The $700 Million Travel Search Deal And Google’s Shift In Strategy
Erick Schonfeld
Jul 4, 2010

Last Thursday, Google placed a major $700 million bet on a new strategy. It announced an agreement to purchase ITA Software, a leading provider of flight information (fares, schedules, availability) to most of the key online travel sites, travel search engines, and airlines. ITA’s existing customers include Bing, Orbitz, Kayak, Expedia’s Hotwire, Continental, US Airways, American Airlines, and Southwest.

Google was careful to note that it would “honor all existing agreements.” Indeed, if Google wants the deal to pass regulatory antitrust scrutiny, one requirement will very likely be a prohibition, or at least a promise on Google’s part, not to cut off ITA’s flight data to the competition. This deal is not primarily about denying other travel search sites access to this data. Rather, it signals a much more subtle and profound strategy shift for Google—towards more customized search experiences in different categories, starting with travel.

In other words, it is moving in the same direction as Bing, which has built out vertical search across not only travel, but also health, shopping, local, and, most recently, entertainment. To put this deal in perspective, it is roughly the same size as the $750 million AdMob deal, which represents Google’s entry into mobile search. Drilling down into different categories of search could be just as important to Google as mobile search.

For the most part, up until now Google search philosophy has been to show the best results from the Web and get people off of Google as fast as possible to other Websites. But for certain types of searches, Google could do a lot more to filter and organize results. Travel is one obvious area where Google could do more to show available flights and prices. Google wants to create a deeper vertical search experience around travel so that people can find what they are looking for more quickly.

Does this mean that Google is becoming more of a destination portal? Not exactly. For a hint at what Google Travel might look like, take a peak at Bing Travel. Bing licenses ITA’s data, making it easy to search for flights by entering the cities you want to fly between. It gives you most of the data you need to make a decision (price, airline, departure and arrival times, number of stops), but then sends you to Orbitz or directly to an airline Website to make the purchase. (See screenshot below).

This kind of purchase-oriented, data-driven search opens up new ways to make money for Google. In addition to running cost-per-click (CPC) search ads in the margins, it could also possibly start charging airlines or travel sites on a cost-per-action basis, where it gets a higher fee for every reservation made. Barclays Capital analyst Douglas Anmuth thinks this is exactly what will happen. In a research note on Friday, he wrote:

We believe the ITA acquisition and the shift toward vertical search pushes Google more in the direction of CPA-based search advertising.

Such CPA ads are generally higher margin than classic CPC ads. But Anmuth notes that Google has so far stayed away from vertical search because it didn’t want to alienate certain advertisers who use Google to drive traffic to their sites. But Google is feeling pressure as “core search growth slows” and may now be more open to picking off specific vertical search categories such as mortgages, credit cards, insurance, and healthcare.

If Google does start to go after vertical search in the same way that Bing does already, search results will look a lot less uniform than they do today. Those much-maligned “ten blue links” just don’t cut it anymore.

Photo credit: Flickr/Luis Argerich


Advertisement
Advertisement
  • http://www.Spirofrog.de Tom

    Interesting move. As Google knows exactly all searches now. I am sure they will sell some flights soon. Billion Dollar Business.

  • Jer

    why would there be antitrust hearings? it's not like google is already in the market and is buying a competitor. They're entering the market.

  • Steve

    They're entering the market by buying a competitor that is the dominant supplier of flight information on the internet. If they don't agree to allow ITA to continue supplying that information to other sites they are now, Google will effectively have a monopoly over that information.

  • Babar

    Interesting to see the shift from CPC to CPA. It gives the best outcome for advertisers at least helping them to only pay for the right users and put the risk on the networks. But paying 700 mill just to promote a simple CPA model? come on. There must be more to the deal than just pushing forward the CPA model.

    Remember that Google already are pushing CPA business model through their GAN with thousands of affiliates. If they integrate it through search they would go head on with their GAN publishers and adsense enabled sites. I’m sure that this is not Google Strategy since the Google content network is giving Google the most revenue growth at the moment. But for sure interesting to see what will happen

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/juliennakache juliennakache

    Ok, it makes sense, but why did Google buy to need ITA ? They could have shifted their strategy without buying ITA, just by licensing ITA's data.

  • Jonathan

    The conclusion at the end is wrong, the ten blue links approach will always work extremely well. The problem Google is having has absolutely nothing to do with the ten blue links approach. It's that they've maxed out what they can do in that segment of search. If they weren't controlled by the government, they could continue to grow the ten blue links by murdering Bing through buying up every other search share in the universe; that would give them more runway on ten blue links.

    If Google gradually abandons ten blue links, it'll mean there's a massive opportunity for somebody else to provide that simple solution that about a billion people on the planet like. There's a reason sites like Craigslist and Wikipedia and ten blue links Google et al. continue to thrive, people love radical simplicity.

  • obioh

    so basically theyre copying bing

    nice to see microsoft still as the leader of innovation.

  • academic

    So what are the odds that the deal will go through?

  • academic

    still as the leader, when were they the leader to begin with?

  • http://www.ponderon.me Jimcale

    So Google is trying to learn from Microsoft, that is interesting.

  • mmmmm

    so basically theyre copying bing

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000523101129 Ed Bert

    Google may give flight information for free than charging for it like ITA Software had done.

  • John Boldin

    which represents Google’s entry into mobile search correction which represents Google’s entry into mobile ADVERTISING although they were already offering AdSense for Mobile but anyway AdMob does not do mobile search

  • anna

    Interesting development.
    Google tries to copy Bing innovations.
    I am not confident that a huge company holding monopoly in search should be allowed to buy important data supplier all other companies depend upon. It increase the market monopolization. Diversity rather then monopoly should be encouraged by government institutions..

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/rpwatkins48 rpwatkins48

    From a "searcher's" perspective I like vertical search sites that only deliver what I want, and not 1,500,000 links that are of no use to me whatsoever. This reminds me of a saying I once ran across. It goes like this: "If everybody is somebody then nobody is anybody." The corollary to this is: "he who tries to be everything to everybody likely ends of being only marginally useful to anybody." So I have to wonder if Google will get caught in this trap if they try to be a one-stop vertical search provider.

  • Chris

    Not quite. CPA was the old model in travel meta search (Kayak et al), they now do CPC. The research is out of date.

  • Chris
  • http://twitter.com/DavidMajer @DavidMajer

    What's with the doomsday feeling art?

  • http://yahoo.com James

    goog does not have any inovations remaining… they have been COPYing a lot of BING…
    1) Left hand naigation
    2) Home page image
    3) Travel

    I ave mself switched from goog to BING and would never go back… (moorover goog has history of ready our personal data so I dont trust them)

    goog would be doomed in few years…

    the world would now be BiNGing and NOT googling….

  • josh

    It's the search-engine world's equivalent of Twitter buying Tweetie. Translation: we're now officially in search of the next Skywalker.

  • johnmitas

    Google are a monopoly on search, and they will be using that monopoly to win in the Travel search industry.

    - Thats pretty clear in my eyes that this needs careful anit-trust regulation

  • Jeff Strat

    How's that job at Microsoft?

  • bob e

    I'll stick with Bing but it is humurous to see Google copying everything Bing has like the extra links, background imag and now traver vertical :) The Bing team has to be proud.

  • http://iptiam.com iPad Therefore I Am

    take a peak at bing travel – u meant 'peek'. ?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/kenasto kenasto

    Google only tries to be only one thing, the organizer of information, not everything.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/kenasto kenasto

    Also an interesting article would be about what exactly Google is paying so much money for.

  • Wenky

    Not really. In fact I am pretty happy that Google bought them away. The poor design and quality of data crept into all the ITA's and travel industry just because they were incapable of re-building their systems again.

    Hope Google comes out with its own multi-modal travel solution coz no one has been able to crack it yet.

    Wenky.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/ninagosaimas ninagosaimas

    This is just normal, if you'll visit scroogle.org you'll soon realize what Google is really up to next. World Domination. http://j.mp/google-the-world-is-not-enough

  • http://twitter.com/helix2301 @helix2301

    Google is so smart they think of anyway to make good revenue and them now being the biggest power brokers in the travel industry good for them. I would like see a chrome chrome add on for this. Go Google!

  • rpwatkins48

    I think the operative word is "tries." If someone wants those 1.5 million results returned in a fraction of a second then they are clearly the best. But if the user want's a single needle pulled from a massive haystack, well, I'm not so sure that fits with Google's standard approach.

  • goog_is_evil

    Its getting more and more difficult to find a line of business as an entrepreneur where Google will not enter – and this is frustrating!!

  • keyrol

    wow gotta love how some people can just throw out "predictions" like "goog will be doomed in few years." really now? and where exactly did you go to school?

  • Adrian

    Google’s strategy = copy Bing

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/niniii0 niniii0

    Thanks for sharing this valuable information.

  • http://twitter.com/mackenziepricee mackenziepricee

    More like, We know that Bing is better so instead of using a bit of innovation we will just completely buy ITA out.

  • http://twitter.com/mackenziepricee mackenziepricee

    Thats funny because as far as I am concerned Bing cracked it a while back.

  • http://twitter.com/mackenziepricee mackenziepricee

    Obviously because they plan to stop supplying data to Bing. They know in the long run Bing will have major marketshare.

  • NolF

    What's the big gripe with the left navigation bar? Most of the time I ignore it without any issues, other times I notice it, press advance and used features that I haven't ever used in over 6 years of usage such as the news button, video button, restricting results by date etc… It has incredibly improve my effective use of Google and help me find the information I want and need. If it hadn't been forced on me I probably would not have used it and missed out on a great experience improvement, and I'm sure they we'll keep in improving the system by making it even more relevant and intuitive (e.g. show certain option such as image/video/date etc when certain keywords are used)

    Regarding this development, I believe Google will create the most intuitive interface for the most effective search experience. Similar to searching "world cup" during the group stages (which showed what games and at what local time they would be), the currency converted, calculator, weather etc…

    Google did not invent search, they just made it the best possible, being didn't invent vertical search, but I believe Google will make it the best possible.

  • http://twitter.com/mackenziepricee mackenziepricee

    Well if you are talking about Bing my friend have I got some news for you.

    I think you would find that most of the latest features in Google Maps have been ripped straight off of the Bing Maps Silveright Version (http://bing.com/maps/explore). Examples of this are the Distance Measurement Tool, What's Around Here, Indexing images off Picasa,Googles attempt to rip off Silverights DeepZoom technology and more.

    This is only maps mind you. Do not even get me started on search or even other Microsoft products.

    By the way, still do not believe me on maps? Check out this TED video by Blaise Aguera Y Arcas. http://www.ted.com/talks/blaise_aguera.html

  • http://twitter.com/mackenziepricee mackenziepricee

    That's where Bing comes in.

  • http://twitter.com/mackenziepricee mackenziepricee

    I often strike up a bit of a conversation with members on the Bing Team on Twitter. The Bing Maps Technical Evanglist replied to me once stating 'Mimicry is the best form of flattery'.

    I thought it about it for a while. He was correct.

  • http://twitter.com/williamfischer @williamfischer

    JP Morgan estimates that travel represents 10% of Google's core business and I think that looking at GOOG's performance by vertical is a much more sensible way to frame GOOGs strategic position than the focus on share-of-search.

    It's much easier to think about making inroads into GOOGs business by taking away key verticals than by attacking them head-on in search. Competitors in search should really be focused on delivering a better UX in key verticals instead of massive marketing spends to gain market share.

    @williamfischer http://twitjobsearch.com

  • Misery

    My God, you're so right! That must mean Bing is a superior search engine. I'm switching NOW!

  • Bob

    but google is a bit more fair. They allow Amazon MP3 songs to be downloaded to Android devices, would Apple ever allow that. Some Android devices even have Bing as default search engine. Compare that to how Apple literally banned flash, because Apple does not want a competing platform lol. Apple used all its might to crush a small company like Adobe.

  • http://twitter.com/mackenziepricee mackenziepricee

    Thanks for the sarcasm, though I was not asking anyone to switch, I was just stating a point. He was correct. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.

  • http://twitter.com/Chris_Edwards Chris Edwards

    Google = Win

  • http://www.iblameme.net Danny

    So what's up with the apocalyptic crashing plane?

  • Obs
  • isaac

    Los Links!

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/makers makers

    This opens a whole new scenario for the travel industry. A big and potential dominant player is coming. With new rules and dynamics.

  • http://www.magikalhotels.com edward

    This is just part of their dominance. Who knows how the search market will change in the next ten years. Maybe this is a way for them to diversify. In the end it is the end user who will benefit. What is next — holidays, hotels, cruises?

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Got a tip? Building a startup? Tell us