Since its launch at Disrupt, BillGuard has saved its early users nearly half a million dollars and is finding at least one bad charge on 20 percent of the credit cards entered into its system. Originally, BillGuard was going to pursue a freemium model whereby the first card would be free but consumers would have to pay for additional cards.
Fred Wilson, who was one of the finalist judges and helped to popularize the term freemium, argued that was the wrong approach (watch below). BillGuard eventually listened and dropped its charges to consumers. The value of the service is in the data it is collecting, so introducing any friction in the collecting of that data is counterproductive. Instead of charging consumers, BillGuard plans on charging banks to license the service on behalf of their customers. Ultimately, banks will become the main distribution arm for BillGuard.
The second way BillGuard plans to make money is from merchants. It is testing out a certification service that gives merchants a BillGuard badge and score they can promote on their sites. “We are doing this with a people-powered movement of flagged data,” notes CEO Yaron Samid. Merchants also get an alert whenever a BillGuard user flags one of their bills. They can send an email to the consumer immediately and address the issue before it gets out of hand.
Once BillGuard collects enough data, it will be able to turn on pre-emptive analytics. It could become one of those databases that gets a lookup in realtime at the time of purchase to reduce fraudulent charges. BillGuard is a big data play in a big industry. But it also shows how techniques from the anti-spam and anti-virus worlds of Internet security can be applied to financial security.
Yuron and Rafael.
Yuron.
Yuron.
Yes.
Hi everyone, I'm Yuron.
This is my co-founder and CTO
Rafeal.
and on Monday on this
stage we unveiled the
world's first anti-virus for bills.
The most exciting thing
I'm gonna tell you today are the
results of what happened since then.
But to start, let me tell
you the personal story that got us on this stage.
It was a year and a half ago.
Mike posted a story about a
credit card scam that
had hit millions of people and
a buddy of mine calls me
up and say, hey, you should check your bill too.
It turns out I
was spending - losing -
over $12 a month or
over six months without even
knowing it.
You see my buddy is one of
these people that checks every line item of their bill meticulously.
I, on the other hand, let's
just say don't. But I
am like nine
out of ten people in this
audience, we almost never check our bills.
And the sad truth is, it's
not only hackers and fraud, but
legitimate merchants that are taking advantage of us.
So much so, that the average
American will lose over
$300 this year, and
our early results are showing even more.
To things we simply miss.
Things like: hidden charges, billing
errors, subscriptions we simply forget about.
Exactly.
I hope Tim's not in the audience, right?
Scams and flat-out fraud.
Now card fraud alone will
cost consumers over seven
billion dollars this year.
The banks will catch a third of it.
The rest is up to us.
Now there is good news.
People actually do catch and
report tens of thousands of bad charges everyday.
Millions more post their complaints online.
But even with
all that knowledge out there,
guess who's still losing money?
you.
Now what if, and
this is the big idea, what if
we could simply harness all of
that collective knowledge for the benefit of everyone.
What if you could simply get
an alert on your bill
whenever anyone else out
there flags a charge
that also appears on your bill.
Introducing BillGuard.
The people-powered anti-virus for our bills.
With BillGuard, we're now safer together.
Let's see the app.
Now the first thing you need to
know about this is that
once you register a card you'd
like to protect your done.
There's nothing else you need to do.
What you're looking at here is
live data for my personal AMEX.
This is not a camed demo.
For every transaction that
came in, BillGuard ran over 100 automated tests.
All that complicated algorithm work we do?
That's distilled down to very
simply showing me that in
in this case, I'm ninety four
percent clean, but I have
three charges that require my review.
Let's take a look at them.
This first one, seemingly free
service I personally was not aware I was paying for.
BillGuard tells me that nine
people have flagged this as misleading advertising.
On Monday, there were four flags.
This system is working.
I can now flag this charge
and BillGuard will give me detailed
instructions on how to cancel
the service and how to get my money back.
Phase 2 of the product will
actually go get your money back for you.
Let 's look at another charge.
Actually while we're here, take
a look at all that detailed meta
data that helps me understand the transaction.
And this is the meat of what
we do, the merchant transaction reliability score.
Someday you will see this
badge on eCommerce sites all across the web.
If I still
don't understand the transaction, I
can post a question to
other customers of this particular
merchant, almost like a quora for transactions.
Let's look at one more charge.
Booksrun.com, seemingly harmless from
the name, it turns
out BillGuard traced its
origins to a DNS server
linked to other fraudulent sites
and cross-referenced that with validated complaints online.
This one is a fraud.
Go ahead and click the flag button.
With that simple click, we've now
not only helped to validate BillGuard's
assumptions, we've potentially
helped thousands of other people who have that charge on their bill.
We have a bunch of other cool
features like seeing all of
your recurring subscriptions, and filtering
- and I mean lightening
fast filtering - for things
like ll my charges below $5.00.
I want to summarize.
BillGuard makes it one-click
easy for anyone to flag charges on their bills.
Let 's go forward.
doesn't play?
Okay, we had a little video to show you, but doesn't play.
You want to see the video?
Go ahead.
Hit the play button.
Working ?
You want us to wait for it, Mike?
PowerPoint on Mac in guess.
Okay, let me tell you, summarize, it's okay.
One-click easy to flag a
charge, analyzes millions
of transactions from banks, and this is deep IP.
Big data mining algorithms.
Lastly, and most disruptively,
listens for complaints online.
There's a lot of data out there.
We harness all of it we
drop it into the brain that
scans your card on a
daily basis and simply emails you when your attention is required.
Let's talk about our business model.
You're out of time.
I 'm out of time.
You want to say something, say it fast.
Okay, I'll tell you the most important thing.
You guys have probably
seen the business model, so let's talk about the results.
Monday night, we opened up, can we go to that slide?
This is the most important thing guys.
Let's start the timer at 12.
Day One.
Over 10,000 cards have been registered.
The next stat is the most important.
Of the users in the system, we
have found a bad charge on
over 20 percent of their cards.
That even blew us away.
And lastly, the charges range
from as little as two bucks, to
we found a $6000
fraud on a very wealthy individual's card.
Thank you guys very much.
Sorry I ran over.
Fred, I wanna start with you.
If you look at
anti-spam products, and there
are examples of this in
anti-spam; crowd source spam filters,
A lot of people mark things
as spam that really aren't spam, they're just irritated by them.
I would imagine a lot
of people are marking things as
fraudulent charges that actually are valid charges.
and that's going to be
very annoying to the
card companies when all of
a sudden they're getting inundated with 'give
me my money back' on things that are actually valid charges.
Right.
So that's actually a problem we solved.
That's what happens today.
People lie.
They say, the product wasn't delivered, I want my money back.'
That's called a false positive.
Right.
Our system not only creates
a merchant transaction reliability score,
we also create a spotter reliability score.
Almost how eBay does reliability
for sellers and buyers.
So we're actually able to offset
that and give a weighted voice
to people who over time we
see in the system have simply cried wolf.
Got it.
Do you guys understand the
business model because I cut
them off.
You understand how they make money?
I'm a in investor
and I don't feel I got it.
I know it, but I think everyone should know it.
I'm sorry, I ran over time, we had a video that was supposed to work.
The business model is very simple, your
first and most primary card,
the one you use most actively is absolutely free.
Once you're convinced and realized that
we are actually giving you actionable
data that helps save you money,
you can upgrade to a premium
version of BillGuard for only $4 a month.
That covers unlimited cards.
I don't like that idea.
Okay.
I think it'd be better to
take a fee, a
success fee, on the money I get back from using your service.
You charge people'a cards, they're not going to put the cards in your service.
I don't think that's a good idea.
Ok .
So we got that question in
the last round and I'll
repeat the answer and I'll expand on it a little bit.
It is core to our
DNA and our message to
consumers that we are consumer advocacy service.
These merchants have their fingers
in the pockets of these consumers.
That's a stream of cash we don't want to get in the middle of.
Okay?
We believe we build
a high-value service that people are willing to pay for.
It might be a
little bit of a novel concept and
I would actually say to
the entrepreneurs in the audience, don't be afraid to charge for your product.
If you're building something of value, people will pay.
If you're going to build a small business.
Thank you.
If you want to build a small business, charge for your product.
If you want to build a huge business, it's going to change the world.
I don't think you could do that by charging for your product.
So let's talk about phase two of our company.
OK.
Phase two of our business, and at the core, we are a big data company.
The real value here
comes at scale with the data, OK?
What I didn't
get a chance to announce is
that we are in talks with three of the top U.S. banks.
As of Monday, it's going to be probably four.
Four of the top
U.S. banks to have them
actually deliver BillGuard as
a service directly to their consumers
I just want to get input from all of the judges.
Sure.
We're just getting back right into it.
The business model is actually one of the most important aspects of what I didn't get to get to.
So what is phase two besides three of the top four banks?
Specifically with the banks?
The data you are talking
about, right?
Right.
So what do the banks want?
This is something that as a
start up we didn't actually disrupt, the economy disrupted it.
So the economic meltdown basically
disrupted the banking industry and
they're trying to figure out 1, how
to generate new revenue from actually
value add services how to
bring down costs and the
number one cost center is Call
Center is lastly had to
re-brand themselves as being Customer
Centric and we simply walked
into that and that's more timing than it is strategy, we got lucky.
What we're doing for them is automating the resolution management process.
It's an online system rather than a phone call.
We're giving them a service that
they can either bake into
the identity theft package that
they sell, or sell as
a new premium protection service.
And lastly, what we're
doing is building an industry standard
central collaborative database, that
all banks can feed into
and benefit from the data out of, they're gonna pay for that.
There's also a component for merchants.
As you notice people are communicating about these merchants.
Merchants will be able to
also get alerts from
us when people are complaining about
them and fix the problem
for the consumer before
the data goes to the bank and their commissions get jacked up.
I'm going to cut you off.
And I want the companies in the back to listen too.
This is like going on a first date.
You want to have the other person think you're fascinating.
You want to do a lot of listening here.
And we can always do a a little bit more talking backstage afterwards.
You want to get all the feedback from all the judges.
I'm not going to say this again with the other companies.
Sorry about that.
Who else feels strongly about this?
So I just have
a question, like If AOL,
if you said 90% of AOL
subscribers don't know they're paying
for it -
Why do you have to bring AOL into this?
What would AOL be flagged in this?
Would they be flagged as fraud?
AOL provides a valuable dial-up
service to million consumers around the world.
Why would this have anything to do with that?
Very specifically not AOL as
a merchant but the specific charge.
The dial-up service charge
would have a lower liability score because
of flags from other customers saying "I didn't even know I was paying for this".
Were those your charges on the screen?
Yeah.
Were those your charges that were in there?
Was that your Amex that you said was?
That was my live Amex So you really charge at Burger King?
I do.
I ate at Burger King.
Yeah, I'm a starving entrepreneur.
What do you want?
Okay.
I'd love to go out with you for dinner, judge.
Let's hear it for Burger King!
Roleoff is this a Sequoia investment?
I'd love to meet the company
actually, I think it's a
very interesting idea, I The
first question I had when
I heard about the idea was
distribution, because it feels
a lot like insurance, an industry
I know a little bit about where
the maxim is you have to sell insurance it's not bought.
It's the same reason why backup hard
drives are sold the day
after someone loses their hard
drives and anti virus sales spike after virus outbreaks.
But you seem to have
addressed that problem through getting
the distribution from the banks, which I think is really interesting.
The other question I had,
was how to get users to trust you.
Something that we dealt with Paypal
back in 2000, 2001.
Yeah.
We got Trust e-badges, got to
deal with Travelers to put their little umbrella on our website.
So the consumers felt that they could trust our servers.
And I think about you having a similar challenge.
Obviously, if you have the
distribution of the banks, that
goes somewhat towards solving that problem.
But if if I'm just arriving
at your web site, how do you deal with that trust issue?
So two pieces of that,
and first of all, I didn't get a
chance to announce this but later
this year we are going to
announce major a distribution
that deals with some of
the leading identity theft companies
and top anti-virus companies in the world. We'll be distributing billGaurd very widely through their customer base. Regarding the
trust issue, it's one of
the most encouraging things of the last two days.
We have only a 13%
drop-off rate at the page where you have to add your card.
And that's because we have a lot of early adopters signing up.
We're aware of that.
But what we're doing by surrounding
ourselves with not only, you
know, building a security product, we're security people.
We're funded by people who
have founded VeriSign, the former
CEO of McAfee on our advisory board.
We 're trying to create a
sense that this is a business
founded by people who understand security,
and we will earn your trust over time.
We don't expect it to happen overnight.
Since you have answers to
all our questions, it seems, what is it that you worry about?
That I worry about?
I'll tell you the
truth, and we spend a lot of time and money on this.
Obviously when you're in this
business, you're a potential target
for those hackers out
there who say, "I can be
smarter than you, and I can break into your system".
And so what we do
is spend a lot of money on
lots of third-party auditing, penetration
testing, we're I assume
you are using Yodlee on the backend, right?
We are.
So we don't store any passwords, we
don't ask for any personally identifiably information.
We ask for your email address to send you alerts and that's it.
And we're very, very sensitive to this.
It's actually in our culture,
the number one thing on the list: first do no harm.
Your privacy and your data is our number one priority.
If we actually get that right I think we'll be fine.
And we're really stressing that
at the company
Did
you - because
I know there's a feature that
when you pay your $4 a
month at the end of
the year - if
the company has not given you
at least that amount in benefit, you get a refund.
Right?
Yes.
I wasn't going to announce this.
This sounds like a set up.
No, no no.
Ron doesn't even know this.
Does this sentence start with, "Later
this year, we will announce
partnerships with three of the
largest I wish we were that coordinated.
We're obviously not.
No.
We're obviously not.
I'm on camera.
I'm in trouble.
So we were not getting that out.
So we subscribe to the
Tony Hsieh school of delivering happiness.
We want to surprise our customers.
So if someone
at the end of the year- we haven't
caught anything for them which, by the way, is a good thing.
If your card is clean that's a
good thing, but there'll be some people who will say "You know what?
I signed up $4 a month, and it didn't catch anything."
We're going to give them their money back.
I think that's a cool feature.
But I didn't know it was undisclosed, and I'm sorry.
Fred, does that make you happy or
do you- you seem to think that
they should be-
I 'm just
telling him what I think.
I think this'll to be a bigger
business if you let people
put their cards in for free
and make them money, saving them
money as opposed to charging them for the service.
That's just my opinion.
No, I agree with you.
OK.
It's a little bit complicated by the way, operationally.
Cause when you say "OK we saved this money and they're like, oh I knew that ahead of time."
You know what I mean?
We want it to stay very clean.
But I- coming from you
Fred, we're gonna take that into very serious consideration.
Yeah but-
I think the concern
would be-
what we just pre-announced
helps that issue a little bit.
So it wasn't set up?
People don't like to come out of pocket.
People are cheap.
That's the problem.
Yeah.
I think that they should start charging
$4 once they've saved me some money.
Which by the way, I stole that idea.
Somebody actually in the audience told me that that's what they thought about this.
So, I love stealing good ideas.
But that to me makes more sense.
Yeah.
I think that is that they
already see that's a problem
and they can initiate a charge back on on their own.
But if you can make easy enough to automate the process then.
It feels like mint.
You don't pay for mint, so why would I pay for this?
Well, there are today about
35 million Americans, who pay
between 10 to 15 dollars
a month for identity theft.
Those things are scams.
The fact that you're associating yourself with that market is crazy.
I'm trying to make a point, I'm trying to make a point.
This is like insurance.
This is like a system
that is protecting you from losing money.
We believe people will pay for it.
If we're wrong and you're right, we're going to change the model.
No, look.
we dont need to argue about that.
I think you've got a great business.
Thank you.
You just gotta figure out how to make money out of it.
Marissa?
I'll give you two compliments.
One i think the marketing piece is
really clear, people I think just get it.
I also think that the technical aspects of what you talked about are pretty interesting.
Being able to go back to DNS
servers, figuring out who's linked
to who, pulling together all of this data, doing a lot of analysis.
I think the technically chops are really there.
I think that I have two concerns.
One of them is the business model concern.
But I even have deeper, I think, concern on that.
Meta effect, which is your system
will become better as more people sign up.
You actually want the clean cards
because that will help you understand what's good and what's bad.
And anything that's a
deterrent to people putting their card
in, is a problem, which to
me that argues for charge me later, don't charge me upfront.
Because you getting even more
cards up front really actually helps your system get better.
And the fourth observation, I'm
sorry, the second observation on sort of
the negative side,I do worry about the user promise.
I think people are going to expect
to have you really find these charges.
But even in your own example,
I think those were probably charges that
you did sign up you start
looking at AOL or HBO or
any of these models where they
say "three months free" and then suddenly it kicks in and starts charging.
It's not that you are a
way that you remind users about
that and shut that off.
I'm worried that it's not
really just about finding fraud or
finding viruses per say; it's
about finding your own behaviors.
I think there's this very fine line
of what's a fraud
that you can report to someone,
versus what's something they did they might just regret.
Brief response, and then we have to move on, you're out of time.
I'll give you one simple
example, its actually
the most common case where people
sign up for stuff, they simply
forgot about it or they didn't
read the fine print, that they
were charged this extra SMS ringtone package on their cellphone bill.
That's still money that is
being lost by the consumer,
and we can help save that,
that's equally damaging to a hardworking individual as a fraud. We think that somewhere in
between, we'll be able to
establish ourselves as a defining
brand for personal finance security,
whether it be fraud or otherwise.
Thank you very much.
Thank you guys.
I'm not reading tweets on
stage but this one was,
personally I think arguing endlessly with
Fred Wilson is not particularly wise