Breaking: Google Announces Android and Open Handset Alliance
Erick Schonfeld
Nov 5, 2007

googleogo11.gifGoogle just officially announced the Open Handset Alliance to create an open platform (to be called Android) for a Linux phone that can run mobile Google apps and others. The 34 partners include T-Mobile, Sprint Nextel, NTT Docomo, China Mobile, Telefonica, Telecom Italia, Motorola, Samsung, HTC, Qualcomm, Intel, and Google itself. No mention of Verizon, AT&T, Vodafone, or Nokia (which is pushing its own Ovi development platform). Here is the press release. Writes Andy Rubin, the man behind the Google Phone. :

Despite all of the very interesting speculation over the last few months, we’re not announcing a Gphone. However, we think what we are announcing — the Open Handset Alliance and Android — is more significant and ambitious than a single phone. In fact, through the joint efforts of the members of the Open Handset Alliance, we hope Android will be the foundation for many new phones and will create an entirely new mobile experience for users, with new applications and new capabilities we can’t imagine today

Android is the first truly open and comprehensive platform for mobile devices. It includes an operating system, user-interface and applications — all of the software to run a mobile phone, but without the proprietary obstacles that have hindered mobile innovation.

Reports started trickling out last week that Google is ready to announce its Gphone, or rather Gphones. It is more a reference design, than a single phone. Android-based phones will start to come out on the market in the latter half of 2008 (from HTC at minimum). One mobile startup CEO I know says he was contacted on Friday by Google and given the final go-ahead to port his app onto Android, which his company has not even started to work on yet. The software development kit will be available on November 12. Today’s announcement is just that. There is nothing concrete here in terms of products or services, but going mobile represents a major growth opportunity for Google, which wants to bring the Internet (along with search and contextual ads) to your phone.

John Biggs at CrunchGear is liveblogging the conference call, and he is also streaming the audio

Here are my notes from the call:

Google CEO Eric Schmidt notes there are 3 billion mobile users. He says:

“We want to create a whole new experience for mobile users.”

“This will be the first fully-integrated software stack, including an operating system and middleware, being made available under the most liberal open-source license ever given to mobile operators [and handset makers].”

“This is not an announcement of a Gphone. We hope thousands of different phones will be powered by Android. This will make possible all sorts of applications that have never been made available on a mobile device.”

He think s a”lack of a collaborative effort” is what has been keeping back the mobile Web. Android will help developers reduce complexities and costs across different mobile devices.

“Mobile software complexity and cost is increasing, but mobile users want the same apps as they have on the Internet. Android will be able to deliver on this.”

Sergey Brin: “As I look at it I reflect, ten years ago I was sitting at a graduate student cubicle. We were able to build incredible things,. There was a set of tools that allowed us to do that. It was all open technologies. It was based on Linux, GNU, Apache. All those pieces and many more allowed us to do great things and distribute it to the world. That is what we are doing today, to allow people to innovate on today’s mobile devices. Today’s mobile devices are more powerful than those computers I was working on just ten years ago. I cannot wait to see what today’s innovators will build.”

No ad-supported phones, says Andy Rubin in Q&A: “Part of this Android solution is a very robust HTML Web browser, so there is really no difference between browsing on a phone [and on a PC]. Contrary to speculation, you won’t see a completely ad-driven phone on this platform for some time.” But he confirms that this plays into Google’s overall advertising strategy by bringing a more fully functioning Web browser to the handset. Notes that Android will require at minimum the equivalent of a 200 MHz ARM 9 processor. The platform is open source, and that will be its competitive advantage over other mobile platforms.

Schmidt: “The best model is to be open. that is what the Internet has taught us. The test of course is whether the applications and developers emerge. The reason we are announcing now is to make sure developers have time to make available applications that have never been available before but are common on Macs and PCs.”

And not that he is announcing anything, but: “If you were to build Gphone, you would build it on this platform.”

Qs about ability of carriers to lock down devices. Rubin: “When you free something into the open it is up to the industry to do something with it.” (i.e., it is not Google’s problem).

Q: “So if the industry wanted to create completely locked down devices, that would be possible?”

And Rubin: “Yes.”

Schmidt: “While that is possible, it is highly unlikely.” Uh-huh, what planet does he live on?

Q: Any overlap with OpenSocial?

Schmidt: “Google announces products whenever they are ready, and the teams are different. OpenSocial will be a framework that will run extremely well on Android for all the obvious reasons. Developers building interesting social apps will have the benefit of mobility as Android becomes widespread.”

Here is a video:

Advertisement
  • Related Topics
Advertisement
  • http://www.pdgcreative.com Ryan Merket

    Android? Are you serious? What kind of name is that?

  • Chris
  • http://www.beijingolympicsfan.com/ Patrick Quek

    Woohoo!

  • http://www.knowprashant.blogspot.com Prashant

    cool

  • http://www.eventmobile.net No Surprise

    The Gphone will be a great asset to developers, fostering much needed mobile innovations.

    Cheers for openness! :-)

  • http://yousefourabi.com Yousef Ourabi

    I wonder if this will pressure Stevo down in Cupertino to open up a bit.

  • Mohammed

    The video does not work? is there a problem???

  • http://megawattpr.com Tyler Wright

    Man do Larry, Sergey and Eric sure get a lot accomplished at Quiznos on Saturday.

  • http://newzup.com John

    The’re workin with a dog, please don’t give them narcotics anymore :)

  • James

    I read on Sunday New York Times.

  • http://www.makayama.com Vincent

    This is a very underwhelming announcement, I don’t think anyone in Finland or Cupertino will be scared. Creating a big fuzzy platform is NOT going to give us sexy devices. You need one company, one vision for that. Not some democratic open debating club.

  • http://www.prospectmarkets.com ChandraB

    I agree is a bit underwhelming with the lack of specifics, no demo of capabilities or the fact that it’s over a year before we see any real hardware.

  • http://www.hungryflix.com Brian Andrews

    I’ll try to stay cautiously optimistic about this one…but when is the general public going to realize that Google is not a tech company that likes to build “free” software for everyone?

    I’m not sure I want ads everywhere, all the time. I’d rather pay for an iPhone. Mobile Safari does a great job at getting me to the web services I need, especially for a 1.0 version.

    I’m not sure exactly what Google is going to bring that MS, Palm, RIM and Apple haven’t already done.

  • Karl Engblom

    The second “open alliance” from Google in a week. I’m all for this, I’m all for OpenSocial as well, but when did an “alliance” ever accomplish anything in the business world?

  • AnonTroll

    It’s clear to me that Google wants to be the software infrastructure of internet much like Cisco aims to be the hardware infrastructure. Inspite of their moronic motto of “Do No Evil”, this is way beyond evil.

  • http://iperbolico.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/breaking-google-announces-android-and-open-handset-alliance/ Breaking: Google Announces Android and Open Handset Alliance « Segnalibri su Del.ici.us? Meglio Wordpress

    [...] Google Announces Android and Open Handset Alliance Posted Novembre 5, 2007 TECHCRUNCH annuncia il famigerato [...]

  • Some Dude

    @AnonTroll

    How exactly is it evil to push open standards that give every developer equal footing? No need to “hack” the platform to install 3rd party apps (ARE YOU LISTENING APPLE).

  • http://fr.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/derniere-minute-google-annonce-android-et-lopen-handset-alliance/ TechCrunch en français » Dernière Minute: Google annonce Android et L’Open Handset Alliance

    [...] Note d’Ouriel: pour ceux intéressés les notes de John Biggs en Live Blogging depuis la conférence de presse de Google ici [...]

  • http://www.crunchgear.com John Biggs

    Guys – I’m live blogging the announcement and streaming it at live.crunchgear.com.

    http://operator11.com/shows/1053/episodes/28816

  • http://pepperlillie.com Bill

    I can’t believe all the negative comments. The mobile industry in the US is horribly restrictive. My blackberry from verizon has its gps disabled and I’m still pissed about that. A new class of phones designed specifically to offer the consumer as much choice and flexibility as possible is great news.

    Also, if anyone knows how to enable the built-in gps device on a 8830, please let me know.

  • http://radar.net John

    Vincent, this doesn’t really have anything to do with sexy devices. (And who’s looking to Google for sexy?)

    This is about fostering a sustainable mobile ecosystem–long overdue given the scale of the mobile opportunity–and I suspect it will in time prove widely and deeply impactful.

  • AnonTroll

    @Some Dude, it’s evil because once Google controls the underlying platform/infrastructure, they own your ass, pure and simply evil. Open source is the friendly term that Google puts out to the public but their real goal is to make you go through them.

  • http://www.cdnoise.com airj1012

    I don’t understand this. Verizon passed up in the iPhone and now the Google OS. As a customer, I’m slightly worried.

  • http://www.misterchips.org Mr.Chips

    Great to see another IDEA floating around this horrible mobile industry in the US…

  • jamie

    Developing for many different types of phones is a royal pain and there is no solution out there today to make it any easier. Somehow though i don’t see this making that much of a difference – there will still be many mobile platforms to target.

    I do find it amusing though that Google is very keen to promote open source and the benefits that they derived from it . Unfortunately they (google) haven’t been that keen to give back / open up their offerings unless it fits with their own commercial plans.

  • AnonTroll

    @airj1012

    A simple fact of all businesses, they want to be the gateway to their customers, that way you have to pay them a toll to get to their customers. Regardless of what companies say in public, they are rarely altruistic. Their PR machine makes you think they are only doing it for the public good but not so. Right now, Verizon owns the gateway to their customers, there has be a damn good incentive for them to give that to Google.

  • Ray Cromwell

    @AnonTroll,
    From what I read, Android will be released as open source, therefore, Google will not control the underlying platform/infrasructure, and anyone can fork the Android platform. Google can only control the direction of the platform to the extent that the developer community likes what they are doing, and the minute that stops, the minute a Fork of Android begins.

    The mobile phone industry, nay, the phone industry in general, is ridiculously evil. Incredibly closed and proprietary, and trying desperately to impede new technologies that imperil old POTS circuit-switched business models. Ask yourself why an international call is so expensive when I can route such a call over VoIP for pennies? The costs for basic voice comm per subscriber have dropped tremendously, but the prices in plans haven’t kept up. Why are ringtones, wallpaper GIFs, etc often controlled in a walled-garden and sold at ridiculously high prices? The list goes on and on.

    I’m sure Google is trying to make money off this, but if someone can profit by making the world a better place, rather than making it a worse one, I’m all for it.

  • http://beta.nafurai.com maurizio

    What about OpenMoko? What will happen to it now that it will start shipping?

  • Malcolm

    So what’s everyone’s timeline expectation?

    1 year for the first Android phone
    18 months for the first Android phone you actually want to buy
    2 years for the bugs and apps to be worked out

    Sound about right or do the crowds think this will go faster?

  • http://book-bot.com gilltots

    @anonTroll -
    i don’t think google wants to “control” the underlying platform/infrastructure, they want it to be open so that you don’t have to write 75 versions of your mobile app in order to get it to run on 80% of the closed-as-balls devices out there.

    this is a “good thing” – but i don’t know if it will work. i think google would have better success building its own cellular network from scratch and having open devices to run on it – i just don’t see verizon or sprint “tearing down that wall” anytime soon. but then they would control the platform, but whatevah. i’d rather it exist and have flaws than be perfect and never happen.

  • Jay

    This isn’t going to work. I dont care what kind of software you write, a regular old flip-phone is still going to suck. We need new hardware. Period.

  • http://www.beercosoftware.com/blog/2007/11/05/google-just-announced-android-and-the-open-handset-alliance/ BeerCo Software Blog

    Google just announced Android and the Open handset Alliance…

    ‘Despite all of the very interesting speculation over the last few months, we’re not announcing a Gphone. However, we think what we are announcing — the Open Handset Alliance and Android — is more significant and ambitious than …

  • http://www.mobilegadget.com mobileGadget

    an option to be able to push Google gadget into my phone would a good idea i hope this thing works

  • Malcolm

    Also, I’m wondering, is this even that big a deal? It helps 3P devs yeah, but would I be wrong to compare what we have today as facebook now and what Android hopes to accomplish as OpenSocial in terms of Apps?

    Is this going to actually bring anything substantially new to the enduser?

  • http://www.ideareboot.com Ashesh

    To address the misgivings about Android fairly rife in the comments above:

    Name: Besides the fact that the name is fairly sexist, I think its a cool name! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android

    Idea:

    1. Google does not make free software.

    Correct. But it does make cool platforms, which opens up a world of possibilities, majority of them driven towards Google monetizing them in some way. Free platform is not the same as free software.

    2. An open platform would be a fuzzy platform and one company, one vision would do a better job.

    However tempting this theory may be, this is not grounded in the reality. Imagine Internet w/o HTTP platform. That’s exactly the state of mobile scape. It’s a spaghetti of incompatible OS, softwares, runtimes, interfaces and peripheral mgmt. Step into a telecom carrier’s shoes, and you will have nightmares strategizing the drivers for selecting your next hot phone!

    One company, one vision – This is pure fiction! If only someone could give me an example for this is the re-collectable history of technology. The vision needs to be driven by the needs of future. And no single company can fully comprehend all those needs, especially when they lie outside the business expedience. Plus, one company-one vision would never cater to the long tail.

    With 34 partners, it may be annoyingly slow to lay out the specs, but there would be little room for getting it wrong.

    3. What is Google offering that MS, Palm, RIM and Apple haven’t already done.

    Well, an open platform, based on industry specs, a browser that should draw on the best from Opera, possibility of drawing a million developers to roll out a million free apps, may be a common interface for embedding a proprietary payment System (are Visa, Mastercard, Paypal listening?)

    4. How private will my life remain with Google at the helm of a mobile platform?

    The scenario is scary – we all would consider Second Life at some point!

  • AnonTroll

    @Ray, @gilltots

    I see your points. I should clarify by what I mean by Google owning the platform. In this case, Android is made to be Google apps friendly meaning by default, it will come with Google Apps installed. Default apps are known to have amazingly long shelf lives, just look at IE, Media Player being bundled with Windows resulting in multiple lawsuits.

    The side effect of having a common platform is of great benefit to developers, I agree wholeheartedly but that’s what Google wants you to believe is their main reason for doing it. However, their true hidden agenda is to make sure that the Google Apps are always installed by default

  • http://www.exchange3d.com Exchange3D

    Where’s the y! Phone :) ?

  • exapted

    @32

    My take on 3.

    3. What is Google offering that MS, Palm, RIM and Apple haven’t already done.

    I think the Android platform will include SOAP push API and a lot of other APIs. Blackberry push is a one trick pony. Android will, I bet, be a SOAP push/pull dashboard. That would make it easier to create network enabled applications that can run in the background, wake up on events, and doesn’t waste battery life.

    Also, the Android should include a set of APIs that are easy to use to grab GPS data and do a whole bunch of things mobile web app developers would love to be able to do.

    MS, Palm, RIM, and Apple just sort of took the desktop to the phone.

  • http://fishtrain.com Jesse

    Google has released 2 potentially, major platforms in a span of a few days: OpenSocial and Android. If you own the platform you have a chance to own everything: http://fishtrain.com/2007/10/17/the-platform-is-what-matters/

  • http://dealscout.com Hubert

    Exactly how is this different from J2ME or Symbian, which are both open platforms that are supported on hundreds of devices and have been around for years?..

  • http://www.exchange3d.com Exchange3D

    Wanna listen to a short audio ad before we connect your call?

  • exapted

    @37

    I agree that the way Android is being described, it is no better than Symbian. See my post 35. Symbian apps don’t extend existing web apps very well, and don’t do push with any kind of data you want. A SOAP push/pull dashboard should ideally form the basis of a mobile OS.

  • http://www.youmail.com Free Voicemail

    leave it to google to pursue this… I would have rather seen an iphone/gphone battle…

  • http://www.uniquessentials.com Dheeraj Sultanian

    so what exactly is the cost of licensing an existing OS on a mobile from an OEM standpoint? Is it like 5% or 50% of the cost? That is the real question.

    Also, the idea of multiple platforms brings with a terrifying reality: The next time I purchase a phone, will I have to answer the question: Symbian or Android? Like Mac Vs. Windows? Ahhhh! I just want to make a call – is that so hard!

    blackberry OS FTW!

  • http://JamaicaWireless.net Rodger

    Their stock is going through he roof, they support several good causes but few can see that they will be history in a short period of time in respect to business life. Yes you heard it here first.

  • Ray Cromwell

    Symbian:

    a) Isn’t open source
    b) Is a pretty crappy OS to develop on

    As for Google Apps being installed by default, the handset manufacturers and networks will control this. They will have the source, so they can build custom firmwares with whatever they want.

    If Google wants a manufacturer or service provider to keep their apps, it will have to ink deals with them, and as such, isn’t much different than today’s walled-garden approach.

    Moreover, with the source being open, endusers will most likely be able to build their OWN firmwares for Android devices (even if DRM attempts to stop a firmware patch), much like people have hacked up custom access point firmwares (DDWRT for Linksys for example)

    Really, people are trying desperately to draw phony comparisons between say, Google and Microsoft here when none apply. So far, software that Google has released has been the most open and benign we’ve seen with respect to end user and developer rights.

  • http://www.blogh.de Peter Schink

    It’s so cool. And the best thing… : Here in Germany Google will work together with T-Mobile, which is also the provider for the iPhone. That’s awesome. German Readers can read more in my german blog… http.//www.blogh.de/779

  • http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2007/11/googles-android-announced.html Junto Boyz

    GOOGLE’S ANDROID ANNOUNCED… MOBILE ADS GO CRAZY?…

    Well, all the hype over the “GPhone” has shown to be misplaced. The announcement by Google today is showing to be a bigger play. Huge. This is why Google bought Android and locked Andy Rubin into the chambers of the new DeathStar a couple years ago. …

  • exapted

    Android is going to be so much fun to play with. Even if it doesn’t take off, I am going to become an Android freak.

    And like others have said, Symbian and WM are steaming piles of crap. Blackberry is a one trick pony good only for the enterprise (will every social network need to create a special Blackberry application?). The iPhone is pretty but where are the background applications and where the hell is push? As far as I’m concerned, there isn’t a mobile web device market yet. Android will be the first real product in that market.

  • http://www.donawilson.com/ Don Wilson

    No pictures? Then I couldn’t care less

  • http://www.getogeto.com Wai-lun Hong

    Great news to mobile startup or mobile developers. It would be nice for Google to lineup those manufacturers into a standard platform, but the problem is if they cannot lineup the majority, then it would becoming another SDK for special set of phones, just like Windows Mobile, J2ME, the not yet came out iPhone SDK, etc….
    It seems like a hard task to beat other platforms and colonize a single platform into majority, but i think Google has done a good job in providing sustainable and practical open-platforms, see GMap and those many many APIs it is providing. I believe Google is a very suitable company to take the challenge.

  • zach

    is it going to be compatible with OpenSocial?

  • http://www.successforyourblog.com Jason @ SFYB

    Yes I think its going to be compatible with Open Social.

  • http://www.dailyslop.com Ryan H

    I’m sorry. How is this related to facebook, and why is it posted on Techcrunch?

  • Velioncho

    Google realizes the importance of having platform to produce innovative applications and took charge of leading the effort here.
    My predictions:

    2008 Q1: Google will ask move many of its employees to work on this effort instead of those “me too” worthless efforts.Anyways, majority of the revenues currently are from its core products (search/ads).

    2008 Q2: Google Mobile OS pre-beta will be ready and app prototypes developement kicks off.

    2008 Q3: Google integrates mobile OS with gphone.

    2008 Q4: GPhone just in time for holidays.By then there are thousands of cool mobile aps available.All cellphone carriers by then charge nominal flat rate for data charges as they see google’s magic will increase the volume that justifies the low rates.

    Now I woder what will iphone folks do in parallel to minimize google’s effect.

  • http://www.google.com Anon

    Google can be so open because they make a killing in ad revenue. They use openness as an excuse to monopolize and kill competitors. Open social to kill facebook, and this to kill the iPhone. They don’t like these closed systems because they can’t get exclusive ads in. I think their no-evil guise will start to wear thin.

    Does Google truly believe in openness for the greater good/innovation rather than a way to monopolize? Consider whether they would ever open up their revenue split calculations, the source or their billions.

    Open standards is one thing. But open software is simply giving away work for free and killing competition and jobs. It does lower the barrier to entry for product development which is a good thing but I think Google is more motivated by the possibility of more publishers, of which it takes half of their ad revenue, rather than the quality of products.

    Google is stepping on developers like ants. It makes small business nervous to think that Google can simply erase your product with something free of charge. Of course small business could make their product free and generate revenue from ads but could still not compete with Google, who gets 100% of ad revenue while the small business gets 50%. This is monopoly.

    F*ck Google

  • http://www.zvoner.ro/google-lanseaza-open-handset-alliance-android-gphone/ Zvoner.ro » Google lanseaza Open Handset Alliance; Android > GPhone

    [...] Asta zice Andy Rubin, coordonatorul proiectului, citat de Techcrunch. [...]

  • http://www.gphone-news.de Rene : www.gphone-news.de/android

    That is great!
    Is this a new platform for Opensocial-apps?

    The german source for gPhone news:
    http://www.gphone-news.de

  • http://www.ederway.com/2007/11/05/green-is-universal-and-other-rumblings-from-the-web/ Green is Universal… and other rumblings from the web. – eder way

    [...] Universal are promoting all week. • It’s not really a GPhone… It’s more of a GPlatform. • A Damn in Iraq could collapse causing a half-million deaths. TreeHugger, CBS News • The [...]

  • Velioncho

    “I’m sorry. How is this related to facebook, and why is it posted on Techcrunch?”

    Good question, only reasoning I can come up with is, this open alliance goes hand in hand with OpenSocial which threatens to kill facebook’s growth.

  • Ray Cromwell

    So, if Google erases your business with open source, it’s bad and evil, but if Richard Stallman or Linus does it, it’s absolutely peachy? And how can you characterize the carriers and handset manufacturers as little guys, small fry developers getting stepped on, when it is these people who in fact make it expensive and difficult for the small developers to deploy to their platforms!

    I own an iPhone, I love it, but Steve Jobs says no to small time developers deploying native apps, and this is less evil than Google releasing a mobile operating system where anyone can build it, and anyone can write apps for it?

    Google can only kill your platform with an open solution, if you weren’t open enough in the first place. It’s the greedy and fearful people creating walled gardens that are shooting themselves in the foot by giving Google the opportunity to upstage them.

  • nemrut

    man…this is huge. these guys are really shaking up the industry via humble little text ads.

    maybe Blodget’s forecast has some merit afterall…

  • exapted

    @52

    If you don’t like what Google is doing, how about what the rest of the mobile industry is doing? You can’t even make a simple web app that’s available and works decently on most smartphones. As a software developer, I don’t want to be using .NET on Windows Mobile, using sockets for Symbian, figuring out push for each and every application I make for Blackberry, etc., etc. etc.

    I will admit that Google is developing into a monopoly if you admit that Android sounds like the closest thing to a really powerful and flexible platform for mobile web apps. The problem isn’t Google, its Symbian, Microsoft, RIM, Yahoo!, ……

  • http://www.google.com Anon

    55: “Google can only kill your platform with an open solution, if you weren’t open enough in the first place”

    Really? So making something open makes it Google proof? Really? So if my company had mad an open Ajax mapping solution before Google maps and licensed it to companies for use it would still be ok? Or by open, do you mean free? It’s hard to work for free when you don’t have a billion dollar ad network. Could a an open and free maps product really compete? Not without an ad network. If you go the ad supported route Google will only give you 50% revenue while their product takes 100%. This is a monopoly.

  • http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/11/05/googles-cell-phone-strategy/ Google’s Cell Phone Strategy – ShoeMoney®

    [...] Techcrunch has a great writeup although no credit 2 shoestradaums for the prediction posted on November 5th, 2007:Written By: ShoeMoney [...]

  • http://www.google.com Anon

    @57
    Yes, you’re right. The way the mobile industry works at the moment is disgusting, and this move by Google is for the better. But that’s not to say its harmless to other industries. I’m not comfortable with Google leading the effort because they’re involved in many other areas of the web including consumer products and advertising. This means that their priorities are not going to be exclusively for the benefit of the mobile software industry.

  • Grzegorz Daniluk

    Two questions ;-)

    1. How much cash Sun made on Java and how much Google is going to earn releasing this Android software for free?

    2. If open technologies are so great then when Google will release its search software for free. I would like to see some innovation in the search field also.

  • http://floatsolutions.net Aidan

    I think a lot of the things people are talking about here seems misguided. People are saying this will not foster a slick sexy interface, but it is not the iphone.

    Google is targeting the world (3 billion users) Apple is targeting rich Americans (10-15 million users). Google can’t control the platform if they want to reach people in New York, Bangdad and Taiwan.

    I think the announcement is very interesting and is right in line with last weeks opensocial announcement. Google seems to have a very unified corporate vision.

  • http://www.google.com Anon

    “If open technologies are so great then when Google will release its search software for free. I would like to see some innovation in the search field also.”

    @60: good point

  • Ray Cromwell

    @58,
    if you had such a solution, why couldn’t you get the major webportals to license it, and why couldn’t you market it successfully for the small guy to mash it up? As I see it, it’s a failure of your business, not Google’s fault. Perhaps if you had launched a site with a free mashable version, but then charged for enterprise use and support, you’d have a more viable business. Moreover, why did you fail to differentiate your product from Google’s free version?

  • http://www.mycutegalaxy.com Smiley

    who cares but if it gets connected to opensocial it will be cool too.

  • http://imeem.com ryan troy

    Allegedly. I hope this gets greater carrier adoption.

  • exapted

    @59

    Well I admit that your arguments are somewhat convincing, but consider the following scenario.

    If I wanted to create a city-wide (say, in Singapore) location-based shopping directory with user profiles and social interaction so that people could share product information and store locations, etc., it would be easiest for me to use the Google Maps API, Android, and OpenSocial. I could hope to get bought out by either Yahoo! or Google. But there is really no way I could survive on my own in the long run.

    The reason the above mentioned fictional business could not survive on its own is the size of the dominant players, not monopoly. As China develops, Google is certainly not going to be the only major player. Baidu and Alibaba group are going to be very powerful. And certainly Microsoft isn’t going to lay down and die.

    And don’t we need huge companies to create industry standards?

  • http://siddharths.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/what-is-it/ What is it ? « Idea Factory

    [...] @ Tech Crunch [...]

  • Hopeless Charm

    Most bogus announcement EVER! Google has just shown themselves to be more Microsoft/IBM than Apple. We wanted a new, ultra-innovative high-tech phone on a new cell network owned and operated by Google. We got a rock instead (ala Charlie Brown). Apple/ATT have the iPhone. HTC/Sprint have the Mogul. Google gives us a rock. Open platforms, alliances, frameworks, open source software, it all sounds so early ’90s. This is what it feels like when a dream dies….

  • http://www.google.com Anon

    @63 Ray, I don’t think you’re this naive. Now instead of simply being open your argument is that you just need to differentiate.

    When a billion dollar company becomes your direct competitor I will be a bit nicer and not call it a failure of your business. This is the equivalent of Walmart entering small towns and instead of selling products for cheaper prices they give them out for free since they already have lots of revenue from big cities.

    No matter how good you’re product is when the economics are not in your favor you cannot succeed.

    I’m really just responding for a different point of view. I’d like to think you’re playing devils advocate with this cascading argument. I’m excited to see the next reason is for failing to compete with Google, after not being open enough and not differentiating enough. It would also be enlightening to so the company behind your feelings.

  • http://mikecane.wordpress.com Mike Cane

    So, basically, they never heard of that vast alliance once called Symbian, huh?

    As uncov would say: FAIL!

  • http://www.ATFR.net Allex Radu

    why do you remove the video from youtube?

  • http://www.google.com Anon

    @66

    I see your point. In other words this helps Google compete with other large companies. However both opensocial and this seem to be annoucements for small developers. Especially opensocial which talks about giving small developers what they crave: distribution, (read: giving google what they want, ad revenue). I get the feeling that Google is trying to gain techie support with this type of annoucement when the next day they don’t think twice about stepping on small developers. I think you’re right that with Google being a dominant force there is no market for small developers. Maybe not a monopoly, but sad.

  • Ray Cromwell

    @68 Anon,
    The reality is, a person with a billion of anything competing with you is going to have a huge advantage, but I’m saying, you can’t run a business with the idea that no one with a huge competitive advantage is going to get into your niche. It’s almost guaranteed if your niche turns out to be a large market. Thus, if you were such an early adopter/innovator, it behooves you to see the handwriting on the wall, and either figure out a way to remain viable and independent, or figure out a strategy to play along with the big boys, either through licensing or acquisition.

    The ad-network supported subsidy argument is really important here. Plenty of companies are being hurt by open source versions developed not by ad-network subsidized companies, but by a bunch of individuals. The point is, anyone can come by and eat your lunch in software due to the costs of distribution, as well as low barrier to entry. When Google does it, you’ll whine about them translating ad network dollars into free source code. But when Linus does it, you won’t complain, in fact, you’ll be grateful that you got an OS for free and didn’t have to pay a Microsoft tax.

    A few people are going to complain, but so many more people are helped by Google’s open platforms, that I doubt many will have sympathy, anymore than I have sympathy for the guys who used to make a living selling commercial TCP stacks to DOS/Windows users before they were commodified and free.

  • http://www.web-jungle.com/2007/11/05/google-and-the-liberation-of-mobile-phones/ Web Jungle

    Google and the liberation of mobile phones…

    Clever, very clever indeed. Google announces the Open Hand Set Alliance and liberates the 33 participating mobile phone operators from the claws of proprietary systems. From the Google Blog:
    Android is the first truly open and comprehensive platform fo…

  • exapted

    Eventually will the market be filled with big Software As a Service applications on a stagnant .Google platform, so that most software jobs will deal with support, configuration, and some customization?

    Personally, I think the mobile web market will grow rapidly, moving ultimately towards the ideal human communication filter. Google isn’t going to completely own the mobile web.

    Will “little” developers get pushed aside in certain areas of the mobile web market? Perhaps they will. And I am one of those little developers.

    But if us little developers get off our asses right now, this is our opportunity to actually build powerful web apps that get off the ground, while Google is still struggling to get their platform off the ground and Microsoft/Facebook/Yahoo are competing with them.

  • Ray Cromwell

    BTW Anon, let me say that I am developing a product right now that is in Google’s territory, a new kind of niche search engine, that Google could quite easily kill. I worry about it all the time, but I wouldn’t fault Google for also trying to develop a good idea, I’d just hope I can figure out a way to modify the business plan so that co-existence is possible. (and it is, Google is not a monopoly in every service)

  • http://www.netpaths.net/blog/google-phone/ Googles Operation Android Will Control Your Cellphone

    [...] Read more from the Google conference call here. [...]

  • AnonTroll

    @Anon, I like the way you think, even with your handle ;)

    @66 exaptd, huge industry to create standard? Yes we had Microsoft who dominates the PC platform and guess what, got sued umpteenth ways for monopoly. When a large company “owns” the standard, it becomes a monopoly.

    @Ray
    Yes I know that Google has made it open source. Consider what this means for a second. They have announced partnership with what, 34 partners so far? So imagine one or a few of the partners decided not to include Google apps but the rest of the them do, guess what kind of review they would get? Oh look, company A or B does not work with docs, spreadsheet, etc. Why in the world would they not do that when it comes free with Android, it’s a no brainer. Now let’s look at those partners that decide to use their own apps instead of Google Apps, all of a sudden, their cost of development support have increased significantly compared to their competitors who opted to go with embedded google apps. See how this works? Default tested apps that go with an OS are hard to resist for many reasons. Yeah so open source make it possible for you to swap out Google apps when when it comes to bottomline, competitors, and functionality, you will likely keep the Google apps.

    And of course, once you start including certain apps, you have your support staff and engineers trained on those apps making it even less appealing for you to switch out those apps in the future. Yeah, you are free to swap out google apps but damn good chance that you won’t.

  • http://www.google.com Anon

    It still just feels wrong.

    They believe in open platforms but their biggest success have been in their own closed platforms, (search/ads). Their closed platforms are the source of their success and they would not jeopardize that by making them open.

    Creating open platforms in industries where they’re not a leader is how they can compete with the big guys in these industries, (social net, mobile, browsers). This is fine, but to say they believe in open platforms is phony. They’re just using it as competitive advantage. It’s manipulative. I wonder if they would support another companies open search or ads platforms, probably not. I really don’t like these guys any more.

  • AnonTroll

    @76, Anon, I agree 100%. I can understand that the open source bit also happens to benefit developers but I am amazed at how many developers think that this is the main reason why Google did it. Give credit to Google ingenious PR machine. If Google appears to care about developers, it’s only because it gives Google a competitive edge to have developers on their platform.

  • http://www.nuance.com Nuance Communications

    Nuance joined the Open Handset Alliance with other industry leaders to grow the entire mobile ecosystem. We’re committed to apply our strength and leadership in voice-based search and messaging to move the market forward. By packaging and optimizing embedded speech technology components for open source distribution, we’ve given developers the opportunity to access speech solutions through open APIs using the Android platform and to easily upgrade to new, more advanced speech features as well. We believe deep collaboration with members of the Alliance will grow our core mobile business and fuel the proliferation of speech-enabled applications worldwide.

  • kael

    I’m wondering what’s the relation between the Open Handset Alliance and the Open Mobile Alliance.

    Not sure what to think about it.

    Google wants to enter the mobile devices industry and they are out-sourcing the development of applications while getting the ads-revenue

    I’m wondering if it’d be possible to hack Androïd to completely remove every traces of Google Inc. (ads included).

    Though they are marginalizing Maemo and other platforms, this will probably create interesting emulation between mobile vendors and might even shake carriers.

    Hopefully, we’ll soon see Nokia Mameo devices with more than 256 MB RAM. :)

  • AnonTroll

    @kael,

    If it is truly open source, then yeah you can hack and branch off on your own to your heart’s content but it requires a great deal of knowledge to do that. I suspect that anyone who does that won’t get the support of the wireless companies. Plus I am sure all support from the wireless companies will be void once they found out that you have your own version. By making it open source, I suspect that Google’s main objective there is to allow 3rd party developers to add their own apps making Android even more popular as a platform giving Google a further competitive advantage.

  • http://www.uniquessentials.com Dheeraj Sultanian

    What if microsoft unveiled an “open platform” that had live search, and live apps built in – would you give them a free pass like you’re giving google?

  • kael

    @ AnonTroll

    I hope the Ubuntu Mobile and Embedded project will be more popular than Androïd.

    Actually, instead of a Maemo based Nokia device (yeah, I like Nokia), I’m impatiently waiting for one supporting Ubuntu. Perhaps, it’s a good thing they didn’t embrace Ubuntu ; it will kept it clean of Google. :D

  • http://www.techveil.com Hairy Mike

    All Google needs to do now is create an ‘open platform’ for internet advertising so that developers and site owners don’t have to share any of their advertising revenue.

  • http://document-dot-write.blogspot.com/2007/11/android-ist-das-gphone-bzw-google-phone.html document.write(“Markus Tressl”);

    Android ist das Gphone bzw. Google Phone — und doch kein Handy…

    Die Spekulationen der vergangenen Wochen und Monate haben vorerst ein Ende. Was zunächst als ein Stück Hardware vermutet und später zu einer Suite von Google Mobile Anwendungen wurde ist nun tatsächli……

  • exapted

    @81 Cheeraj Sultanian
    “What if microsoft unveiled an “open platform” that had live search, and live apps built in – would you give them a free pass like you’re giving google?”

    If Microsoft offered the same or better quantity and quality of SOAP services and worked as hard to teach developers how to use their APIs, and had as high of quality of browser based web apps as Google or better, and didn’t come out with Sharepoint……. sure.

  • Velioncho

    one new topic came out of these comments , that I havenot heard of before – If google is so into open source, why not opn source its search framework? good point.

  • http://www.venturedeal.com Don Jones

    The bigger the announcement, the less important the content is…

  • Dave

    I don’t see what all the excitement is about. It looks like yet another open platform for something that will fade into obscurity.

    The carriers control the network and they alone will control the bandwidth and applications on their wireless networks.

    Google, Apple, Microsoft and Cisco should put together a WiMax network that would cover square inch of the USA. Then these open source things woudl have a home along with hardware support.

  • Jind

    “Open Platform”?? Why not openmoko.com?

  • Ray Cromwell

    If Microsoft released an open source Linux derivative operating system, I would have no problem supporting them.

  • Moe Glitz

    Google OpenSocial – Yawn! Google Android – Even bigger Yawn!
    No matter what other new Products or Services Google tries to introduce, they will never be as revolutionary as their original Search/Advertising Model.

    Although both their OpenSocial and Android plans seem to be a way of trying to introduce their successful Search/Advertising Model onto both of these Platforms, I truly believe that neither of them will offer nothing new. In my view the Mobile Internet will not be as popular as Mobile Operators are trying to state, no matter what hype Google tries to throw into this domain.

    In the last week Google has made brash and bold statements with both OpenSocial and Android, but only for the benefit of raising their share price even higher – and like fools the market has reacted to the Google spin and raised their shares to a level that does not reflect their true value.

    Google’s current share price is based upon the promises of tomorrow, especially the launch of their two new Services, that are trying hard to introduce a Search/Ad Platform onto the Social and Mobile Web.
    But how many people out there remember Googlebase. Wasn’t it suppose to bring about the demise of eBay.
    Then there’s Froogle, Google Money, etc, etc.

    Google is a one trick pony. They can only do Search/Ads and nothing else.
    This one and only business model will eventually peak and subside.

  • devvxn

    Does anyone else see that Google is trying to abstract the OS (Google Apps) and with the FCC auction it is trying to abstract the communications pipeline as well? Kudos to them if they can take on Microsoft and AT&T.

    With an agnostic platform and push/pull capabilities, they could own location based search/advertising, AND real time location based social networking. This would in effect connect Android and OpenSocial.

    Those that think Google isn’t doing anything new, they’re right. OpenMoko has been slowly adding more devices, but the device base is still weak. From what I’ve seen, Voyager (Recursion Software/ Objectspace) supports the widest range of devices I have seen, but these guys aren’t open source and won’t get there anytime soon. They do however, have a P2P/P2Group push/pull messaging console and are Java and .NET agnostic, which would accomplish the goal nicely.

    All in all, this announcement is a positive move. Plus according to comments in USA today, Andy Rubin doesn’t envision ads ads ads popping up everywhere upon your phone. But I personally would enjoy being able to received pushed content as long as I can turn it on and off as needed.

  • http://lapnol.blogspot.com yasam

    i am a great fan of GOOGLE

    http://lapnol.blogspot.com (complete tech stuff)

  • Bull ARD

    That’s what she said!

  • Ben

    The bottleneck has never been the hardware/software it’s been the telecoms. If all the features built into phones (Java J2ME, GPS) were enabled and used to their full potential we’d have a completely different world. But the telecoms purposefully disable the hardware/software so that they can require upgrade costs and/or subscriptions to enable that technology.

    Google has great intentions, but unfortunately this platform puts too much power in the hands of the developers and away from the telecoms, which is why no large telecoms will sign on.

    IMHO opinion what we’ll be seeing is cooler mobile applications, with even higher data premiums therefore hindering the adoption of any useful aspect of the platform.

  • http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com Steve Ballmer
  • http://speak.to/?q=node/51 speak.to

    Google announces the Android mobile platform…

    Today Google announced Android, their wildly anticipated mobile platform. Android is a free, open, and complete software platform for mobile devices like phones….

  • Jerry

    Mike, I was at Iluna tonight and some journalists were talking about getting their Google phones. Did you get one? Or is it a secret?

  • http://code4gold.com/blog/2007/11/06/google-gphone-on-the-backburner-enter-the-open-handset-alliance/ Code4Gold

    Google Gphone on the Backburner, Enter The Open Handset Alliance…

    There’s been a lot of speculation on the Yahoo message boards about Google Inc (GOOG) announcing their entry into the wireless handset market and the possibility of a Gphone ending up in consumers hands in the near future. While this specualtio…

  • http://dt.yogtec.com/ Ankit Duseja
  • exapted

    @94

    The bottleneck is the platform, not specifically the hardware or the software. The platform includes the standards, services, runtime environments, APIs, interface, etc.

    My reason:
    Try getting “Dodgeball” (location based social networking via SMS) to actually work using something other than SMS.

  • http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2007/11/06/will-the-gphone-drive-local-business/ thinks

    Will the GPhone drive local business?…

    So the Gphone turns out to be – not a phone – but a platform for phones. Good turnout, too, from some fairly major players.
    The notable absences: Verizon and AT&T, which The New York Times claims together account for 52% of the U.S. mobile market….

  • http://www.VeniVidiWiki.eu Sylvie

    an other bottleneck is the screen size
    I tried to think how to browse Google Maps on my pocket-size-cell-phone…
    here is a proposal : http://venividiwiki.blogspot.com/2007/11/how-to-display-large-pages-on-small.html
    what do you think of it ?

  • exapted

    @99
    Nice idea. There might be problems if the user is accelerating in any direction.

    My random two cents (allow me to procrastinate):

    If you are zoomed out, you can move the map a little at a time with buttons or your finger/stylus, somewhat (but not completely of course) negating the utility of such a gyroscopic interface; if you are zoomed in, using the motion sensor might move you too far along the map if you are not careful. (If you are zoomed in, you probably want to see details. Moving the map too quickly while zoomed in might cause you to get lost.)

    I think the iPhone solved the map scrolling problem pretty well, but certainly gyroscopes are used for visualization (for exploring brain scans, for instance) so you might be on to something.

  • http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/google-wants-internet-dial-tone-everywhere/ SmoothSpan Blog

    Google Wants Internet Dial Tone Everywhere…

    I’ve read through the blizzard of blog posts on Google’s phone initiative, and I come away from it with one overriding impression:
    Google Wants Internet Dial Tone Everywhere
    This is all about creating more web activity on phones.  If Googl…

  • http://oyunfound.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/breaking-google-announces-android-and-open-handset-alliance/ oyunfound

    Breaking: Google Announces Android and Open Handset Alliance…

    [...] Google just officially announced the Open Handset Alliance to create an open platform (to be called Android) for a Linux phone that can run mobile Google apps and others. The 34 partners i [...]…

  • http://internetreklama.com/computers/phone/android/ Android

    [...] за операционна система за мобилни телефони, но и създаде далеч по амбициозен прект – Отворен алианс на [...]

  • http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2007/11/07/android-early-analysis/ Abhishek Tiwari

    Android: Early Analysis…

    If you’re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
    As expected, on Monday (Nov 5th) Google announced their open mobile OS to the world, along with a very powerful new alliance with over 30 companies in the mobile space…

  • http://androidguys.blogspot.com Android Guys

    CALLING ALL DEVELOPERS! If you have a project in the works and want to showcase it, contact us an we’ll devote whatever we can to getting your software promoted. We’ll even host if for you. AndroidGuys is the best site for compiling Android related news. Features reviews, previews, facts, and rumors. All of these shaken up and mixed in with opinion.

  • http://www.androidmobilephone.com Android Mobile

    After all the excitement about the Android platform, a community for Android developers has been set up called http://www.androiddeveloper.com which is a central hub where developers can discuss and learn about the Android platform.

    A different site called http://www.androidmobileforum.com has also been set up for everyone to discuss anything about Android mobile.

    It looks like theres going to be a lot of talk before we even get the first Android mobile devices in late 2008.

  • http://www.kennyp.cn/2007/11/13/featured-posts-of-the-week-year-07-week-45/ KennyP’s Technology Blog

    一周精彩文章(07年-45周)…

    《本周精彩文章》从这个星期开始更名为更恰当的《一周精彩文章》,以下是过去一周( 2007 年 45 周)的精彩文章。
    本站精彩文章

    Google Adsense 达 50 美元后的 PIN
    KennyP.cn 的网络赚钱旅程之 200…

  • bob

    i see a lot of great potential from android. has anyone heard about this yet?

    http://www.androidforum.org/developers/13-calling-all-developers-10m-android-challenge.html

    ready, set ,go ;)

  • http://www.fat-man-collective.com/blog Adam Martin {Fat Man}

    Hmm, ‘Android’, ‘Open Handset Alliance’ call me Yodic, but this is all starting to sound a bit Star Wars to me, perchance the first handset will be called the X-Wing or At-At and there’s sure to be room for some people of restricted height talking too loudly on public transport into Googlic transponders whilst dressed in Lucian bear suits?

    Google are late to the game and it’s all a little desperate, let’s listen in 12 months when all this hype about hype (clearly borrowed from the iPhone marketeers, which is and of itself akin to a surrogate child) shows some real results.

    All talk and no touchphone maketh for hottish air.

  • http://fat-man-collective.com/blog/mobile/iphone-applications-to-be-sold-on-itunes/126 Fat Man – interactive design & development collective | iPhone – Applications to be sold on iTunes

    [...] all too busy getting very rich to care very much and Google is really very far behind and that Android announcement is like announcing in 12 months you may have grown a beard and you might want to shave [...]

  • http://anddev.org plusminus

    anddev.org is a open board where you can share Tutorials and Experience about the Android SDK (powered by the Google Open Handset Alliance) in a helpful and friendly Community. Tutorials reach from ones for very beginners to advanced ones.
    Be a part of it =)
    http://www.anddev.org

    Regards,
    plusminus

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/verizon-wireless-opens-up-it-network-whos-next/ Verizon Wireless Opens Up It Network. Who’s Next?

    [...] what is either a response to Google’s Android mobile operating system or an attempt to butter up the FCC for the upcoming 700 Mhz spectrum [...]

  • http://www.allaboutandroid.net mohit

    android forum android programming android tutorials
    http://www.allaboutandroid.net

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/verizon-says-it-will-support-googles-android/ Verizon Says It Will Support Google’s Android

    [...] not yet officially part of the Open Handset Alliance that is supporting Google’s open-source Android mobile operating system, Verizon Wireless CEO Lowell McAdam tells BusinessWeek, “We’re [...]

  • http://www.feedup.net/2007/12/06/verizon-says-it-will-support-google%e2%80%99s-android/ Verizon Says It Will Support Google’s Android teasered @ Feed UP !!

    [...] not yet officially part of the Open Handset Alliance that is supporting Google’s open-source Android mobile operating system, Verizon Wireless CEO Lowell McAdam tells BusinessWeek, “We’re [...]

  • http://feliciano1979.wordpress.com/2007/12/28/in-arrivo-il-gphone-il-telefonino-cellulare-di-google/ In arrivo il gPhone, il telefonino cellulare di Google « Feliciano1979 Agropoli

    [...] cellulare di Google che monterà il sistema operativo Android, prodotto da un’alleanza di 34 aziende produttrici di telefonini e operatori telefonici tra cui T-Mobile, Sprint Nextel, NTT Docomo, China [...]

  • http://idannyb.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/google-ceo-now-recuses-himself-from-mobile-phone-discussions-at-apple-board-meetings/ Google CEO now recuses himself from mobile-phone discussions at Apple board meetings. « iPhone in China 来到中国

    [...] has created Android, a new open-source, mobile operating system. Consequently, Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who also sits on Apple’s board of directors, now recuses [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/03/google-gears-goes-mobile/ Google Gears Goes Mobile

    [...] Google is bringing offline apps to mobile phones – and this has nothing to do with Android. [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/15/loopt-may-be-friending-more-mobile-networks/ Loopt May Be “Friending” More Mobile Networks

    [...] Mobile social network Loopt’s deal with Sprint, however, has given it the distinction of being one of two with automated location updates and deep integration with a U.S. carrier (Helio is the other). This opens up a lot of possibilities for location based services. The deal gave them a lot of advantages over other networks. They could easily relay location information — what we call the “Holy Grail” — and came pre-installed on phones. But the deal also meant only your Sprint friends could join and you need a GPS enabled phone. However, Loopt’s exclusivity agreement is up and they’re looking to expand the service across more carriers and services (even Android). [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/24/google-throws-another-wireless-ball-in-the-air-wifi-20/ Google Throws Another Wireless Ball in The Air: WiFi 2.0

    [...] also wants as many companies as possible to build Android phones and wireless devices for as many of those networks as possible so that even more people can [...]

  • http://nzfusion.com/james/2007/11/05/google-addicted-to-making-my-life-more-interesting/ Google addicted to making my life more interesting? | James @ nzfusion.com

    [...] Well perhaps not my life specifically… but Open Social this week… Android and the open handset alliance next week (November 12 will be the release of the SDK). [...]

  • http://www.tech-moz.com/google-gears-goes-mobile/ Tech Moz – Tech News » Blog Archive » Google Gears Goes Mobile

    [...] Mobile 4th March Google is bringing offline apps to mobile phones – and this has nothing to do with Android. Google Gears, which allows developers to create apps that run on Firefox and Internet Explorer [...]

  • http://kdi-media.com/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/ Why Google Invested in Clearwire – KDI Media – Savannah, GA

    [...] it invested—to ensure that the resulting broadband network is as open as possible and accepts Android handsets and devices. It also sounds like Google may also be the default search engine on devices [...]

  • http://www.ubraniaroxy.pl/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/ www.ubraniaroxy.pl » Blog Archive » Why Google Invested in Clearwire

    [...] why it invested—to ensure that the resulting broadband network is as open as possible and accepts Android handsets and devices. It also sounds like Google may also be the default search engine on devices [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/10/i-am-a-member-of-the-cult-of-iphone/ I Am A Member Of The Cult Of iPhone

    [...] We had a grand debate today on the Gillmor Gang about the iPhone and its place in history. The most interesting part of the debate for me was the closed v. open debate. That’s because ultimately I believe the iPhone isn’t competing with Windows Mobile or RIM as much as Google’s upcoming Android. [...]

  • http://frontporchforum.com/blog/2008/06/10/how-is-front-porch-forum-like-an-iphone/ How is Front Porch Forum like an iPhone? at Ghost of Midnight

    [...] because ultimately I believe the iPhone isn’t competing with Windows Mobile or RIM as much as Google’s upcoming Android, a very open mobile [...]

  • http://www.keenerliving.com/2007/11/08/can-googles-android-improve-productivity/ Can Google’s Android Improve Productivity?

    [...] Google’s Open Handset Alliance will lead to the development of an open platform for cell phones. This platform, dubbed Android, is being bought into by by Sprint, T-Mobile, a number of device manufacturers, and others. It will be based on Linux and Java. A good backgrounder on this is TechCrunch’s recent article. [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/23/googles-android-hits-snags-with-mobile-carriers/ Google’s Android Hits Snags With Mobile Carriers

    [...] finding that launching an entirely new cell phone platform is taking longer than expected. When it first announced its Android mobile operating system, Google said the first Android phones would be available during [...]

  • http://dailymarauder.com/2008/06/23/wireless-226/ WIRELESS « Daily Marauder

    [...] finding that launching an entirely new cell phone platform is taking longer than expected. When it first announced its Android mobile operating system, Google said the first Android phones would be available during [...]

  • http://www.techtear.com/2007/11/05/android-google-lo-hizo-otra-vez/ TechTear – Blog Magazine de Tecnologia » Android: Google lo hizo otra vez

    [...] TechCrunch Mauro Borione Lunes 05 de Noviembre de 2007 a las 19:15 Noticia de Destacado Compártelo [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/13/gphone-may-really-happen-and-ammunition-group-may-be-designing-it/ Gphone May Really Happen, And Ammunition Group May Be Designing It

    [...] attention around most of the rumors. But Google eventually squashed those rumors by announcing the Open Handset Alliance and Android. Instead of building an iPhone like device and service combined, they’d be [...]

  • http://truckkit.info/gphone-may-really-happen-and-ammunition-group-may-be-designing-it/ Gphone May Really Happen, And Ammunition Group May Be Designing It | Truckers’ Kit

    [...] attention around most of the rumors. But Google eventually squashed those rumors by announcing the Open Handset Alliance and Android. Instead of building an iPhone like device and service combined, they’d be [...]

  • http://www.gphoneblog.info/2008/07/15/gphone-may-really-happen-and-ammunition-group-may-be-designing-it/ Gphone May Really Happen, And Ammunition Group May Be Designing It | Gphone News And Information Center | Gphone Home

    [...] attention around most of the rumors. But Google eventually squashed those rumors by announcing the Open Handset Alliance and Android. Instead of building an iPhone like device and service combined, they’d be backing an [...]

  • http://komposto.org/?p=5 [komposto.org] » Blog Archive » Google Phone Coming!!!

    [...] attention around most of the rumors. But Google eventually squashed those rumors by announcing the Open Handset Alliance and Android. Instead of building an iPhone like device and service combined, they’d be backing an [...]

  • http://next2friendsblog.com/2008/09/11/the-android-is-coming/ next2friendsblog.com » Blog Archive » The Android is Coming

    [...] In November 2007 the blogoshere was aflame with interest in Google’s plans. Mashable, Techcrunch and scores of others confirmed that Google would be launching its own Mobile Phone OS that would be [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/28/motorola-building-up-350-person-android-team-nokia-also-sniffing-around/ Motorola Building Up 350-Person Android Team. Nokia Also Sniffing Around.

    [...] most significant of these may come from Motorola. One of the original partners in the Open Handset Alliance behind the open-source mobile OS, Motorola already has 50 people on its Android team and is growing [...]

  • nogoogle

    Google is pure evil.

    Google will use android to record everything you do 24/7: where you are, what direction your facing even, google will store *forever* every single character of every email, IM, web post, phone call, number of said call, it will use speech to text to store a searchable version of every call you make, in fact every single event is stored in a SQLite database, available for google to query at any time.

    This is the most evil piece of software ever created and for google to have the balls to call it ‘open’ is very telling of the deception they use to fool people into using google products.

    Android is not an os, it a closed java like sandbox, merely a program that runs on top of a tightly tied up and tucked away linux stored on a encrypted filesystem. There is nothing open or safe about android at all, it is SPYWARE plain and simple.

    No one will be safe from google even if your not a google user. Don’t stand beside someone with an android device, it will use face recognition software to ID and geotag you without you or the device owners permission.

    If you see an android device destroy it and take the owner in for de-programming to remove the google brain washing ASAP.

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/21/android-code-is-finally-released-into-the-open-source-wild/ Android Code Is Finally Released Into The Open-Source Wild

    [...] Google announced the Android operating system and established the Open Handset Alliance to support it, the plan was [...]

  • http://intertubes.info/news/?p=13 Android is set free! | intertubes

    [...] Google announced the Android operating system and established the Open Handset Alliance to support it, the plan was [...]

  • http://fr.techcrunch.com/2008/10/22/google-publie-le-code-opensource-dandroid/ TechCrunch en français » Google publie le code OpenSource d’Android

    [...] Google a annonce le lancement d’un système d’exploitation Android et créa la Open Handset Alliance, [...]

  • Mo

    Actually, Google doesn’t put $*** on their stuff like MS.

    General apps come on any phone anyways.

    Gmail is way better than other email services. It has what you “actually” need, it’s reliable, it’s fast, you don’t really “see” any ads while you are logged into your account.

    Chrome, has a few bugs but it’s much faster than even Firefox, give it a little while and it will become the best browser out there.

    Google Calender, the best free online calender out there.

    Google Desktop and all the gadgets it comes with are all pretty useful and free (no ads anywhere).

    Google Documents, Google Maps, Google News, Google Scholar, Google Finance. The list goes on and on.

    This is going to work out very well. I can’t wait.

    Whenever they do something, they do it better than everyone else.

    Google will shake up the mobile world. I am tired of seeing no competition.

    I am certain the consumers (you and I) won’t be paying for this. Google will make the money somewhere else (The same way they are going it now)

  • Mo

    GOOGLE IS GOING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD.

    MUHAHAHAHAHA

    I guess MS, Apple and RIM are going to have to do something about that.

    I like that. Competition.

    I can’t wait till Google has its own Computer OS.

  • Mo

    Actually, Google doesn’t put $*** on their stuff like MS.

    General apps come on any phone anyways.

    Gmail is way better than other email services. It has what you “actually” need, it’s reliable, it’s fast, you don’t really “see” any ads while you are logged into your account.

    Chrome, has a few bugs but it’s much faster than even Firefox, give it a little while and it will become the best browser out there.

    Google Calender, the best free online calender out there.

    Google Desktop and all the gadgets it comes with are all pretty useful and free (no ads anywhere).

    Google Documents, Google Maps, Google News, Google Scholar, Google Finance. The list goes on and on.

    This is going to work out very well. I can’t wait.

    Whenever they do something, they do it better than everyone else.

    Google will shake up the mobile world. I am tired of seeing no competition.

    I am certain the consumers (you and I) won’t be paying for this. Google will make the money somewhere else (The same way they are going it now)

  • http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/09/android-rising-sony-ericsson-vodafone-and-14-others-join-open-handset-alliance/ Android Rising: Sony Ericsson, Vodafone, and 14 Others Join Open Handset Alliance

    [...] the Open Handset Alliance was announced a year ago, it launched with 34 partners, including T-Mobile, HTC (maker of the G1 Android), Qualcomm, Intel, [...]

  • http://www.3giphones.co.za/?p=276 iPhone 3G » Blog Archive » Android Rising: Sony Ericsson, Vodafone, and 12 Others Join Open Handset Alliance

    [...] Omron Software, Softbank Mobile, Teleca AB, and Toshiba. When the Open Handset Alliance was announced a year ago, it launched with 34 partners, including T-Mobile, HTC (maker of the G1 Android), Qualcomm, Intel, [...]

  • http://www.drqmedia.cn/wordpress/?p=200 关于 Android 振奋人心的消息 | 小飞的足迹

    [...] the Open Handset Alliance was announced a year ago, it launched with 34 partners, including T-Mobile, HTC (maker of the G1 Android), Qualcomm, Intel, [...]

  • http://www.topitechnews.com/android-rising-sony-ericsson-vodafone-and-12-others-join-open-handset-alliance/ Video | Technology News

    [...] the Open Handset Alliance was announced a year ago, it launched with 34 partners, including T-Mobile, HTC (maker of the G1 Android), Qualcomm, Intel, [...]

  • http://blog.handspiel.hostingkunde.de/2007/11/05/google-mobile-plane-die-grose-neue-richtung/ Google Mobile Pläne: Auf zu neuen Ufern | HANDSPIEL.blog
  • http://dandriffill.com/2009/08/19/apple-vs-google/ Apple vs Google? « The Blog of Dan Driffill

    [...] Google announced their Android mobile software (direct threat to the iPhone), then GOOG announced a new web browser (direct threat to Safari), [...]

  • http://mx123mobile.wordpress.com/ bob foss

    The i phone has nothing on Droid. google maps navigator is fantastic

  • http://www.androidapps.org/google-announces-android-but-not-gphone Google Announces Android But Not GPhone | Androidapps.org – Your source for technology news

    [...] TechCrunch Posted in News Wrap Up Of Today’s Android And OHA News » You can leave a [...]

  • http://strategyofadvertising.blogspot.com/ advertising strategy

    yes i hope so.. what a nice fitur when its works by push only :)

  • http://terrybiddle.com.s92484.gridserver.com/?p=1 WTF, yo? | Terry Biddle dot com

    [...] eventually got one a’ them there EYE-Phone thingees. This happened. That happened. And this got real [...]

  • http://www.wannabemogul.com/musings-and-tips/why-googles-android-will-revolutionize-cell-phone-usage-smartphones/ Why Google’s Android will revolutionize cell phone usage, smartphones | wannabeMogul

    [...] me, the current gen of smartphones won’t satisfy…then along comes Android. Check out a quick features [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Got a tip? Building a startup? Tell us