Google Acquires Metaweb To Make Search Smarter
Leena Rao
Jul 16, 2010

Google has bought semantic search startup Metaweb, according to recent post on the search giant’s blog. Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Metaweb develops both semantic data storage infrastructure for the web, and Freebase, an “open, shared database of the world’s knowledge”. Freebase is a massive, collaboratively edited database of cross-linked data. The idea behind the product is to create a system for building the semantic web. Freebase allows anyone to contribute, structure, search, copy and use data. It sounds like Wikipedia, but instead of arranging by articles, it is more of an almanac, organized like a database, and readable by people and software. You can read our previous coverage of Freebase here.

Clearly, Google is acquiring Metaweb to boost its own search offerings. Metaweb’s database of tagged data will help make Google search smarter. And Freebase will be maintained as a free and open database but Google will continue to develop and contribute to Freebase. According to a blog post on the Freebase site, the site will increase the frequency of its downloadable database dumps from quarterly to weekly. The company says that it will continue to support Metaweb’s existing partners, but won’t be taking on new partners.

Co-founded by Danny Hills, Metaweb has raised close to $60 million from Omidyar Network, Millennium technology Ventures, Benchmark Capital and Goldman Sachs.

Advertisement
  • Related Topics
Advertisement
  • Steve

    Doing M&As here and there is not making Google smarter at all. Search share is not growing, revenue is not meeting expectations and costs increasing.. Google News redesign = FAIL, Google Buzz, Wave = FAIL. Google Apps for Enterprise = Highly unreliable. Background images on homepage = FAIL. Android phone = Nothing close to iPhone. I don't know where's Google going or rather i dont know the answer to the question "What is Google?"

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/paramendra paramendra

    This is exciting.

  • Dave

    check out the video What is Metaweb: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBSdYi4EY3s

  • http://21petals.com DC WEB DESIGN

    Why it's exciting?

  • Jon

    +1

  • brent

    Don’t forget about Google Base. It was supposed to be similar to what Freebase is. They’re paying twice for the same thing.

  • http://managementfunda.com/ Yogin

    Thia made me to sign in the metaweb site..thank you tech crunch.

  • http://www.buzzintechnology.com buzzit

    one more to its list. check out here how it compares with other companies on acquisitions http://buzzintechnology.com/2010/07/a-brief-histo...

  • http://twitter.com/thyaga Thyaga

    It does not make business sense if Google agreed to 'Freebase will be maintained as a free and open database but Google will continue to develop and contribute to Freebase.'. Google will not tolerate a start-ups which may become visible and have traces of competition for their cash cow – AdSense. It is easy for them to kill such companies using their cash in the bank. Investors of both companies will be happy, so who will complain.

  • http://www.facebook.com/clark.benson Clark Benson

    Congrats to Robert and the rest of the Freebase team – we love you guys at Ranker!

  • http://www.facebook.com/kris.haamer Kris Haamer

    Freebase was one of my fave startups a few years back they started out. Great to see them make it big.

  • niallo

    "Android phone = Nothing close to iPhone."

    Eh – Android has more sales in the US than iPhone, dude. http://mashable.com/2010/05/10/android-outselling...

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/paramendra paramendra

    It is exciting because this will take search to a whole new level.
    Google's Metaweb Acquisition http://goo.gl/fb/5L2yW

  • jad

    They didn't make it big. In fact, this means they failed at their mission of better organizing the world's information so that rich apps could be built around it. They never got to the APPS part. FAIL!

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/tailormypc tailormypc

    What would be even more newsworthy would be a company other than Google buying this up. For instance the media would go crazy if Facebook bought it, since rumors keep flying about Facebook starting it's own search engine.

  • http://twitter.com/beth_tk @beth_tk

    Anyone know what they paid?

  • http://www.cvwraps.com Tyone .G. Atkinson Jr

    Google make my job so easy I have a google phone that’s insync with my marketing work…

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/r0macdonald r0macdonald

    Google’s acquisition of Metaweb is a major validation of open Linked Data schema and Sir Tim Berners-Lee’s 1999 Semantic Web “dream for the Web [in which computers] become capable of analyzing all the data on the Web – the content, links, and transactions between people and computers.”

    It is all about the metadata.

    It has been a heck of a great last three months for validating the Semantic web proposition, what with the Apple acquisition of Siri, the Huffington Post buying Adaptive Semantics, Evri buying Twine, Facebook’s partial implementation of RDFa and the opportunities afforded by Twitter’s Annotations feature.

  • http://twitter.com/andraz @andraz

    This is definitely good news for people using structured data!

    Freebase identifiers are going to become ubiquitous.

    bye
    Andraz Tori, Zemanta

  • http://www.facebook.com/tysonquick Tyson Quick

    Yeah Steve, you must be right!!!!…. that's why they only have 30 billion dollars in cash to spend freely? They did this by making dumb decisions, building crappy products, hiring crappy engineers, and not knowing exactly why their goals are as a company? NOT

    Get off the internet Steve.

  • http://twitter.com/eranshir @eranshir

    Sadly The metaweb deal is not a great outcome. For a company that raised $60M, if this deal would've been in a valuation that is a decent multiple, Google would've had to disclose the valuation. The fact they didn't means it's pretty low. Freebase is a great source of knowledge and helped many start-ups and projects, alas the business case was just not there.

    One thing this deal does mean is that google is starting to get out of their fixation of solving everything through algorithms, and understanding the power of crowdsourcing. Hopefully google won't trash it and actually leverage it for a decent semantic search.

  • Glen

    Microsoft has probably even more cash.

    Is cash in hand = great products?
    Is cash in hand = innovation?
    Is cash in hand = company is going to be awesome in the coming years?

    No, No and No.

  • http://twitter.com/SurfinBerg @SurfinBerg

    Google clearly making a strong play in structured search. A good read :http://gigaom.com/2010/07/09/after-ita-where-might-google-look-next-for-structured-data/

  • jds

    no, yes* and no. Innovation isn't always driven from inside the organization.

    open innovation allows organizations, such as google, to buy instead of develop. Same thing is happening with pharma

  • http://twitter.com/tonlap @tonlap

    Google mastered this skill, ask Microsoft.

  • Armin

    I feel like the more interesting tidbit that here that you guys looked over is that metaweb powers Bing's image search to some degree. I wonder what happens with that

    http://www.metaweb.com/bing

  • http://webscannotes.com Lem

    Great news! Google’s acquisition of Metaweb marks a major milestone in Semantic Web development, and could be the trigger that will finally let Semantic Web take hold.

    The main reasons why Semantic Web never really took off despite having clear value propositions are due to the lack of major corporate sponsors and also the fact that keyword-based search engines were able to satisfy most basic search needs.

  • Bob

    160K android devices activated daily does not equal to fail.

  • http://twitter.com/bill_bliss @bill_bliss

    We can only hope that happens, Andraz! Getting one set of ID's and metadata to critical mass would be a huge catalyst to interoperability among Web applications.

    Metaweb rocks. I'm very happy for them.

  • http://twitter.com/bill_bliss @bill_bliss

    It does appear they are doubling down. There's this, of course, and the ITA acquisition, but one other thing that happened a while ago: the hiring of Daniel Tunkelang (http://thenoisychannel.com), Endeca's chief scientist.

  • http://givingplants.com/ Plant Gifts

    So Metaweb is a worldwide database of categories. Insert your stuff in this 'entity'/ category..OK. Now we know what you're talking about.

  • http://www.mymnyp.com/ Sytek MN Directory

    Metaweb was yet another semantic web startup before its time, but with the help of Google it now has the potential to make a much bigger impact.

  • http://twitter.com/johnoday @johnoday

    I'd really appreciate at least a ballpark rumor estimate of the purchase price. Also if there were any prior suitors. Thanks

  • http://twitter.com/beth_tk @beth_tk

    How are they planning to parse all these new questions? They give the "actors over 40 who've won at least one Oscar" as an example in their blog but neither Freebase nor Google can understand what that's asking for. Sounds like a natural language company should be next on their shopping list.

  • Mark

    Their CEO, Thomas Layton, has one of the hottest hands in tech…CitySearch, Opentable, Metaweb. Better yet, he seems to fly under the rumor mill of the trade blogs and general douchebaggery of The Valley. Not many entrepreneurs batting 1000 with that kind of tenure in tech start-ups.

  • steve 2.0

    While I want to believe that this is a win, it smacks of bailout – like the Evri purchase of Twine before it. As for the Semantic Web – at least we know that Google is still a believer.

  • Steve Day

    All this talk and no one seems to have gotten the low down on how much Google paid for Metaweb. The day it was announced, Techcrunch wrote about what Google paid for Slide.

    How much did the metaweb guys score???

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Got a tip? Building a startup? Tell us