<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blame FriendFeed II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Replica breitling</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-10131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Replica breitling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-10131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for sharing, I thought.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Replica breitling&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Replica Omega&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Watches paypal&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing, I thought.<br />
<a href="http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/" rel="nofollow">Replica breitling</a><br />
<a href="http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/" rel="nofollow">Replica Omega</a><br />
<a href="http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/" rel="nofollow">Watches paypal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Replica breitling</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-23453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Replica breitling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-23453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for sharing, I thought.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Replica breitling&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Replica Omega&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Watches paypal&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing, I thought.<br />
<a href="http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/" rel="nofollow">Replica breitling</a><br />
<a href="http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/" rel="nofollow">Replica Omega</a><br />
<a href="http://www.replicas-watchhome.com/" rel="nofollow">Watches paypal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitpocalypse: &#8220;Open Source Twitter&#8221; proposed as antidote to Twitter&#8217;s DDOS vulnerability &#124; linkthe.com</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-10130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twitpocalypse: &#8220;Open Source Twitter&#8221; proposed as antidote to Twitter&#8217;s DDOS vulnerability &#124; linkthe.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-10130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Blame FriendFeed II (techcrunchit.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blame FriendFeed II (techcrunchit.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitpocalypse: &#8220;Open Source Twitter&#8221; proposed as antidote to Twitter&#8217;s DDOS vulnerability &#124; linkthe.com</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-23452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twitpocalypse: &#8220;Open Source Twitter&#8221; proposed as antidote to Twitter&#8217;s DDOS vulnerability &#124; linkthe.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-23452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Blame FriendFeed II (techcrunchit.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blame FriendFeed II (techcrunchit.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechPitch</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-10129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TechPitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-10129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Steve,

Glad to hear you are a &quot;FriendFeediot&quot; (lol) - we at TechPitch.com use it to post our &quot;spotlight&quot; posts and have it copy it to twitter. Just found out that many of our posts this morn didn&#039;t really make it to twitter. (so had to post some breaking news on &quot;VmMare acquiring Springsource&quot; directly on to Twitter.

Also,  Steve, We would love to have you take a look at at TechPitch.com. We focus on Business technology - that&#039;s the street you drive your car on, right? So, what do you think?? Would love to hear your first thoughts / impressions. Thanks!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve,</p>
<p>Glad to hear you are a &#8220;FriendFeediot&#8221; (lol) &#8211; we at TechPitch.com use it to post our &#8220;spotlight&#8221; posts and have it copy it to twitter. Just found out that many of our posts this morn didn&#8217;t really make it to twitter. (so had to post some breaking news on &#8220;VmMare acquiring Springsource&#8221; directly on to Twitter.</p>
<p>Also,  Steve, We would love to have you take a look at at TechPitch.com. We focus on Business technology &#8211; that&#8217;s the street you drive your car on, right? So, what do you think?? Would love to hear your first thoughts / impressions. Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechPitch</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-23451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TechPitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-23451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Steve,

Glad to hear you are a &quot;FriendFeediot&quot; (lol) - we at TechPitch.com use it to post our &quot;spotlight&quot; posts and have it copy it to twitter. Just found out that many of our posts this morn didn&#039;t really make it to twitter. (so had to post some breaking news on &quot;VmMare acquiring Springsource&quot; directly on to Twitter.

Also,  Steve, We would love to have you take a look at at TechPitch.com. We focus on Business technology - that&#039;s the street you drive your car on, right? So, what do you think?? Would love to hear your first thoughts / impressions. Thanks!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve,</p>
<p>Glad to hear you are a &#8220;FriendFeediot&#8221; (lol) &#8211; we at TechPitch.com use it to post our &#8220;spotlight&#8221; posts and have it copy it to twitter. Just found out that many of our posts this morn didn&#8217;t really make it to twitter. (so had to post some breaking news on &#8220;VmMare acquiring Springsource&#8221; directly on to Twitter.</p>
<p>Also,  Steve, We would love to have you take a look at at TechPitch.com. We focus on Business technology &#8211; that&#8217;s the street you drive your car on, right? So, what do you think?? Would love to hear your first thoughts / impressions. Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Langdale</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-10128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Langdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-10128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry if that was mean spirited.  Perhaps it was more mean spirited than you saying I&#039;m &quot;prancing&quot; about to the degree that would cause even Einstein to reconsider himself.  Perhaps it wasn&#039;t.  I&#039;m not really sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if that was mean spirited.  Perhaps it was more mean spirited than you saying I&#8217;m &#8220;prancing&#8221; about to the degree that would cause even Einstein to reconsider himself.  Perhaps it wasn&#8217;t.  I&#8217;m not really sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Langdale</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-23450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Langdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-23450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry if that was mean spirited.  Perhaps it was more mean spirited than you saying I&#039;m &quot;prancing&quot; about to the degree that would cause even Einstein to reconsider himself.  Perhaps it wasn&#039;t.  I&#039;m not really sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if that was mean spirited.  Perhaps it was more mean spirited than you saying I&#8217;m &#8220;prancing&#8221; about to the degree that would cause even Einstein to reconsider himself.  Perhaps it wasn&#8217;t.  I&#8217;m not really sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nafnosseb</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-10127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nafnosseb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-10127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, this last comment seems mean spirited. Einstein himself was a great fan of simplicity. Anyways, pretty decent of you to be less imaginative with the spelling of gillmor, so I will take your advice and &quot;shut up or think&quot;. --regards]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this last comment seems mean spirited. Einstein himself was a great fan of simplicity. Anyways, pretty decent of you to be less imaginative with the spelling of gillmor, so I will take your advice and &#8220;shut up or think&#8221;. &#8211;regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nafnosseb</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-23449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nafnosseb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-23449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, this last comment seems mean spirited. Einstein himself was a great fan of simplicity. Anyways, pretty decent of you to be less imaginative with the spelling of gillmor, so I will take your advice and &quot;shut up or think&quot;. --regards]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this last comment seems mean spirited. Einstein himself was a great fan of simplicity. Anyways, pretty decent of you to be less imaginative with the spelling of gillmor, so I will take your advice and &#8220;shut up or think&#8221;. &#8211;regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Langdale</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-10126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Langdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-10126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See what I did there? I tried to actually make this relevant to this comment thread and the topic.

Might wanna try that more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See what I did there? I tried to actually make this relevant to this comment thread and the topic.</p>
<p>Might wanna try that more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Langdale</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-23448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Langdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-23448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See what I did there? I tried to actually make this relevant to this comment thread and the topic.

Might wanna try that more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See what I did there? I tried to actually make this relevant to this comment thread and the topic.</p>
<p>Might wanna try that more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Langdale</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-10125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Langdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-10125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For you, the simplest thing would probably be:

shut up

or

think

Yea, think is probably most simple.  Is that too simple?  My bad, you said not too simple.  I&#039;m not good at this.  I didn&#039;t know there were degrees to simple.

Let&#039;s go with this, and it&#039;s just a theory...

Don&#039;t be a Gillmor fanboy and attack people just because you&#039;re biased.

Or not that you&#039;re so much a Gillmor fanboy, but that you too also have pimples on your ass and were frustrated with FF and twitter being down.

Remember, these are only theories.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For you, the simplest thing would probably be:</p>
<p>shut up</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>think</p>
<p>Yea, think is probably most simple.  Is that too simple?  My bad, you said not too simple.  I&#8217;m not good at this.  I didn&#8217;t know there were degrees to simple.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go with this, and it&#8217;s just a theory&#8230;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be a Gillmor fanboy and attack people just because you&#8217;re biased.</p>
<p>Or not that you&#8217;re so much a Gillmor fanboy, but that you too also have pimples on your ass and were frustrated with FF and twitter being down.</p>
<p>Remember, these are only theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Langdale</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-23447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Langdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-23447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For you, the simplest thing would probably be:

shut up

or

think

Yea, think is probably most simple.  Is that too simple?  My bad, you said not too simple.  I&#039;m not good at this.  I didn&#039;t know there were degrees to simple.

Let&#039;s go with this, and it&#039;s just a theory...

Don&#039;t be a Gillmor fanboy and attack people just because you&#039;re biased.

Or not that you&#039;re so much a Gillmor fanboy, but that you too also have pimples on your ass and were frustrated with FF and twitter being down.

Remember, these are only theories.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For you, the simplest thing would probably be:</p>
<p>shut up</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>think</p>
<p>Yea, think is probably most simple.  Is that too simple?  My bad, you said not too simple.  I&#8217;m not good at this.  I didn&#8217;t know there were degrees to simple.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go with this, and it&#8217;s just a theory&#8230;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be a Gillmor fanboy and attack people just because you&#8217;re biased.</p>
<p>Or not that you&#8217;re so much a Gillmor fanboy, but that you too also have pimples on your ass and were frustrated with FF and twitter being down.</p>
<p>Remember, these are only theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nafnosseb</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-10124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nafnosseb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-10124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am lost. Could you simplify it a bit, without making it too simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am lost. Could you simplify it a bit, without making it too simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nafnosseb</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-23446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nafnosseb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-23446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am lost. Could you simplify it a bit, without making it too simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am lost. Could you simplify it a bit, without making it too simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Langdale</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-10123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Langdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-10123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thats better.

It&#039;s possible he may have considered it, but would probably have rejected the idea.

Or, he may have seen some sorta of significance in the binary streaking of text in an article comment thread to have deep meaning as it relates to super massive black holes or the Alice CERN experiments to study quark-gluon plasma.

Or, he may have argued that pseudo-streaking is more important than the commenting about a quotee based on a quoter l as if the fact that someone quoting him or the behavior of people quoting him could possibly change his mind.

In fact, this may have only reinforced his idea that imagination is more important than knowledge.  You, claiming knowledge, or claiming to know what Einstein may have reconsidered, and me using imagination to suggest a potential alternative that you would not have otherwise considered.

Knowledge assumes and limits while imagination is open to all.

So while he may have considered the idea and been open to it considering the nature of the statement, he indeed probably would not have reconsidered the statement.  He probably would have told you the direct opposite and said it&#039;s only more true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats better.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible he may have considered it, but would probably have rejected the idea.</p>
<p>Or, he may have seen some sorta of significance in the binary streaking of text in an article comment thread to have deep meaning as it relates to super massive black holes or the Alice CERN experiments to study quark-gluon plasma.</p>
<p>Or, he may have argued that pseudo-streaking is more important than the commenting about a quotee based on a quoter l as if the fact that someone quoting him or the behavior of people quoting him could possibly change his mind.</p>
<p>In fact, this may have only reinforced his idea that imagination is more important than knowledge.  You, claiming knowledge, or claiming to know what Einstein may have reconsidered, and me using imagination to suggest a potential alternative that you would not have otherwise considered.</p>
<p>Knowledge assumes and limits while imagination is open to all.</p>
<p>So while he may have considered the idea and been open to it considering the nature of the statement, he indeed probably would not have reconsidered the statement.  He probably would have told you the direct opposite and said it&#8217;s only more true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Langdale</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-23445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Langdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-23445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thats better.

It&#039;s possible he may have considered it, but would probably have rejected the idea.

Or, he may have seen some sorta of significance in the binary streaking of text in an article comment thread to have deep meaning as it relates to super massive black holes or the Alice CERN experiments to study quark-gluon plasma.

Or, he may have argued that pseudo-streaking is more important than the commenting about a quotee based on a quoter l as if the fact that someone quoting him or the behavior of people quoting him could possibly change his mind.

In fact, this may have only reinforced his idea that imagination is more important than knowledge.  You, claiming knowledge, or claiming to know what Einstein may have reconsidered, and me using imagination to suggest a potential alternative that you would not have otherwise considered.

Knowledge assumes and limits while imagination is open to all.

So while he may have considered the idea and been open to it considering the nature of the statement, he indeed probably would not have reconsidered the statement.  He probably would have told you the direct opposite and said it&#039;s only more true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats better.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible he may have considered it, but would probably have rejected the idea.</p>
<p>Or, he may have seen some sorta of significance in the binary streaking of text in an article comment thread to have deep meaning as it relates to super massive black holes or the Alice CERN experiments to study quark-gluon plasma.</p>
<p>Or, he may have argued that pseudo-streaking is more important than the commenting about a quotee based on a quoter l as if the fact that someone quoting him or the behavior of people quoting him could possibly change his mind.</p>
<p>In fact, this may have only reinforced his idea that imagination is more important than knowledge.  You, claiming knowledge, or claiming to know what Einstein may have reconsidered, and me using imagination to suggest a potential alternative that you would not have otherwise considered.</p>
<p>Knowledge assumes and limits while imagination is open to all.</p>
<p>So while he may have considered the idea and been open to it considering the nature of the statement, he indeed probably would not have reconsidered the statement.  He probably would have told you the direct opposite and said it&#8217;s only more true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nafnosseb</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-10122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nafnosseb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-10122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corrected: Einstein would probably have reconsidered saying “Imagination is more important than knowledge”, had he known you would come streaking along.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrected: Einstein would probably have reconsidered saying “Imagination is more important than knowledge”, had he known you would come streaking along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nafnosseb</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/06/blame-friendfeed-ii/#comment-23444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nafnosseb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=3170#comment-23444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corrected: Einstein would probably have reconsidered saying “Imagination is more important than knowledge”, had he known you would come streaking along.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrected: Einstein would probably have reconsidered saying “Imagination is more important than knowledge”, had he known you would come streaking along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

