VMWare: Missed Opportunity For EMC?

Next Story

Getty Images Begins Licensing Flickr Photos

Over the weekend Diane Greene and VMWare were featured in a profile peice in The Economist which praised both the company and its CEO. EMC acquired VMWare for $650M, and then within a few years had split VMWare out on its own by floating 10% of the company. It was the biggest and most exciting tech IPO since Google, and analysts lavished the company with praise while institutions piled in driving the stock higher. At the end of October in 07, only a month after the inital IPO, there was so much attention on VMWare that the stock rose to $124 – a market cap of $46B, which also drove up EMC to a market cap of over $55B.

Fast forwrd a year later, and today market darling has lost a quarter of its market cap and had its founding CEO, Diane Greene, forced out by the board, after yet another growth expectation downgrade. The initial VMWare growth expectation for 2008 was 90%, with a revenue target of $2.5B. This was first downgraded to 80% in January, and then further to 60% after the company reported its first quarter. With second quarter results only a week away, expectations have been lowered again and some forecasts now predict a 2008 year of as low as $1.7B, or even lower – which would present a year-on-year growth rate of just over 30%, far lower than initial expectations.

We have heard rumors today, and there are also some previous references on other blogs, that EMC were attempting to sell all or part of VMWare during the previous 6 months and leading up to the end of Q2. EMC were anticipating that a crunch day would eventually come where the market would punish the stock for not matching expectations, and it would be difficult to regain market and mind share as Microsoft entered the market with their own virtualization product. We hear that the potential suitor was Intel, and also potentially either HP or Oracle (although that is much more speculative). A full acquisition may have been unlikely because of short-term capital gains tax implications, but it isn’t difficult to imagine Intel acquiring VMWare as a short but big step into the new growing market.

VMWare built the virtualization market and were all alone in a growing industry that was changing the way datacenters are run and managed. Executive and research reports run thick with terms such as ‘dynamic datacenters’ but in essence what virtualization allows is a dynamic shift in how hardware, operating systems and applications are managed on a large scale. Through virtualization servers are added, removed and manged through control panels rather than through physical processes – and the cost savings and increased efficiencies are what have been driving sales of VMWare products. VMWare had total ownership of the new market, and their IPO and valuation reflected that, until it was disrupted by the entry of Sun, Citrix, Oracle and now finally Microsoft.

David Lynch is the VP of Marketing at Embotics, a provider of a virtualization management product and tools and a partner with both VMWare and Microsoft. He says that “the changes at the top of the company were bound to happen at some point, as they are now in a new phase” he adds “Microsoft entering a market dictates the next level of growth and what is required [from the incumbants]”. As a vendor in the virtualization market, Embotics has watched as VMWare steadily built up a customer base of some 25,000 clients – while Microsoft has been able to shortcut that process with their existing server install base which is orders of magnitude larger. It would be impossible for VMWare to prevent Microsoft from capturing market share, and they have done well to survive as far as they did as in previous examples, such as with PKI, even an announcement of an impending new Microsoft product has been enough to freeze a market and kill competitors.

Lynch goes on to say that he belives that the greatest flaw in the recent VMWare strategy was in attempting to take Microsoft on head-to-head, by not responding when Microsoft reached out in an effort to standardize virtualization container formats. He referred to this move as “foolish”, as in a head-to-head showdown there is only a single winner, and it is usually Microsoft. Lynch believes that the new President and CEO of VMWare, Paul Maritz, is more suited to the next phase of development as he is an experienced former Microsoft executive and understands the challenges that VMWare are about to face directly.

With the combination of a slowdown in growth and the entry of formidable competition, VMWare may have already passed its peak – unless a new team can adapt the company and its strategy. The right strategy would be for the company to accept Microsoft and other vendors as part of a new hetrogeneous virtualization environment, and rather than attempting to own the whole market focus on its key capabilities as a technology and services provider within particular areas.

Because VMWare makes up such a large part of the value of EMC, the problems that VMWare are facing are also big problems for EMC. In attempting to sell all or part of VMWare EMC likely recognized that they only had a short time window in which to realize their gains before the next phase of the virtualization market would take hold with much larger and more formidable competition. VMWare has yet to prove that it can compete head-to-head, and with a lot of new technology research and marketing money being poured into the market by larger competitors, it can quickly lose its edge. VMWare must adapt, or what was only yesterday the fourth largest software company in the world could easily end up as a footnote in IT history just as many companies before it who established new markets to then only lose them very quickly.

  • http://virtualization.com Robin Wauters

    Stock actually hit 125;5 at some point.

  • http://virtualization.com Robin Wauters

    A commenter on our blog who we believe to be a VMware employee, had this to share:

    “There’s also the possibility that EMC intentionally deflated the value because they couldn’t find a buyer at the stock’s previous price point. It would hardly be the first time “the troops” were sacrificed at the corporate alter to profits.”

    Full comment is here: http://virtualization.com/news/2008/07/08/diane-greene-vmware-paul-maritz/

  • http://monkeyattack.com/ Chris Meredith

    I still don’t see anyone really offering a solution to compete with VMWare in the enterprise market. In the medium scale server, and desktop market, there are plenty of competitors, but no one can really take on an ESX Cluster.

    Microsoft’s previous shots at clustering based on Microsoft standards have been all but dismissed in most markets (dfs not withstanding), and so far I haven’t seen anything that says their new virtualization product will do any better, assuming they ever ship such an animal.

    If VMWare was simply made up of VMWare Workstation/Player, I would dismiss them as dead. Until someone else gets me an auto balancing SAN backed virtualization solution with session level failover, as mature as ESX, I’ll stick with them. Now the second VirtualBox or someone like that gets me a similar solution at an easier to swallow price…

  • http://vcsandangels.com/blog/?p=8209 VMWare Drops 25% Of Market Cap : VCsAndAngels - Venture Capital / VCs, Angel Investors, Startup News, Etc

    […] VMWare: A missed opportunity for EMC? Continue reading at Techcrunch IT >> […]

  • http://www.techcrunchit.com/ Nik Cubrilovic

    @Robin: that doesn’t make sense, because you don’t have the same problems with an acquisition as you would with other public companies because EMC owns 90% of the stock and have control. They can push VMWare out at any price they want.

    I think the acquisition didnt happen simply because VMWare is way overvalued, and will probably drop further.

  • http://www.techcrunchit.com/ Nik Cubrilovic

    @Chris: I am about to do a tech comparison in the medium and high end. I think Sun and Citrix are getting close, and the Msft stuff has potential esp as it is being architected into Server itself – but your right, ESX Cluster is a good product, but it doesn’t mean it will remain that way forever. The markets are looking forward and evaluating if VMWare are going to be capable of protecting/defending their position.

  • sammy

    Few people want to use windows in the datacenter. I don’t believe msft is a viable competitor.

  • http://www.francorp.com Francorp

    This could prove to be a very favorable move for VM, their sales force was completely mismanaged and had virtually no correlation with EMC’s. It was difficult if not impossible to get any level of support from VM corporate people in the field, I would imagine that this move in leadership will greatly benefit VM from a sales perspective, of course this will take some time to see the effects on the stock price. I think VM is a good buying opportunity now though, controlling over 85% of that market gives them a good lead on the competition however you want to rank them.

  • Basil


    Be careful about how you compare those products- most “comparisons” I read seem to be written by people who do not use the technology. The main advantage that VMW has in the enterprise is their interop list. All the other nice features are nice, but the reason people will look into a massive consolidation project with VMW but not sun or microsoft is that their products have a 4 year lag in application interoperability testing.

  • Stephen Kramer


  • http://www.siterefuge.com Alfonzo Lempka

    Fantastic goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely excellent. I actually like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you’re saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it smart. I can’t wait to read far more from you. This is really a wonderful site.

blog comments powered by Disqus