<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Continuous Partial Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 22:07:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: agevychong</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-17127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[agevychong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-17127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[must check &lt;a href=&quot;http://cheapreplicachanelbag.weebly.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;replica chanel bags&lt;/a&gt;  to get new coupon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>must check <a href="http://cheapreplicachanelbag.weebly.com" rel="nofollow">replica chanel bags</a>  to get new coupon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deletium &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Own Personal Easter Egg</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-3804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deletium &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Own Personal Easter Egg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-3804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was a semi-recent post to TechCrunchIT by Steve Gilmore about how software companies are transitioning from big bang [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a semi-recent post to TechCrunchIT by Steve Gilmore about how software companies are transitioning from big bang [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deletium &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Own Personal Easter Egg</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-17126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deletium &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Own Personal Easter Egg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-17126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was a semi-recent post to TechCrunchIT by Steve Gilmore about how software companies are transitioning from big bang [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a semi-recent post to TechCrunchIT by Steve Gilmore about how software companies are transitioning from big bang [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-3803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-3803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I could&#039;ve handled the video if it was about 1/2 or 1/3 the length.
Beyond that it gave me a headache and I was sorry I&#039;d watched for more than a minute.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I could&#8217;ve handled the video if it was about 1/2 or 1/3 the length.<br />
Beyond that it gave me a headache and I was sorry I&#8217;d watched for more than a minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-17125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-17125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I could&#039;ve handled the video if it was about 1/2 or 1/3 the length.
Beyond that it gave me a headache and I was sorry I&#039;d watched for more than a minute.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I could&#8217;ve handled the video if it was about 1/2 or 1/3 the length.<br />
Beyond that it gave me a headache and I was sorry I&#8217;d watched for more than a minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myinnervoice</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-3802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[myinnervoice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-3802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clara comments are lucid. Open Source is an elegant concept. The challenge was in execution and in the definition of &quot;free&quot;.
Sun is one of the nicest company to work for, if we can keep alive our jobs. Open Source must be adapted by (1) not leaving the probability of profits in the hands of developers and content creators only, (2) sell branded services and branded utilities instead  as selling the products themselves. How? I think the sale of branded software products will diminish and we all use Cloud Computing Services to &quot;emanate&quot; services , just as the Sun emanates light.  In forum like this, it takes a few minutes to state ideas.  Jonathan has great ideas. What it is need a clever, seductive, for profit, implementation  of Services. Google, Yahoo, etc did it for day to day apps. Sun is perhaps best equipped to deliver the services in Enterprise Applications and High Performance computing, sparing customers of the enormous headache of setting up complex, complicated, one of kind data center monsters gobbling money and people. I am amazed how no one in the industry has not noticed this valuable potential of Sun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clara comments are lucid. Open Source is an elegant concept. The challenge was in execution and in the definition of &#8220;free&#8221;.<br />
Sun is one of the nicest company to work for, if we can keep alive our jobs. Open Source must be adapted by (1) not leaving the probability of profits in the hands of developers and content creators only, (2) sell branded services and branded utilities instead  as selling the products themselves. How? I think the sale of branded software products will diminish and we all use Cloud Computing Services to &#8220;emanate&#8221; services , just as the Sun emanates light.  In forum like this, it takes a few minutes to state ideas.  Jonathan has great ideas. What it is need a clever, seductive, for profit, implementation  of Services. Google, Yahoo, etc did it for day to day apps. Sun is perhaps best equipped to deliver the services in Enterprise Applications and High Performance computing, sparing customers of the enormous headache of setting up complex, complicated, one of kind data center monsters gobbling money and people. I am amazed how no one in the industry has not noticed this valuable potential of Sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myinnervoice</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-17124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[myinnervoice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-17124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clara comments are lucid. Open Source is an elegant concept. The challenge was in execution and in the definition of &quot;free&quot;.
Sun is one of the nicest company to work for, if we can keep alive our jobs. Open Source must be adapted by (1) not leaving the probability of profits in the hands of developers and content creators only, (2) sell branded services and branded utilities instead  as selling the products themselves. How? I think the sale of branded software products will diminish and we all use Cloud Computing Services to &quot;emanate&quot; services , just as the Sun emanates light.  In forum like this, it takes a few minutes to state ideas.  Jonathan has great ideas. What it is need a clever, seductive, for profit, implementation  of Services. Google, Yahoo, etc did it for day to day apps. Sun is perhaps best equipped to deliver the services in Enterprise Applications and High Performance computing, sparing customers of the enormous headache of setting up complex, complicated, one of kind data center monsters gobbling money and people. I am amazed how no one in the industry has not noticed this valuable potential of Sun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clara comments are lucid. Open Source is an elegant concept. The challenge was in execution and in the definition of &#8220;free&#8221;.<br />
Sun is one of the nicest company to work for, if we can keep alive our jobs. Open Source must be adapted by (1) not leaving the probability of profits in the hands of developers and content creators only, (2) sell branded services and branded utilities instead  as selling the products themselves. How? I think the sale of branded software products will diminish and we all use Cloud Computing Services to &#8220;emanate&#8221; services , just as the Sun emanates light.  In forum like this, it takes a few minutes to state ideas.  Jonathan has great ideas. What it is need a clever, seductive, for profit, implementation  of Services. Google, Yahoo, etc did it for day to day apps. Sun is perhaps best equipped to deliver the services in Enterprise Applications and High Performance computing, sparing customers of the enormous headache of setting up complex, complicated, one of kind data center monsters gobbling money and people. I am amazed how no one in the industry has not noticed this valuable potential of Sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Sunner</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-3801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Old Sunner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-3801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s sad to watch Sun die before us.
Will the technology business be a better with or without Sun.
I think worse off without Sun, so sad..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sad to watch Sun die before us.<br />
Will the technology business be a better with or without Sun.<br />
I think worse off without Sun, so sad..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Sunner</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-17123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Old Sunner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-17123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s sad to watch Sun die before us.
Will the technology business be a better with or without Sun.
I think worse off without Sun, so sad..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sad to watch Sun die before us.<br />
Will the technology business be a better with or without Sun.<br />
I think worse off without Sun, so sad..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links List 10.31.08 &#124; ScienceLogic</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-3800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links List 10.31.08 &#124; ScienceLogic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-3800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] open source and his ponytail. The driest Sesame Street take-off you’ll ever see. Check out the video here. For those of you playing a drinking game at home, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] open source and his ponytail. The driest Sesame Street take-off you’ll ever see. Check out the video here. For those of you playing a drinking game at home, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links List 10.31.08 &#124; ScienceLogic</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-17122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links List 10.31.08 &#124; ScienceLogic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-17122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] open source and his ponytail. The driest Sesame Street take-off you’ll ever see. Check out the video here. For those of you playing a drinking game at home, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] open source and his ponytail. The driest Sesame Street take-off you’ll ever see. Check out the video here. For those of you playing a drinking game at home, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunnyGuy</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-3799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FunnyGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-3799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve,

You&#039;ve earned my admiration... It&#039;s OPEN SOURCE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve earned my admiration&#8230; It&#8217;s OPEN SOURCE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunnyGuy</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-17121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FunnyGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-17121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve,

You&#039;ve earned my admiration... It&#039;s OPEN SOURCE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve earned my admiration&#8230; It&#8217;s OPEN SOURCE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Never Mind That $1.7 Billion Loss, Jonathan Schwartz Has A New Plan To Save Sun</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-3798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Never Mind That $1.7 Billion Loss, Jonathan Schwartz Has A New Plan To Save Sun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-3798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] lays it out in the exclusive video interview above, which he conducted a couple weeks ago with TechCrunchIT editor Steve Gillmor. Okay, the interview is with Schwartz&#8217;s puppet. But it is an exclusive [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lays it out in the exclusive video interview above, which he conducted a couple weeks ago with TechCrunchIT editor Steve Gillmor. Okay, the interview is with Schwartz&#8217;s puppet. But it is an exclusive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Never Mind That $1.7 Billion Loss, Jonathan Schwartz Has A New Plan To Save Sun</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-17120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Never Mind That $1.7 Billion Loss, Jonathan Schwartz Has A New Plan To Save Sun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-17120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] lays it out in the exclusive video interview above, which he conducted a couple weeks ago with TechCrunchIT editor Steve Gillmor. Okay, the interview is with Schwartz&#8217;s puppet. But it is an exclusive [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lays it out in the exclusive video interview above, which he conducted a couple weeks ago with TechCrunchIT editor Steve Gillmor. Okay, the interview is with Schwartz&#8217;s puppet. But it is an exclusive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clara</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-3797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-3797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the video...classic and reminiscent of the follies in the Muppet Show.  This is a nice way to illustrate the challenges in innovation, which is usually incremental because phenomenal &quot;big bang&quot; innovation is really difficult, unless you are basically creating an entirely newly, never-before-addressed market. Sun is an odd duck. Sun suggests that open source offerings will lead to a higher propensity to buy Sun&#039;s hardware products. But they are also challenged because &quot;free&quot; also lowers the barriers to entry for their competitors in similar markets, and you&#039;re not earning any money.  On the production side, there is just way too much reliance on the good will of content creators to develop a strong product. Also, free doesn&#039;t create brand loyalty, and as Apple has demonstrated in the consumer iPhone market: you can create expensive, high value products that people are willing to buy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the video&#8230;classic and reminiscent of the follies in the Muppet Show.  This is a nice way to illustrate the challenges in innovation, which is usually incremental because phenomenal &#8220;big bang&#8221; innovation is really difficult, unless you are basically creating an entirely newly, never-before-addressed market. Sun is an odd duck. Sun suggests that open source offerings will lead to a higher propensity to buy Sun&#8217;s hardware products. But they are also challenged because &#8220;free&#8221; also lowers the barriers to entry for their competitors in similar markets, and you&#8217;re not earning any money.  On the production side, there is just way too much reliance on the good will of content creators to develop a strong product. Also, free doesn&#8217;t create brand loyalty, and as Apple has demonstrated in the consumer iPhone market: you can create expensive, high value products that people are willing to buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clara</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-17119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-17119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the video...classic and reminiscent of the follies in the Muppet Show.  This is a nice way to illustrate the challenges in innovation, which is usually incremental because phenomenal &quot;big bang&quot; innovation is really difficult, unless you are basically creating an entirely newly, never-before-addressed market. Sun is an odd duck. Sun suggests that open source offerings will lead to a higher propensity to buy Sun&#039;s hardware products. But they are also challenged because &quot;free&quot; also lowers the barriers to entry for their competitors in similar markets, and you&#039;re not earning any money.  On the production side, there is just way too much reliance on the good will of content creators to develop a strong product. Also, free doesn&#039;t create brand loyalty, and as Apple has demonstrated in the consumer iPhone market: you can create expensive, high value products that people are willing to buy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the video&#8230;classic and reminiscent of the follies in the Muppet Show.  This is a nice way to illustrate the challenges in innovation, which is usually incremental because phenomenal &#8220;big bang&#8221; innovation is really difficult, unless you are basically creating an entirely newly, never-before-addressed market. Sun is an odd duck. Sun suggests that open source offerings will lead to a higher propensity to buy Sun&#8217;s hardware products. But they are also challenged because &#8220;free&#8221; also lowers the barriers to entry for their competitors in similar markets, and you&#8217;re not earning any money.  On the production side, there is just way too much reliance on the good will of content creators to develop a strong product. Also, free doesn&#8217;t create brand loyalty, and as Apple has demonstrated in the consumer iPhone market: you can create expensive, high value products that people are willing to buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-3796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-3796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hahaha! Too funny - well done Steve!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha! Too funny &#8211; well done Steve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-17118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-17118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hahaha! Too funny - well done Steve!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha! Too funny &#8211; well done Steve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/10/14/continuous-partial-innovation/#comment-3795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=570#comment-3795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dominant architecture of the mobile Net won&#039;t include Silverlight? I thought Silverlight *was* the future of mobile architectures?? Or was that Mesh? Nevermind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dominant architecture of the mobile Net won&#8217;t include Silverlight? I thought Silverlight *was* the future of mobile architectures?? Or was that Mesh? Nevermind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
