NY Times: "Hoo Hoos and Ta Tas Look Bad in HD"

Monday, January 22nd, 2007

Biggs is the editor of TechCrunch Gadgets. Biggs has written for the New York Times, InSync, USA Weekend, Popular Mechanics, Popular Science, Money and a number of other outlets on technology and wristwatches. He is the former editor-in-chief of Gizmodo.com and lives in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn. You can Tweet him here and G+ him here. Email him directly at john@techcrunch.com. → Learn More

I’m all for progress, but perhaps we’re reaching a stage in our evolution where the fruits of our intellect are surpassing our ability to keep down our Chef Boyardee.

It seems that someone — we know who you are — is complaining that HD porn is getting really nasty. Public Enemy #1? Razor burn, friends. That’s right. Jenna’s stubble looks like a truck driver’s three-day Georgia-to-Washington-run facial growth when projected in striking HD on a 56-inch TV.

But does the industry understand what’s going on? Definitely not. Take, for example, Ms. Stormy Daniel’s misunderestimation of the general porn-watching public.

Ms. Daniels is also a skeptic. ā€œI’m not 100 percent sure why anyone would want to see their porn in HD,ā€ she said

I recall a time in my life when flipping back and forth between scrambled adult pay channels was sufficient for my own private pleasure. There is, with all certainty, someone out there with a stubble and cellulite fetish. BTW – That image above is a <a HREF="http://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/Ms. Dirty Mind.

In Raw World of Sex Movies, High Definition Could Be a View Too Real [NYTimes]

Tags: , , ,

Sponsored Ads

blog comments powered by Disqus

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads