Vine Takes Early Command In The Mobile Video Market Over Viddy, Socialcam And Others Despite Low Adoption

Editor’s note: Robert J. Moore is the co-founder of RJMetrics, a company whose software helps online businesses make smarter decisions using their own data. He also previously served on the Investment Team of Insight Venture Partners. Follow him on Twitter @RJMetrics.

On January 24, 2013, Twitter released Vine, a mobile service that lets you capture and share short looping videos. We set out to learn how popular Vine has become in its first month of existence and how its performance has stacked up against competitors like Viddy and Socialcam.

We loaded data from Twitter’s API into RJMetrics and here’s what we found:

  • Overall, video creation is still an extremely underdeveloped market. Only about 4 percent of highly active users shared a video through Vine or a top competitor during Vine’s first month on the market. In that same period, 98 percent of the same group shared at least one photo through a leading photo sharing service.
  • In its first month, Vine steadily gained market penetration to 2.8 percent of Twitter’s highly active users, blowing past competitors Viddy and Socialcam, which were used by 0.5 percent and 0.2 percent of the same population, respectively.
  • Twitter’s built-in tools for photo and video sharing are dominating the competition. and are the most popular tools in their respective categories by a wide margin.
Vine Adoption

Vine showed impressively stable adoption growth over the course of its first month. We were expecting to see a spike in adoption around the time of the announcement followed by a leveling-off period, but instead the percentage of new users each day has remained consistent. This is a good sign for future growth, because the rate of adoption does not appear to be slowing as time goes by.


Vine Vs. Viddy Vs. Socialcam

In Vine’s first month, the percentage of highly active users who used Vine was meaningfully higher than the percentage who used competitors Viddy and Socialcam.

VideoAdoptionWe were concerned that this might not be an apples-to-apples comparison since many users may have just been “trying out” Vine in this month. So we looked at the average number of times each of these tools was used during the month. As it turned out, repeat usage of Vine was actually more likely than the other apps.

UsesPerMonthVideo Vs. Photo

While Vine’s performance is impressive relative to its competitors, it’s still a tiny player in the universe of media sharing on Twitter. We looked at the percentage of users who linked to various media sharing services and found that photos represent the vast majority of the links sent out by highly active users.

LinksByServiceAs you can see in the chart above, native Twitter photo hosting ( is the dominant player, followed by Instagram and then a number of less prominent competitors. When you remove Twitter and Instagram, you can see just how small a player Vine is when it comes to sharing media.

LinksByServiceSmaller About The Data

We decided to sample from Twitter’s most active users to find early-adopter activity. Twitter’s API was used to identify and download the Twitter streams of about 2,500 randomly selected, “highly active” users, each of whom had tweeted at least 100 times at that point in 2013. The result was 2.3 million tweets that were sent between January 24th and February 24th. 320,000 of these tweets contained links, which we followed through any link shorteners to find their final destinations. The data was then loaded into RJMetrics, where we generated this analysis with just a few clicks.

Twitter’s effort to add native photo and video sharing into its service is proving fruitful. These tools have quickly become the most popular options for end users, causing a major impact on the market for third-party apps. Vine appears to be establishing itself as the de facto tool for short video creation and sharing. However, the significance of this move will only be felt as its market matures. Today, Vine is a service only used by a small minority of even the most highly active users.