Anti-piracy comics (fail to) show the sad, short life of a file-sharer

Friday, August 22nd, 2008

Biggs is the editor of TechCrunch Gadgets. Biggs has written for the New York Times, InSync, USA Weekend, Popular Mechanics, Popular Science, Money and a number of other outlets on technology and wristwatches. He is the former editor-in-chief of Gizmodo.com and lives in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn. You can Tweet him here and G+ him here. Email him directly at john@techcrunch.com. → Learn More

The National Center for State Courts, a non-profit dedicated to “Helping Courts Anticipate Change and Better Serve the Public” has released a comic book that aimed at educating children on how the courts work by ripping a case right out of the headlines: piracy! Sadly, the tale is so fantastical – most cases end up in Civil court, not State, and are rarely tried with a public defender – that it loses most of its educational value. As BBG points out:

The strip also confuses federal with magistrate courts and presents a courtroom scenario that would never occur in real life.

It’s the Pascal’s Wager of antipiracy arguments: who cares about the truth when you might burn in hell? I submit that the war is lost when you’re reduced to publishing Chick Tracts.


I also submit that the NCSC didn’t know what it was doing when it released this comic and has ultimately failed on a pedagogical and a mission level, failing to prepare students to understand the courts and failing to “anticipate change” in getting their message out. But dig the pathos, man!

Sponsored Ads

blog comments powered by Disqus

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads