<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Send in the Clowns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2008/07/08/send-in-the-clowns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/07/08/send-in-the-clowns/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:13:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dMix</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/07/08/send-in-the-clowns/#comment-14358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dMix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=166#comment-14358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its interesting how Microsoft dominated the dominated the app market early on. Theres two observations from this: 1) Being first to market isn&#039;t always the best in the long term, people learn from your mistakes. 2) Big companies can&#039;t adapt to new technology that quickly without messing up their existing revenue streams.

Way to play the big company role, Microsoft.

Their developers have the right idea but they aren&#039;t executing at Microsofts existing standards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting how Microsoft dominated the dominated the app market early on. Theres two observations from this: 1) Being first to market isn&#8217;t always the best in the long term, people learn from your mistakes. 2) Big companies can&#8217;t adapt to new technology that quickly without messing up their existing revenue streams.</p>
<p>Way to play the big company role, Microsoft.</p>
<p>Their developers have the right idea but they aren&#8217;t executing at Microsofts existing standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source ERP Guru</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/07/08/send-in-the-clowns/#comment-14357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Open Source ERP Guru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunchit.com/?p=166#comment-14357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hybrid software deployment model (SaaSOn-Premise) really sounds great, but I wonder how many companies have actually implemented the model.
SaaSing your On-Premise software is similar to standard migration procedures very common in corporate IT. However, I do not see large enterprises SaaS their data assets so easily, security being the most significant issue. I agree that Microsoft is a company that many enterprises trust, but I am not sure how much footprint they have in large IT accounts in non-Exchange-Office applications.
Deploying large scale,true multi-tenancy business application can be tricky. SalesForce proved they can do it. For others, the burden of proof remains.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hybrid software deployment model (SaaSOn-Premise) really sounds great, but I wonder how many companies have actually implemented the model.<br />
SaaSing your On-Premise software is similar to standard migration procedures very common in corporate IT. However, I do not see large enterprises SaaS their data assets so easily, security being the most significant issue. I agree that Microsoft is a company that many enterprises trust, but I am not sure how much footprint they have in large IT accounts in non-Exchange-Office applications.<br />
Deploying large scale,true multi-tenancy business application can be tricky. SalesForce proved they can do it. For others, the burden of proof remains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

