<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Short and Winding Road</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: riffic</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-10139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[riffic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-10139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gillmor as usual you write a lot of words but just don&#039;t state the obvious point. Twitter, by ignoring this issue, allows url shortening habits to be adopted by the masses and this needs to stop.

my, and many others arguments are this: url shortening is dangerous.

1) it encourages users to click blind links, which may be malicious
2) spammers or phishers can use these blind links to do not so nice things to users

If Twitter has no interest in budging from their arbitrarily set 140 character limits, then Twitter must remove URL metadata outside of the message body and into a separate metadata field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gillmor as usual you write a lot of words but just don&#8217;t state the obvious point. Twitter, by ignoring this issue, allows url shortening habits to be adopted by the masses and this needs to stop.</p>
<p>my, and many others arguments are this: url shortening is dangerous.</p>
<p>1) it encourages users to click blind links, which may be malicious<br />
2) spammers or phishers can use these blind links to do not so nice things to users</p>
<p>If Twitter has no interest in budging from their arbitrarily set 140 character limits, then Twitter must remove URL metadata outside of the message body and into a separate metadata field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riffic</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-23461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[riffic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-23461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gillmor as usual you write a lot of words but just don&#039;t state the obvious point. Twitter, by ignoring this issue, allows url shortening habits to be adopted by the masses and this needs to stop.

my, and many others arguments are this: url shortening is dangerous.

1) it encourages users to click blind links, which may be malicious
2) spammers or phishers can use these blind links to do not so nice things to users

If Twitter has no interest in budging from their arbitrarily set 140 character limits, then Twitter must remove URL metadata outside of the message body and into a separate metadata field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gillmor as usual you write a lot of words but just don&#8217;t state the obvious point. Twitter, by ignoring this issue, allows url shortening habits to be adopted by the masses and this needs to stop.</p>
<p>my, and many others arguments are this: url shortening is dangerous.</p>
<p>1) it encourages users to click blind links, which may be malicious<br />
2) spammers or phishers can use these blind links to do not so nice things to users</p>
<p>If Twitter has no interest in budging from their arbitrarily set 140 character limits, then Twitter must remove URL metadata outside of the message body and into a separate metadata field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aronski</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-10138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aronski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-10138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the end, someone has to maintain the integrity of the shortened links or these small messages will no longer lead to the rest of universe. It&#039;s great that there are competing services and a given that some will not last, but if we depend on our linking history through these status platforms (uh, if we&#039;re able to access our history through these status platforms beyond a few days), it&#039;s important that the links still work to point us to what we referred to.

If one or two of the major players grab and make a(n) (open) standard of URL shorteners, it might not be a bad thing. Having a history, a file of the links and the places they pointed wouldn&#039;t be bad either, just in case the service goes up in smoke.

For those people who have invested time, money and energy into these new communications, it would be dreadful to find that some or all of the links you created (or favorited) lead nowhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, someone has to maintain the integrity of the shortened links or these small messages will no longer lead to the rest of universe. It&#8217;s great that there are competing services and a given that some will not last, but if we depend on our linking history through these status platforms (uh, if we&#8217;re able to access our history through these status platforms beyond a few days), it&#8217;s important that the links still work to point us to what we referred to.</p>
<p>If one or two of the major players grab and make a(n) (open) standard of URL shorteners, it might not be a bad thing. Having a history, a file of the links and the places they pointed wouldn&#8217;t be bad either, just in case the service goes up in smoke.</p>
<p>For those people who have invested time, money and energy into these new communications, it would be dreadful to find that some or all of the links you created (or favorited) lead nowhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aronski</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-23460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aronski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-23460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the end, someone has to maintain the integrity of the shortened links or these small messages will no longer lead to the rest of universe. It&#039;s great that there are competing services and a given that some will not last, but if we depend on our linking history through these status platforms (uh, if we&#039;re able to access our history through these status platforms beyond a few days), it&#039;s important that the links still work to point us to what we referred to.

If one or two of the major players grab and make a(n) (open) standard of URL shorteners, it might not be a bad thing. Having a history, a file of the links and the places they pointed wouldn&#039;t be bad either, just in case the service goes up in smoke.

For those people who have invested time, money and energy into these new communications, it would be dreadful to find that some or all of the links you created (or favorited) lead nowhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, someone has to maintain the integrity of the shortened links or these small messages will no longer lead to the rest of universe. It&#8217;s great that there are competing services and a given that some will not last, but if we depend on our linking history through these status platforms (uh, if we&#8217;re able to access our history through these status platforms beyond a few days), it&#8217;s important that the links still work to point us to what we referred to.</p>
<p>If one or two of the major players grab and make a(n) (open) standard of URL shorteners, it might not be a bad thing. Having a history, a file of the links and the places they pointed wouldn&#8217;t be bad either, just in case the service goes up in smoke.</p>
<p>For those people who have invested time, money and energy into these new communications, it would be dreadful to find that some or all of the links you created (or favorited) lead nowhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francine hardaway</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-10137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[francine hardaway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-10137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like your idea that URL shortening will be absorbed into the OS.  I never thought of that, but it makes perfect sense. Especially if the OS is the browser or the browser is the OS, yes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your idea that URL shortening will be absorbed into the OS.  I never thought of that, but it makes perfect sense. Especially if the OS is the browser or the browser is the OS, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francine hardaway</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-23459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[francine hardaway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-23459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like your idea that URL shortening will be absorbed into the OS.  I never thought of that, but it makes perfect sense. Especially if the OS is the browser or the browser is the OS, yes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your idea that URL shortening will be absorbed into the OS.  I never thought of that, but it makes perfect sense. Especially if the OS is the browser or the browser is the OS, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aronski</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-10136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aronski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-10136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps you should leave the verbose responses to the qualified...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you should leave the verbose responses to the qualified&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aronski</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-23458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aronski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-23458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps you should leave the verbose responses to the qualified...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you should leave the verbose responses to the qualified&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kino</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-10135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-10135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting article. I never understood the whole point of url shorting. Its seems I never get technology until its widely adopted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting article. I never understood the whole point of url shorting. Its seems I never get technology until its widely adopted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kino</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-23457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-23457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting article. I never understood the whole point of url shorting. Its seems I never get technology until its widely adopted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting article. I never understood the whole point of url shorting. Its seems I never get technology until its widely adopted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Really Interested Fascinating Stuff</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-10134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Really Interested Fascinating Stuff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-10134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s really great, interesting stuff, Steve. My only question is: how are you even able to write with your head so far up your own ass? Isn&#039;t it dark in there?

Looking forward to your next incoherent War-and-Peace-sized post about Twitter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really great, interesting stuff, Steve. My only question is: how are you even able to write with your head so far up your own ass? Isn&#8217;t it dark in there?</p>
<p>Looking forward to your next incoherent War-and-Peace-sized post about Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Really Interested Fascinating Stuff</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-23456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Really Interested Fascinating Stuff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-23456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s really great, interesting stuff, Steve. My only question is: how are you even able to write with your head so far up your own ass? Isn&#039;t it dark in there?

Looking forward to your next incoherent War-and-Peace-sized post about Twitter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really great, interesting stuff, Steve. My only question is: how are you even able to write with your head so far up your own ass? Isn&#8217;t it dark in there?</p>
<p>Looking forward to your next incoherent War-and-Peace-sized post about Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: replicas-watchhome</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-10133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[replicas-watchhome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-10133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you sharing!!! Continue to work hard!! Give us better information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you sharing!!! Continue to work hard!! Give us better information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: replicas-watchhome</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-23455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[replicas-watchhome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-23455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you sharing!!! Continue to work hard!! Give us better information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you sharing!!! Continue to work hard!! Give us better information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul E. Ester</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-10132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul E. Ester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-10132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article, looking forward to hearing it discussed on a future Gillmor gang. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, looking forward to hearing it discussed on a future Gillmor gang. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul E. Ester</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/10/the-short-and-winding-road/#comment-23454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul E. Ester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3176#comment-23454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article, looking forward to hearing it discussed on a future Gillmor gang. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, looking forward to hearing it discussed on a future Gillmor gang. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

