<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechCrunch &#187; Viewscore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/tag/viewscore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 22:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='techcrunch.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://techcrunch.com/osd.xml" title="TechCrunch" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://techcrunch.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>An aggregate review of aggregate review services</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2006/09/28/an-aggregate-review-of-aggregate-gadget-review-services/</link>
		<comments>http://techcrunch.com/2006/09/28/an-aggregate-review-of-aggregate-gadget-review-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vince Veneziani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retrevo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viewscore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/28/an-aggregate-review-of-aggregate-gadget-review-services/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Product review search engine Retrevo was selected to launch at DEMO yesterday and it&#8217;s pretty cool. We&#8217;ve written about competitor ViewScore here before and also launched this month is yet another similar service that just launched called Wize. All of these sites will help you find reviews of electronics and other products and each of them has a unique feature set that adds value to the basic search and aggregation. What could be better than services that aggregate reviews? Perhaps an aggregate review of these type of services. If that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re thinking, you&#8217;ve come to the right place. If neither gadgets nor reviews are your thing, I think the following are still interesting case studies in how to add value on top of product search and affiliate revenue generation. Affiliate and contextual advertising have created a seductive opportunity for monetization that many site designers are seeking to cash in on. There are so many sites that try to monetize affiliate links that I&#8217;ve grown bored with most of them, but the following ones are more fresh and interesting than most. Between these three sites I think that Wize has the best chance for commercial success, but I really like some of the features of the other two sites, Retrevo and Viewscore. Retrevo Retrevo just launched yesterday. It discovers product manuals and previews them if in PDF format, displays information from manufacturer websites, searches blogs and forums, professional reviews and articles and offers a preview pane to easily switch between sources. It does not offer numerical ratings, saved searches or much else. The variety of sources searched are very good, but not much value added on top of that. For a simple, powerful, thorough search &#8211; Retrevo is a good option. The company is backed by just under one million dollars from Alloy Ventures and is seeking further funding. They plan to roll out many new features in the future to support the full life-cycle of product ownership all the way to recycling things. Matt Marshall wrote about Retrevo earlier this week. ViewScore Israel based ViewScore uses numeric score averaging and a semantic algorithm to give products an average score out of 100 over thousands of professional reviews online. The review sources are ranked by another algorithm and user feedback. The site grabs product specs, compares similar products and offers comparative pricing from multiple online shopping sites. Users can also]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Product review search engine <a href="http://www.retrevo.com">Retrevo</a> was selected to launch at <a href="http://demo.com">DEMO</a> yesterday and it&#8217;s pretty cool.  We&#8217;ve written about competitor <a href="http://viewscore.com">ViewScore</a> here before and also launched this month is yet another similar service that just launched called <a href="http://wize.com">Wize</a>.  All of these sites will help you find reviews of electronics and other products and each of them has a unique feature set that adds value to the basic search and aggregation.</p>
<p>What could be better than services that aggregate reviews?  Perhaps an aggregate review of these type of services.  If that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re thinking, you&#8217;ve come to the right place.  <em>If neither gadgets nor reviews are your thing,</em> I think the following are still interesting case studies in how to add value on top of product search and affiliate revenue generation.</p>
<p>Affiliate and contextual advertising have created a seductive opportunity for monetization that many site designers are seeking to cash in on.  There are so many sites that try to monetize affiliate links that I&#8217;ve grown bored with most of them, but the following ones are more fresh and interesting than most.  Between these three sites I think that <a href="http://wize.com">Wize</a> has the best chance for commercial success, but I really like some of the features of the other two sites, <a href="http://retrevo.com">Retrevo</a> and <a href="http://viewscore.com">Viewscore</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Retrevo</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.retrevo.com"></a><a href="http://retrevo.com">Retrevo</a> just launched yesterday.  It discovers product manuals and previews them if in PDF format, displays information from manufacturer websites,  searches blogs and forums, professional reviews and articles and offers a preview pane to easily switch between sources.</p>
<p>It does not offer numerical ratings, saved searches or much else.  The variety of sources searched are very good, but not much value added on top of that.  For a simple, powerful, thorough search &#8211; Retrevo is a good option.  The company is backed by just under one million dollars from Alloy Ventures and is seeking further funding.  They plan to roll out many new features in the future to support the full life-cycle of product ownership all the way to recycling things.  <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2006/09/25/retrevo-offers-gadget-search-engine-raises-less-than-1m/">Matt Marshall</a> wrote about Retrevo earlier this week.</p>
<p><strong>ViewScore</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.viewscore.com"></a>Israel based <a href="http://viewscore.com">ViewScore</a> uses numeric score averaging and a semantic algorithm to give products an average score out of 100 over thousands of professional reviews online.  The review sources are ranked by another algorithm and user feedback.  The site grabs product specs, compares similar products and offers comparative pricing from multiple online shopping sites.  Users can also sign up to get an alert when a new review for a particular product is available.</p>
<p>Viewscore currently offers 60,000 reviews from 1,000 sources.  Blogs and other social media are not included.  The company says it hopes to expand it&#8217;s basic formula beyond gadgets and into many other fields.  See <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/">our initial review of Viewscore here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Wize</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wize.com"></a><a href="http://wize.com">Wize</a> aggregates reviews on far more than just electronics, it&#8217;s got home and garden, video games, health products and more.  It searches shopping sites with user reviews like Shopping.com and Amazon and expert reviews from traditional product review sites.  The company says it has 757,136 product reviews from 4,735 different websites for 19,806 different products.  That&#8217;s a lot of websites, 4,735.</p>
<p>Wize quantifies what percentage of reviews were positive or negative (&#8220;users like it&#8221;) and it tracks buzz &#8211; by simply counting what percentage of reviews for a product were posted in the last 60 days and how the reviews rated that product relative to others in its class.  The site combines user ratings with expert review ratings and the buzz formula above to give products an overall Wize rating.  User research can be saved via a cookie, without creating an account.</p>
<p>The site is very aesthetically pleasing and probably has the best chance of commercial success.  I think people like the combination of trusted professional sources along with simple up or down community voting.  It&#8217;s not the most subtle, interesting approach here but I think it&#8217;s likely to work the best with large numbers of users.</p>
<p><strong>Others</strong></p>
<p>Also worth looking at again if review aggregation is what you&#8217;re in the mood for are <a href="http://shopwiki.com">ShopWiki</a> (<a href="http://techcrunch.com/tag/shopwiki">our review</a> &#8211; it&#8217;s got loads of cool features) and <a href="http://www.Kulist.com">Külist</a>, which is strange <a href="http://techcrunch.com/tag/kulist">but kind of cool</a>.  <a href="http://www.metacritic.com/">Metacritic</a> is probably the overall review ag leader, but doesn&#8217;t do gadgets.</p>
<p>These are the types of sites that only so many people probably want to think about them too often &#8211; but when you need one they are quite handy.  More are sure to pop up any day now, but I think the sites above provide a good look at the state of the art.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/3085/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/3085/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/3085/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/3085/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/3085/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/3085/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/3085/"></a> ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techcrunch.com/2006/09/28/an-aggregate-review-of-aggregate-gadget-review-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2a014e70509390133a9b9073671a2e8d?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcbucket</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/retrevologo.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/viewscorelogo.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/wizelogo.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ViewScore.com: Review Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscorecom-review-aggregator/</link>
		<comments>http://techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscorecom-review-aggregator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viewscore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Bytes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/08/30/viewscorecom-review-aggregator/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[makes a lot of sense. . The site then crawls the web &#8211; namely a few major review sites &#8211; and grabs the pertinent scores and information. Now this is the trick to the whole system &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t just grab the 1-10 numerical scores. ViewScores patented process actually parses the review for positive and negative language and uses that to produce the majority of its final score. That&#8217;s right &#8211; they have a robo-critic who distills reviews to their barest essentials and then figures out if the reviewer hated the product or was raving about it. &#8220;We took a Sony press release and put it into the system and it got the highest score because everything was positive,&#8221; said Ami Zivov, CTO of the Tel Aviv-based company. &#8220;But when we put in a professional review, it gets a mix of positive and negative.&#8221; The site also obviously has sale links near the bottom and usually creates a set of 5 or six scores and allows you to &#8220;suggest&#8221; a review to be added into the mix. Finally, you get an average score (between 1 and 100) and a star score and general &#8220;mood&#8221; score (&#8220;Good&#8221;, &#8220;Excellent&#8221;) for those so inclined. The database is fairly hefty right now, with quite a few gadgets already processed and ranked. ViewScore lets you can find a set of professional reviews in a concentrated space, thereby alleviating the standard &#8220;Click-on-splog-sites-until-I-find-a-review&#8221; syndrome and that kind of makes my day. ViewScore]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a HREF="http://www.viewscore.com"><img> makes a lot of sense.</p>
<p><img>. The site then crawls the web &#8211; namely a few major review sites &#8211; and grabs the pertinent scores and information.<br />
<span id="more-622"></span><br />
Now this is the trick to the whole system &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t just grab the 1-10 numerical scores. ViewScores patented process actually parses the review for positive and negative language and uses that to produce the majority of its final score. That&#8217;s right &#8211; they have a robo-critic who distills reviews to their barest essentials and then figures out if the reviewer hated the product or was raving about it.</p>
<p>&#8220;We took a Sony press release and put it into the system and it got the highest score because everything was positive,&#8221; said Ami Zivov, CTO of the Tel Aviv-based company. &#8220;But when we put in a professional review, it gets a mix of positive and negative.&#8221;</p>
<p>The site also obviously has sale links near the bottom and usually creates a set of 5 or six scores and allows you to &#8220;suggest&#8221; a review to be added into the mix. Finally, you get an average score (between 1 and 100) and a star score and general &#8220;mood&#8221; score (&#8220;Good&#8221;, &#8220;Excellent&#8221;) for those so inclined.</p>
<p>The database is fairly hefty right now, with quite a few gadgets already processed and ranked. ViewScore lets you can find a set of professional reviews in a concentrated space, thereby alleviating the standard  &#8220;Click-on-splog-sites-until-I-find-a-review&#8221; syndrome and that kind of makes my day.</p>
<p><a HREF="http://www.viewscore.com">ViewScore</a></p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/622/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/622/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/622/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/622/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/622/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/622/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/622/"></a> ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscorecom-review-aggregator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c0a943f484a32e62ed3bc81dd0dd25da?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">john</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viewscore aggregates gadget reviews</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake Robinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viewscore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Biggs over at CrunchGear wrote about an Israeli startup called Viewscore that aggregates product reviews of gadgets from around the web. He says it&#8217;s like the metacritic.com of gadgets. The cool technology here though is that the site normalizes numeric ratings across sites that use different scales (a number out of ten or up to five stars are converted to a score out of 100) and uses semantic analysis to determine a number for reviews that don&#8217;t use numeric ratings. All the reviews are averaged and viewable individually. You can compare prices and rate the quality of the reviews. There&#8217;s also basic information displayed about each product and a product comparison page for many gadgets. Biggs, the CrunchGear editor, says the database of gadgets is pretty good so far. The company has told me that it intends to take its technology beyond gadgets but that this was the best place to start because there are already so many gadget reviews online. In related meta-review site news, the multi-topic review search engine iNods (see Mike&#8217;s review) released their 1.0 version today. There&#8217;s so much content available online these days that quality aggregation of it with some good added value on top is an important service to provide. I think there&#8217;s a lot of room for more entries into this space.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.viewscore.com"></a>John Biggs over at <a href="http://crunchgear.com/2006/08/30/viewscorecom-review-aggregator/">CrunchGear</a> wrote about an Israeli startup called <a href="http://viewscore.com">Viewscore</a> that aggregates product reviews of gadgets from around the web. He says it&#8217;s like the <a href="http://www.metacritic.com/">metacritic.com</a> of gadgets.  The cool technology here though is that the site normalizes numeric ratings across sites that use different scales (a number out of ten or up to five stars are converted to a score out of 100) and uses semantic analysis to determine a number for reviews that don&#8217;t use numeric ratings.  All the reviews are averaged and viewable individually.   You can compare prices and rate the quality of the reviews. There&#8217;s also basic information displayed about each product and a product comparison page for many gadgets.</p>
<p>Biggs, the CrunchGear editor, says the database of gadgets is pretty good so far.  The company has told me that it intends to take its technology beyond gadgets but that this was the best place to start because there are already so many gadget reviews online.</p>
<p>In related meta-review site news, the multi-topic review search engine <a href="http://inods.com">iNods</a> (see <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/10/more-edge-reviews-inods/">Mike&#8217;s review</a>) released their 1.0 version today.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s so much content available online these days that quality aggregation of it with some good added value on top is an important service to provide.  I think there&#8217;s a lot of room for more entries into this space.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/2747/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/2747/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/2747/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/2747/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/2747/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/2747/"></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/2747/"></a> ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2a014e70509390133a9b9073671a2e8d?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcbucket</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/viewscorelogo.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
