Y Combinator Backed GazeHawk Heatmaps With Web Cams
Alexia Tsotsis
Jul 29, 2010

You’ve normally got two choices in site heatmapping (figuring out where eyeballs land on your site),  you can either buy costly specialized equipment ($40K) or pay a consultant to use their own equipment, which costs upwards of $5K. Y Combinator funded GazeHawk has figured out a more pared down and innovative solution; Why not use webcams?

Co-founded by Brian Krausz and Joe Gershenson, newly launched GazeHawk is less expensive than most already existing eyetracking services at 1/10 the price. And heatmapping, something that required custom hardware and bringing people into a lab, now requires simple consumer hardware and proprietary software.

GazeHawk has its own network of test subjects; All you need to do as a website owner is give them a url or a screenshot and you get back a site map of the most active viewed places on your website, instead of having to got through the unwieldly and costly processes described above.

Though similar in concept to UserTesting, GazeHawk is disruptive in the sense that we’ve never seen a low-cost, low-effort eye tracking service before. According to Krausz, GazeHawk’s future plans include a number of extra features, better visualizations, allowing people to use their own test viewers, and eventually expansion in to the UX industry — Creating product based on tester feedback,  i.e. what people want to see.

Weary readers have learned to ignore ads, especially those placed in the bottom right corner. Say Krausz, “People are so good about identifying ads nowadays that if anything looks like one you lose the entire area.” Below is a GazeHawk heatmap of our homepage — most notably people are looking at our story rotator, ING ads and not our events stuff.  So quick look to the bottom right! Look!

Aside from being fascinating, accurate heatmapping is crucial to informing online ad placement, cost per click and cost per impression are just not as accurate when measuring brand conveyance. For those interested in trying it out, GazeHawk is offering a 50% discount for TC readers, just enter TECHCRUNCH10 at checkout.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  • http://www.tiny.cc/750i4 rima20

    this is insane!
    http://tiny.cc/750i4

  • David

    Awesome, congrats Brian & Joe! Amazing what a $40 webcam and gazehawk can do for the future of user testing and advertising =)

  • nobody

    Wow. Not inspired by Flickr at all.

    Or blatant spam. Nice one.

  • Orange

    Clearly doesn’t work – it seems to say people actually looked at the ING ad?!

  • Argyris Zymnis

    It’s amazing that they can charge so little for such a useful app. Will definitely use it in our website. Good job guys!

  • http://michaelthegeek.wordpress.com michaelthegeek

    What is there to fear?

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=520YG-IjPgo DC WEB DESIGN

    Nice !!!!!!! love it

  • http://www.cyber-duck.co.uk Khal

    While this an interesting idea and an option for the budget minded, it is not a perfect solution.

    Its worth noting that there is much more to eye tracking than heatmaps and relying on one metric alone is dangerous in any form of analytics.

    We found that full Eye tracking sessions have been invaluable to our clients and realtime user feedback combined with a range of metrics is worth the additional cost.

  • http://gazehawk.com Brian Krausz

    You’re absolutely right: eye tracking and heatmaps are definitely not the be-all end-all of usability. We’re looking at building out different metrics and visualizations to improve our analytics (and we already do provide a few more features than just a heatmap). Even now we think GazeHawk is a great compliment to the current suite of usability tools out there.

    One thing we’ve seen and have been frustrated with is the complexity of commercial eye tracking analytics suites. We want to build up all of the power they have, but without the complexity. This requires a fair amount of time, but we think the payoff is immense.

  • http://tomloverro.com Tom Loverro

    Sounds like a cool tech for both marketers and web designers.

    I guess August might want their money back though :-)

  • http://www.cyber-duck.co.uk Tom

    Yes, clearly this is for very basic results only. It also doesn’t take into consideration that someone experienced has to interpret the results or they are pretty much useless!

    One other thing…you don’t seem to have too much control over who the users are, what they interests are, demographics etc.

  • Jacob

    It seems to me that heat mapping is more effective and accurate when youbare studying clicks.

    Http://crazyegg.com is awesome for that.

    I wouldn’t rely on any eye-tracking software to make decisions.

  • http://tinyurl.com/3xnhznu kelly
  • kristin

    So nice to now see your writings on techcrunch!
    They don’t deserve you, but then, who does. :-D

  • http://www.gazehawk.com Joe Gershenson

    Click mapping is certainly a valuable technology as well. Whether you’re using CrazyEgg or Google Analytics, you can gain a lot of information that way.

    Click mapping can’t tell you more in the end than where users clicked, though, and we think there’s a lot of value in learning where they were looking.

    One of our goals is to take you past heatmaps and give you the ability to directly compare visual interest in different regions on your site. Like Brian said above, we’re already offering a few more visualizations, and we’re hoping to roll out some killer features in this area soon.

  • http://www.gazehawk.com Joe Gershenson

    Both of these are excellent points. As it happens, this is something some of our users have also brought up, and we’re already working on some features related to demographic selection. We currently provide some custom advice based on your results, and we’re planning on expanding this feature to help everyone understand what the eyetracking studies mean.

  • http://artchang.com Art Chang

    Another great product from a YC company! I spent a good amount of time looking at the TechCrunch heatmap example, it’s just so interesting.

    Heat maps are still so new to me, seems like there’s a lot to learn and definitely seems like a great addition to using the traditional analytics to improve UX.

    Great work!

  • http://marketmpb.blogspot.com Matt Blum

    I think its a great idea and congrats to the authors…

    for a marketing blog that is better than.. well you know..

    check out http://marketmpb.blogspot.com.com

    matt

  • Nick

    Warning: clicking on that link redirects you to a site that remotely installs a trojan on your computer.

  • http://www.unhappyincident.com Ralitza Iankova

    Very cool. I’m willing to give this try, especially considering the TC discount :).

  • John

    Who ever wrote this article clearly doesn’t know the market.

    crazyegg.com/usertesting.com are cheap as hell for heat mapping and video feedback, and how can this company guarantee where the eyeballs were looking?

    Do your research before posting a companies PR blast.

  • http://gazehawk.com Brian Krausz

    As my cofounder said above ( http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/29/y-combinator-backed-gazehawk-heatmaps-with-web-cams/#comment-1176837 ), CrazyEgg doesn’t do actual eye tracking, they build click maps. It’s a nice visualization, but it doesn’t give you more data than Google Analytics would give.

    UserTesting.com charges $39/user, so they’re about the same price point, and they don’t do anything with metrics: all of their data is qualitative, whereas we’re looking to provide both qualitative and quantitative results. They’re a great service, but the markets and goals are not the same.

    We haven’t released our accuracy numbers yet, but it is something we are considering, which should answer your concerns about our ability to know “where the eyeballs were looking”. We do screen our results for quality using a variety of measurements, and throw out results that aren’t accurate or don’t track properly (you get 10 “good tracks”, even if we track more than 10 people), so we do have a certain quality level we stick to.

  • Dan

    Nope, you are just a douchebag.

  • AndyC

    “how can this company guarantee where the eyeballs were looking?”

    Taking a wild guess here that before a session begins… they ask the user to go through a calibration test where they stare at dots on different parts of the screen.

  • http://optimdesign.com Brian L

    That sounds like a good way to do it. If it is done with a webcam it seems like something that could eventually be sold to agencies who could run their own tests and have control of the testing groups etc.

  • Nauman

    Thats a very good idea . As a web marketer I feel tempted to test this service. I think the owners shall give some free trial for a little web site look up.

  • http://www.aims.co.il Ron Spinner

    I tried this service and we learned a few things. One of the surprises is the attention the Flash show generated.

    Other research has shown that people ignore flash presentations on the web. This just reinforces our view that you have to test things yourself.

    If you are interested our full review of this service is here: http://www.aims.co.il/blog/eye-tracking-review-of-gazehawk-%E2%80%93-a-useful-website-marketing-tool/

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Got a tip? Building a startup? Tell us