This is a Guest Post by Robin Klein, Partner in The Accelerator Group (TAG), an early stage seed funder of tech startups in the UK and across the rest of Europe. If there is anyone who knows about early stage tech startup funding in Europe, it’s Klein. It chimes in with my post last year that the UK government should make sure any stimulus funds are channeled to into many more startups than proposed, instead of into a lucky few.
Alistair Darling, Lord Drayson – an Open Letter
Dear Lord Drayson,
Put £100,000 into 10,000 startups – not £10m into 100!
There has been a lot of chatter about the Government’s apparent initiative to make £1bn available for innovative early-stage companies.
Apparently, Lord Drayson, the Minister of Science and Innovation in the Department for Universities and Skills is driving this. The BVCA is keen to promote the idea through its influential contacts that this money should be channeled via the large established VC funds.
From where we sit, putting lots more money into the large funds achieves the exact opposite of what I understand the desired the objectives to be.
What is urgently needed in the UK – in order to promote entrepreneurship and encourage innovation – is funding at the very earliest stages.
One of the major drivers for Silicon Valley’s success has been the readily available, quickly raised seed capital. Its not uncommon, even in today’s funding climate to find start-ups funded with $500K in a matter of weeks by angel syndicates led by an agile tech VC.
There is more than enough capital available once companies have proven their technologies, validated the market need and have real momentum. This capital is NOT venture, it is development or growth capital.
The so-called funding gap has never been adequately filled and the growth in size of the leading funds has forced them to move up the food chain and to back relatively fewer pure start-ups.
We have all been wringing our hands at this gap for many years and in the current environment the gap is noticeably widening.
Seed funds are extremely difficult to make work effectively on the classic 2/20 model since it is important that seed funds invest in a large and diverse portfolio (in order to find the winners) while at the same time need to provide a lot of hand-holding to these companies (implying a larger organisation – more partners).
The BVCA’s position is interesting in that it looks at the whole issue from the ‘industry’s perspective’ – you can’t blame them for that – its their job. It’s certainly not being looked at from the entrepreneurs perspective!
We at TAG have had terrific support from some of the large tech VCs but their ability to do many seed fundings is very limited. We need healthy and growing seed capital partners to join us in our quest to find and nurture the next world beaters.
One of the most important and effective vehicles for promoting entrepreneurship in the tech arena in recent years has been Seedcamp [Interest declared: TAG has been an investor in companies promoted by Seedcamp - Editor] – the flood of applicants and the rising quality of these applicants attest to the strength of innovation emanating from Europe.
They are deserving of far greater financial backing.
Partner, The Accelerator Group (TAG)
PS: TAG is an early stage technology investor with 43 investments currently in its portfolio. We invest actively mainly in the UK but also across Europe and in the US.