Conventional wisdom for the loss

Next Story

BlackBerry Storm video found, apparently taped using a Fisher Price PXL 2000

In the presidential race the pundits are going crazy offering advice for the Obama campaign. Much of it is to ignore Palin and concentrate on McCain. The conventional wisdom is that attacking her would drive independents and women to the Republican ticket, thereby ensuring McCain’s victory.

What if Google had taken such advice about its assault on Microsoft’s domination of the computer industry? Conventional wisdom was that Office was impregnable, that an on-demand version with minimal functionality could not stand up to the suite’s IT stranglehold in the corporate environment. And conventional wisdom is right from a conventional perspective: Office continues to own more than 90% of Windows desktops and a healthy share of the Mac.

But the next generation of users that’s coming on line, namely my 7 and 14 year olds, know from nothing about Windows or Office. Even though their grandparents bought the older daughter a PC, she borrowed my old MacBook and never went back. The other night she thought she briefly lost some homework she was typing into Blogger, and I walked her through reopening the post which was tucked safely away through the program’s auto-save function. Her generation feels more comfortable knowing the data is stored in the cloud than on the hard drive where she’s already lost 100 iTunes downloads when it crashed.

And that’s just Office. Next up is Windows, which Google is undermining first with Firefox, next with Chrome, and finally with Gears on top of browser apps like WordPress. When that works – and it makes no difference whether it’s Chrome, Safari, or Firefox the plug-in edition – then the browser becomes a read/write system and Office is really dead. Remember that Ajax was Microsoft’s last-ditch ploy to dumb down the browser and cripple the IE ActiveX control to reject text entry.

Conventional wisdom was that rich internet applications required offline support before they would be free of the Windows stranglehold, but the iPhone proved that always-on trumped rich and streaming beats DRM. The conventional wisdom is now shifting from moving files around to moving pointers to the location in the file that needs to be displayed around. When Gears develops caching smarts and tools for adding that functionality to third party applications like Twitter and other activity streams, the concept of web site is flipped on its head to a series of pointers to media that is predictively streamed ahead based on social graph behavioral data.

Conventional wisdom is nonetheless valuable, especially in its utility as a predictive indicator of the real trend it hides from. Google knew there was no clock to run out in the battle with Microsoft, so instead Brin and Page went into a 2 minute offense at the start of the game. Microsoft has plenty of strength on the bench, but it needs to understand the conventional wisdom and then call the audible at the line of scrimmage. Obama should appoint Ray Ozzie as Secretary of Swarming before it’s too late.

  • scott

    Google’s assault on Microsoft for the most part has not included verbal attacks against Microsoft. I think it was fairly easy for Google to take the high road while targeting Microsoft’s vulnerabilities.

  • michael arrington

    great post Steve.

  • TravisV

    To extend your 2 minute drill analogy – MSFT is the Mike Nolan (SF 49ers) of head coaches. Extremely conservative, putrid play calling. MSFT fans are like 49ers fans – who keep piling into a stadium (Candlestick>>3Com>>Monster>>Candlestick) that changes its name once every several years, but sees no real structural improvements otherwise. The organization keeps making noise about a “better stadium” that’s on the horizon, and there is a lot of speculation about this alleged better stadium, but no real tangible evidence that is going to materialize. And finally, MSFT and the 9ers have in common a piece of history (decade(s) ago) that was so brilliant that the masses are willing to give the benefit of the doubt and keep lingering around for something good to happen, despite very obvious evidence that would suggest the contrary.

  • Karoli

    Much more of my work is being done in the cloud, no question. However I still have concerns around security, and how to deal with times where I am not connected, which remains a reality no matter how ubiquitous network access may be via iPhone or BlackBerry.

    What will ultimately drive me to the cloud permanently? A decent photo editing application and fast uploads of RAW files. There is nothing that comes close to what I have on my laptop right now, but damn, it hurt to lose 320 GB of RAW files that represented over 2 years of daily photography to two dead (same brand) hard drives. All I have left of those are the finally edited best images stored on Flickr and Zooomr. I would store all of it there if it worked faster and better.

    Like most voters who still haven’t decided between Obama and McCain, what I am looking for is a sense of confidence in the choice I make. Having Lightroom installed on the PC is something known to me; using cloud applications and storing my data there? Still a bit of a risk, despite my incredibly negative experience with the known.

  • Steve Gillmor

    One more time – personal attacks will be deleted.

blog comments powered by Disqus