Look for new San Diego-based Nirvanix to launch in the next few weeks. It aims to compete with Amazon’s popular S3 storage web service and provide web developers another choice for online storage. The company, which is affiliated with online storage startup MediaMax (aka Streamload), should also be announcing a $12 million round of financing in the near future. It’s not clear exactly how affiliated Nirvanix and MediaMax are, and the company is keeping the specifics of the relationship quiet for now. There has clearly been a technology swap, though, and MediaMax is now using the Nirvanix service to provide the back end of its storage product. Also, former MediaMax CEO Patrick Harr is now running the show at Nirvanix (MediaMax founder Steve Iverson has retaken the CEO spot at MediaMax). While the company is keeping quiet about the funding and exactly how it’s affildiated with MediaMax, they are saying that they’ll be filling some of the perceived holes in S3. Hopefully they’ll be offering a service level agreement (Amazon doesn’t). MediaMax, meanwhile, has been trying to pull through a hellish technology transition (my guess is it was related to the changeover to Nirvanix) that plagued them earlier this summer. They’ve moved their corporate blog to a new site, and are talking openly with users about some of the problems they’re facing. Disclosure: I am an investor in Omnidrive, which is also in the online storage space and can be considered a competitor to MediaMax and Nirvanix. → Read More
San Diego based storage service Streamload is having a hellish summer. On June 22, more than a month ago, they began rolling out “significant improvements” to the service. Users were told in a blog post that some files would become temporarily unaccessible and to expect downtime of up to two weeks. “Please rest asssured [sic] that we are doing everything possible to minimize these service interruptions” they said. Much of what happened since then is unclear, but things clearly didn’t go according to plan. On July 1 Streamload said they were back online. On July 2 they noted some issues affecting some users. Skip to July 21: another blog post noting issues. On July 24 another update, and users are welcomed to the “speedy new MediaMax database and user interface.” Overall the blog posts don’t signal that much chaos was going on behind the scenes, but it is clear that things were not going as well as the Streamload blog suggested. Many customers complained in the comments to those posts about file deletions, outages and lack of customer service response to their questions. At some point Streamload turned off comments and deleted all existing ones, presumably to downplay the problems. At least one user-created blog has popped up that reprints the blog posts, adds commentary suggesting that Streamload is hiding the facts, and allows users to comment. Some of the commenters are outraged at the alleged cover up: Mediamax isn’t just hopelessly incompetent, its corrupt and borderline evil! It’s corrupt because its still taking money for a service that doesnt work. And its evil because it must be aware of the incredible stress this is causing to so many people but its doing nothing to ease that pain. Just a few honest words of understanding on their blog would help, instead of the BS and lies they are posting. I’ve emailed Streamload for a response to get their side of things. I’ll update this post when I have more facts. Disclosure: I am not an independent observer of these events – I am an investor and on the board of directors of Omnidrive, which is also in the online storage space and can be considered a competitor to Streamload. If people notice other coverage of this, please leave a comment and I’ll link to it here. Until now I have only heard excellent things about the Streamload service, and I → Read More
<img src="http://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/editor, the situation was particularly dire.) Since then I’ve been very “don’t let this happen to you” when I talk to people about backing up their files. The number of digital media files alone on my computer skyrocketed over the past few years and to lose that stuff would be devastating. You likely feel the same way about yours. To that end, I decided to throw down some rules to follow to setup a successful file backup routine. → Read More
Public interest TV station C-SPAN and online media storage provider StreamLoad have announced that the two companies will collaborate on a new user submitted video site set to launch later this month and called ViewFinder. The ViewFinder site is already online, though it’s clearly not ready for launch (I just guessed the URL correctly after seeing the press release). Everyone wants in on the user submitted video game. More than seeking extra revenue, it may be a survival strategy. Old media’s dominance of video can no longer be presumed. Will short-form amateur video makers still seek the big audiences and validation of old, mainstream media or are the other options emerging too appealing and numerous to take that for granted anymore? C-SPAN’s entry demands some comparison with CNN’s user submitted video site, launched in July and called Exchange. Exchange emphasizes fast street level action reports in a section it calls iReports but it also includes mundane questions like “How do you plan to stay sane during holiday travel?” that users can upload videos in response to. CNN’s Exchange is powered by Blip.tv (winners of the Best Video Hosting Vloggies Award) and requires Windows Media Player to view the videos, which must have been the media behemoth’s idea since the videos on Blip.tv are all in Flash. It’s hard to know how much traction Exchange has gained in the 4 months since it launched, but in the blogosphere the site has only seen around 20 inbound links in the last week. In contrast, C-SPAN is asking for video replies to two questions, with submissions under 2 minutes in length. Right now the site asks for responses to a Question of the Week from the show Washington Journal and thoughts about the “fast approaching” midterm US congressional elections. The links aren’t all correct and some of the pages won’t load, so when they say it won’t be out until the end of the month that’s probably true. C-SPAN’s Viewfinder will be powered by Streamload, a San Diego based multipurpose media storage service that offers very low costs, large capacity and a wide variety of white labeled services. Our previous coverage of StreamLoad is here. The TV network had discussed a partnership with Google Video this spring. In fact, PaidContent reported at the time, C-SPAN’s demand that the famous Colbert/Bush roast video be pulled from YouTube was a part of that experiment to → Read More
In a likely sign of things to come, online storage company Streamload has signed a deal to provide file storage and automatic backup for customers of ISP Embarq, a Sprint/Nextel spin-off. Embarq customers will now have access to 25 GB of free online storage and a web interface for easy access to stored multimedia files. Larger packages supporting up to a terabyte of storage will also be available for purchase. Streamload monetizes increased storage space and quotas for file sharing. Streamload is just one of many online storage options and the company has offered 25 GB of free storage for some time. The partnership is a smart one for Embarq, though, as the company seeks to preempt more high profile offerings from vendors like Google and Microsoft. Earthlink offers a similar service, called Weblife. Weblife only comes with 1 GB of free storage, however. See also Mike Arrington’s recent review of Carbonite (which he says is the best option yet) for an overview of the online storage scene today. Partnering with ISPs seems like a particularly smart move for online storage services; as prices fall and it becomes increasingly difficult to differentiate based on features, competition may come down primarily to a fight for visibility. As user generated multimedia becomes increasingly common, bulk storage may become a standard offering for ISPs. Automatic online backup is set to become standard as well. → Read More
The online storage market is evolving fast. In the past, users could expect no more than a simple service where files could be slowly uploaded and downloaded from a mapped virtual drive or a simple web based interface. Little competition (and the bursting of the bubble) led to very high prices for a minimal amount of storage. Over the last year a slew of new services have launched (some are launching in February) with serious web 2.0 features, reasonable pricing (including free unlimited storage) and, in at least one case (OmniDrive), the ability to read/write directly to the file with local applications like Office, on the remote server. This last feature speeds the process of writing to files significantly by skipping the requirement to download the file to the hard drive first. The Online Storage Gang We looked at a total of thirteen companies. They are: AllMyData, Box.net, eSnips, Freepository, (the unfortunately named) GoDaddy, iStorage, Mofile, Mozy, Omnidrive, Openomy, Streamload, Strongspace and Xdrive. Another service, Zingee, has yet to launch and may also (or may not) have a compelling offering. Of the thirteen companies that we researched for this post, three really stand out. Australia-based OmniDrive (unfunded but not for long) is the clear leader in features. Box.net and Streamload are also very good choices. The services can roughly be broken down into storage-centric and sharing-centric. Some services, like Mozy and the unfortunately named Godaddy, are centered on storage only. GoDaddy offers online file backup with very basic uploading and downloading features – effectively a remote network drive. They are a bare-bones service with a fairly attractive price point ($20/year for 2 GB). You will not find sharing or other advanced features here. Other services offer storage but really focus on sharing files. There are a number of options here, but the best (OmniDrive, Box.net and Streamload) offer full private and public sharing. In addition, I really like the way Box.net approaches group folders, where any number of people can have read/write priviliges. Omnidrive is close to launching this feature as well. Web 2.0 Features Most of the new players (possibly with the exception of Mozy) are laser focused on key web 2.0 features. The best have multiple folders (private, shared, group, public), RSS feeds for each folder, etc. A couple, including Omnidrive, have also built features that allow subscriptions for RSS enclosures (such as podcasts), so that those files → Read More
San Francisco, CA
