Facebook Takes the Microsoft Money And Runs.
Erick Schonfeld
Oct 24, 2007

facebooklogo2.gifWhile the storyline would have been more dramatic if Facebook had spurned its current ad-serving partner Microsoft for Google, it is confirmed that Microsoft has won the deal. It will invest $240 million in Facebook and expand its existing relationship to international markets, according to the WSJ. (The previous advertising relationship was only for the U.S., now Microsoft is Facebook’s exclusive advertising partner both in the U.S. and abroad until 2011) The $240 million is a minority stake that values the company at $15 billion. So that comes out to less than a 2 percent stake for Microsoft, which is much smaller than 5 percent stake that was bandied about earlier. (Update: During the conference call, Facebook left open the possibility that more investors may be included in this round of financing, though it declined to disclose who those investors may or may not be. But that does open the door to Facebook raising more than the $240 million).

While Google would have been a closer fit in terms of it overall philosophy (more open than not), it may have just been too expensive to buy out Microsoft from its current deal to supply ads for Facebook in the U.S. Given its deep ties with Microsoft, sticking with them was always the path of least resistance. And one could argue that Google has never felt comfortable targeting ads based on private user profile data, which seems to be the great promise of Facebook, ad-wise. Microsoft doesn’t share those qualms.

We are liveblogging the conference call here.

Advertisement
  • Related Topics
Advertisement
  • franck

    I posted it in your board 5mn ago..tried to beat you out..
    anyways..thats ridiculous..$250M ?????? I recalled people mentionned 400M and until yesterday 1.5B !!!
    I wonder why kind of deal and valuation they got after the signatures..

  • Jon Kimball

    Wow.

  • Morgan

    “While Google would have been a closer fit in terms of it overall philosophy (more open than not).”

    So is Facebook more open than not? I’m not convinced Google is either, but I don’t think this point really says anything.

    “And one could argue that Google has never felt comfortable targeting ads based on private user profile data.”

    This makes no sense to me either, being a Gmail user. It seems to me they are a pioneer in targeting ads based on private user data.

  • sky

    facebook worth $15B??? It’s valuation gone crazy again, I think.

  • http://www.wikipop.net magnusdopus

    Between Aquantive, Xbox 360 and Facebook, Microsoft is on an impressive run. I predict Zuckerberg will be CEO of Microsoft within 10 years. They found their next bill gates.

    BTW : Still waiting to hear if Silverlight adoption is part of the deal.

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/facebook-takes-the-microsoft-money-and-runs/ Windows Vista News

    Facebook Takes the Microsoft Money And Runs….

    New post at http://www.techcrunch.com...

  • http://blogkatt.blogspot.com sanmat

    This brings some light to facebook value. Which choice was good, too early to predict. This definetly will give MS a boost .

    http://blogkatt.blogspot.com/2007/10/is-it-yahoo-google-myspace-or-facebook.html

  • Don

    Um doesn’t Google target ads based on my e-mail content? G-mail.

  • http://FacebookEconomy.com Mark Mayhew

    what a difference a year makes (Zuckerberg considered offers last year for $1B for ALL of Facebook).
    http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=5457960557&topic=3283&ref=mf

  • http://www.sellmyhomeinmetrowestma.com Metrowest MA Real Estate

    Amazing how the tides have turned! Who would have thought that Facebook would garner so much value.

  • http://www.leeclemmer.com lee

    Is there any research on what kind of ROI companies are seeing when advertising on social networks? Does the amount of money ultimately spent by consumers because of advertising really justify the kind of money being spent? It’s hard for me to imagine that it is so, so I’m wondering what kind of hard numbers are out there.

    I agree with Morgan on the point of using private information to serve up ads; in fact, google seem to have less qualms, not more.

  • http://www.michigan.org Michigan

    Makes Rupert’s sub $600M purchase of Myspace look all the wiser, doesn’t it?

  • http://fakearrington.blogspot.com/ FakeMA

    This is insane…

  • http://www.ziizoo.com Robert Einspruch

    kind of a bummer – microsoft has the opposite of a halo (no pun intended) effect. It’s almost as cool as Rupert Murdoch sitting on your board. At least they did not sell the whole shop.

  • Alaska Miller

    Why would Google and Facebook be a good fit? They’re direct competitors considering Facebook’s real goal is to become an independent advertising company. Also, pretty sure Google’s been reading my email, collecting my search histories, and caching my cookies from anyone with urchin installed since day 1.

  • Erick Schonfeld

    The Gmail ads are an experiment, and even those are matched to keywords in your mail, not a user profile with your age, gender, relationship status, and stated interests.

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/liveblogging-the-facebook-press-conference/ Liveblogging The Facebook Press Conference

    [...] « Previous post [...]

  • techcrunchreader

    Google had the bank account to go thru with the deal. Too bad, they could have kicked MSFT out of the picture.

    Anyway, 240 M$ for 1.6% of the company, good job Zuckerberg.

  • stephen

    Unless facebook has persuaded other investors in at the same $15bn valuation, it’s not a real price tag at all.

    I bet Microsoft sees the tiny sum of $240m as the price of securing what it hopes will be a lucrative ad deal, not an investment in a valuable piece of equity.

    If that’s the case, then Facebook has in effect set its own valuation, at a price which I’m sure does wonders for the accounts of its VC backers.

  • jane

    Erick, you make yet another incredibly biased, uninformed statement about Google vs. Microsoft: “And one could argue that Google has never felt comfortable targeting ads based on private user profile data…Microsoft doesn’t share those qualms.”

    No company has made more progress in the targetted ad space than Google. They *defined* it with their unabashedly creepy GMail policies. And Microsoft probably trails by years behind Google in making an ad platform robust enough to support the kinds of smart targetting that Google does.

    The comments on your infamous SkyDrive post of last week were, I thought, overly vitriolic, but now I’m starting to realize that all those commenters may have had a point.

  • franck

    “Anyway, 240 M$ for 1.6% of the company, good job Zuckerberg.”

    You bet it is….!! loool

  • http://www.molicki.com/microsoft-wygral-walke-o-facebooka/ » Microsoft wygrał walkę o Facebooka Internet-Marek Molicki-In Online We Trust:

    [...] Więcej informacji na stronach The Wall Street Journal oraz TechCrunch. [...]

  • sky

    It can only happen in USA, not in Europe.

  • gabbu

    “Google has never felt comfortable targeting ads based on private user profile data”

    What the crap these guys are writing huh??

  • tusser

    as long as user feels comfartable it doesnt mater.in the consumer market users can tolerate ads.

  • Sam

    I don’t think Mark Zuckerburg can run with the money….what the hell does that mean? It’s not like he hit the lottery, Facebook had been generating 50M in 2006 and is expected to hit 200M in 2007.

    This is just an injection of cash to help expand the business faster than they can now. Because guess what, the server cost and employee salary probably costs them 180M.

  • Alaska Miller

    Even without profiling, Google has finagled its way into being the dominant advertising provider for the Internet. If anything, “matching” keywords in my email is creepier than figuring out I’m 21 and selling me Budweisers.

    Google Analytics + Google Search History + Gmail + Gcal + Google Toolbar + Google Desktop Search > Facebook

  • muddu

    Michael,
    TIME TO FIRE ERICK.

  • John

    15 BILLION????
    That is insane. Another over the top valuation. Skype anyone?

  • http://microsoft.blognewschannel.com/archives/2007/10/24/microsoft-wins-gets-facebook-investment/ » Microsoft Wins, Gets Facebook Investment » InsideMicrosoft-part of the Blog News Channel

    [...] TechCrunch thinks that the cost to buyout Microsoft’s U.S. ad deal, which runs through 2011, would have been too high, making the Microsoft money more profitable than Google’s money. However, we know that Microsoft’s deal with Facebook would earn the company less than $10 million if Facebook was sold to someone else. On the other hand, that payout was for the original deal, which ran through 2009, while a newer deal signed earlier this year runs through 2011, and may have pushed that number higher. [...]

  • http://actionstalk.com/?p=36 ActionsTalk.com » Blog Archive » Zuckerberg finally starts to see the cherries line up $$$.

    [...] Today it was announced that Microsoft is to invest $240 million in Facebook and expand their existing relationship into international markets.  The $240 million is less than a 2% stake in Facebook.  I just wonder what Zuckerberg and pals are going to do with the other 98%?  Read more at TechCrunch. [...]

  • franck

    Mark Zuckerberg’s stake in the company is worth $3Billion as of today.

  • amador

    time to sell everything. thanks facebook for the sell signal.

  • http://www.productfoolery.com productfool

    I am going to watch this closely before I write up a parody of such a deal on productfoolery.com. But you know, a parody of this deal might not look so different…

  • Erick Schonfeld

    @22, “maybe you shoul bring yourself into te 21st century before making suck stupid comments.”

    Maybe I’ll do that when you learn how to spell.

  • http://www.exchange3d.com Exchange3D

    Looks like MS is so desperate get a piece of the action in social networks crowd that it is throwing money out without counting

  • Chris

    This is just stupid. Come on $15B. Who in their right mind would want to work there starting now. You want to make minimum 2-5x return on options right? 10x surely isn’t out of the question. So you think FB is going to increase 5-10x – no freaking way. Just look at the market cap of companies that would put them on par with at a 75B-150B valuation. There’s going to have to be some very creative option discounting (of the type that will probably get them in trouble later) if they’re going to attract future talent. Of course any employee there for some amount of time made bank!

  • http://www.shamskm.com Shams

    Microsoft has really won.
    $15 Billion, are you sleeping? Get a good calculator.

  • http://www.ackermangreenberg.com Dan Ackerman Greenberg

    Damn, I wish I worked at Facebook.

    Dan
    http://www.ackermangreenberg.com

  • Shawn

    Erick – do you have any data to back up that claim that Google is uncomfortable about serving up ads based on personal information and Microsoft isn’t? That’s a pretty strong statement given that Google is the only one doing anything close to that with Gmail ads (and Microsoft has no equivalent today).

    Why the anti-Microsoft spin?

  • anon

    Regarding comment #35, does anyone know what strike price new employees will be getting now? Will it be at the $15B valuation?

  • http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/24/facebook-why-microsofts-buy-makes-sense/ Facebook: Why Microsoft’s buy makes sense – - mathewingram.com/work

    [...] – Mike Arrington has been live-blogging the conference call. – Silicon Alley Insider did too, by way of writer Peter Kafka. – Some analysis from Ashkan Karbasfrooshan at WatchMojo. – John Paczkowski at All Things D leads with the Ballmer quote about Facebook being, well… no big deal. – Rafat at PaidContent says there’s still room for others to invest. – Erick Schonfeld says Facebook took the path of least resistance. [...]

  • http://www.polkarobot.de/index.php/2007/10/25/facebook-entscheidet-sich-fr-microsoft/ PolkaRobot » Facebook entscheidet sich für Microsoft

    [...] Techcrunch, (live conference coverage) [...]

  • Tom

    Zuckerberg for President!! And I will be the Secretary of Defense

  • http://www.skireport.com Jon

    chill on the $15B valuation… $240 million is not much for msft and its a play for a tighter relationship with FB. Imagine windows tied into FB? It could happen.

    And remember the comments on the supposed $1b valuation from yahoo? People thought that was nuts. Will we look back in 5 years and laugh at thinking a $15b valuation was crazy? Who knows.

    is there a bubble ? yes. is FB one of the exceptions to the bubble… yes

  • Erick Schonfeld

    @38, why do you take it as anti-MSFT? Maybe they are smart to target ads that way. I am not making a judgment. The fact is that MSFT does more behavioral targeting than Google, and thus is more comfortable with it. The Gmail ads, while admittedly creepy, are based on the same keyword-based algorithms as Google’s other search ads.

    Can you point to an example where Google has targeted ads based on user profile data instead of direct intent as manifested in keywords?

    It’s just a difference in approach. And arguably, MSFT’s approach is more in line with where Facebook wants to go.

  • http://www.web2newswire.com Kikimodo

    I smell another bubble.

    Remember Broadcast.com? In April 1999, Broadcast.com was acquired by Yahoo! for $5.7 billion in stock and became ……….figure it out yourself…

    Where is it today? Is this another pipe drain?

  • Seth

    Facebook does not have a $15 billion value now, few people are saying that. However, with online ad revenue Facebook could easily be worth that and more. The majority of their new subscribers are expected to be from overseas and Facebook is expanding into foreign languages. Both Microsoft and Google (as well as Yahoo!) are drooling over those people for ad revenue. As far as this deal goes for Microsoft, good for them. Excellent call on the part of their Board of Directors http://www.newsvisual.com/newsvisual/2007/10/microsoft-diver.html This is the kind of forward and aggresive action they need to take if they want to seriously challenge Google.

  • http://blog.metaroll.de/2007/10/25/ms-facebook/ MS Facebook at viralmythen

    [...] Nun ist geschehen, was bereits seit geraumer Zeit in der Blogosphäre vermutet wurde. Ein Teil von Facebook gehört jetzt dem Microsoft-Konzern. Für 240 Millionen USD hat das Softwareunternehmen einen 1,6%igen Anteil unseres Lieblingszeitvertreibs aufgekauft. Damit liegt der momentane Gesamtwert von Facebook bei 15 Mrd. USD. Damit lag die NY Post, was den Deal an sich angeht, richtig, mit den Zahlen aber doch etwas daneben. Das Unternehmen dürfte jetzt über ausreichend Reserven verfügen, auch in Europa richtig Fuß zu fassen. [...]

  • jane

    Erick – the reason we take you to task is b/c the language you use naturally incites questions about your motivations. You have yet to provide any reasons whatsoever for stating that Google has discomfort about targetted ads, but then you say that Microsoft “has no qualms” about it. You choose to use pejorative rhetoric in making a grandiose, controversial statement backed by no clear evidence, & it appears that you try to excuse it all by prefacing it with the maddeningly non-committal “One could argue.” In addition to being poor editorial writing, it just seems downright dishonest.

  • TheNextBubble

    @43 yes you are right. The same will happen to facebook and myspace when they want to use profiles of their users for advertising targeting. Think many of them will not accept that and then delete their entrys or reduce them to the minimum. You cannot make money with communites so that an sn is 15B worth because af the user number or theit growth. That doesnt say anything about the real valuation and potential in advertisements for this target groupt. But we will see. I think that doesnt work.

  • Yoni

    Start > Run > CALC.EXE
    If techcrunch earns 240k$/month (as published), we can estimate that facbook makes 10x times more at least. =~ 2.5M$/mo –> 30M$/year [at least!]
    no economic module can predict how this income made facebook value 15B. what it looks to me is that MS vs GOOG had an “honor fight” between them on face book, and that zuckerberg or whatever his name is, is the winner.

    to sum things up, this whole social/blogging/web2 seems like a big bubble gum ready to explode any minute now. names of bubble from the first round have already been mentioned in the talkbacks, but also worth to mention ebay’s acquire of skype which now in prespective of 1.5 years later seems like a giant flop.

    Yoni,
    Israel

  • Jim

    “And one could argue that Google has never felt comfortable targeting ads based on private user profile data…”

    Ha!

  • Chris

    folks – can we drop the MS vs Google ad targeting thing. That’s so not what this story’s about.

    @41 “chill on the valuation”. I love it. That’s like saying, “dude, don’t worry about the math, what about the love, the feeling in it all…” Definitely $240M is nothing for MS to pay – the point is at what cost. Unfortunately for MS – it’s a panic buy situation. They gotta get in the game and were on the wrong side of the standard rules of negotiation. I don’t disagree that they had to do it – but shame on their management for it having to come to this point.

    @44 “Facebook doesn’t have a 15B valuation now” If the news is correct they most certainly and *legally* do have a $15B valuation right now. Else it would be like saying well since Google’s share price reflects X years of future growth I would like to make a bid to buy the company at 75% it’s current price/share. Uh – no.

    A fundraising is a very important financial/legal/fiduciary point in time. It sets the state for a lot of things – like stock option pricing, like up rounds, down rounds, IPO pricing, director liability if was way off and causing some sort of harm in the future, etc. To me that’s why $15B is the story here.

  • Cricketmaster

    The Broadcast.com comparison is a useful one, and proves one point, which is that the online space, in it’s entirety, is up for grabs and will remain so with the current form of the web (and that’s a good thing).

    Which makes the $15 billion valuation highly speculative, to say the least.

  • Prashant

    I don’t think that MSFT expects to make money on the $250MM at a $15B valuation. Internally for them it is a $250MM investment to get an exclusive advertisement deal over the next 4 years. The 2% stake is only icing on the cake. Had they announced that they have given $250MM to Facebook for a 4 year exclusive ad deal, no one would have flinched, this is cheaper than the Google/MySpace deal.

    I think it would be naive of us to think that MSFT is looking at doubling its $250MM investment. Locking in a potential ad platform on the other hand is lucrative.

    On that note, I doubt that there will be other investors, because the returns on a $15B valuation is probably none to negative

  • http://www.web2newswire.com Kikimodo

    He who has ear, let me hear …bubble rain is coming and this time it is going to be different …slow and longer. The users are not loyal to any social networking site. Remember Geocities?

    the next you will see maybe iphoneFaces and everyone will jump on the bandwagon. So, it is all about time. Let’s wait and see what we happen to these sites in 5 years to come.

    Also remember the some psychologists talking about the impact of virtual friendship compare to good old day “face-to-face” meeting. Again, I am not sanguine about the whole thing but I don’t think this will last 5-10 years to come.

    If I were the facebook guy, I will take the money just like Cuban did with Broadcast.com and run a sprint or marathon and don’t look back. Only a loser will pay $15B for a website that can evaporate in 5 years. That is a $3B burn rate/year.

    Instead, MSFT should invest in green technology or something meaningful with good RETURN.

    Just my 2 cents

  • Simon

    I totally agree with Prashant’s comment.
    For MSFT, this is nothing more than spending $250 Mil so they can continue advertising. They have a warchest of over 30-40 billion dollars. This is a small drop in the bucket. After losing out to Google on earlier purchases of Doubleclick, this is a small victory with some long term consequences.

    And yes, MSFT probably bidded up to this high to ENSURE no one else will be willing to invest in a company that is valued ($15 Bil) so ridiculously high. It’s like buying a .COM at the peak in the late 90s and just waiting for it to drop.

    I’m glad as a MSFT shareholder than we got it done though. It’s a write-off, but definitely the ROI will present itself in other ways.

  • Izzy

    I think Google played Microsoft. True this isn’t a huge sum for Microsoft but in a way it binds them to Facebook. The stake they bought isnt really enough for them to make a huge difference in Facebooks direction. If Google’s efforts to open its API are successful in gaining ground against Facebook then this is a defacto win against Microsoft. This isnt going to do much to hurt MS’s profits directly but if Google wins against facebook Microsoft’s leaders look even more lost. I really dont see the win for Google in buying a major piece of facebook. They already have the infrastructure and the know-how to compete and facebooks gains vs myspace only show that noones position in the social network game is secure.

  • Dave

    @49 – It’s not so much a question about whether the post is about MSFT versus Google (although really, clearly the fact that some have picked up on Erick’s biases here must account for something). its about giving feedback to the writer that he should do more fact checking first before making sweeping statements.

  • http://blog.vagueware.com/2007/10/24/now-you-can-call-it-a-bubble-facebook-massively-over-valued Innovation in Software

    Now you can call it a bubble – Facebook massively over-valued…

    If you need any proof that we’re in a bubble around Web companies, the valuation of Facebook at $15 billion thanks to the $240 million Microsoft just paid for a 1.6% share, must be it. Even the TechCrunch guys seem a little flummoxed by it – the comme…

  • http://blog.vagueware.com Paul Robinson

    There is no way they can justify a 1.6% buy-in at $240 million just as a means to be able to hand over $150 million more next year in ad revenue. This *is* a valuation of the company, they even talk about it as a valuation.

    The problem is, they’re talking about keeping up 200,000 user sign-ups/day to 200 million users and then hoping the bottom doesn’t fall out of online advertising.

    Sounds like a bubble of a buy to me…

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/facebook-takes-the-microsoft-money-and-runs/#comment-1697385 Windows Vista News

    Comment on Facebook Takes the Microsoft Money And Runs. by Izzy…

    There is an interesting post over at http://www.techcrunch.com...

  • anon

    I’m not sure what to make of the valuation. While it does seem like an authentic valuation, the only investor is one that sees significant value beyond the mere financial return (if there even is one).

  • http://bootstrapeconomist.org/category/facebook/ dweezel

    I saw the writing on the wall five months ago, and am not surprised that the TechCrunch community just doesn’t “get it”. Do you realize what is happening here? The advertising deal is just the beginning, I give it 12-18 months before we start seeing the Microsoft Office suite getting developed for the Facebook platform.

    As time goes by, Facebook will start offering more services and products that keep the consumer within its walls and away from Google’s tentacles. Microsoft is old school with a known brand, the key to business success.

  • boinnk

    For what its worth, Erik Schonfeld interviewed at Microsoft 13 years ago and was not offered a job… do the math

  • http://bootstrapeconomist.org/category/facebook/ dweezel

    For the record, Google is the one screwed. Keep thinking that the advertising through search business will continue forever — it won’t. There is a reason why people are leaving while their stock price is at unsustainable levels…

  • http://www.web2newswire.com Kikimodo

    #58, It seems to me, you are part of the valuation team :)

    No one in his right mind will value FB at $15B. That is billion with a B. I think people need to be taught Internet history lessons especially when you look back at past valuations and buyouts. You will see that tomorrow’s bubble will make 1999-2001 bubble look like a child’s play.

    Time is the only factor here. Already your old school is losing ground big time. We are in different era and Redmond doesn’t just get it.

  • app me

    I grew up visionary I knew this… MS FACEBOOK

  • Alex

    One could argue that techcrunch has been paid off by Google to attack Microsoft over targetted adverts.

  • Colin

    Smart analysis here http://hublog.fr/2007/10/25/facebooks-very-smart-move/
    Do you share the Google/Facebook opening war ?

  • http://www.topwebsitesGuide.com Norman

    Since Microsoft is the ad parnter of facebook in US, it is more reasonable to be the partner in overseas. Does facebook worth 15 billion? May be. Remember, members of face book are students of top colleges in the country. They are the future of the country.

  • http://www.buzzpal.com chrisco

    #58: Microsoft knows how to milk its operating system and Office cash cows… that’s it. Yawn.

  • http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com Steve Ballmer

    Gaggle was never going to beat us! If I spent a Billion!

    http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com

  • http://www.mydemos.com/blog Scott

    To #45 Jane, Word. It’s all in the subtle anti-Microsoft, pro-Google wording. Erick is trying to pull a fast one by implying a lot but not outright saying it.

    “Google would have been a closer fit”. Maybe 5 years ago. But in 2007 Google is the new “evil empire” secretly collecting a huge database about each and every one of us, and Microsoft is now playing nice. Every Internet company, every single one, can count Google as a competitor. Google is a competitor to Facebook. Microsoft is not. Microsoft is a closer fit.

    And your claim that Google has never felt comfortable targeting people based on their personal data has been disproven to death in the comments. There’s no evidence, NONE, that they in any way “feel” uncomfortable while they are targeting me with their ads based on everything they know about me.

  • http://www.dorksandlosers.com Tan The Man

    $15 billion valuation is ridiculous.

  • http://woodmarvels.com Jon

    Hmmm… I guess by reading this deal that Microsoft also thinks social networking has had better days and it doesn’t want to much… why not just put 240M into it’s own Live Spaces?

    Jon

  • http://www.owalog.com Wes

    $15 billion looks like way over the top. Or maybe I am missing something.

  • Todd

    The news is not that remarkable, however, the absolute lack of objectivity and reasonableness in your reporting has compelled me to come and comment.
    This is the dumbest thing I’ve read all day. It starts with a sensationalist headline which is not supported by the story, and the article is dripping with a bunch of opinion that is mostly wrong. Sure, Google would never do something like targeting ads based on a profile – give me a break. My opinion of TechCrunch has dropped a lot based on this senseless blather. I would have thought that “going pro” would also bring increasing professionalism. Apparently not.

  • Larry M

    “won”
    interesting use of word.

  • http://nachofoto.com anuj

    Nothing against Microsoft but they have this tendency to pretty much f*** things up that they acquire and haven’t build themselves. Just hoping that the same thing doesn’t happen to facebook.

  • http://www.ohview.com Theodore Denovan

    “Google has never felt comfortable targeting ads based on private user profile data” – Whilst this may be true it certainly has scarcely hindered Google serving very specfiic contextually driven advertisements. (Gmail, anyone?)

  • http://newchinacareer.com Doron Vermaat

    maybe zuckerberg can buy some decent shoes now instead of walking around in flip flops..

  • techcrunchie

    @Jane and Todd (72):
    Agree wholeheartedly. Erick, WTF is wrong with you? Are you insane? Do you get paid by Google? Why the ridiculous title? Why the anti-MSFT rhetoric? You question if we have evidence that Google does target based on personal profile — on the contrary who the fuck is the writer here? Do you have any evidence before writing that Google does indeed NOT target based on personal profile??? Do they say it out explicitly — anywhere? Who the fuck cares what you feel Google “feels” about targeting, you dumbass fuck fanboy?

    What a crappy writer — Mike PLEASE if you wanna save Techcrunch have this Google’s-cock-sucking clown fired!

  • Amar

    Erick has been contributing a lot of good stuff. The colume and the frequency of his posts is great. Haters…fuck off.

  • http://ghillie-suits.info/?p=26970 Ghillie Suits » Comment on Facebook Takes the Microsoft Money And Runs. by Doron …

    [...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here’s a quick excerptmaybe zuckerberg can buy some decent shoes now instead of walking around in flip flops.. [...]

  • techcrunchie

    @Amer(78):
    LOL! Amar’s another Google-cock-sucker? Oh wait thats for Erick, so Amar perhaps licks Google’s ass?

  • http://www.metanotes.com Srini Kumar

    Fans of rock and roll will remember the bidding war between major labels that surrounded Nirvana after it sold 60,000 copies of Bleach. Setting Microsoft up in an “honor fight” against Google is an obvious winning strategy. I remember when Facebook investor Peter Thiel crowed about Facebook being worth at least $8bn at one point, to hoots of derision.

    Microsoft acquired something more precious than dollars today – and Zuckerberg cares more about valuation than cash. I am glad they have demonstrated themselves as a player in Web 2.0, partially because it means that other startups can attract their participation in future bidding wars. Good times !

    Finally, Zuckerberg’s influence may extend beyond the financial and even cultural. Let’s see the impact of Facebook, Myspace, and YouTube on next year’s elections. I wonder what Karl Marx would think…

  • http://www.riquock.com Riko Kwe

    Microsoft got Facebook and Digg… Good job… But their advertisement are mostly banner…. kinda annoying….

  • http://www.vidmetro.com Vidmetro

    that was a smart move on for facebook if i was them I would have sold the whole site.

    http://www.vidmetro.com

  • http://emergenceweb.com/blog/?p=287 émergenceweb : blogue » Blog Archive » C’est officiel ! Facebook et Microsoft s’entendent…

    [...] un court billet pour souligner qu’Éric Schonefeld, de TechCrunch a eu le scoop hier : Microsoft investit 240 millions $ dans Facebook [...]

  • Sheetstache McClure

    I am hereby announcing the Graphing Social Patterns of MS Powerpoint conference, to be held in the Taco Bell parking lot on El Camino on December 4th at 2pm.

  • http://webpl.us/what-the-microsoft-investment-in-facebook-means-to-you/ » What the Microsoft investment in Facebook means to you.   webPLUS

    [...] caught wind of the $240,000,000 that Microsoft invested in Facebook today, if not you can read about it everywhere else.  So aside from the mind blowing $15 Billion valuation, what does this [...]

  • http://www.pjbrunet.com/ PJ

    Not really surprised. Facebook is solid, and it’s only just starting to get popular with the over-21 crowd.

  • http://facebook.blog.com/2221925/ facebook.blog.com >> Microsoft $240M investment…

    facebook.blog.com >> Microsoft $240M investment……

    What does Microsoft’s $240 million investment into Facebook mean?
    The following posts provide a thorough review of the Microsoft/Facebook deal from many angles:…

  • http://www.skireport.com Jon

    #47…

    For real? Comparing tech crunch to Facebook!?! Your estimate is FB has 10x the advertising dollars as TC?

    Do me a favor, go to this Url:
    http://www.quantcast.com/traffic-compare.jsp?domain0=facebook.com&domain1=techcrunch.com&domain2=&domain3=&domain4=

    Yes public analytics is not accurate but gives a rough ballpark. First off, you’re not close with your revenue figures. Facebook supposedly brought in 100m over the past year and yes 15b is a lofty valuation. Again, for all the doubters out there, if they would’ve started FB they would’ve sold 2 years ago for 100 million so lets leave it at that.

    They have smart ass people working there, they acquired a company that was developing a web based OS, they have tons of traction… they’re legit and they are a exception to the bubble.

  • aquintag

    quick question…since when does a 1.6% shareholder have that much pull?

  • Findlay

    As a recent Facebook convert and a dedicated Firfox user, my only hope is that Microsoft’s involvment in Facebook will not lead to a situation where one browser is “preferred” over another, such as the case with MSN sites.

  • Marc

    World’s Most Expensive Cock Block.

  • http://auctionbuyback.com Sipboy

    Read between the lines! This is all about long term strategy. For MS, they get to ride the wave for primetime advertising. For FB, Zuckerburg is using leverage to position himself and his company for long term stability. They know this bubble will soon pop. MS has always had a good market capitalization strategy which is why they continue to be a force in technology. With technology ever-changing, FB will have their hands full within 4 years because it won’t take long for the competition to catch up. They know it at FB and MS knows it as well. Google likes to swallow companies. MS on the other hand is using the perfect strategy to keep a stronghold on their marketshare. By 2011, they will be primed for the next opportunity that technology will create. And the icing on the cake is that they will also have a stronger team of bright individuals to help figure it all out. Who in their right mind will pay that kind of money for such a small peice of the overall pie without some other major incentive. Advertising dollars and eyeballs are the keys. FB is the platform that has is right now. They wouldn’t have been able to make this deal with Myspace or any of the other sites because FB is where it is at right now. Why buy them, when you can create a beautiful relationship that benefits the both of you just as good. Wait and see! Read between the lines!

  • Ace

    That valuation is BS. You’re not thinking clearly (if at all). MSFT is just buying a contract with Facebook to advertise. They also get some stock in the deal. The value of the transaction has to include BOTH parts – you can’t just lump it all into the stock. You think there’s no value to exclusive advertising on facebook?

    Is there something in the California water that prevents rational thought?

    Step one: Think. Step two: Write.

  • MJ

    The $15 billion valuation is a 300x multiple of 2006 revenue of $50M and a 75x multiple of 2007 SUPPOSED $200M revenue. This “manufactured” valuation is a great win for Facebook investors, executives, and employees. However, where is the discussion on the true value/return from advertising on social networks like Facebook? Valuations are fleeting if there isn’t a business model to justify it. Bubble anyone?

  • http://www.leveragingideas.com/2007/10/24/your-facebook-profile-is-worth-30612/ Leveraging Ideas » Your Facebook Profile is Worth $306.12: Sam Huleatt – Social Media, Venture Capital and Startup Architecture Blog

    [...] don’t have much to say on Facebook/Microsoft deal, expect to [...]

  • Sandeep

    Good for FB, and bad for Microsoft. they threw up $240 mil for 1.6%. MS buying FB- Gimme a break. With this valuation, MS will dig its grave if it tries to buy FB in future.

    FB will die on its own in the next few years. Reason: Look at the value that they are providing to the customers. I do not see any value at all. Atleast not that is worth $15bn. Maybe few millions but not in billions. Question: Does providing the ability to share pix and videos among college kids worth $15 bn? I dont think so.

    FB revenue: Its a game of demand and supply. With Internet exploding exponentially, do you think that the CPM rates will remain the same? There is limited supply of ad inventory and the real estate for those ads is rising exponentially. This will further put downward pressure on CPM (esp for SN websites). Also, remember…Myspace and Google are opening up their platforms. Developers who are swarming over FB will go to Myspace/Google. They are still the bigger fish in the market.

    Microsoft will struggle to get ROI on its investment. But maybe ROI is not the reason why they have invested in FB. What else could be the reason, if they cant buy it (as stated above) and they cant recover the money? Also, MSFT is no fool. Surely there is some strategy which we are not able to decipher at this moment. Or maybe this time they read it wrong. Afterall, everyone makes mistakes sometime.

  • http://www.leveragingideas.com/ Sam

    @Chris – Great point on the potential difficulty in attracting future talent due to options.

    So is a Facebook profile really worth $306.12?

    http://www.leveragingideas.com/2007/10/24/your-facebook-profile-is-worth-30612/

  • Marc

    See my previous comment. This is all about MS thinking that they are depriving GOOG of FB ad oxygen. Chump change for MS and makes it too rich for anyone else to get their hands on. MS can pick up on the cheap or dump it later when it never lives up to the price. This is basically a keep off the grass sign for any other would be acquirers. FB has delusions of grandeur but needs this cash bad to keep the lights on in hopes that one day they’ll actually have some earnings.

  • Berlin

    Given its deep ties with Microsoft, sticking with them was always the path of least resistance. And one could argue that Google has never felt comfortable targeting ads based on private user profile data, which seems to be the great promise of Facebook, ad-wise. Microsoft doesn’t share those qualms.

    stop sucking d#ck. Google’s will not hire you.

  • MJ

    @94

    I agree that this was more of a defensive strategic move by Microsoft to make Facebook’s valuation too rich for other potential suitors. $240M is a drop in the bucket for MS to prevent Google from getting their hands on Facebook. Huge win for Facebook from a cash infusion & valuation perspective but they will need to prove they are worth this valuation if the $15B number is to hold up long term.

  • http://www.ubicmedia.com Pierre Col | UbicMedia

    The totally overevaluated acquisition of Skype by Ebay – we’ve seen the huge depreciations impacting Ebay P&L recently – marked the beginnig of the 2d Internet Bubble

    This Microsoft / facebook deal does not make any sense, from a financial, marketing or techie point of view. It just confirms we are now in the heart of the bubble, in the eye of the tornado. Fasten your seat belts, you will be shaked soon!

  • Herman

    While all signs indicate the presence of a bubble, this is probably the most logical deal I’ve seen in a while.

    MySpace is a disguised Xanga – driven entirely by its audience. I give it 2 more years max.

    Facebook has evolved into a platform of its own, for its customers, third party developers, and advertisers. It deserves every cent of the 15 billion it’s valued at.

  • Herman

    Also, to the people who believe facebook is an impulse investment: I’ve been a facebook user since its early days. Time and time again, I’ve been impressed by how they rolled out new features and engaged with their customers. People don’t realize that facebook has changed the way with which we share and manage information.

  • http://www.paintedreamz.com aMmadz

    I always knew this day is not too far away.. But why Microsoft.. That’s definitely a wrong swing it is – Why not Google?

  • http://www.fat-man-collective.com/blog Adam Martin

    Eek Facesoft is watching you. All this talk of contextual ads based on my social stream is Minority Report creepy, so I’m talking about Paris Hilton’s recent morale boosting visit to Baghdad and an ad for The Hilton Hotel, Tikrit pops up, boy that $9 as much as you can eat, suite and hooker deal sure looks tempting… er no.

    Facesoft is watching you and when did we all think we could get everything for free? How about we all paid $1 per week for Facebook, so that’s $1 x 40 million per week, a tidy income… I vent my spleen and discuss my dreams being interpreted by a virtual psychotherapist serving my real life pop-up ads for lady shavers over at Fat Man.

    Adam

  • http://www.fat-man-collective.com/blog Adam Martin

    Sorry that should be ‘serving me’ not, ‘serving my’ which just sounds weird.

  • http://www.micfo.com micfo.com

    Yep, user trust is the base of their success, I hope facebook deserve for that much value.

  • Propaganda

    Account closed!

    I don’t need M$ propaganda and crappy software to infest my boxen.

    Whatever, fvck M$

  • Becks

    nice CB widget.

  • http://www.ricdes.com/blog/2007/10/boom/ ricdes dot com

    Boom!?…

    Sagt Mal, wann platzt die Blase 2.0?
    Techcrunch, Golem berichten unter Anderen, dass Microsoft für 240 Millionen $ einen Anteil von 1.6% an Facebook gekauft hat. Das beschert dem US-Social Network nun eine Bewertung von etwa 15 Millarden $.
    Ich …

  • http://www.duilist.com JDoggg

    note to self: login to facebook and remove address, phone number, and change email address to MyEmailThatIDontUseAnymore@hotmail.com

  • http://www.lypp.com Daniel Gibbons

    @42. Citing the use of the same algorithm for targeting ads in search vs. gmail is a bit misleading. Users explicitly provide those keywords when searching, so the ads are often relevant. In gmail, by contrast, the words in a message sent to me or by me rarely have anything to do with particular things I’m looking for at that moment.

    I don’t think that makes gmail targeting any more creepy, but certainly it must be far less effective.

  • http://buzzmag.cz/microsoft-do-facebooku-investoval-nakonec-jen-240-milionu-dolaru-26-10-2007/ Microsoft do Facebooku investoval nakonec “jen” 240 milionů dolarů

    [...] pověst narušitele Google-světovlády. Na druhou stranu je v tomto kole financovaní Facebook otevřený i dalším investorům, snad nebudou mít příliš hluboho do peněženky, laťka je nastavená [...]

  • http://www.techsoapbox.com/even-microsoft-doesnt-value-facebook-at-15-billion-use-your-damn-brain/ Even Microsoft doesn’t value Facebook at $15 billion – Tech Soapbox

    [...] rip from Techcrunch (with added emphasis): It will invest $240 million in Facebook and expand its existing relationship [...]

  • http://simplehotel.com Ashutosh Kadakia

    Everyone is who thinks Facebook is worth $15 billion is nuts. And everyone who thinks that Microsoft paid $250 million for 1.6% of Facebook is more nuts. Yes, WSJ, you are wrong.

    Sure if you do the math considering current equity positions it might come to $15 billion, but is that really what Microsoft is buying into? The most important part of the press release is that Microsoft is now the exclusive advertising partner for Facebook until the year 2011. The 1.6% equity stake is just extra gravy.

    Google paid $900m for exclusive advertising rights for MySpace a few years ago. If they had received 1.6% does that make MySpace worth some multiplicative factor of $900 million?

    If the press release had simply said, Microsoft pays $250 million for exclusive advertising rights, no one would have batted an eye.

    To those people who are comparing this valuation with Broadcast.com you are comparing apples and oranges. $5.9 billion in cash/stock (outright purchase) is far different from $250 million to purchase exclusive advertising rights. Microsoft has not paid $15 billion for Facebook but rather simply purchasing advertising rights.

    And I think it’s brilliant on Microsoft’s part taking 1.6% equity. The equity has little monetary value to Microsoft – it’s unlikely that Facebook will ever be worth $15 billion, but look aren’t we all talking about it?

    This is a win for Microsoft. And naturally a win for Facebook.

  • http://facebook.com Fake Mark Zuckerburg

    I know something you don’t know. hummhahahahaha hahahahahh.. no more flip flops.. i’m going barefoot. … Harvard Dropouts RULE!!! hummhahahahaha hahahahahh. Don’t hate the player.. hate the game.

  • http://www.geekstr.com/2007/10/25/liveblogging-the-facebook-press-conference/ Liveblogging The Facebook Press Conference at Geekstr

    [...] is holding a press conference at 2 pm PST to discuss and presumably confirm the Microsoft investment. We’ll be liveblogging the event here. Stay [...]

  • DLJ

    lol…you really have no idea what you are talking about

  • http://bbxdesign.com/web-world/facebook-ne-vaut-pas-15-milliards-de-dollars Facebook ne vaut pas 15 milliards de $ | bbxdesign

    [...] Par ci, par là, et même dans le journal, on lit que Facebook vaudrait 15 milliards de $ parce que Microsoft y a investi 240 millions de $ pour détenir 1,6% de Facebook. Le calcul rapide qui permet d’arriver à cette somme astronomique omet de préciser que l’accord ne correspond pas uniquement à une prise de capital mais aussi (et surtout) à un accord publicitaire. [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/googles-response-to-facebook-maka-maka/ Google’s Response to Facebook: “Maka-Maka”

    [...] may have lost the bidding war to invest in Facebook, but it is preparing its own major assault on the social networking scene. It [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/ok-heres-at-least-part-of-what-facebook-is-announcing-on-tuesday/ Ok Here’s At Least Part Of What Facebook Is Announcing On Tuesday: Project Beacon

    [...] even off the Facebook network itself. And then there is the Microsoft angle – since they have some rights to serve advertising on Facebook, it’s unclear how they fit into it [...]

  • http://bhopu.com parul bindra
  • http://www.batipi.com Online Meeting Consultant

    i don’t mind the target based advertising (i think), if the ad is relevant to my local community, then it is more relevant to me….rather then see some broadly splattered ad that may or may not relate to the demographic reading

  • http://blog.gorrie.org/2007/11/24/web20-and-history-recurring/ Bad Penny

    Web2.0 and history recurring…

    Most though, are sitting around and hoping that one of the big dogs will give them a crate of stock certificates for their cute (hastily developed and full of vulnerabilities) web application which they built with other peoples money who want their inv…

  • http://laigoo.com/blogs/?p=361   Another $60 Million For Facebook by Laigoo – All In One

    [...] Facebook took a $240 million investment from Microsoft last month at a $15 billion valuation, they became, in theory, one of the most [...]

  • http://inmoneynow.com/2007/12/15/money-winners-of-2007-facebooks-marc-zuckerberg-calls-the-shots/ money news blog » Money Winners of 2007: Facebook’s Marc Zuckerberg calls the shots

    [...] turns out that Zuckerberg got the last laugh. In October, Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) agreed to invest $240 million for a 1.6% stake in Facebook in a deal that values the company at $12 [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/15/breaking-samwer-brothers-invest-in-facebook/ Breaking: Samwer Brothers Invest In Facebook

    [...] announced today that they are investing in Facebook – presumably as part of Facebook’s recent $15 billion valuation round with [...]

  • http://fr.techcrunch.com/2008/01/15/les-freres-samwer-investissent-dans-facebook/ TechCrunch en français » Dernière Minute: les frères Samwer investissent dans Facebook

    [...] nous l’avons appris d’une source très sure, sans doute durant le dernier tour de table de $15 milliards avec Microsoft. Nous essayons de connaître le [...]

  • http://biggerpicture.wordpress.com/2008/02/01/seriously-microsoft-takeover-of-yahoo/ Seriously? Microsoft takeover of Yahoo! « seeing the Bigger Picture

    [...] great stuff with that focus – Xbox. But they’ve also had some highly questionable (at best) – Facebook investment, the Zune, etc… I’m betting this deal, if it goes through, will be the biggest mistake [...]

  • http://fr.techcrunch.com/2008/02/10/google-pret-a-investir-dans-cnet/ TechCrunch en français » Google prêt à investir dans CNet?

    [...] échange d’un contrôle sur la publicité ne semble pas être une idée ridicule. Microsoft a recemment investi dans Facebook avec un accord publicitaire à la clef également. Et en 2005, Google investissait 5% [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/09/google-to-acquire-stake-in-cnet-unlikely/ Google To Acquire Stake In CNet?

    [...] some or all of the advertising inventory isn’t a ridiculous proposition. Microsoft recently invested in Facebook in connection with an advertising deal. And in 2005, Google took a 5% stake in AOL for [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/25/perspective-facebook-is-now-5th-most-valuable-us-internet-company/ Perspective: Facebook Is Now 5th Most Valuable U.S. Internet Company

    [...] came news that Microsoft invested $240 million into Facebook, valuing the company at $15 [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/a-peek-at-crunchbase/ A Peek At CrunchBase

    [...] a startup, and we’ll include that widget in posts about startups. To see an example, see this and this post. I’ve also put the widget in this post for the startup PoliticalBase, since I [...]

  • http://blog.justlanded.com/jobs/wheres-your-language/ The Just Landed Blog » Where’s your language?

    [...] to translate its application for free. This is a company that has a bucket-load of VC cash and is ‘allegedly’ worth $15 billion (although some beg to differ, Barry Diller said in the New York Times, “If it was real money, [...]

  • http://www.twicefunded.com/?p=22 TwiceFunded.com :: Up is Down, Black is White, and Pantone 805 is Back

    [...] started things with is US$580mm acquisition. YouTube follow-up with a $1.6b exit. Microsoft thinks Facebook is worth about $15b and Bebo just went for $850mm a few weeks ago. Or is the return of Pantone 805 the first tremor of [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/31/why-were-suing-facebook-for-25-million-in-statutory-damages/ Why We’re Suing Facebook For $25 Million In Statutory Damages

    [...] case for $25 million in Facebook stock (priced at the employee option price, not that ridiculous $15 billion Microsoft valuation), a small fraction of the amount we’ll almost certainly receive if this case goes to trial, [...]

  • http://blog.europe20.com/2008/04/01/roundup-of-some-incredible-news-google-techcrunch-and-engadget/ Roundup of some incredible news: Google, TechCrunch, …and Engadget « Europe 2.0

    [...] Basically, the use of his name and picture in newsfeed items is seen as an outrageous use of his “personal brand”.  As compensation for this damage, Arrington is asking: At this point we’re prepared to settle the case for $25 million in Facebook stock (priced at the employee option price, not that ridiculous $15 billion Microsoft valuation) [...]

  • http://www.jelmerdejong.nl/weblog/index.php/199/van-den-ende-en-deitmers-in-hyves-voor-minimaal-241-miljoen-euro/ Van den Ende en Deitmers in Hyves voor minimaal 241 miljoen euro | Jelmer de Jong

    [...] totale grote van ongeveer 100 miljoen) hier voor hebben betaald? In oktober 2007 betaalde Microsoft 240 miljoen dollar voor 1,6 procent van de aandelen in Facebook. Natuurlijk is Facebook een stuk groter dan Hyves. Facebook heeft [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/another-60-million-for-facebook/ Another $60 Million For Facebook

    [...] Facebook took a $240 million investment from Microsoft last month at a $15 billion valuation, they became, in theory, one of the most [...]

  • http://www.gordonbowman.com/?p=17 GordonBowman.com

    [...] on the other hand, is now gearing up for Plan B. A move for Facebook could make sense given their existing relationship. Even so, the previous valuation of Facebook at $15 Billion makes the price tag a bit steep. A more [...]

  • http://andrej.nabergoj.com/2007/valuation-for-dummies/ Valuation For Dummies | Nothing Ever Happens

    [...] that Facebook raised $240M from Microsoft at a $15B valuation, with revenues of $100M-$150M and $30M in profits, people wonder where is the [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/28/want-some-facebook-stock-at-a-3-billion-valutation-we-know-who-to-call/ Want Some Facebook Stock At A $3 Billion Valutation? We Know Who To Call.

    [...] may have talked a few investors, including Microsoft, Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing and Germany’s Samwer brothers, into investing in the [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/24/microsoft-scores-facebook-search-deal-and-may-get-a-little-livecom-branding-to-boot/ Microsoft Scores Facebook Search Deal And May Get A Little Live.com Branding To Boot

    [...] has announced that the company has expanded its deal with Facebook to integrate Microsoft’s Live Search into the social network. There are few details at this point, but Microsoft will be serving up [...]

  • http://fr.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/nouvel-accord-publicitaire-entre-microsoft-et-facebook-autour-de-livesearch/ TechCrunch en français » Nouvel accord publicitaire entre Microsoft et Facebook autour de LiveSearch

    [...] a annoncé un nouvel accord avec Facebook afin d’intégrer Microsoft Live Search, sur le réseau social. Pas encore beaucoup de détails mais Microsoft devrait également placer de [...]

  • http://mondaymorningblogger.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/5-things-i-learned-at-techcrunch-august-capital-event/ 5 Things I Learned at TechCrunch August Capital Event « Monday Morning Blogger

    [...] Facebook does in fact value itself around 4 billion (suck it Microsoft) [...]

  • http://blog.genlighten.com/2008/08/20/imaginative-rumor-lds-church-to-buy-facebook/ Genlighten Blog — Genealogy Documented » Blog Archive » Imaginative Rumor — LDS Church to buy Facebook?

    [...] would that help further the Church’s overall objectives? And if Facebook is really worth some $15B, how is the Church going to afford the purchase? That’s a lot of [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/22/microsoft-uses-facebook-to-conduct-research-with-collabio/ Microsoft Conducts Research On Facebook With Collabio

    [...] bond that Microsoft and Facebook have forged with eachother, which has included massive search and advertising deals. Of course, Collabio doesn’t see any money changing hands, but you probably won’t [...]

  • http://bhc3.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/microsoft-is-getting-much-more-from-its-investment-in-facebook/ Microsoft Is Getting Much More from Its Investment in Facebook « I’m Not Actually a Geek

    [...] was well within the comfort zone of a giant like Microsoft. Here’s how commenter Prashant put it on TechCrunch: I don’t think that MSFT expects to make money on the $250MM at a $15B valuation. Internally for [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/07/facebook-rolls-out-live-searchwait-whered-it-go/ Facebook Rolls Out Live Search…Wait, Where’d It Go?

    [...] integration is a natural consequence of Microsoft’s $250 million investment in Facebook last Fall. Google has a similar deal in place with competitor MySpace. [...]

  • http://beavernews.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/why-facebook-will-rule-the-world%e2%80%94and-why-it-won%e2%80%99t/ Why Facebook will rule the world—and why it won’t « The Beaver Reader

    [...] a desperate move meant to just keep Facebook away from Google at all costs; one headline read, “Facebook Takes the Microsoft Money And Runs.” More on that [...]

  • http://www.cheeze.com/blog/20080810/facebook-rolls-out-microsoft-live-search/ Facebook rolls out UK search engine with live.com | Cheeze Blog

    [...] final integration of Windows Live Search and Facebook. The integration is another part in the $240m investment Microsoft made in FB back in [...]

  • http://24.150.205.156/hp/index.php/?p=17745 Facebook Rolls Out Live Search…Wait, Where’d It Go? Oh, There It Is.

    [...] integration is a natural consequence of Microsoft’s 0 million investment in Facebook last Fall. Google has a similar deal in place with competitor [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/22/dont-hold-your-breathe-for-the-facebook-android-app/ Don’t Hold Your Breathe For The Facebook Android App

    [...] source of the feud: Facebook chose Microsoft as their ad partner and investor a year ago; Google had already put their money behind MySpace. But [...]

  • http://www.mjgenclik.com Sercy

    alayına facebook . super .

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/31/facebooks-growing-problem/ Facebook’s Growing Problem

    [...] at terms that could be much more favorable to investors than the previous $15 billion round that Microsoft kicked off in October 2007. Facebook Is Growing, But So Are [...]

  • http://stagingblog.yks.tv/yksblog/?p=113 Yks blog » Blog Archive » Facebook May Be Growing Too Fast. And Hitting The Capital Markets Again.

    [...] raise at terms that could be much more favorable to investors than the previous billion round that Microsoft kicked off in October 2007. Facebook Is Growing, But So Are [...]

  • http://stagingblog.yks.tv/yksblog/?p=113 Yks blog » Blog Archive » Facebook May Be Growing Too Fast. And Hitting The Capital Markets Again.

    [...] raise at terms that could be much more favorable to investors than the previous billion round that Microsoft kicked off in October 2007. Facebook Is Growing, But So Are [...]

  • http://vietanhnguyen.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/%e1%ba%a9n-tinh-gi%e1%bb%afa-microsoft-facebook/ “Ẩn tình” giữa Microsoft & Facebook « Viet Anh Nguyen

    [...] về quảng cáo đầu tiên giữa 2 công ty. Sau đó 1 năm, Facebook nhận được khoản tiền đầu tư 240 triệu USD từ Microsoft và mối quan hệ đó vẫn tiếp tục được mở rộng cho đến ngày [...]

  • http://www.carlcrowder.com/blog/?p=41 Facebook doesn’t buy Twitter

    [...] millions”. Given that the $500m valuation of the stock was based on the equally tenuous $15bn pricetag Facebook got courtesy of Microsoft, this may have been [...]

  • http://foutplus.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/twitter-a-refuse-500-millions-de-dollars-de-facebook/ Twitter a refusé 500 millions de dollars de Facebook « Yann Tessier Weblog

    [...] un montant basé sur la valorisation de Facebook à 15 milliards de dollars établie à la suite de l’entrée au capital de Microsoft en octobre 2007. Une valorisation jugée complètement irréaliste par beaucoup, digne des excès pré-bulle [...]

  • http://www.quarara.com/?p=792 The End Of Venture Capital As We Know It? | Q u a r a r a

    [...] the already-lowered $4 billion internal valuation the plan called for, never mind the over-inflated $15 billion that Microsoft got in at last [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/06/the-end-of-venture-capital-as-we-know-it/ The End Of Venture Capital As We Know It?

    [...] the already-lowered $4 billion internal valuation the plan called for, never mind the over-inflated $15 billion that Microsoft got in at last [...]

  • http://belanger.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/the-end-of-venture-capital-as-we-know-it/ The End Of Venture Capital As We Know It « myblog | brad.belanger

    [...] already-lowered $4 billion internal valuation the plan called for, never mind the over-inflated $15 billion that Microsoft got in at last [...]

  • http://www.pasteris.it/blog/2008/12/08/la-fine-del-venture-capital-come-lo-conosciamo-forse/ La fine del Venture Capital come lo conosciamo, forse – Vittorio Pasteris

    [...] the already-lowered $4 billion internal valuation the plan called for, never mind the over-inflated $15 billion that Microsoft got in at last [...]

  • http://www.torinovalley.com/blog/2008/12/08/la-fine-del-venture-capital/ Torino Valley Blog » » La fine del Venture Capital ?

    [...] the already-lowered $4 billion internal valuation the plan called for, never mind the over-inflated $15 billion that Microsoft got in at last [...]

  • http://www.beatnic.co.uk/2007/10/24/silly-money/ beatnic – just wondering » Silly money

    [...] From TechCrunch: Facebook Takes the Microsoft Money And Runs. [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/the-future-of-social-search-or-why-google-should-buy-facebook/ The Future Of Social Search (Or Why Google Should Buy Facebook)

    [...] set aside for a moment the unlikelihood of any Google-Facebook deal or partnership (given Microsoft’s investment in Facebook), and let’s imagine how the two could help each [...]

  • http://blogs.praized.com/seb/aol/facebook-was-never-worth-15-billion/ The Praized Blog » Blog Archive » Facebook Was Never Worth $15 Billion

    [...] the prospect of a down round in their next financing round. As we all remember, Microsoft had invested a $240M in Facebook for a 1.6% stake in the company in October 2007, valuing the company at [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/10/law-firm-blunder-reveals-value-of-facebookconnectu-settlement-65-million/ Law Firm Blunder Reveals Value Of Facebook/ConnectU Settlement: $65 Million

    [...] or the valuation of the Facebook stock (it may have been based on the vaunted $15 million valuation established by Microsoft’s ad deal 2007, while recent internal valuations are only around a quarter of [...]

  • http://media.cafe.themarker.com/view.php?t=892301 האם הרגע הסלולרי מגיע? – TheMarker Cafe

    [...] פייסבוק היא הרשת החברתית הראשונה שיצרה את ה-"news feed", דו"ח המתעדכן ברציפות ומספר לכל חבר ברשת מה חבריו עשו לאחרונה – מי החברים החדשים שלהם, לאילו אירועים הם הוזמנו, אילו תמונות הם העלו, אילו תכנים הם יצרו ועוד מידע רלוונטי אחר – אחת האפליקציות הויראליות ביותר אי פעם ברשתות חברתיות. ולבסוף, פייסבוק היא גם הרשת החברתית שגייסה הון לפי השווי הגבוה ביותר אי פעם לרשת חברתית: 15 מיליארד דולר. [...]

  • http://buzz.bournemouth.ac.uk/?p=951 Buzz » News » The Status Update of Facebook.
  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/27/facebook-definitely-raising-capital-this-year-google-considered-acquisition/ Facebook “Definitely” Raising Capital This Year; Google Considered Acquisition

    [...] December Zuckerberg told me the company was open to raising more capital, but only at the previous $15 billion valuation: We discussed Facebook fundraising issues and valuation. He said some of the speculation was true [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/27/facebook-definitely-raising-capital-this-year-google-considered-acquisition/ Facebook “Definitely” Raising Capital This Year; Google Considered Acquisition

    [...] December Zuckerberg told me the company was open to raising more capital, but only at the previous $15 billion valuation: We discussed Facebook fundraising issues and valuation. He said some of the speculation was true [...]

  • http://www.netdesk.co.uk/site/2009/social-marketing/facebook-%e2%80%9cdefinitely%e2%80%9d-raising-capital-this-year-google-considered-acquisition/ Facebook “Definitely” Raising Capital This Year; Google Considered Acquisition | netdesk

    [...] December Zuckerberg told me the company was open to raising more capital, but only at the previous $15 billion valuation: We discussed Facebook fundraising issues and valuation. He said some of the speculation was true [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/03/facebooks-newest-funding-source-you/ Facebook’s Newest Funding Source: You

    [...] to raise money at what’s likely to be an embarrassing large discount from that ridiculous $15 billion valuation that Microsoft gave them in 2007. Maybe if enough users buy credits that can never be redeemed back [...]

  • http://charlescohen.com/2009/04/04/facebook-death-watch-part-one/ Facebook Death Watch – Part One. « Charles Cohen.

    [...] forecast are hard to come by, because Facebook is of course a private company. According to TechCrunch, they took $240m from Microsoft in October 2007. But BusinessWeek has them out raising new cash [...]

  • http://onhit.net/facebook%e2%80%99s-newest-funding-source-you-6/ Facebook’s Newest Funding Source: You

    [...] to raise money at what’s likely to be an embarrassing large discount from that ridiculous $15 billion valuation that Microsoft gave them in 2007. Maybe if enough users buy credits that can never be redeemed back [...]

  • http://www.technologygear.net/facebook-%e2%80%93-an-effective-marketing-tool.html Facebook – An Effective Marketing Tool!

    [...] of $1 billion for Facebook.  As of 2007, Microsoft (http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/facebook-takes-the-microsoft-money-and-runs/) owns 1.6% of Facebook and the cost – $240 [...]

  • http://www.charged.co.za/latest-news/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation Decision Time For Facebook: Term Sheets Received At $2 Billion Valuation | CHARGED’s Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play

    [...] CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company was open to raising new money but only at the previous $15 billion valuation set by [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/ Decision Time For Facebook: Term Sheets Received At $2 Billion Valuation

    [...] CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company was open to raising new money but only at the previous $15 billion valuation set by [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/ Decision Time For Facebook: Term Sheets Received At $2 Billion Valuation

    [...] CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company was open to raising new money but only at the previous $15 billion valuation set by [...]

  • http://reviewsmanual.com/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheet-received-at-2-billion-valuation.html Decision Time For Facebook: Term Sheet Received At $2 Billion Valuation | Reviews Manual

    [...] Zuckerberg said the consort was unstoppered to raising newborn money but exclusive at the preceding $15 billion appraisal ordered by [...]

  • http://www.netdesk.co.uk/2009/social-marketing/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/ Decision Time For Facebook: Term Sheets Received At $2 Billion Valuation | netdesk

    [...] CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company was open to raising new money but only at the previous $15 billion valuation set by [...]

  • http://ldgak.com/?p=3613 Decision Time For Facebook: Term Sheet Received At $2 Billion Valuation | Our World…travelling by the seat of our pants….

    [...] CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company was open to raising new money but only at the previous $15 billion valuation set by [...]

  • http://floragraham.com/wp/?p=95 New Scientist Technology Blog: Boost for social networking goldrush – Flora Graham

    [...] Scientist Technology Blog: Boost for social networking goldrush May 15, 2008 The big-money investments in social networking sites like Facebook are based on the notion that it will be possible to spin [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/19/facebook-turns-down-8-billion-valuation-term-sheet-claims-2009-revenues-to-be-550-million/ Facebook Turns Down $8 billion Valuation Term Sheet, Claims 2009 Revenues Will Be $550 million

    [...] it could stomach other than the board seat issue. Facebook’s last round valuation was $15 billion, but those days are long [...]

  • http://blog.viningmedia.nl/2009/05/facebook-turns-down-8-billion-valuation-term-sheet-claims-2009-revenues-will-be-550-million/ Facebook Turns Down $8 billion Valuation Term Sheet, Claims 2009 Revenues Will Be $550 million | Viningmedia Nieuws

    [...] it could stomach other than the board seat issue. Facebook’s last round valuation was $15 billion, but those days are long [...]

  • http://reviewsmanual.com/facebook-turns-down-8-billion-valuation-term-sheet-claims-2009-revenues-will-be-550-million.html Facebook Turns Down $8 billion Valuation Term Sheet, Claims 2009 Revenues Will Be $550 million | Reviews Manual

    [...] breadbasket another than the commission centre issue. Facebook’s terminal ammo appraisal was $15 billion, but those life are daylong [...]

  • http://news.techhours.com/facebook-turns-down-8-billion-valuation-term-sheet-claims-2009-revenues-will-be-550-million/ Techhours » Facebook Turns Down $8 billion Valuation Term Sheet, Claims 2009 Revenues Will Be $550 million

    [...] it could stomach other than the board seat issue. Facebook’s last round valuation was $15 billion, but those days are long [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/22/a-new-potential-facebook-investment-at-10-billion-valuation/ Facebook’s Valuation Heading North Again. Up To $10 Billion Now.

    [...] once again. Though perhaps Facebook will like the $10 billion number — which is closer to the $15 billion valuation it got from Microsoft’s investment in 2007. If Facebook were to accept these terms, and give away a [...]

  • http://blog.viningmedia.nl/2009/05/facebook%e2%80%99s-valuation-heading-north-again-up-to-10-billion-now/ Facebook’s Valuation Heading North Again. Up To $10 Billion Now. | Viningmedia Nieuws

    [...] once again. Though perhaps Facebook will like the $10 billion number — which is closer to the $15 billion valuation it got from Microsoft’s investment in 2007. If Facebook were to accept these terms, and give away a [...]

  • http://www.thefaredge.com/?p=4161 The Far Edge » Blog Archive » Facebook’s Valuation Heading North Again. Up To $10 Billion Now.

    [...] once again. Though perhaps Facebook will like the $10 billion number — which is closer to the $15 billion valuation it got from Microsoft’s investment in 2007. If Facebook were to accept these terms, and give away a [...]

  • http://reviewsmanual.com/facebook%e2%80%99s-valuation-heading-north-again-up-to-10-billion-now-2.html Facebook’s Valuation Heading North Again. Up To $10 Billion Now. | Reviews Manual

    [...] again. Though perhaps Facebook module same the $10 1000000000 sort — which is fireman to the $15 1000000000 appraisal it got from Microsoft’s assets in 2007. If Facebook were to accept these terms, and provide absent a [...]

  • http://vipinlalla.com/tech/?p=29 Facebook’s Valuation Heading North Again. Up To $10 Billion Now. – Vipin Lalla

    [...] once again. Though perhaps Facebook will like the $10 billion number — which is closer to the $15 billion valuation it got from Microsoft’s investment in 2007. If Facebook were to accept these terms, and give away a [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/26/facebook-takes-that-200-million-investment-from-the-russians-at-a-10-billion-valuation/ Facebook Takes That $200 Million Investment From The Russians At A $10 Billion Valuation.

    [...] Microsoft bought preferred shares, it valued Facebook at $15 billion. Since then the market has come way down and various valuations [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/26/mark-zuckerberg-and-yuri-milner-talk-about-facebooks-new-investment-video/ Mark Zuckerberg And Yuri Milner Talk About Facebook’s New Investment (Video)

    [...] to what Microsoft and others paid – this current round values Facebook at a third less than the $15 billion valuation they accepted in October 2007. We live blogged the press call on the announcement earlier [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/26/mark-zuckerberg-and-yuri-milner-talk-about-facebooks-new-investment-video/ Mark Zuckerberg And Yuri Milner Talk About Facebook’s New Investment (Video)

    [...] to what Microsoft and others paid – this current round values Facebook at a third less than the $15 billion valuation they accepted in October 2007. We live blogged the press call on the announcement earlier [...]

  • http://thegoodnetguide.com/05/mark-zuckerberg-and-yuri-milner-talk-about-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-investment-video/ Mark Zuckerberg And Yuri Milner Talk About Facebook’s New Investment (Video) | The Good NET Guide

    [...] to what Microsoft and others paid – this current round values Facebook at a third less than the $15 billion valuation they accepted in October 2007. We live blogged the press call on the announcement earlier [...]

  • http://www.upoff.com/2009/05/27/exclusive-video-mark-zuckerberg-and-yuri-milner-talk-about-facebook%e2%80%99s-new-investment/ Exclusive Video: Mark Zuckerberg And Yuri Milner Talk About Facebook’s New Investment | UpOff.com

    [...] to what Microsoft and others paid – this current round values Facebook at a third less than the $15 billion valuation they accepted in October 2007. We live blogged the press call on the announcement earlier [...]

  • http://blog.superbhosting.net/2009/06/05/microsoft-still-searching-for-answers/ Microsoft still searching for answers

    [...] to try and make this work, from MSN Search to Windows Live Search to Live Search – not to mention search deals they’ve made with companies like Facebook – and yet Google continues to dominate. Is that all going to change with [...]

  • http://www.myspace.com/heatproduction Heat

    adddddd meeeeee pleaseeeeeeeeeee

    http://WWW.MYSPACE.COM/HEATPRODUCTION

  • http://www.universitystartups.com/2009/06/the-future-of-social-search-or-why-google-should-buy-facebook/ University Startups» Blog Archive » The Future Of Social Search (Or Why Google Should Buy Facebook)

    [...] let�s set aside for a moment the unlikelihood of any Google-Facebook deal or partnership (given Microsoft�s investment in Facebook), and let�s imagine how the two could help each [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/29/facebook-names-genentech-exec-david-ebersman-as-cfo/ Facebook Names Genentech Exec David Ebersman As CFO

    [...] speculation that he had been unable to secure investments at the company’s lofty $15 billion valuation established by the Microsoft deal, and that the company was considering an early IPO. Since then, [...]

  • http://www.techeroid.com/2009/06/29/facebook-names-genentech-exec-david-ebersman-as-cfo/ Techeroid » Facebook Names Genentech Exec David Ebersman As CFO

    [...] speculation that he had been unable to secure investments at the company’s lofty $15 billion valuation established by the Microsoft deal, and that the company was considering an early IPO. Since then, [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/26/investment-or-marketing-the-real-reason-lightspeed-invested-in-ning-at-a-crazy-valuation/ Investing Or Marketing? The Real Reason Lightspeed Invested In Ning At A Crazy Valuation

    [...] around at the time, and increased their profile in Silicon Valley. Likewise, Microsoft’s investment in Facebook at a $15 billion valuation, was done not in the hope of making money on the investment, but to lock up a search [...]

  • http://builddesignwebpage.com/2009/07/investing-or-marketing-the-real-reason-lightspeed-invested-in-ning-at-a-crazy-valuation/ Investing Or Marketing? The Real Reason Lightspeed Invested In Ning At A Crazy Valuation | Design Website Easy

    [...] around at the time, and increased their profile in Silicon Valley. Likewise, Microsoft’s investment in Facebook at a $15 billion valuation, was done not in the hope of making money on the investment, but to lock up a search [...]

  • http://spinvalleypost.com/2009/07/26/investing-or-marketing-the-real-reason-lightspeed-invested-in-ning-at-a-crazy-valuation/ Investing Or Marketing? The Real Reason Lightspeed Invested In Ning At A Crazy Valuation | Spin Valley Post

    [...] around at the time, and increased their profile in Silicon Valley. Likewise, Microsoft’s investment in Facebook at a $15 billion valuation, was done not in the hope of making money on the investment, but to lock up a search [...]

  • http://www.tweepuntnul.net/index.php/2009/08/25/privacy-op-internet/ Twee Punt Nul.net » Archief » Privacy op internet – angst of niets nieuws onder de zon?

    [...] hoe komt die informatie van mijn vrienden daar terecht? Facebook en Microsoft zijn inmiddels vriendjes geworden en Bing heeft ook haar weg gevonden naar Facebook. Het doorzoeken [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/25/we-hold-twitter-ransom-for-100-billion-dollars/ We Hold Twitter Ransom For $100 Billion Dollars

    [...] some are — Microsoft’s investment in Facebook that pumped its valuation to $15 billion is a great example. But the key point there is that [...]

  • http://www.fun2chill.com/?p=3291 Technology – Gadgets – Mobiles – Laptops – Iphone – Mobile Tools » We Hold Twitter Ransom For $100 Billion Dollars

    [...] some are — Microsoft’s investment in Facebook that pumped its valuation to $15 billion is a great example. But the key point there is that [...]

  • http://www.itzeen.com/?p=74 Is Google Cooking-up Something? – IT-Zeen

    [...] kicking its rivals where it hurts most. Can’t think of any cases like that? Well, remember when Microsoft was investing in Facebook? Everyone was jabbering how M$ has “defeated” Google in the bid war and then Google announced [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/that-didnt-take-long-twitter-is-coming-to-google/ That Didn’t Take Long: Twitter Search Is Coming To Google

    [...] Facebook’s search with Bing results, and it controls a small stake in the company after investing$240 million at a sky-high $15 billion valuation back in late 2007. [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/02/google-friend-connect-twitter/ Google Turns To Twitter To Help Friend Connect Fly

    [...] It’s also worth noting the Google rival Microsoft owns a small portion of Facebook through an investment made in [...]

  • http://madhusudanrao.wordpress.com/2009/12/03/social-connections-on-the-rise/ Social Connections on the rise « My Thoughts on Technology, Management, …

    [...] they had 350 million users. Do remember that Microsoft owns a small portion of Facebook, through an investment made in [...]

  • http://www.keesromkes.nl/2009/08/17/privacy-op-internet-angst-of-niets-nieuws-onder-de-zon/ Privacy op internet, angst of niets nieuws onder de zon ? | Kees Romkes

    [...] hoe komt die informatie van mijn vrienden daar terecht ? Facebook en Microsoft zijn inmiddels vriendjes geworden en Bing heeft ook haar weg gevonden naar Facebook. Het doorzoeken [...]

  • http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/20/facebook-valued-at-14-billion-on-secondmarket/ Facebook Valued At $14 Billion On SecondMarket

    [...] a sale occurs at $32 it will be the closest the company has come to its $15 billion valuation that Microsoft paid way back in late 2007. In May 2009 DST purchased $200 million in Facebook preferred stock at a $10 [...]

  • http://save-self.com/?p=153 Facebook Valued At $14 Billion On SecondMarket | Save Self

    [...] a sale occurs at $32 it will be the closest the company has come to its $15 billion valuation that Microsoft paid way back in late 2007. In May 2009, DST purchased $200 million in Facebook preferred stock at a $10 [...]

  • http://www.social-wifi.com/blog/archives/109 Facebook Valued At $14 Billion On SecondMarket « Living a life distracted by shiny objects

    [...] a sale occurs at $32 it will be the closest the company has come to its $15 billion valuation that Microsoft paid way back in late 2007. In May 2009, DST purchased $200 million in Facebook preferred stock at a $10 [...]

  • http://clickinternetmarketingtools.com/facebook-takes-over-its-own-display-advertising-from-microsoft-keeps-bing-for-web-search/ Facebook Takes Over Its Own Display Advertising From Microsoft, Keeps Bing For Web Search « Internet Marketing Tools

    [...] taking full control of its inventory away from Microsoft. Even prior to Microsoft’s initial $240 million investment in Facebook in 2007, the two companies had an advertising partnership giving Microsoft [...]

  • http://stocksandsectors.com/facebook-takes-advertising-away-from-microsoft/ Facebook Takes Advertising Away from Microsoft | Stocks and Sectors

    [...] full control of its inventory away from Microsoft (MSFT). Even prior to Microsoft’s initial $240 million investment in Facebook in 2007, the two companies had an advertising partnership giving Microsoft [...]

  • http://lefttochance.com/2010/02/11/facebook-denies-%e2%80%98all-wrongdoing%e2%80%99-in-%e2%80%98beacon%e2%80%99-data-breach/ Left to chance » Facebook Denies ‘All Wrongdoing’ in ‘Beacon’ Data Breach

    [...] lawyers in the case said it was a good deal they struck with a wealthy company that contends it did no wrong and was willing to go to trial to defend its [...]

  • http://www.newsurl.net/facebook-denies-%e2%80%98all-wrongdoing%e2%80%99-in-%e2%80%98beacon%e2%80%99-data-breach/ Facebook Denies ‘All Wrongdoing’ in ‘Beacon’ Data Breach | News URL

    [...] lawyers in the case said it was a good deal they struck with a wealthy company that contends it did no wrong and was willing to go to trial to defend its [...]

  • http://alexmak.net/blog/2010/02/18/microsoft-as-keyser-soze/ Microsoft в роли Кайзера Созе | alexmak.net

    [...] когда Microsoft купила маленькую долю Facebook в 2007 году, все вопили по поводу [...]

  • http://omergertel.com/2010/02/28/twitter-will-make-money-just-not-that-much/ Twitter Will Make Money (Just Not That Much) | Re-gur-gi-tate (n) | Omer Gertel

    [...] – $15B- Microsoft acquires ~1.5%. This is the peak of the [...]

  • http://www.bestinvestmentsguide.com Investments Guide

    Thanks for sharing. This is really very useful article.
    I would also like to share some useful information with you all. Investments Guide Make sure you check this out. I came across this site a few days ago.

  • http://sellandcapital.com/2010/04/wiring-the-web/ Wiring the Web | Selland Capital

    [...]  An acquisition of Facebook would make sense for both companies – although Microsoft should have the inside track should they choose to use [...]

  • http://garyfales.com/ new york asset protection

    facebook’s deal with microsoft didn’t work out very well.

  • http://garyfales.com/ new york asset protection

    this deal didn’t work out very well.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Got a tip? Building a startup? Tell us