<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trouble right here in Twitter City</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuck Steve</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-9309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fuck Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 11:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-9309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow you talk BULLSHIT. Glad Mike took your fucked updates off TechCrunch.com - your articles are such bullshit and you have NO IDEA. If you did, you&#039;d run a technology company instead of spewing the same garbage OVER AND OVER about Twitter.

Get off the net and go sit in a nursing home you old fuck. The web is for 20 somethings not washed up old fucks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow you talk BULLSHIT. Glad Mike took your fucked updates off TechCrunch.com &#8211; your articles are such bullshit and you have NO IDEA. If you did, you&#8217;d run a technology company instead of spewing the same garbage OVER AND OVER about Twitter.</p>
<p>Get off the net and go sit in a nursing home you old fuck. The web is for 20 somethings not washed up old fucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuck Steve</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-22631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fuck Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 11:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-22631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow you talk BULLSHIT. Glad Mike took your fucked updates off TechCrunch.com - your articles are such bullshit and you have NO IDEA. If you did, you&#039;d run a technology company instead of spewing the same garbage OVER AND OVER about Twitter.

Get off the net and go sit in a nursing home you old fuck. The web is for 20 somethings not washed up old fucks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow you talk BULLSHIT. Glad Mike took your fucked updates off TechCrunch.com &#8211; your articles are such bullshit and you have NO IDEA. If you did, you&#8217;d run a technology company instead of spewing the same garbage OVER AND OVER about Twitter.</p>
<p>Get off the net and go sit in a nursing home you old fuck. The web is for 20 somethings not washed up old fucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prokofy Neva</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-9308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prokofy Neva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-9308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, you are completely silent here about the real issue of A-listers banging on the devs about what they don&#039;t like: the inability to filter @ in your @ tab from people you don&#039;t like, while still retaining the ability to get loads of adoring masses to follow you loyally and never talk back, and keep broadcasting to them without ever hearing any static.

You are one of the main lobbyists for track filter, and return of track filter -- which is essentially the same thing as #fixreplies  -- and in fact it is the devs caving to you and others wishing to silence back-talk, who use &#039;follow block&#039; whom we have to thank for this nerf.

By scrubbing the @ from people you don&#039;t follow -- or are blocked from following! -- feedback in the system, especially critical feedback, is eliminated for the vain -- but thin-skinned. A terrible system-wide development which I&#039;ve been trying to get you to realize since last summer, but you stubbornly resist.

It&#039;s terrible because it&#039;s not just about some individual&#039;s preferences and his privacy, when public figures use this to block accountability of their actions.

So the devs are only putting part of it back, and they&#039;ve also disabled another function -- the ability to use search words or search on a name, and if you see a tweet that&#039;s interesting, press on the return arrow and talk to them immediately. That&#039;s gone now if you are follow-blocked, or not following a person, and you have to try to re-type it manually.

This isn&#039;t a technical or scaling issue. It&#039;s a political issue.

The reason you and Scoble and others are flogging Friendfeed is because you can reach into the comments just like a blog, and delete comments you don&#039;t like.

So the entire beauty and functionality of Twitter is hobbled -- a public space where people like you cannot act as censors for arbitrary and sectarian reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you are completely silent here about the real issue of A-listers banging on the devs about what they don&#8217;t like: the inability to filter @ in your @ tab from people you don&#8217;t like, while still retaining the ability to get loads of adoring masses to follow you loyally and never talk back, and keep broadcasting to them without ever hearing any static.</p>
<p>You are one of the main lobbyists for track filter, and return of track filter &#8212; which is essentially the same thing as #fixreplies  &#8212; and in fact it is the devs caving to you and others wishing to silence back-talk, who use &#8216;follow block&#8217; whom we have to thank for this nerf.</p>
<p>By scrubbing the @ from people you don&#8217;t follow &#8212; or are blocked from following! &#8212; feedback in the system, especially critical feedback, is eliminated for the vain &#8212; but thin-skinned. A terrible system-wide development which I&#8217;ve been trying to get you to realize since last summer, but you stubbornly resist.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s terrible because it&#8217;s not just about some individual&#8217;s preferences and his privacy, when public figures use this to block accountability of their actions.</p>
<p>So the devs are only putting part of it back, and they&#8217;ve also disabled another function &#8212; the ability to use search words or search on a name, and if you see a tweet that&#8217;s interesting, press on the return arrow and talk to them immediately. That&#8217;s gone now if you are follow-blocked, or not following a person, and you have to try to re-type it manually.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a technical or scaling issue. It&#8217;s a political issue.</p>
<p>The reason you and Scoble and others are flogging Friendfeed is because you can reach into the comments just like a blog, and delete comments you don&#8217;t like.</p>
<p>So the entire beauty and functionality of Twitter is hobbled &#8212; a public space where people like you cannot act as censors for arbitrary and sectarian reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prokofy Neva</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-22630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prokofy Neva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-22630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, you are completely silent here about the real issue of A-listers banging on the devs about what they don&#039;t like: the inability to filter @ in your @ tab from people you don&#039;t like, while still retaining the ability to get loads of adoring masses to follow you loyally and never talk back, and keep broadcasting to them without ever hearing any static.

You are one of the main lobbyists for track filter, and return of track filter -- which is essentially the same thing as #fixreplies  -- and in fact it is the devs caving to you and others wishing to silence back-talk, who use &#039;follow block&#039; whom we have to thank for this nerf.

By scrubbing the @ from people you don&#039;t follow -- or are blocked from following! -- feedback in the system, especially critical feedback, is eliminated for the vain -- but thin-skinned. A terrible system-wide development which I&#039;ve been trying to get you to realize since last summer, but you stubbornly resist.

It&#039;s terrible because it&#039;s not just about some individual&#039;s preferences and his privacy, when public figures use this to block accountability of their actions.

So the devs are only putting part of it back, and they&#039;ve also disabled another function -- the ability to use search words or search on a name, and if you see a tweet that&#039;s interesting, press on the return arrow and talk to them immediately. That&#039;s gone now if you are follow-blocked, or not following a person, and you have to try to re-type it manually.

This isn&#039;t a technical or scaling issue. It&#039;s a political issue.

The reason you and Scoble and others are flogging Friendfeed is because you can reach into the comments just like a blog, and delete comments you don&#039;t like.

So the entire beauty and functionality of Twitter is hobbled -- a public space where people like you cannot act as censors for arbitrary and sectarian reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you are completely silent here about the real issue of A-listers banging on the devs about what they don&#8217;t like: the inability to filter @ in your @ tab from people you don&#8217;t like, while still retaining the ability to get loads of adoring masses to follow you loyally and never talk back, and keep broadcasting to them without ever hearing any static.</p>
<p>You are one of the main lobbyists for track filter, and return of track filter &#8212; which is essentially the same thing as #fixreplies  &#8212; and in fact it is the devs caving to you and others wishing to silence back-talk, who use &#8216;follow block&#8217; whom we have to thank for this nerf.</p>
<p>By scrubbing the @ from people you don&#8217;t follow &#8212; or are blocked from following! &#8212; feedback in the system, especially critical feedback, is eliminated for the vain &#8212; but thin-skinned. A terrible system-wide development which I&#8217;ve been trying to get you to realize since last summer, but you stubbornly resist.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s terrible because it&#8217;s not just about some individual&#8217;s preferences and his privacy, when public figures use this to block accountability of their actions.</p>
<p>So the devs are only putting part of it back, and they&#8217;ve also disabled another function &#8212; the ability to use search words or search on a name, and if you see a tweet that&#8217;s interesting, press on the return arrow and talk to them immediately. That&#8217;s gone now if you are follow-blocked, or not following a person, and you have to try to re-type it manually.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a technical or scaling issue. It&#8217;s a political issue.</p>
<p>The reason you and Scoble and others are flogging Friendfeed is because you can reach into the comments just like a blog, and delete comments you don&#8217;t like.</p>
<p>So the entire beauty and functionality of Twitter is hobbled &#8212; a public space where people like you cannot act as censors for arbitrary and sectarian reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francine hardaway</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-9307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[francine hardaway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-9307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bummer. I&#039;m getting so tired of Twitter and its endless histrionics. I swear, Twitter learned its business model from Goldman Sachs or Citibank. Does Twitter own Washington? I&#039;m beginning to think so.

Nice piece, Steve. See you soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer. I&#8217;m getting so tired of Twitter and its endless histrionics. I swear, Twitter learned its business model from Goldman Sachs or Citibank. Does Twitter own Washington? I&#8217;m beginning to think so.</p>
<p>Nice piece, Steve. See you soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francine hardaway</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-22629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[francine hardaway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-22629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bummer. I&#039;m getting so tired of Twitter and its endless histrionics. I swear, Twitter learned its business model from Goldman Sachs or Citibank. Does Twitter own Washington? I&#039;m beginning to think so.

Nice piece, Steve. See you soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer. I&#8217;m getting so tired of Twitter and its endless histrionics. I swear, Twitter learned its business model from Goldman Sachs or Citibank. Does Twitter own Washington? I&#8217;m beginning to think so.</p>
<p>Nice piece, Steve. See you soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Chalkley</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-9306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Chalkley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-9306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DEMOCRACY IN FREE TO JOIN SERVICES ON THE WEB!!!

Burn Twitter! (Joke, I really love you, I hope you are well and listen to everyone at the detriment to your sanity and what you know behind closed doors xxx)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DEMOCRACY IN FREE TO JOIN SERVICES ON THE WEB!!!</p>
<p>Burn Twitter! (Joke, I really love you, I hope you are well and listen to everyone at the detriment to your sanity and what you know behind closed doors xxx)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Chalkley</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-22628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Chalkley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-22628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DEMOCRACY IN FREE TO JOIN SERVICES ON THE WEB!!!

Burn Twitter! (Joke, I really love you, I hope you are well and listen to everyone at the detriment to your sanity and what you know behind closed doors xxx)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DEMOCRACY IN FREE TO JOIN SERVICES ON THE WEB!!!</p>
<p>Burn Twitter! (Joke, I really love you, I hope you are well and listen to everyone at the detriment to your sanity and what you know behind closed doors xxx)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Cuthrell</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-9305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Cuthrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-9305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sadder but wiser services for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sadder but wiser services for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Cuthrell</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-22627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Cuthrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-22627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sadder but wiser services for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sadder but wiser services for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lea</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-9304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-9304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[english would be nice man. english.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>english would be nice man. english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lea</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-22626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-22626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[english would be nice man. english.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>english would be nice man. english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Mougayar</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-9303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Mougayar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-9303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sure looks like they have shot themselves in the foot with this one. It will be interesting to see what happens as we all speculate if this is a permanent move or one that will be re-adjusted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure looks like they have shot themselves in the foot with this one. It will be interesting to see what happens as we all speculate if this is a permanent move or one that will be re-adjusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Mougayar</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-22625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Mougayar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-22625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sure looks like they have shot themselves in the foot with this one. It will be interesting to see what happens as we all speculate if this is a permanent move or one that will be re-adjusted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure looks like they have shot themselves in the foot with this one. It will be interesting to see what happens as we all speculate if this is a permanent move or one that will be re-adjusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billso</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-9302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-9302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article! Twitter really did drop the PR ball - a change like this should have been announced in advance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! Twitter really did drop the PR ball &#8211; a change like this should have been announced in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billso</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/13/trouble-right-here-in-twitter-city/#comment-22624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=2395#comment-22624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article! Twitter really did drop the PR ball - a change like this should have been announced in advance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! Twitter really did drop the PR ball &#8211; a change like this should have been announced in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

