<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Manhattan Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: reven</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-9486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-9486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This negative WAVE with TWIT - just step away from the plate - LEO is bigger then u.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This negative WAVE with TWIT &#8211; just step away from the plate &#8211; LEO is bigger then u.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reven</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-22808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-22808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This negative WAVE with TWIT - just step away from the plate - LEO is bigger then u.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This negative WAVE with TWIT &#8211; just step away from the plate &#8211; LEO is bigger then u.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stack</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-9485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Stack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-9485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Wave will have a serious impact on product directions for both Msft MOSS and IBM/Lotus Domino - to the enterprise customer&#039;s benefit.  I think you were dead on about strategy; however, I think enterprise thinks quite differently and not as quickly.  They&#039;re still learning Web 2.0.

While Microsoft has their gunsights on the remaining 25M Domino seats, they&#039;ve probably noted that many of the document paradigms (and successes) are an adtaption of what Mr. Ozzie et. al (Ray, Jack, Mussie Shore, others (maybe even Bob Balaban (oh hi bob!)) of Iris Associates and Lotus created.  The principle difference being the document store is now a directory with XML versus a single object-oriented database.  The DNA?  Unids are similar.  Parent child relationships are similar.  Security inheritance different (for some reason.) Near instant, authenticated, communications with stateful client sessions.

What Google must remember is that within the enterprise, IT has to support the nearly 100% connected user.  The nearly part is what&#039;s going to get you - they&#039;re the Information Workers.

(Guys, you can have a protocol but without a server and APIs, there&#039;s no way to leverage it.)

Regardless, all of this is going to be a GREAT DEAL OF FUN!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Wave will have a serious impact on product directions for both Msft MOSS and IBM/Lotus Domino &#8211; to the enterprise customer&#8217;s benefit.  I think you were dead on about strategy; however, I think enterprise thinks quite differently and not as quickly.  They&#8217;re still learning Web 2.0.</p>
<p>While Microsoft has their gunsights on the remaining 25M Domino seats, they&#8217;ve probably noted that many of the document paradigms (and successes) are an adtaption of what Mr. Ozzie et. al (Ray, Jack, Mussie Shore, others (maybe even Bob Balaban (oh hi bob!)) of Iris Associates and Lotus created.  The principle difference being the document store is now a directory with XML versus a single object-oriented database.  The DNA?  Unids are similar.  Parent child relationships are similar.  Security inheritance different (for some reason.) Near instant, authenticated, communications with stateful client sessions.</p>
<p>What Google must remember is that within the enterprise, IT has to support the nearly 100% connected user.  The nearly part is what&#8217;s going to get you &#8211; they&#8217;re the Information Workers.</p>
<p>(Guys, you can have a protocol but without a server and APIs, there&#8217;s no way to leverage it.)</p>
<p>Regardless, all of this is going to be a GREAT DEAL OF FUN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stack</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-22807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Stack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-22807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Wave will have a serious impact on product directions for both Msft MOSS and IBM/Lotus Domino - to the enterprise customer&#039;s benefit.  I think you were dead on about strategy; however, I think enterprise thinks quite differently and not as quickly.  They&#039;re still learning Web 2.0.

While Microsoft has their gunsights on the remaining 25M Domino seats, they&#039;ve probably noted that many of the document paradigms (and successes) are an adtaption of what Mr. Ozzie et. al (Ray, Jack, Mussie Shore, others (maybe even Bob Balaban (oh hi bob!)) of Iris Associates and Lotus created.  The principle difference being the document store is now a directory with XML versus a single object-oriented database.  The DNA?  Unids are similar.  Parent child relationships are similar.  Security inheritance different (for some reason.) Near instant, authenticated, communications with stateful client sessions.

What Google must remember is that within the enterprise, IT has to support the nearly 100% connected user.  The nearly part is what&#039;s going to get you - they&#039;re the Information Workers.

(Guys, you can have a protocol but without a server and APIs, there&#039;s no way to leverage it.)

Regardless, all of this is going to be a GREAT DEAL OF FUN!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Wave will have a serious impact on product directions for both Msft MOSS and IBM/Lotus Domino &#8211; to the enterprise customer&#8217;s benefit.  I think you were dead on about strategy; however, I think enterprise thinks quite differently and not as quickly.  They&#8217;re still learning Web 2.0.</p>
<p>While Microsoft has their gunsights on the remaining 25M Domino seats, they&#8217;ve probably noted that many of the document paradigms (and successes) are an adtaption of what Mr. Ozzie et. al (Ray, Jack, Mussie Shore, others (maybe even Bob Balaban (oh hi bob!)) of Iris Associates and Lotus created.  The principle difference being the document store is now a directory with XML versus a single object-oriented database.  The DNA?  Unids are similar.  Parent child relationships are similar.  Security inheritance different (for some reason.) Near instant, authenticated, communications with stateful client sessions.</p>
<p>What Google must remember is that within the enterprise, IT has to support the nearly 100% connected user.  The nearly part is what&#8217;s going to get you &#8211; they&#8217;re the Information Workers.</p>
<p>(Guys, you can have a protocol but without a server and APIs, there&#8217;s no way to leverage it.)</p>
<p>Regardless, all of this is going to be a GREAT DEAL OF FUN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Sieling</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-9484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Sieling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-9484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; Crazy sounding, isn’t it.

No, not at all actually. It sounds like the first shoe of the next big thing dropping. Great analysis, Steve. Please keep it up, and more podcasts if at all possible, I really miss them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Crazy sounding, isn’t it.</p>
<p>No, not at all actually. It sounds like the first shoe of the next big thing dropping. Great analysis, Steve. Please keep it up, and more podcasts if at all possible, I really miss them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Sieling</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-22806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Sieling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-22806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; Crazy sounding, isn’t it.

No, not at all actually. It sounds like the first shoe of the next big thing dropping. Great analysis, Steve. Please keep it up, and more podcasts if at all possible, I really miss them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Crazy sounding, isn’t it.</p>
<p>No, not at all actually. It sounds like the first shoe of the next big thing dropping. Great analysis, Steve. Please keep it up, and more podcasts if at all possible, I really miss them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbebop</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-9483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bbebop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-9483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I like about Steve Gillmor is he always makes me think. This piece doesn&#039;t resonate as much, mostly because he frames it as a winner-take-all contest between Google and Microsoft, and his examples of how Microsoft can compete don&#039;t make sense to me.

If I were Microsoft, I would embrace, extend and embed Wave everywhere. What I wouldn&#039;t do is try to come up with something new/better/different, especially if it&#039;s proprietary. No one will trust Microsoft on anything like that. Maybe enterprises, but open source, open access is where we&#039;re headed.

As with Twitter, the big question is how this gets monetized. With widespread adoption of Google Wave, there have to be opportunities for Google, Microsoft and companies we&#039;ve never heard of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I like about Steve Gillmor is he always makes me think. This piece doesn&#8217;t resonate as much, mostly because he frames it as a winner-take-all contest between Google and Microsoft, and his examples of how Microsoft can compete don&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
<p>If I were Microsoft, I would embrace, extend and embed Wave everywhere. What I wouldn&#8217;t do is try to come up with something new/better/different, especially if it&#8217;s proprietary. No one will trust Microsoft on anything like that. Maybe enterprises, but open source, open access is where we&#8217;re headed.</p>
<p>As with Twitter, the big question is how this gets monetized. With widespread adoption of Google Wave, there have to be opportunities for Google, Microsoft and companies we&#8217;ve never heard of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbebop</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-22805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bbebop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-22805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I like about Steve Gillmor is he always makes me think. This piece doesn&#039;t resonate as much, mostly because he frames it as a winner-take-all contest between Google and Microsoft, and his examples of how Microsoft can compete don&#039;t make sense to me.

If I were Microsoft, I would embrace, extend and embed Wave everywhere. What I wouldn&#039;t do is try to come up with something new/better/different, especially if it&#039;s proprietary. No one will trust Microsoft on anything like that. Maybe enterprises, but open source, open access is where we&#039;re headed.

As with Twitter, the big question is how this gets monetized. With widespread adoption of Google Wave, there have to be opportunities for Google, Microsoft and companies we&#039;ve never heard of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I like about Steve Gillmor is he always makes me think. This piece doesn&#8217;t resonate as much, mostly because he frames it as a winner-take-all contest between Google and Microsoft, and his examples of how Microsoft can compete don&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
<p>If I were Microsoft, I would embrace, extend and embed Wave everywhere. What I wouldn&#8217;t do is try to come up with something new/better/different, especially if it&#8217;s proprietary. No one will trust Microsoft on anything like that. Maybe enterprises, but open source, open access is where we&#8217;re headed.</p>
<p>As with Twitter, the big question is how this gets monetized. With widespread adoption of Google Wave, there have to be opportunities for Google, Microsoft and companies we&#8217;ve never heard of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lokesh</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-9482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lokesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-9482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice Post Steve.
Its a api, its a protocol..
Its a big leap in the collaboration and real time communication space. With open sourcing it, Google has opened the doors for much more innovations and contributions from the open source community.

~Lokesh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Post Steve.<br />
Its a api, its a protocol..<br />
Its a big leap in the collaboration and real time communication space. With open sourcing it, Google has opened the doors for much more innovations and contributions from the open source community.</p>
<p>~Lokesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lokesh</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-22804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lokesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-22804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice Post Steve.
Its a api, its a protocol..
Its a big leap in the collaboration and real time communication space. With open sourcing it, Google has opened the doors for much more innovations and contributions from the open source community.

~Lokesh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Post Steve.<br />
Its a api, its a protocol..<br />
Its a big leap in the collaboration and real time communication space. With open sourcing it, Google has opened the doors for much more innovations and contributions from the open source community.</p>
<p>~Lokesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francine Hardaway</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-9481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francine Hardaway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-9481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, I have another thought, but you need to finish it for me.  Somehow, what I noticed in trying Bing is connected to all this.  In Bing, I found information about myself that was quite real time, quite relevant, and pretty shocking, since I had forgotten a lot of it was out there, although I&#039;m trained in the transparent life.

So there is a stream of gestures that either MSFT or GOOG can and will take advantage and possesion of. This raises many questions in my mind.

Coffee?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I have another thought, but you need to finish it for me.  Somehow, what I noticed in trying Bing is connected to all this.  In Bing, I found information about myself that was quite real time, quite relevant, and pretty shocking, since I had forgotten a lot of it was out there, although I&#8217;m trained in the transparent life.</p>
<p>So there is a stream of gestures that either MSFT or GOOG can and will take advantage and possesion of. This raises many questions in my mind.</p>
<p>Coffee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francine Hardaway</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-22803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francine Hardaway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-22803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, I have another thought, but you need to finish it for me.  Somehow, what I noticed in trying Bing is connected to all this.  In Bing, I found information about myself that was quite real time, quite relevant, and pretty shocking, since I had forgotten a lot of it was out there, although I&#039;m trained in the transparent life.

So there is a stream of gestures that either MSFT or GOOG can and will take advantage and possesion of. This raises many questions in my mind.

Coffee?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I have another thought, but you need to finish it for me.  Somehow, what I noticed in trying Bing is connected to all this.  In Bing, I found information about myself that was quite real time, quite relevant, and pretty shocking, since I had forgotten a lot of it was out there, although I&#8217;m trained in the transparent life.</p>
<p>So there is a stream of gestures that either MSFT or GOOG can and will take advantage and possesion of. This raises many questions in my mind.</p>
<p>Coffee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yep</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-9480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-9480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agreed. nice post, Steve. No razors either! ;-P

Wave/Mesh are scaring the smile out of me!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed. nice post, Steve. No razors either! ;-P</p>
<p>Wave/Mesh are scaring the smile out of me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yep</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-22802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-22802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agreed. nice post, Steve. No razors either! ;-P

Wave/Mesh are scaring the smile out of me!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed. nice post, Steve. No razors either! ;-P</p>
<p>Wave/Mesh are scaring the smile out of me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-9479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-9479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year when Live Mesh was demoed at the Azure announcement, Ray Ozzie said that &#039;an open source product using a protocol such as XMPP could be competition&#039;...

and so it is :-).

Great vindication for the XMPP folks who&#039;ve spent years trying to tell people that it was always much more than just about chat...

- Bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year when Live Mesh was demoed at the Azure announcement, Ray Ozzie said that &#8216;an open source product using a protocol such as XMPP could be competition&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>and so it is <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Great vindication for the XMPP folks who&#8217;ve spent years trying to tell people that it was always much more than just about chat&#8230;</p>
<p>- Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-22801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-22801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year when Live Mesh was demoed at the Azure announcement, Ray Ozzie said that &#039;an open source product using a protocol such as XMPP could be competition&#039;...

and so it is :-).

Great vindication for the XMPP folks who&#039;ve spent years trying to tell people that it was always much more than just about chat...

- Bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year when Live Mesh was demoed at the Azure announcement, Ray Ozzie said that &#8216;an open source product using a protocol such as XMPP could be competition&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>and so it is <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Great vindication for the XMPP folks who&#8217;ve spent years trying to tell people that it was always much more than just about chat&#8230;</p>
<p>- Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-9478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-9478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s nice to read thoughtful commentary on the implications of Wave instead of someone just trying to nit pick alpha quality software.

This could have a huge impact in the Content Management Systems market.  Especially if Google transitions Apps to Wave and instantly start with tens of millions of users.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to read thoughtful commentary on the implications of Wave instead of someone just trying to nit pick alpha quality software.</p>
<p>This could have a huge impact in the Content Management Systems market.  Especially if Google transitions Apps to Wave and instantly start with tens of millions of users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-22800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-22800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s nice to read thoughtful commentary on the implications of Wave instead of someone just trying to nit pick alpha quality software.

This could have a huge impact in the Content Management Systems market.  Especially if Google transitions Apps to Wave and instantly start with tens of millions of users.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to read thoughtful commentary on the implications of Wave instead of someone just trying to nit pick alpha quality software.</p>
<p>This could have a huge impact in the Content Management Systems market.  Especially if Google transitions Apps to Wave and instantly start with tens of millions of users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Waves Prévisualisation &#124; Kimind Consulting</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-9477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Waves Prévisualisation &#124; Kimind Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-9477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] update : lire l&#8217;intéressant article de TechCrunchIT dédié au sujet. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] update : lire l&#8217;intéressant article de TechCrunchIT dédié au sujet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Waves Prévisualisation &#124; Kimind Consulting</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/the-manhattan-project/#comment-22799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Waves Prévisualisation &#124; Kimind Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2516#comment-22799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] update : lire l&#8217;intéressant article de TechCrunchIT dédié au sujet. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] update : lire l&#8217;intéressant article de TechCrunchIT dédié au sujet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

