<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One and one and one is three</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-10470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tina Gillmor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-10470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I don&#039;t usually &quot;open my mouth&quot; on a TCIT thread, especially if the author is Steve Gillmor, as it could be seen self-serving, bordering on masturbatory. So this time, I&#039;m &quot;on my knees&quot;  hoping and praying that Steve doesn&#039;t give me the &quot;shaft&quot; for what I&#039;m about about to say regarding the &quot;endowment&quot; in question.

The anonymous author named &quot;You Have a Tiny Penis&quot; strikes me as the sort who needs to &quot;bone up&quot; on his vocabulary because he is clearly threatened by the big, frothy words Steve uses and this little fellow is unfamiliar with them. They scare him. Mr Anonymous even goes so far as to question my husbands manhood, or at least the size of it. Come on! I&#039;m not the only one who knows that Steve has balls - BIG ones. And well, the rest of him is proportioned to serve them well.

Why be like all the other morons who drone on and on about how Steve doesn&#039;t know what he&#039;s talking about just because you can&#039;t figure out that social media is calling the &quot;money shots&quot; and is totally what enterprise IT is getting off on these days? You figure you&#039;ll be original and use the word  penis... cuz every decent comedian knows the word penis is completely and always funny. Bravo, you&#039;ve &quot;banged&quot; us into a collective pee-in-our-pants frenzy. Uncontrollable ecstasy. Really. Oh, yeah, Baby. Do it more. You tell Steve to &quot;suck it up&quot;. I say, &quot;suck on it!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t usually &#8220;open my mouth&#8221; on a TCIT thread, especially if the author is Steve Gillmor, as it could be seen self-serving, bordering on masturbatory. So this time, I&#8217;m &#8220;on my knees&#8221;  hoping and praying that Steve doesn&#8217;t give me the &#8220;shaft&#8221; for what I&#8217;m about about to say regarding the &#8220;endowment&#8221; in question.</p>
<p>The anonymous author named &#8220;You Have a Tiny Penis&#8221; strikes me as the sort who needs to &#8220;bone up&#8221; on his vocabulary because he is clearly threatened by the big, frothy words Steve uses and this little fellow is unfamiliar with them. They scare him. Mr Anonymous even goes so far as to question my husbands manhood, or at least the size of it. Come on! I&#8217;m not the only one who knows that Steve has balls &#8211; BIG ones. And well, the rest of him is proportioned to serve them well.</p>
<p>Why be like all the other morons who drone on and on about how Steve doesn&#8217;t know what he&#8217;s talking about just because you can&#8217;t figure out that social media is calling the &#8220;money shots&#8221; and is totally what enterprise IT is getting off on these days? You figure you&#8217;ll be original and use the word  penis&#8230; cuz every decent comedian knows the word penis is completely and always funny. Bravo, you&#8217;ve &#8220;banged&#8221; us into a collective pee-in-our-pants frenzy. Uncontrollable ecstasy. Really. Oh, yeah, Baby. Do it more. You tell Steve to &#8220;suck it up&#8221;. I say, &#8220;suck on it!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-23792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tina Gillmor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-23792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I don&#039;t usually &quot;open my mouth&quot; on a TCIT thread, especially if the author is Steve Gillmor, as it could be seen self-serving, bordering on masturbatory. So this time, I&#039;m &quot;on my knees&quot;  hoping and praying that Steve doesn&#039;t give me the &quot;shaft&quot; for what I&#039;m about about to say regarding the &quot;endowment&quot; in question.

The anonymous author named &quot;You Have a Tiny Penis&quot; strikes me as the sort who needs to &quot;bone up&quot; on his vocabulary because he is clearly threatened by the big, frothy words Steve uses and this little fellow is unfamiliar with them. They scare him. Mr Anonymous even goes so far as to question my husbands manhood, or at least the size of it. Come on! I&#039;m not the only one who knows that Steve has balls - BIG ones. And well, the rest of him is proportioned to serve them well.

Why be like all the other morons who drone on and on about how Steve doesn&#039;t know what he&#039;s talking about just because you can&#039;t figure out that social media is calling the &quot;money shots&quot; and is totally what enterprise IT is getting off on these days? You figure you&#039;ll be original and use the word  penis... cuz every decent comedian knows the word penis is completely and always funny. Bravo, you&#039;ve &quot;banged&quot; us into a collective pee-in-our-pants frenzy. Uncontrollable ecstasy. Really. Oh, yeah, Baby. Do it more. You tell Steve to &quot;suck it up&quot;. I say, &quot;suck on it!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t usually &#8220;open my mouth&#8221; on a TCIT thread, especially if the author is Steve Gillmor, as it could be seen self-serving, bordering on masturbatory. So this time, I&#8217;m &#8220;on my knees&#8221;  hoping and praying that Steve doesn&#8217;t give me the &#8220;shaft&#8221; for what I&#8217;m about about to say regarding the &#8220;endowment&#8221; in question.</p>
<p>The anonymous author named &#8220;You Have a Tiny Penis&#8221; strikes me as the sort who needs to &#8220;bone up&#8221; on his vocabulary because he is clearly threatened by the big, frothy words Steve uses and this little fellow is unfamiliar with them. They scare him. Mr Anonymous even goes so far as to question my husbands manhood, or at least the size of it. Come on! I&#8217;m not the only one who knows that Steve has balls &#8211; BIG ones. And well, the rest of him is proportioned to serve them well.</p>
<p>Why be like all the other morons who drone on and on about how Steve doesn&#8217;t know what he&#8217;s talking about just because you can&#8217;t figure out that social media is calling the &#8220;money shots&#8221; and is totally what enterprise IT is getting off on these days? You figure you&#8217;ll be original and use the word  penis&#8230; cuz every decent comedian knows the word penis is completely and always funny. Bravo, you&#8217;ve &#8220;banged&#8221; us into a collective pee-in-our-pants frenzy. Uncontrollable ecstasy. Really. Oh, yeah, Baby. Do it more. You tell Steve to &#8220;suck it up&#8221;. I say, &#8220;suck on it!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Have a Tiny Penis</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-10469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You Have a Tiny Penis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-10469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, recent studies reveal that tech journalists often overcompensate for certain physical inadequacies by writing page after page of buzzword-laden gobbledygook. On behalf of TechCrunch readers everywhere, I beg you to just suck it up and pay for a penis enlargement procedure and stop cluttering up TechCrunch with crap articles like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, recent studies reveal that tech journalists often overcompensate for certain physical inadequacies by writing page after page of buzzword-laden gobbledygook. On behalf of TechCrunch readers everywhere, I beg you to just suck it up and pay for a penis enlargement procedure and stop cluttering up TechCrunch with crap articles like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Have a Tiny Penis</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-23791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You Have a Tiny Penis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-23791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, recent studies reveal that tech journalists often overcompensate for certain physical inadequacies by writing page after page of buzzword-laden gobbledygook. On behalf of TechCrunch readers everywhere, I beg you to just suck it up and pay for a penis enlargement procedure and stop cluttering up TechCrunch with crap articles like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, recent studies reveal that tech journalists often overcompensate for certain physical inadequacies by writing page after page of buzzword-laden gobbledygook. On behalf of TechCrunch readers everywhere, I beg you to just suck it up and pay for a penis enlargement procedure and stop cluttering up TechCrunch with crap articles like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phideltacity &#187; GMail outage outs the Cloud-Issue</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-10468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phideltacity &#187; GMail outage outs the Cloud-Issue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-10468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have suspected before-hand. In fact the world has pretty much gone on as before simply doing a smooth failover. This means that we know how to fail over, but it also debunks a myth that has been used my [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have suspected before-hand. In fact the world has pretty much gone on as before simply doing a smooth failover. This means that we know how to fail over, but it also debunks a myth that has been used my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phideltacity &#187; GMail outage outs the Cloud-Issue</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-23790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phideltacity &#187; GMail outage outs the Cloud-Issue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-23790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have suspected before-hand. In fact the world has pretty much gone on as before simply doing a smooth failover. This means that we know how to fail over, but it also debunks a myth that has been used my [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have suspected before-hand. In fact the world has pretty much gone on as before simply doing a smooth failover. This means that we know how to fail over, but it also debunks a myth that has been used my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-10467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-10467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The irony of this was that the Google engineers continued to use Wave as their way of merging real-time and email communication to work the problem with the &#039;legacy&#039; email app...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony of this was that the Google engineers continued to use Wave as their way of merging real-time and email communication to work the problem with the &#8216;legacy&#8217; email app&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-23789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-23789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The irony of this was that the Google engineers continued to use Wave as their way of merging real-time and email communication to work the problem with the &#039;legacy&#039; email app...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony of this was that the Google engineers continued to use Wave as their way of merging real-time and email communication to work the problem with the &#8216;legacy&#8217; email app&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-10466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-10466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-23788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-23788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-10465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Gillmor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-10465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t say friends, I said social graph-based. Many in the 3 degrees of separation of follow clouds are not necessarily friends ut important filters based on who they follow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say friends, I said social graph-based. Many in the 3 degrees of separation of follow clouds are not necessarily friends ut important filters based on who they follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-23787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Gillmor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-23787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t say friends, I said social graph-based. Many in the 3 degrees of separation of follow clouds are not necessarily friends ut important filters based on who they follow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say friends, I said social graph-based. Many in the 3 degrees of separation of follow clouds are not necessarily friends ut important filters based on who they follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-10464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-10464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Businesses will come together in email inboxes for a long time to come.
It&#039;s not getting better.
Phonecalls, IM and realtime chatservices help businesses collaborate but there&#039;s always a follow up email that makes it kind of official.
As for Gmail, you got to be free, it&#039;s free and bad news is good news so the outage is a win for Google.

I slightly disagree about the collaborative filtering  done by our friends. I don&#039;t see it taking over RSS readers. I don&#039;t want to be limited to what my friends are filtering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Businesses will come together in email inboxes for a long time to come.<br />
It&#8217;s not getting better.<br />
Phonecalls, IM and realtime chatservices help businesses collaborate but there&#8217;s always a follow up email that makes it kind of official.<br />
As for Gmail, you got to be free, it&#8217;s free and bad news is good news so the outage is a win for Google.</p>
<p>I slightly disagree about the collaborative filtering  done by our friends. I don&#8217;t see it taking over RSS readers. I don&#8217;t want to be limited to what my friends are filtering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-23786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-23786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Businesses will come together in email inboxes for a long time to come.
It&#039;s not getting better.
Phonecalls, IM and realtime chatservices help businesses collaborate but there&#039;s always a follow up email that makes it kind of official.
As for Gmail, you got to be free, it&#039;s free and bad news is good news so the outage is a win for Google.

I slightly disagree about the collaborative filtering  done by our friends. I don&#039;t see it taking over RSS readers. I don&#039;t want to be limited to what my friends are filtering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Businesses will come together in email inboxes for a long time to come.<br />
It&#8217;s not getting better.<br />
Phonecalls, IM and realtime chatservices help businesses collaborate but there&#8217;s always a follow up email that makes it kind of official.<br />
As for Gmail, you got to be free, it&#8217;s free and bad news is good news so the outage is a win for Google.</p>
<p>I slightly disagree about the collaborative filtering  done by our friends. I don&#8217;t see it taking over RSS readers. I don&#8217;t want to be limited to what my friends are filtering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mimetz</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-10463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mimetz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-10463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sorry for the unintended caps:(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for the unintended caps:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mimetz</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-23785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mimetz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-23785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sorry for the unintended caps:(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for the unintended caps:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIMETZ</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-10462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MIMETZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-10462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SO YOU&#039;RE SAYING THAT EMAIL WILL, OR MAYBE COULD, BE REPLACED AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE (OR MAYBE JUST AUGMENTED?) BY A COMBINATION OF IM, FF/TWITTER AND PRIVATE GROUPS. SEEMS LIKE A REASONABLE AND STRAIGHTFORWARD PROPOSITION.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO YOU&#8217;RE SAYING THAT EMAIL WILL, OR MAYBE COULD, BE REPLACED AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE (OR MAYBE JUST AUGMENTED?) BY A COMBINATION OF IM, FF/TWITTER AND PRIVATE GROUPS. SEEMS LIKE A REASONABLE AND STRAIGHTFORWARD PROPOSITION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIMETZ</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-23784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MIMETZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-23784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SO YOU&#039;RE SAYING THAT EMAIL WILL, OR MAYBE COULD, BE REPLACED AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE (OR MAYBE JUST AUGMENTED?) BY A COMBINATION OF IM, FF/TWITTER AND PRIVATE GROUPS. SEEMS LIKE A REASONABLE AND STRAIGHTFORWARD PROPOSITION.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO YOU&#8217;RE SAYING THAT EMAIL WILL, OR MAYBE COULD, BE REPLACED AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE (OR MAYBE JUST AUGMENTED?) BY A COMBINATION OF IM, FF/TWITTER AND PRIVATE GROUPS. SEEMS LIKE A REASONABLE AND STRAIGHTFORWARD PROPOSITION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXLated</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-10461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PXLated]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-10461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like too much monkey business. And what if Twitter goes down and FriendFeed becomes extinct? The fragility of real-time. Will it ever be as reliable as the old system?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like too much monkey business. And what if Twitter goes down and FriendFeed becomes extinct? The fragility of real-time. Will it ever be as reliable as the old system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXLated</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/01/one-and-one-and-one-is-three/#comment-23783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PXLated]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3487#comment-23783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like too much monkey business. And what if Twitter goes down and FriendFeed becomes extinct? The fragility of real-time. Will it ever be as reliable as the old system?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like too much monkey business. And what if Twitter goes down and FriendFeed becomes extinct? The fragility of real-time. Will it ever be as reliable as the old system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

