs. At least the smarter ones do.

  • Suasoria

    I’m a major word nerd with a 4-crossword puzzles-a-day habit, and I’ve never heard of this site until now…reading about it on TechCrunch via an email from a colleague. Harumph.

  • John Conely

    I’m amazed at the PR hacks’ comments based on this story. It’s clear the comments are based either on envy — since most of you have no clients or contacts from the looks of your websites — or enormous self-loathing because you refuse to acknowledge that what Ms. Hammerling attempts to deliver — relationships and coverage — are what most clients expect out of their PR firm. When the first words out of a PR consultant’s mouth are “we do strategy” make sure you still have your wallet because your company’s coffers are about to be emptied with no ink to show for it.

  • http://www.technologypr.com Alison Minaglia

    Seriously – you have to give Brooke credit for pitching her own firm to the Times. All too often we PR folks have to leave our egos at the back door as we work behind the scenes to generate visibility for our clients. Seriously, you go girl. Let’s get together for coffee (/brew?) next time you’re in New York.

  • http://www.technologypr.com Alison Minaglia

    This is for Mohammed -

    I’ve actually had two New York Times reporters call with questions about client news AFTER TechCrunch – (or other influential blogs depending on the industry sector) broke the story first (even thought the Times was also offered a pre-brief.) Internet clients are quite happy these days with coverage in influential (key word influential) tech and internet blogs as they are with national newspaper coverage…. If you’re an internet company – what counts most in the end is the coverage/visibility (achieved through an integrated program of traditional and social media and analyst relations) that generates traffic/unique visitors to your site – the growth metric by which internet sites are measured.

  • joe

    I’m sure they will talk to TC later if they are smart, get all the bugs out first. Sometimes a stealth launch is better to work out the bugs.

  • http://www.highyields.com/news/tech-execs-how-to-reach-%e2%80%9cnormal%e2%80%9d-users-with-pr-and-with-techcrunchgigaom-et-al/ Tech execs: how to reach “normal” users with PR and with TechCrunch/GigaOm et al | HighYields.com

    [...] quote, that caught my eye (it caught TechCrunch’s founder, Mike Arrington’s, too) is this one from Roger McNamee, after Brooke suggested a company’s founder talk to tech [...]

  • http://www.bateman-group.com/blog/2009/07/putting-%e2%80%9cthe-article%e2%80%9d-to-bed/ Putting “The Article” to Bed @ Bateman Banter

    [...] really hit a collective nerve with an entire profession ― and the subsequent histrionics and grandstanding were something to behold. This was one of those rare occurrences — like the Rodney King verdict, [...]

  • http://www.3hatscommunications.com/blog/?p=207 3Hats Communications: Marketing and Public Relations Blog

    [...] NYT PR Spin piece triggered many posts including TechCrunch’s and Brian Solis’. [...]

  • Michael Draznin

    In response to Julianne – I hope you’re being ironic, but I’m not sure. Can you please clarify because if you’re not, there are a few important points that need to be made opposing “that old saying” you refer to: “any news is newsworthy.” (Btw, I think you mean “any press is good press.”) Looking forward to your response…

  • http://www.xyshop.co.uk Tania

    I am also very frustrated to have some PR in my sites

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/01/10-words-i-would-love-to-see-banned-from-press-releases/ 10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases

    [...] the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry in today’s world, and in particular our stance towards [...]

  • http://www.neurosoftware.ro/programming-blog/blogposter/web-resources/10-words-i-would-love-to-see-banned-from-press-releases/ 10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases – Programming Blog

    [...] the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry – and some of its proponents – in today’s world, and in particular our stance towards [...]

  • http://www.jboxman.com/releases/?p=846 Scene Releases » 10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases

    [...] the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry – and some of its proponents – in today’s world, and in particular our stance [...]

  • http://www.blogangle.com/2009/08/01/10-words-i-would-love-to-see-banned-from-press-releases/ 10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases – BlogAngle

    [...] the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry – and some of its proponents – in today’s world, and in particular our stance [...]

  • http://builddesignwebpage.com/2009/08/10-words-i-would-love-to-see-banned-from-press-releases-2/ 10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases | Design Website Easy

    [...] the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry – and some of its proponents – in today’s world, and in particular our stance towards [...]

  • http://articlesave.com/2009/08/02/3706/10-words-i-would-love-to-see-banned-from-press-releases/ ArticleSave :: Uncategorized :: 10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases

    [...] the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry – and some of its proponents – in today’s world, and in particular our stance towards [...]

  • http://www.rivershan.com/2009/08/04/10-words-i-would-love-to-see-banned-from-press-releases/ 10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases | 笨猫的窝

    [...] the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry – and some of its proponents – in today’s world, and in particular our stance towards [...]

  • http://findingfault.idearaft.com/2009/08/05/correlation-versus-causation-versus-blogging/ Finding Fault » Correlation versus Causation versus Blogging

    [...] Name Drop, Pray.” dated 2009-07-04 by Michael Arrington in blog “TechCrunch” http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/04/the-reality-of-pr-smile-dial-name-drop-pray/ visited 2009-08-01. [...]

  • http://www.uhtenwoldt-blog.de/2009/08/13/pr-worthulsen-auf-dem-index/ PR-Worthülsen auf dem Index |

    [...] Reality of PR: Smile, Dial, Name Drop, Pray”, behauptet etwa Blogger Michael Arrington in TechCrunch, einem Blog, das sich hauptsächlich mit technologischen Neugründungen im Web 2.0 Sektor befasst. [...]

  • http://www.pamil-visions.net/michael-arrington-pr-company/24216/ Michael Arrington Wants To Be Your PR

    [...] short of this is; “I think I am right all the time too”, only to later find I am wrong. In an article the other day Michael once again takes the opportunity to hammer on some poor little PR people. If [...]

  • http://littleconversations.wordpress.com/2009/07/05/startup-launch-strategy-after-the-buzz-will-you-be-found/ Startup Launch Strategy: After the Buzz, Will You Be Found? « Little Conversations

    [...] also makes a good point about the results of the campaign, comparing the traffic results generated by the Wordnik launch to [...]

  • http://www.mediabullseye.com/mb/2009/07/id-give-my-right-arm-for-a-goo.html I’d Give My Right Arm for a Good, Accurate Article About the PR Industry « Media Bullseye – A New Media and Communications Magazine

    [...] dismissed by one of the protagonists in the piece as “cynical,” responded with a, well, cynical, PR-hating piece that makes hash of the notion that a tech company shouldn’t launch without talking to them. I [...]

  • http://www.brunotrani.info/blog/2010/02/26/i-will-honor-the-embargo/ I Will Honor The Embargo | bruno trani dot info

    [...] To Blissful Blogging One PR Firm’s Lack Of Ethics: Reverb Caught Astroturfing The App Store The Reality Of PR: Smile, Dial, Name Drop, Pray. Meet Lois Whitman, The Poster Child For Everything Wrong With PR Death To The Embargo The Last Has [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Got a tip? Building a startup? Tell us