<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Battle for Microsoft&#039;s Soul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:13:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Carstan</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-4530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Carstan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-4530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I again visited this post and think now this post is going to be right to battle for Microsoft soul......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I again visited this post and think now this post is going to be right to battle for Microsoft soul&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Carstan</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-17852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Carstan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-17852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I again visited this post and think now this post is going to be right to battle for Microsoft soul......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I again visited this post and think now this post is going to be right to battle for Microsoft soul&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Many Niches &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cloud Strategy - A Question of Motivations</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-4529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Many Niches &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cloud Strategy - A Question of Motivations]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-4529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] about our new platform, especially when there is plenty of good, some bad, and some good if not somewhat rambling.  There will be no shortage of guessing as to what Microsoft is &#8220;really up to&#8221; with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about our new platform, especially when there is plenty of good, some bad, and some good if not somewhat rambling.  There will be no shortage of guessing as to what Microsoft is &#8220;really up to&#8221; with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Many Niches &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cloud Strategy - A Question of Motivations</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-17851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Many Niches &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cloud Strategy - A Question of Motivations]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-17851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] about our new platform, especially when there is plenty of good, some bad, and some good if not somewhat rambling.  There will be no shortage of guessing as to what Microsoft is &#8220;really up to&#8221; with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about our new platform, especially when there is plenty of good, some bad, and some good if not somewhat rambling.  There will be no shortage of guessing as to what Microsoft is &#8220;really up to&#8221; with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter T</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-4528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-4528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whow ... according to AzureJournal - http://www.azurejournal.com/2008/11/on-premises-cloud-computing/ Microsoft is in the race for the &quot;on premises cloud&quot; or &quot;internal cloud&quot; battle! This makes total sense, considering Microsoft&#039;s business model, and I agree with a previous comment, Microsoft was good at seling to corporations and I&#039;ll add it still is. Just wait and see. Windows Azure, like we know it today it is just a decoy, a test bed for future products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whow &#8230; according to AzureJournal &#8211; <a href="http://www.azurejournal.com/2008/11/on-premises-cloud-computing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.azurejournal.com/2008/11/on-premises-cloud-computing/</a> Microsoft is in the race for the &#8220;on premises cloud&#8221; or &#8220;internal cloud&#8221; battle! This makes total sense, considering Microsoft&#8217;s business model, and I agree with a previous comment, Microsoft was good at seling to corporations and I&#8217;ll add it still is. Just wait and see. Windows Azure, like we know it today it is just a decoy, a test bed for future products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter T</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-17850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-17850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whow ... according to AzureJournal - http://www.azurejournal.com/2008/11/on-premises-cloud-computing/ Microsoft is in the race for the &quot;on premises cloud&quot; or &quot;internal cloud&quot; battle! This makes total sense, considering Microsoft&#039;s business model, and I agree with a previous comment, Microsoft was good at seling to corporations and I&#039;ll add it still is. Just wait and see. Windows Azure, like we know it today it is just a decoy, a test bed for future products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whow &#8230; according to AzureJournal &#8211; <a href="http://www.azurejournal.com/2008/11/on-premises-cloud-computing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.azurejournal.com/2008/11/on-premises-cloud-computing/</a> Microsoft is in the race for the &#8220;on premises cloud&#8221; or &#8220;internal cloud&#8221; battle! This makes total sense, considering Microsoft&#8217;s business model, and I agree with a previous comment, Microsoft was good at seling to corporations and I&#8217;ll add it still is. Just wait and see. Windows Azure, like we know it today it is just a decoy, a test bed for future products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT O'Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-4527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JT O'Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 04:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-4527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From someone who worked at MSFT for over 14 years, within the company during its golden years in the early 90&#039;s through the DOJ debacle to the mid-2000&#039;s, I can say with complete confidence that Microsoft is in its twilight years. Microsoft is betting on a corporate-dependency mindset that was created in the 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s, nurtured in the 80&#039;s, and coddled in the 90&#039;s. That model to which they still adhere, and which provides the great bulk of their profit, is quickly waning as younger generations who emerged in a non-Microsoft world are not going to see any point in suckling MS milk. Even before I left MS, the psychotic, paranoid eating-your-own-young attitude in order to make computers &quot;trustworthy&quot; (ha, yeah right), and STOP Linux and STOP Google prevailed and will continued.

For as long as I worked at the company, EVEN in the golden years, MS has always been a follower and very rarely a leader in anything they&#039;ve accomplished. Billy/Stevy Come Lately - that&#039;s the idea. Cloud computing - sure, it&#039;s a cool idea, but again MS is following someone else&#039;s lead. I frankly found this to be pathetic and sad.

Time will tell...who knows, the well-funded MS Research might stumble upon cold fusion and find a way out of their deepening gravity well...but it&#039;s unlikely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From someone who worked at MSFT for over 14 years, within the company during its golden years in the early 90&#8242;s through the DOJ debacle to the mid-2000&#8242;s, I can say with complete confidence that Microsoft is in its twilight years. Microsoft is betting on a corporate-dependency mindset that was created in the 60&#8242;s and 70&#8242;s, nurtured in the 80&#8242;s, and coddled in the 90&#8242;s. That model to which they still adhere, and which provides the great bulk of their profit, is quickly waning as younger generations who emerged in a non-Microsoft world are not going to see any point in suckling MS milk. Even before I left MS, the psychotic, paranoid eating-your-own-young attitude in order to make computers &#8220;trustworthy&#8221; (ha, yeah right), and STOP Linux and STOP Google prevailed and will continued.</p>
<p>For as long as I worked at the company, EVEN in the golden years, MS has always been a follower and very rarely a leader in anything they&#8217;ve accomplished. Billy/Stevy Come Lately &#8211; that&#8217;s the idea. Cloud computing &#8211; sure, it&#8217;s a cool idea, but again MS is following someone else&#8217;s lead. I frankly found this to be pathetic and sad.</p>
<p>Time will tell&#8230;who knows, the well-funded MS Research might stumble upon cold fusion and find a way out of their deepening gravity well&#8230;but it&#8217;s unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT O'Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-17849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JT O'Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 04:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-17849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From someone who worked at MSFT for over 14 years, within the company during its golden years in the early 90&#039;s through the DOJ debacle to the mid-2000&#039;s, I can say with complete confidence that Microsoft is in its twilight years. Microsoft is betting on a corporate-dependency mindset that was created in the 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s, nurtured in the 80&#039;s, and coddled in the 90&#039;s. That model to which they still adhere, and which provides the great bulk of their profit, is quickly waning as younger generations who emerged in a non-Microsoft world are not going to see any point in suckling MS milk. Even before I left MS, the psychotic, paranoid eating-your-own-young attitude in order to make computers &quot;trustworthy&quot; (ha, yeah right), and STOP Linux and STOP Google prevailed and will continued.

For as long as I worked at the company, EVEN in the golden years, MS has always been a follower and very rarely a leader in anything they&#039;ve accomplished. Billy/Stevy Come Lately - that&#039;s the idea. Cloud computing - sure, it&#039;s a cool idea, but again MS is following someone else&#039;s lead. I frankly found this to be pathetic and sad.

Time will tell...who knows, the well-funded MS Research might stumble upon cold fusion and find a way out of their deepening gravity well...but it&#039;s unlikely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From someone who worked at MSFT for over 14 years, within the company during its golden years in the early 90&#8242;s through the DOJ debacle to the mid-2000&#8242;s, I can say with complete confidence that Microsoft is in its twilight years. Microsoft is betting on a corporate-dependency mindset that was created in the 60&#8242;s and 70&#8242;s, nurtured in the 80&#8242;s, and coddled in the 90&#8242;s. That model to which they still adhere, and which provides the great bulk of their profit, is quickly waning as younger generations who emerged in a non-Microsoft world are not going to see any point in suckling MS milk. Even before I left MS, the psychotic, paranoid eating-your-own-young attitude in order to make computers &#8220;trustworthy&#8221; (ha, yeah right), and STOP Linux and STOP Google prevailed and will continued.</p>
<p>For as long as I worked at the company, EVEN in the golden years, MS has always been a follower and very rarely a leader in anything they&#8217;ve accomplished. Billy/Stevy Come Lately &#8211; that&#8217;s the idea. Cloud computing &#8211; sure, it&#8217;s a cool idea, but again MS is following someone else&#8217;s lead. I frankly found this to be pathetic and sad.</p>
<p>Time will tell&#8230;who knows, the well-funded MS Research might stumble upon cold fusion and find a way out of their deepening gravity well&#8230;but it&#8217;s unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone Somewhere</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-4526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Someone Somewhere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-4526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post Steve. Whatever be the outcome, its certainly an exciting time to be at Microsoft. Venturing out into cloud computing and hopefully having &#039;found their soul&#039; as Steve mentions, Microsoft would certainly try and get most out of Ray Ozzie&#039;s long term vision. Add to this the market forces that are forcing them to open up (as in the case of Office Online)  to web apps. and open standards. Only time will tell if smart folks like Scott Guthrie and Bob Muglia would be able to gel their ideas into Ozzie&#039;s broad perspective or if it&#039;d be a case of &#039;too many cooks&#039;, but for now it certainly looks positive and interesting as a strategy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Steve. Whatever be the outcome, its certainly an exciting time to be at Microsoft. Venturing out into cloud computing and hopefully having &#8216;found their soul&#8217; as Steve mentions, Microsoft would certainly try and get most out of Ray Ozzie&#8217;s long term vision. Add to this the market forces that are forcing them to open up (as in the case of Office Online)  to web apps. and open standards. Only time will tell if smart folks like Scott Guthrie and Bob Muglia would be able to gel their ideas into Ozzie&#8217;s broad perspective or if it&#8217;d be a case of &#8216;too many cooks&#8217;, but for now it certainly looks positive and interesting as a strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone Somewhere</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-17848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Someone Somewhere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-17848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post Steve. Whatever be the outcome, its certainly an exciting time to be at Microsoft. Venturing out into cloud computing and hopefully having &#039;found their soul&#039; as Steve mentions, Microsoft would certainly try and get most out of Ray Ozzie&#039;s long term vision. Add to this the market forces that are forcing them to open up (as in the case of Office Online)  to web apps. and open standards. Only time will tell if smart folks like Scott Guthrie and Bob Muglia would be able to gel their ideas into Ozzie&#039;s broad perspective or if it&#039;d be a case of &#039;too many cooks&#039;, but for now it certainly looks positive and interesting as a strategy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Steve. Whatever be the outcome, its certainly an exciting time to be at Microsoft. Venturing out into cloud computing and hopefully having &#8216;found their soul&#8217; as Steve mentions, Microsoft would certainly try and get most out of Ray Ozzie&#8217;s long term vision. Add to this the market forces that are forcing them to open up (as in the case of Office Online)  to web apps. and open standards. Only time will tell if smart folks like Scott Guthrie and Bob Muglia would be able to gel their ideas into Ozzie&#8217;s broad perspective or if it&#8217;d be a case of &#8216;too many cooks&#8217;, but for now it certainly looks positive and interesting as a strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael C. Neel</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-4525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael C. Neel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-4525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short Version:  MSFT was good at selling to corporations,  MSFT is still good at selling to corporations, we want to think it&#039;s because we pushed them on &quot;standards&quot; and &quot;open&quot; (but it&#039;s probably due to market forces).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short Version:  MSFT was good at selling to corporations,  MSFT is still good at selling to corporations, we want to think it&#8217;s because we pushed them on &#8220;standards&#8221; and &#8220;open&#8221; (but it&#8217;s probably due to market forces).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael C. Neel</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-17847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael C. Neel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-17847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short Version:  MSFT was good at selling to corporations,  MSFT is still good at selling to corporations, we want to think it&#039;s because we pushed them on &quot;standards&quot; and &quot;open&quot; (but it&#039;s probably due to market forces).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short Version:  MSFT was good at selling to corporations,  MSFT is still good at selling to corporations, we want to think it&#8217;s because we pushed them on &#8220;standards&#8221; and &#8220;open&#8221; (but it&#8217;s probably due to market forces).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-4524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-4524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting discussion from everyone. I think the one thing people often forget is MSFT took an approach 30 yrs ago to focus on the Corporate market - sure, it&#039;s less sexy, it&#039;s less visible, and for that reason, companies like Google/ Apple appear to get a lot of attention. Fact is, that MSFT is in over 90% of the corporate world. With a focus on cost efficiency, large scale deployments into enterprise - I would agree that some of the snazzy &quot;consumer&#039;esque&quot; type features are missing and the &quot;sexiness&quot; of a google/ apple is clearly absent.

When you think of Azure - don&#039;t think of today, next year or even 3 yrs. Think of the world in 5yrs or 10yrs. That&#039;s where MSFT excels - the company thinks long term and aims to jump on that opportunity whereas Google/ Apple are focused on tomorrow/ next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion from everyone. I think the one thing people often forget is MSFT took an approach 30 yrs ago to focus on the Corporate market &#8211; sure, it&#8217;s less sexy, it&#8217;s less visible, and for that reason, companies like Google/ Apple appear to get a lot of attention. Fact is, that MSFT is in over 90% of the corporate world. With a focus on cost efficiency, large scale deployments into enterprise &#8211; I would agree that some of the snazzy &#8220;consumer&#8217;esque&#8221; type features are missing and the &#8220;sexiness&#8221; of a google/ apple is clearly absent.</p>
<p>When you think of Azure &#8211; don&#8217;t think of today, next year or even 3 yrs. Think of the world in 5yrs or 10yrs. That&#8217;s where MSFT excels &#8211; the company thinks long term and aims to jump on that opportunity whereas Google/ Apple are focused on tomorrow/ next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-17846</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-17846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting discussion from everyone. I think the one thing people often forget is MSFT took an approach 30 yrs ago to focus on the Corporate market - sure, it&#039;s less sexy, it&#039;s less visible, and for that reason, companies like Google/ Apple appear to get a lot of attention. Fact is, that MSFT is in over 90% of the corporate world. With a focus on cost efficiency, large scale deployments into enterprise - I would agree that some of the snazzy &quot;consumer&#039;esque&quot; type features are missing and the &quot;sexiness&quot; of a google/ apple is clearly absent.

When you think of Azure - don&#039;t think of today, next year or even 3 yrs. Think of the world in 5yrs or 10yrs. That&#039;s where MSFT excels - the company thinks long term and aims to jump on that opportunity whereas Google/ Apple are focused on tomorrow/ next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion from everyone. I think the one thing people often forget is MSFT took an approach 30 yrs ago to focus on the Corporate market &#8211; sure, it&#8217;s less sexy, it&#8217;s less visible, and for that reason, companies like Google/ Apple appear to get a lot of attention. Fact is, that MSFT is in over 90% of the corporate world. With a focus on cost efficiency, large scale deployments into enterprise &#8211; I would agree that some of the snazzy &#8220;consumer&#8217;esque&#8221; type features are missing and the &#8220;sexiness&#8221; of a google/ apple is clearly absent.</p>
<p>When you think of Azure &#8211; don&#8217;t think of today, next year or even 3 yrs. Think of the world in 5yrs or 10yrs. That&#8217;s where MSFT excels &#8211; the company thinks long term and aims to jump on that opportunity whereas Google/ Apple are focused on tomorrow/ next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-4523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-4523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It takes a very long time for a giant company to die but we are witnessing the slow death of Microsoft. Vista has so badly damaged the company it will be very hard to recover. Now-a-days, if you are on a plane how many consumers do you bump into that love Microsoft? All I hear is disgust and distrust. And whatever developers may think, ultimately when consumers begin to despise a company and they have alternatives, that company is going down.

As someone who was deposed by the DOJ twice during the trials, I will not shed any tears. I was also part of a suit against the company over questionable or downright illegal hiring practices that they decided to settle out of court. Let&#039;s not forget how much damage they did in the market and how, through their illegal monopoly (remember they were found guilty), they destroyed some very good companies.

A new vision from a team within Microsoft does not change all the entrenched old guard and their ways of doing things. When Ray Ozzie stated it will take 20-50 years to deliver on the full vision of the new operating system, you know nothing has fundamentally changed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes a very long time for a giant company to die but we are witnessing the slow death of Microsoft. Vista has so badly damaged the company it will be very hard to recover. Now-a-days, if you are on a plane how many consumers do you bump into that love Microsoft? All I hear is disgust and distrust. And whatever developers may think, ultimately when consumers begin to despise a company and they have alternatives, that company is going down.</p>
<p>As someone who was deposed by the DOJ twice during the trials, I will not shed any tears. I was also part of a suit against the company over questionable or downright illegal hiring practices that they decided to settle out of court. Let&#8217;s not forget how much damage they did in the market and how, through their illegal monopoly (remember they were found guilty), they destroyed some very good companies.</p>
<p>A new vision from a team within Microsoft does not change all the entrenched old guard and their ways of doing things. When Ray Ozzie stated it will take 20-50 years to deliver on the full vision of the new operating system, you know nothing has fundamentally changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-17845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-17845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It takes a very long time for a giant company to die but we are witnessing the slow death of Microsoft. Vista has so badly damaged the company it will be very hard to recover. Now-a-days, if you are on a plane how many consumers do you bump into that love Microsoft? All I hear is disgust and distrust. And whatever developers may think, ultimately when consumers begin to despise a company and they have alternatives, that company is going down.

As someone who was deposed by the DOJ twice during the trials, I will not shed any tears. I was also part of a suit against the company over questionable or downright illegal hiring practices that they decided to settle out of court. Let&#039;s not forget how much damage they did in the market and how, through their illegal monopoly (remember they were found guilty), they destroyed some very good companies.

A new vision from a team within Microsoft does not change all the entrenched old guard and their ways of doing things. When Ray Ozzie stated it will take 20-50 years to deliver on the full vision of the new operating system, you know nothing has fundamentally changed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes a very long time for a giant company to die but we are witnessing the slow death of Microsoft. Vista has so badly damaged the company it will be very hard to recover. Now-a-days, if you are on a plane how many consumers do you bump into that love Microsoft? All I hear is disgust and distrust. And whatever developers may think, ultimately when consumers begin to despise a company and they have alternatives, that company is going down.</p>
<p>As someone who was deposed by the DOJ twice during the trials, I will not shed any tears. I was also part of a suit against the company over questionable or downright illegal hiring practices that they decided to settle out of court. Let&#8217;s not forget how much damage they did in the market and how, through their illegal monopoly (remember they were found guilty), they destroyed some very good companies.</p>
<p>A new vision from a team within Microsoft does not change all the entrenched old guard and their ways of doing things. When Ray Ozzie stated it will take 20-50 years to deliver on the full vision of the new operating system, you know nothing has fundamentally changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lifeGeeked</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-4522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lifeGeeked]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-4522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lot of inside knowledge !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lot of inside knowledge !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lifeGeeked</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-17844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lifeGeeked]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-17844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lot of inside knowledge !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lot of inside knowledge !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghunda</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-4521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ghunda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-4521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to clarify, web services have not gone mainstream.  Talking about them has gone mainstream.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify, web services have not gone mainstream.  Talking about them has gone mainstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghunda</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/#comment-17843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ghunda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=684#comment-17843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to clarify, web services have not gone mainstream.  Talking about them has gone mainstream.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify, web services have not gone mainstream.  Talking about them has gone mainstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

