<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Force.com sets its Sites on Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salesforce.com Now Lets Companies Build Both Apps And Sites In The Cloud</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salesforce.com Now Lets Companies Build Both Apps And Sites In The Cloud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and entrepreneurs a budget friendly way to use Salesforce&#8217;s platform. The company originally announced the Force.com Sites capability last winter, signaling Salesforce&#8217;s ambitions to expand [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and entrepreneurs a budget friendly way to use Salesforce&#8217;s platform. The company originally announced the Force.com Sites capability last winter, signaling Salesforce&#8217;s ambitions to expand [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slnbyi bzmq</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slnbyi bzmq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[suncd dvlehbnc uzoa vezg uzlcs xdebctuo bwtsoi]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>suncd dvlehbnc uzoa vezg uzlcs xdebctuo bwtsoi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Force.com + Google App Engine = Cloud Relationship Management</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Force.com + Google App Engine = Cloud Relationship Management]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a month ago Salesforce announced a new Sites service, which allows Force.com customers to host not only internal Salesforce and App Force applications [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a month ago Salesforce announced a new Sites service, which allows Force.com customers to host not only internal Salesforce and App Force applications [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are actually in the process of moving off Salesforce to Dynamics.  Salesforce has some nice features sales people, but as a platform and CRM application it just comes up way short in comparison.
Also we are just paying way too much for Salesforce, and the API and storage limites are far too low for our requirements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are actually in the process of moving off Salesforce to Dynamics.  Salesforce has some nice features sales people, but as a platform and CRM application it just comes up way short in comparison.<br />
Also we are just paying way too much for Salesforce, and the API and storage limites are far too low for our requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How are they charging for this? That will determine success/failure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are they charging for this? That will determine success/failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Customer Relationship Experience: The Strategy Behind Salesforce Sites? &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Experience: The Strategy Behind Salesforce Sites? &#171; SmoothSpan Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] these outwardly facing applications and the connections with other Cloud platforms is causing some like TechCrunchIT to speculate that the announcement means closer ties with Microsoft and Google.  While Salesforce [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] these outwardly facing applications and the connections with other Cloud platforms is causing some like TechCrunchIT to speculate that the announcement means closer ties with Microsoft and Google.  While Salesforce [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also found this article to be really difficult to read.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also found this article to be really difficult to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Hendry</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Hendry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the assertions that Salesforce.com is chasing too many rabbits.  In my opinion it doesn&#039;t do CRM especially well and should have got that game moved on before running off to start another.  Their churn on the core offerings is pretty high.

The only real area where Salesforce,com innovates is marketing spend.  That got them the users they have today, but the problem is the ones they have don&#039;t really care too much about the rest of the stuff.

Ian Hendry
CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ
http://www.wecando.biz]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the assertions that Salesforce.com is chasing too many rabbits.  In my opinion it doesn&#8217;t do CRM especially well and should have got that game moved on before running off to start another.  Their churn on the core offerings is pretty high.</p>
<p>The only real area where Salesforce,com innovates is marketing spend.  That got them the users they have today, but the problem is the ones they have don&#8217;t really care too much about the rest of the stuff.</p>
<p>Ian Hendry<br />
CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ<br />
<a href="http://www.wecando.biz" rel="nofollow">http://www.wecando.biz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me get this straight, if MS &quot;..maintain a good quality ...it might quite work.&quot; ???

Brilliant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight, if MS &#8220;..maintain a good quality &#8230;it might quite work.&#8221; ???</p>
<p>Brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blabla</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blabla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[test2]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bla</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[test]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cool Products</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cool Products]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would definitely like to know more about this, but this post is very vague. After reading the comments though, it does not look like I need to waste any time researching this product.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely like to know more about this, but this post is very vague. After reading the comments though, it does not look like I need to waste any time researching this product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.iboozi.com</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[www.iboozi.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why we are commenting here if we haven&#039;t any reason?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why we are commenting here if we haven&#8217;t any reason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Goth</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold Goth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point. Chase too many rabbits you catch none of them. Chase one and you are always most certain to catch it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. Chase too many rabbits you catch none of them. Chase one and you are always most certain to catch it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forcenot</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forcenot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you transform a station wagon into a sportscar into a minivan using same azel..no. Salesforce product is half baked and in this economy...why are they taking their eyes off the ball?????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you transform a station wagon into a sportscar into a minivan using same azel..no. Salesforce product is half baked and in this economy&#8230;why are they taking their eyes off the ball?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Harish: i was thinking the same thing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Harish: i was thinking the same thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Azure, Office for Web...all these recently announcements from Microsoft is fairly ambitious. If they maintain a good quality (and just not think of minting money), it might quite work. I have a feeling MS might succeed big time. Except for Google/Apple, I do not see any threat from anybody else whatsoever.

http://www.livbit.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Azure, Office for Web&#8230;all these recently announcements from Microsoft is fairly ambitious. If they maintain a good quality (and just not think of minting money), it might quite work. I have a feeling MS might succeed big time. Except for Google/Apple, I do not see any threat from anybody else whatsoever.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.livbit.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.livbit.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a SalesForce.com user (power user of CRM), I can honestly say it is a fairly worthless product. I find it very useless and seriously wonder why people like it. I have used several platforms and in reality they are just ACT! on the web, with group support.

SalesForce.com has not made me one bit more productive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a SalesForce.com user (power user of CRM), I can honestly say it is a fairly worthless product. I find it very useless and seriously wonder why people like it. I have used several platforms and in reality they are just ACT! on the web, with group support.</p>
<p>SalesForce.com has not made me one bit more productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harish</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish this post was more detailed.  It is more like a press release not a blog post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish this post was more detailed.  It is more like a press release not a blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/02/forcecom-sets-its-sites-on-microsoft/#comment-17803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=692#comment-17803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; Salesforce can provide tomorrow’s Azure services today

That&#039;s perhaps a slightly rash comment. Their platform is highly proprietary, and lacks the full power of .NET which Azure will give. The comparison should instead perhaps be with Dynamics Online, with which Microsoft have confidently undercut Salesforce on price (though lacks all Salesforce&#039;s features).

Even Microsoft&#039;s offerings look open compared with a walled garden like Salesforce?! But I do give them great credit for providing a clever and user friendly CRM platform that&#039;s available now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Salesforce can provide tomorrow’s Azure services today</p>
<p>That&#8217;s perhaps a slightly rash comment. Their platform is highly proprietary, and lacks the full power of .NET which Azure will give. The comparison should instead perhaps be with Dynamics Online, with which Microsoft have confidently undercut Salesforce on price (though lacks all Salesforce&#8217;s features).</p>
<p>Even Microsoft&#8217;s offerings look open compared with a walled garden like Salesforce?! But I do give them great credit for providing a clever and user friendly CRM platform that&#8217;s available now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

