<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The death of in-house IT? Only partially&#8230; Force.com enables outsourcing IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/the-death-of-in-house-it-only-partially-forcecom-enables-outsourcing-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/the-death-of-in-house-it-only-partially-forcecom-enables-outsourcing-it/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Weinstein</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/the-death-of-in-house-it-only-partially-forcecom-enables-outsourcing-it/#comment-18477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Weinstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=994#comment-18477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave - I agree.  But removing the infrastructure issues frees up IT to focus more on what IT leaders have been saying they want to do for years - focus on solving business problems.  We all know that traditional IT spends more time chasing down routine maintenance and operations issues than working with the business on creative ways to use technology as a tool to juice revenue and lower overall costs.  SaaS, ultimately will redefine, not remove, corporate IT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave &#8211; I agree.  But removing the infrastructure issues frees up IT to focus more on what IT leaders have been saying they want to do for years &#8211; focus on solving business problems.  We all know that traditional IT spends more time chasing down routine maintenance and operations issues than working with the business on creative ways to use technology as a tool to juice revenue and lower overall costs.  SaaS, ultimately will redefine, not remove, corporate IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Widman</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/the-death-of-in-house-it-only-partially-forcecom-enables-outsourcing-it/#comment-18476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Widman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=994#comment-18476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave--great summary. IT certainly won&#039;t go away, but they&#039;ll deal less with the infrastructure, and more with on-site issues relevant to keeping employees productive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave&#8211;great summary. IT certainly won&#8217;t go away, but they&#8217;ll deal less with the infrastructure, and more with on-site issues relevant to keeping employees productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jess</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/the-death-of-in-house-it-only-partially-forcecom-enables-outsourcing-it/#comment-18475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=994#comment-18475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but is it really a good idea to give control of your company&#039;s major infratstucture to other companies and start being totally dependent on them. Usually i can forsee a few major problems with that approach.

jess
www.Yocial.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but is it really a good idea to give control of your company&#8217;s major infratstucture to other companies and start being totally dependent on them. Usually i can forsee a few major problems with that approach.</p>
<p>jess<br />
<a href="http://www.Yocial.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Yocial.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ploch</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/the-death-of-in-house-it-only-partially-forcecom-enables-outsourcing-it/#comment-18474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Ploch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=994#comment-18474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moving applications to the cloud does NOT remove the need for an IT department in most enterprises.  Who is going to deal with networking, security, end user support, etc.  What is does partially do, is remove much of the infrastructure that an organization is required to maintain and reduce the server operational loads.  ALL the problems with technology are still there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moving applications to the cloud does NOT remove the need for an IT department in most enterprises.  Who is going to deal with networking, security, end user support, etc.  What is does partially do, is remove much of the infrastructure that an organization is required to maintain and reduce the server operational loads.  ALL the problems with technology are still there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Gilyeat</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/the-death-of-in-house-it-only-partially-forcecom-enables-outsourcing-it/#comment-18473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Gilyeat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=994#comment-18473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great example of why companies are moving portions of IT into the cloud.  Having said that, whether its in the cloud or in the data center for most employees it makes little difference.  The question of outsourcing comes front and center for smaller companies that move IT functions into the cloud, where there previously may not have been available to them.  In many ways, the shift to cloud computing extends the outsourcing model that has been used by big business down market into every company that is interested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great example of why companies are moving portions of IT into the cloud.  Having said that, whether its in the cloud or in the data center for most employees it makes little difference.  The question of outsourcing comes front and center for smaller companies that move IT functions into the cloud, where there previously may not have been available to them.  In many ways, the shift to cloud computing extends the outsourcing model that has been used by big business down market into every company that is interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

