NY Times: "Hoo Hoos and Ta Tas Look Bad in HD"

Next Story

Shed Some Flab With Your Wii

I’m all for progress, but perhaps we’re reaching a stage in our evolution where the fruits of our intellect are surpassing our ability to keep down our Chef Boyardee.

It seems that someone — we know who you are — is complaining that HD porn is getting really nasty. Public Enemy #1? Razor burn, friends. That’s right. Jenna’s stubble looks like a truck driver’s three-day Georgia-to-Washington-run facial growth when projected in striking HD on a 56-inch TV.

But does the industry understand what’s going on? Definitely not. Take, for example, Ms. Stormy Daniel’s misunderestimation of the general porn-watching public.

Ms. Daniels is also a skeptic. “I’m not 100 percent sure why anyone would want to see their porn in HD,” she said

I recall a time in my life when flipping back and forth between scrambled adult pay channels was sufficient for my own private pleasure. There is, with all certainty, someone out there with a stubble and cellulite fetish. BTW – That image above is a <a HREF="http://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/Ms. Dirty Mind.

In Raw World of Sex Movies, High Definition Could Be a View Too Real [NYTimes]

blog comments powered by Disqus