<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Fred Wilson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sem</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-6587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-6587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been using Hulu for a some time now.  I am able to keep up with some of my shows if I miss them due to working late here.  It is very convenient and I have not had a problem yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Hulu for a some time now.  I am able to keep up with some of my shows if I miss them due to working late here.  It is very convenient and I have not had a problem yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sem</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-19909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-19909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been using Hulu for a some time now.  I am able to keep up with some of my shows if I miss them due to working late here.  It is very convenient and I have not had a problem yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Hulu for a some time now.  I am able to keep up with some of my shows if I miss them due to working late here.  It is very convenient and I have not had a problem yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remote Access Software</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-6586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remote Access Software]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-6586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh. I had IPTV in college, and I&#039;m gonna be honest, it wasn&#039;t great. Hulu is really fine - it works just as well for time-shifting, and if I want anything better than that, I want to be in my living room, on my DVR and a big TV, far away from my computer as possible...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh. I had IPTV in college, and I&#8217;m gonna be honest, it wasn&#8217;t great. Hulu is really fine &#8211; it works just as well for time-shifting, and if I want anything better than that, I want to be in my living room, on my DVR and a big TV, far away from my computer as possible&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remote Access Software</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-19908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remote Access Software]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-19908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh. I had IPTV in college, and I&#039;m gonna be honest, it wasn&#039;t great. Hulu is really fine - it works just as well for time-shifting, and if I want anything better than that, I want to be in my living room, on my DVR and a big TV, far away from my computer as possible...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh. I had IPTV in college, and I&#8217;m gonna be honest, it wasn&#8217;t great. Hulu is really fine &#8211; it works just as well for time-shifting, and if I want anything better than that, I want to be in my living room, on my DVR and a big TV, far away from my computer as possible&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-6585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-6585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice story Steve, boxee is doing everything they can to be open and transparent and LEGAL with content that goes into the service.  It&#039;s interesting to see the user backlash against Hulu - with the early adopter community stating they will go to torrents (without ads) in result to their pulling from the service.

From what I have seen from twitter at such an early stage, which is growing even faster than boxee, Twitter has done everything that they can to allow open connectivity into their platform as well.  As we all hate the fail whale, I can understand their limiting.  As more clients tax their system inefficiently, I can see more limitations coming into play.

As for the Hulu/Boxee situation, Hulu is held between a rock and a hard spot with their content holders.  They love the extra traffic and ad views that they receive, 100k streams from boxee last week alone.  It is my opinion that they were not running their IP ad network effectively - by showing PSA&#039;s during two or three week old programming.  They will figure that out with better algorithms, weighting, etc.

As for Hulu being stuck between a rock and ahard place: this little sword fight is just a posturing game - no different than YouTube had with the networks in 2006 and 2007.  I would have thought that we had this &quot;figured out&quot; after those days.  It is 2009, but old media got scared.  Own it guys.  Don&#039;t run from it.

On a positive note, check out the boxee initiative to have users create the language for the media companies to wake up and smell the digital coffee.  http://boxee.pbwiki.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice story Steve, boxee is doing everything they can to be open and transparent and LEGAL with content that goes into the service.  It&#8217;s interesting to see the user backlash against Hulu &#8211; with the early adopter community stating they will go to torrents (without ads) in result to their pulling from the service.</p>
<p>From what I have seen from twitter at such an early stage, which is growing even faster than boxee, Twitter has done everything that they can to allow open connectivity into their platform as well.  As we all hate the fail whale, I can understand their limiting.  As more clients tax their system inefficiently, I can see more limitations coming into play.</p>
<p>As for the Hulu/Boxee situation, Hulu is held between a rock and a hard spot with their content holders.  They love the extra traffic and ad views that they receive, 100k streams from boxee last week alone.  It is my opinion that they were not running their IP ad network effectively &#8211; by showing PSA&#8217;s during two or three week old programming.  They will figure that out with better algorithms, weighting, etc.</p>
<p>As for Hulu being stuck between a rock and ahard place: this little sword fight is just a posturing game &#8211; no different than YouTube had with the networks in 2006 and 2007.  I would have thought that we had this &#8220;figured out&#8221; after those days.  It is 2009, but old media got scared.  Own it guys.  Don&#8217;t run from it.</p>
<p>On a positive note, check out the boxee initiative to have users create the language for the media companies to wake up and smell the digital coffee.  <a href="http://boxee.pbwiki.com/" rel="nofollow">http://boxee.pbwiki.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-19907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-19907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice story Steve, boxee is doing everything they can to be open and transparent and LEGAL with content that goes into the service.  It&#039;s interesting to see the user backlash against Hulu - with the early adopter community stating they will go to torrents (without ads) in result to their pulling from the service.

From what I have seen from twitter at such an early stage, which is growing even faster than boxee, Twitter has done everything that they can to allow open connectivity into their platform as well.  As we all hate the fail whale, I can understand their limiting.  As more clients tax their system inefficiently, I can see more limitations coming into play.

As for the Hulu/Boxee situation, Hulu is held between a rock and a hard spot with their content holders.  They love the extra traffic and ad views that they receive, 100k streams from boxee last week alone.  It is my opinion that they were not running their IP ad network effectively - by showing PSA&#039;s during two or three week old programming.  They will figure that out with better algorithms, weighting, etc.

As for Hulu being stuck between a rock and ahard place: this little sword fight is just a posturing game - no different than YouTube had with the networks in 2006 and 2007.  I would have thought that we had this &quot;figured out&quot; after those days.  It is 2009, but old media got scared.  Own it guys.  Don&#039;t run from it.

On a positive note, check out the boxee initiative to have users create the language for the media companies to wake up and smell the digital coffee.  http://boxee.pbwiki.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice story Steve, boxee is doing everything they can to be open and transparent and LEGAL with content that goes into the service.  It&#8217;s interesting to see the user backlash against Hulu &#8211; with the early adopter community stating they will go to torrents (without ads) in result to their pulling from the service.</p>
<p>From what I have seen from twitter at such an early stage, which is growing even faster than boxee, Twitter has done everything that they can to allow open connectivity into their platform as well.  As we all hate the fail whale, I can understand their limiting.  As more clients tax their system inefficiently, I can see more limitations coming into play.</p>
<p>As for the Hulu/Boxee situation, Hulu is held between a rock and a hard spot with their content holders.  They love the extra traffic and ad views that they receive, 100k streams from boxee last week alone.  It is my opinion that they were not running their IP ad network effectively &#8211; by showing PSA&#8217;s during two or three week old programming.  They will figure that out with better algorithms, weighting, etc.</p>
<p>As for Hulu being stuck between a rock and ahard place: this little sword fight is just a posturing game &#8211; no different than YouTube had with the networks in 2006 and 2007.  I would have thought that we had this &#8220;figured out&#8221; after those days.  It is 2009, but old media got scared.  Own it guys.  Don&#8217;t run from it.</p>
<p>On a positive note, check out the boxee initiative to have users create the language for the media companies to wake up and smell the digital coffee.  <a href="http://boxee.pbwiki.com/" rel="nofollow">http://boxee.pbwiki.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-6584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-6584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Anyway, this was a very well thought and expressed article.&lt;/i&gt;

No it isn&#039;t. You can see that he&#039;s capable of rendering a competent analysis, but this isn&#039;t it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Anyway, this was a very well thought and expressed article.</i></p>
<p>No it isn&#8217;t. You can see that he&#8217;s capable of rendering a competent analysis, but this isn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-19906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-19906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Anyway, this was a very well thought and expressed article.&lt;/i&gt;

No it isn&#039;t. You can see that he&#039;s capable of rendering a competent analysis, but this isn&#039;t it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Anyway, this was a very well thought and expressed article.</i></p>
<p>No it isn&#8217;t. You can see that he&#8217;s capable of rendering a competent analysis, but this isn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Offbeatmammal</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-6583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Offbeatmammal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-6583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IPTV has great promise - a la carte programming, virtually infinite on-demand content, p2p data distribution with smart rules to pre-cache content etc all supported by suscription and targeted (ie better value) advertising but .... the very arguments that are currently causing pain at Hulu and downstream re-users of the content like Boxee are going to continue to hurt any chance of real progress.

I&#039;d be happy to pay for content. I&#039;d be happy to have it wrapped in DRM as long as there was a concept of fair use (if I buy it let me keep it forever. if I rent it enforce the terms I agreed to but let me watch/listen on multiple devices if I want etc)

The problem is ... no-one has worked out a viable model that will allow the incumbent riders of the gravy train continue to make money while producing decent content (though the quality of a lot of content the studios deliver is questionable now as everyone heads for low cost RealityTV programming!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IPTV has great promise &#8211; a la carte programming, virtually infinite on-demand content, p2p data distribution with smart rules to pre-cache content etc all supported by suscription and targeted (ie better value) advertising but &#8230;. the very arguments that are currently causing pain at Hulu and downstream re-users of the content like Boxee are going to continue to hurt any chance of real progress.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to pay for content. I&#8217;d be happy to have it wrapped in DRM as long as there was a concept of fair use (if I buy it let me keep it forever. if I rent it enforce the terms I agreed to but let me watch/listen on multiple devices if I want etc)</p>
<p>The problem is &#8230; no-one has worked out a viable model that will allow the incumbent riders of the gravy train continue to make money while producing decent content (though the quality of a lot of content the studios deliver is questionable now as everyone heads for low cost RealityTV programming!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Offbeatmammal</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-19905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Offbeatmammal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-19905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IPTV has great promise - a la carte programming, virtually infinite on-demand content, p2p data distribution with smart rules to pre-cache content etc all supported by suscription and targeted (ie better value) advertising but .... the very arguments that are currently causing pain at Hulu and downstream re-users of the content like Boxee are going to continue to hurt any chance of real progress.

I&#039;d be happy to pay for content. I&#039;d be happy to have it wrapped in DRM as long as there was a concept of fair use (if I buy it let me keep it forever. if I rent it enforce the terms I agreed to but let me watch/listen on multiple devices if I want etc)

The problem is ... no-one has worked out a viable model that will allow the incumbent riders of the gravy train continue to make money while producing decent content (though the quality of a lot of content the studios deliver is questionable now as everyone heads for low cost RealityTV programming!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IPTV has great promise &#8211; a la carte programming, virtually infinite on-demand content, p2p data distribution with smart rules to pre-cache content etc all supported by suscription and targeted (ie better value) advertising but &#8230;. the very arguments that are currently causing pain at Hulu and downstream re-users of the content like Boxee are going to continue to hurt any chance of real progress.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to pay for content. I&#8217;d be happy to have it wrapped in DRM as long as there was a concept of fair use (if I buy it let me keep it forever. if I rent it enforce the terms I agreed to but let me watch/listen on multiple devices if I want etc)</p>
<p>The problem is &#8230; no-one has worked out a viable model that will allow the incumbent riders of the gravy train continue to make money while producing decent content (though the quality of a lot of content the studios deliver is questionable now as everyone heads for low cost RealityTV programming!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-6582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-6582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Protecting content might be a losing battle but how do we expect the content producers to make money when we want the content to be available everywhere for free?
Advertisements usually pay for it but once the content ends up on a UGC site the ROI is close to zero.
Eyeballs are great to launch something but I don&#039;t think those UGC CPMs pay the bill.
BitTorrents are having a ball with U2&#039;s latest.
U2&#039;s concerts will probably make up for it but not everyone&#039;s in a similar position.
The only way for content producers to protect their TV programs is to sign license deals with sites that distribute the content.
What happened to Boxee should not be the end of Boxee, it&#039;s just a sign Boxee needs to start negotiations or change the business model.
I&#039;m not sure those negotiations will be succesful because is Hulu waiting for another iTunes?
I use iTunes a lot but it sort of became a very powerful player and I don&#039;t think Fox and NBC want that to happen to someone else when they themselve can have it all.
I think it&#039;s extremely difficult to make money in a browser based environment because people got used to having everything for free.
iTunes is a program and so is Boxee, which makes it easier to charge money.
I have no clue what business model the Boxee guys have in mind and I never used it but I can see why it&#039;s a big threat to Hulu.
Hulu&#039;s browser based and if they can pull off what I think they are about to do then there&#039;s no way they will share their own content (Hulu&#039;s a joint venture of NBC and News Corp) with someone else.
Did Boxee &amp; CBS&#039; tv.com help Hulu reach its tipping point &amp; now they are no longer needed?
I haven&#039;t looked at the numbers but it wouldn&#039;t surprise me.
I hate to say it but when Boxee folds because of this or when Boxee signs a licensing deal : content will become king again.

And about Twitter. I could be wrong but it&#039;s a vertical search engine in the making.
The question to me is is Twitter better off when it looks for conversations / status updates / intentions coming from inside Twitter or when it searches for those in other places as well?
When Twitter manages to combine the conversations taking place in some very specific communities would it be a smart idea if Twitter gave those communities a percentage of all profits?
It would be like having adsense on your website but you&#039;re only making money when someone does a search on Twitter and the conversations on your site are being used to monetize that search (or stream).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Protecting content might be a losing battle but how do we expect the content producers to make money when we want the content to be available everywhere for free?<br />
Advertisements usually pay for it but once the content ends up on a UGC site the ROI is close to zero.<br />
Eyeballs are great to launch something but I don&#8217;t think those UGC CPMs pay the bill.<br />
BitTorrents are having a ball with U2&#8242;s latest.<br />
U2&#8242;s concerts will probably make up for it but not everyone&#8217;s in a similar position.<br />
The only way for content producers to protect their TV programs is to sign license deals with sites that distribute the content.<br />
What happened to Boxee should not be the end of Boxee, it&#8217;s just a sign Boxee needs to start negotiations or change the business model.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure those negotiations will be succesful because is Hulu waiting for another iTunes?<br />
I use iTunes a lot but it sort of became a very powerful player and I don&#8217;t think Fox and NBC want that to happen to someone else when they themselve can have it all.<br />
I think it&#8217;s extremely difficult to make money in a browser based environment because people got used to having everything for free.<br />
iTunes is a program and so is Boxee, which makes it easier to charge money.<br />
I have no clue what business model the Boxee guys have in mind and I never used it but I can see why it&#8217;s a big threat to Hulu.<br />
Hulu&#8217;s browser based and if they can pull off what I think they are about to do then there&#8217;s no way they will share their own content (Hulu&#8217;s a joint venture of NBC and News Corp) with someone else.<br />
Did Boxee &amp; CBS&#8217; tv.com help Hulu reach its tipping point &amp; now they are no longer needed?<br />
I haven&#8217;t looked at the numbers but it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me.<br />
I hate to say it but when Boxee folds because of this or when Boxee signs a licensing deal : content will become king again.</p>
<p>And about Twitter. I could be wrong but it&#8217;s a vertical search engine in the making.<br />
The question to me is is Twitter better off when it looks for conversations / status updates / intentions coming from inside Twitter or when it searches for those in other places as well?<br />
When Twitter manages to combine the conversations taking place in some very specific communities would it be a smart idea if Twitter gave those communities a percentage of all profits?<br />
It would be like having adsense on your website but you&#8217;re only making money when someone does a search on Twitter and the conversations on your site are being used to monetize that search (or stream).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-19904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-19904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Protecting content might be a losing battle but how do we expect the content producers to make money when we want the content to be available everywhere for free?
Advertisements usually pay for it but once the content ends up on a UGC site the ROI is close to zero.
Eyeballs are great to launch something but I don&#039;t think those UGC CPMs pay the bill.
BitTorrents are having a ball with U2&#039;s latest.
U2&#039;s concerts will probably make up for it but not everyone&#039;s in a similar position.
The only way for content producers to protect their TV programs is to sign license deals with sites that distribute the content.
What happened to Boxee should not be the end of Boxee, it&#039;s just a sign Boxee needs to start negotiations or change the business model.
I&#039;m not sure those negotiations will be succesful because is Hulu waiting for another iTunes?
I use iTunes a lot but it sort of became a very powerful player and I don&#039;t think Fox and NBC want that to happen to someone else when they themselve can have it all.
I think it&#039;s extremely difficult to make money in a browser based environment because people got used to having everything for free.
iTunes is a program and so is Boxee, which makes it easier to charge money.
I have no clue what business model the Boxee guys have in mind and I never used it but I can see why it&#039;s a big threat to Hulu.
Hulu&#039;s browser based and if they can pull off what I think they are about to do then there&#039;s no way they will share their own content (Hulu&#039;s a joint venture of NBC and News Corp) with someone else.
Did Boxee &amp; CBS&#039; tv.com help Hulu reach its tipping point &amp; now they are no longer needed?
I haven&#039;t looked at the numbers but it wouldn&#039;t surprise me.
I hate to say it but when Boxee folds because of this or when Boxee signs a licensing deal : content will become king again.

And about Twitter. I could be wrong but it&#039;s a vertical search engine in the making.
The question to me is is Twitter better off when it looks for conversations / status updates / intentions coming from inside Twitter or when it searches for those in other places as well?
When Twitter manages to combine the conversations taking place in some very specific communities would it be a smart idea if Twitter gave those communities a percentage of all profits?
It would be like having adsense on your website but you&#039;re only making money when someone does a search on Twitter and the conversations on your site are being used to monetize that search (or stream).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Protecting content might be a losing battle but how do we expect the content producers to make money when we want the content to be available everywhere for free?<br />
Advertisements usually pay for it but once the content ends up on a UGC site the ROI is close to zero.<br />
Eyeballs are great to launch something but I don&#8217;t think those UGC CPMs pay the bill.<br />
BitTorrents are having a ball with U2&#8242;s latest.<br />
U2&#8242;s concerts will probably make up for it but not everyone&#8217;s in a similar position.<br />
The only way for content producers to protect their TV programs is to sign license deals with sites that distribute the content.<br />
What happened to Boxee should not be the end of Boxee, it&#8217;s just a sign Boxee needs to start negotiations or change the business model.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure those negotiations will be succesful because is Hulu waiting for another iTunes?<br />
I use iTunes a lot but it sort of became a very powerful player and I don&#8217;t think Fox and NBC want that to happen to someone else when they themselve can have it all.<br />
I think it&#8217;s extremely difficult to make money in a browser based environment because people got used to having everything for free.<br />
iTunes is a program and so is Boxee, which makes it easier to charge money.<br />
I have no clue what business model the Boxee guys have in mind and I never used it but I can see why it&#8217;s a big threat to Hulu.<br />
Hulu&#8217;s browser based and if they can pull off what I think they are about to do then there&#8217;s no way they will share their own content (Hulu&#8217;s a joint venture of NBC and News Corp) with someone else.<br />
Did Boxee &amp; CBS&#8217; tv.com help Hulu reach its tipping point &amp; now they are no longer needed?<br />
I haven&#8217;t looked at the numbers but it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me.<br />
I hate to say it but when Boxee folds because of this or when Boxee signs a licensing deal : content will become king again.</p>
<p>And about Twitter. I could be wrong but it&#8217;s a vertical search engine in the making.<br />
The question to me is is Twitter better off when it looks for conversations / status updates / intentions coming from inside Twitter or when it searches for those in other places as well?<br />
When Twitter manages to combine the conversations taking place in some very specific communities would it be a smart idea if Twitter gave those communities a percentage of all profits?<br />
It would be like having adsense on your website but you&#8217;re only making money when someone does a search on Twitter and the conversations on your site are being used to monetize that search (or stream).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-6581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Gillmor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-6581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pretty much anything but Track, that is, Fred. And Track is very much similar to Boxee&#039;s value add.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty much anything but Track, that is, Fred. And Track is very much similar to Boxee&#8217;s value add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-19903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Gillmor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-19903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pretty much anything but Track, that is, Fred. And Track is very much similar to Boxee&#039;s value add.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty much anything but Track, that is, Fred. And Track is very much similar to Boxee&#8217;s value add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bouzide</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-6580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Bouzide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-6580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“It is ugly to demand as a socialist, the tools to be a capitalist” but human nature and history shows that they invariably do, which is why socialism doesn&#039;t work. There&#039;s probably a decent analog to zero-cost content and services here. But a pox on both houses, the capitalists also rig things so that I need to pay $hundreds per month for the channels that give me access to the content and services. Any opinions on whether that revenue stream is fairly apportioned?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“It is ugly to demand as a socialist, the tools to be a capitalist” but human nature and history shows that they invariably do, which is why socialism doesn&#8217;t work. There&#8217;s probably a decent analog to zero-cost content and services here. But a pox on both houses, the capitalists also rig things so that I need to pay $hundreds per month for the channels that give me access to the content and services. Any opinions on whether that revenue stream is fairly apportioned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bouzide</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-19902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Bouzide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-19902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“It is ugly to demand as a socialist, the tools to be a capitalist” but human nature and history shows that they invariably do, which is why socialism doesn&#039;t work. There&#039;s probably a decent analog to zero-cost content and services here. But a pox on both houses, the capitalists also rig things so that I need to pay $hundreds per month for the channels that give me access to the content and services. Any opinions on whether that revenue stream is fairly apportioned?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“It is ugly to demand as a socialist, the tools to be a capitalist” but human nature and history shows that they invariably do, which is why socialism doesn&#8217;t work. There&#8217;s probably a decent analog to zero-cost content and services here. But a pox on both houses, the capitalists also rig things so that I need to pay $hundreds per month for the channels that give me access to the content and services. Any opinions on whether that revenue stream is fairly apportioned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred wilson</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-6579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fred wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-6579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i don&#039;t really know the reasons for this and boxee&#039;s management is hoping to engage in a discussion with Hulu and their content partners to get this fixed asap]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t really know the reasons for this and boxee&#8217;s management is hoping to engage in a discussion with Hulu and their content partners to get this fixed asap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred wilson</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-19901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fred wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-19901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i don&#039;t really know the reasons for this and boxee&#039;s management is hoping to engage in a discussion with Hulu and their content partners to get this fixed asap]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t really know the reasons for this and boxee&#8217;s management is hoping to engage in a discussion with Hulu and their content partners to get this fixed asap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-6578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-6578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guy in the pic looks a bit like Rahm Emmanuel doesn&#039;t he?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy in the pic looks a bit like Rahm Emmanuel doesn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/free-fred-wilson/#comment-19900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=1691#comment-19900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guy in the pic looks a bit like Rahm Emmanuel doesn&#039;t he?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy in the pic looks a bit like Rahm Emmanuel doesn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

