Comments on: Facebook has not launched a 'Panic Button' – it's smarter than that

By: Making the web a safer place. « The iPlatform

Making the web a safer place. « The iPlatform — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:52:14 +0000

[...] http://eu.techcrunch.com/2010/07/12/facebook-has-not-launched-a-panic-button-its-smarter-than-that/ [...]

By: laptop

laptop — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:34:48 +0000

Why would you have two Facebook accounts?

By: Facebook has not launched a ‘Panic Button’ – it’s smarter than that | Blogle.org

Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:29:05 +0000

[...] on eu.techcrunch.com « Hello world! Category: Technology | RSS 2.0 You can skip to the end and leave a [...]

By: Tammy Edwards

Tammy Edwards — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:39:54 +0000

This is a great idea!
I see the possibility of this being misused by some facebook users.

By: Custom Software Development

Custom Software Development — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:50:11 +0000

It’s useful for users to use properly. Custom Software Development | iPad Developer

By: Facebook to Add Panic Button App

Facebook to Add Panic Button App — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:29:37 +0000

[...] ever-growing social networking site Facebook has agreed to add a “panic button” application that its users can install. The button will connect the user to the UK-based [...]

By: software

software — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:42:38 +0000

Do you think a panic button would stop internet groomers?

For a start you’re not supposed to use Facebook if you’re under 13 years of age.

By: Linkwertig: Microsoft, Spotify, Panic Button, Zillow » netzwertig.com

Linkwertig: Microsoft, Spotify, Panic Button, Zillow » netzwertig.com — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:02:18 +0000

[...] » Facebook unveils child safety ‘panic button’ » Facebook has not launched a ‘Panic Button’ – it’s smarter than that [...]

By: yohan

yohan — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 05:13:32 +0000

great post man

By: nesa

nesa — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:15:51 +0000

Somehow this may yield a good outcome if use properly, but we all know that in FB, its impossible. Take for example even those 'like' buttons, now used for trojan and worm propagation.

By: Why Do I Keep Getting Panic Attacks After I Have An Orgasm? | conquer anxiety panic attacks

Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:40:15 +0000

[...] Facebook has not launched a 'Panic Button' – it's smarter than that [...]

By: We Are Social’s Monday Mashup #32 / we are social

We Are Social’s Monday Mashup #32 / we are social — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:42:19 +0000

[...] a panic button, and its launch follows ‘months of negotiations’ between Facebook and CEOP. But as Techcrunch reports: while a few media outlets are reporting today that it has launched [a panic button], the reality [...]

By: helix2301

helix2301 — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:21:51 +0000

I think this is a start for Facebook but I really still think that companies like safetyweb are the way to go the button is only good for people that push it. Safetyweb lets the parent view and block the contacts young kids are sometimes not smart enough and two nieve to know whats bad and good. They can also be persuaded. With safetyweb the parent is looking over the child’s shoulder.

By: Sabine Boe

Sabine Boe — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:27:12 +0000

Excellent article, put everything in perspective, I couldn’t read all this from the BBC article. Thank you.

By: FP Tech Desk: Facebook adds ‘panic button’ to improve child safety | FP Posted | Financial Post

Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:00:11 +0000

[...] to their peers rather than it being imposed from above, so the viral effect can take off,” wrote Mr. Butcher on [...]

By: Peter Maude

Peter Maude — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:31:48 +0000

And what about the issue, that facebook has a very large community of Under 13′s. That technically should not be on the site.

This may be a good idea, and done the correctly way could help.

Also, it helps do more brand building for CEOP, which is always a good thing :-S

By: GIRL83

GIRL83 — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:06:33 +0000

This article is so poorly written. Whoever wrote it needs to learn proper English grammar or proofreading skills.

By: dreamy

dreamy — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:53:03 +0000

first?