<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China Mobile Drops iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:13:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blu ray to mp4</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blu ray to mp4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for this post, it was very insightful!
 How To Rip Blu-ray To Mp4 with blu-ray to mp4 converter?
With this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluraytomp4.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Blu-Ray To MP4&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; software, you can share your favourite   Blu-Ray movies on more portable devices, as Apple TV, iPod, iPhone, GPhone, PSP\PS3, XBox, Mobile Phone, Windows   Mobile.
More info you can visit: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluraytomp4.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.bluraytomp4.net&lt;/a&gt;

More Related Products : &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluraytomp4.net/blue-ray-to-mp4-converter.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blu ray to mp4 converter&lt;/a&gt; &#124;&#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluraytomp4.net/mp4-to-blu-ray-converter.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mp4 to blu ray&lt;/a&gt; &#124;&#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ripbluray.us/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rip blu ray&lt;/a&gt; &#124;&#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ripbluray.us/burnbluray/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blu ray burner]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this post, it was very insightful!<br />
 How To Rip Blu-ray To Mp4 with blu-ray to mp4 converter?<br />
With this <a href="http://www.bluraytomp4.net" rel="nofollow"><strong>Blu-Ray To MP4</strong></a> software, you can share your favourite   Blu-Ray movies on more portable devices, as Apple TV, iPod, iPhone, GPhone, PSP\PS3, XBox, Mobile Phone, Windows   Mobile.<br />
More info you can visit: <a href="http://www.bluraytomp4.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.bluraytomp4.net</a></p>
<p>More Related Products : <a href="http://www.bluraytomp4.net/blue-ray-to-mp4-converter.html" rel="nofollow">blu ray to mp4 converter</a> || <a href="http://www.bluraytomp4.net/mp4-to-blu-ray-converter.html" rel="nofollow">mp4 to blu ray</a> || <a href="http://www.ripbluray.us/" rel="nofollow">rip blu ray</a> || <a href="http://www.ripbluray.us/burnbluray/index.html" rel="nofollow">blu ray burner</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blu ray ripper</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blu ray ripper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cutting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cutting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog des RIA &#187; Google Apps dans les grandes entreprises : Valeo “sort du placard” !</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blog des RIA &#187; Google Apps dans les grandes entreprises : Valeo “sort du placard” !]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] nombreux supports qui ont parlé de Valeo et Google, on trouve :- Le journal du Net - Le blog de Techcrunch- Cnet.com- BusinessWeek- Et, bien sûr, le site de Revevol [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nombreux supports qui ont parlé de Valeo et Google, on trouve :- Le journal du Net &#8211; Le blog de Techcrunch- Cnet.com- BusinessWeek- Et, bien sûr, le site de Revevol [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are falling like dominos now, shutting off exchange, notes, etc. First year cost savings are massive across the board, especially in the 5K employee and up accounts. Keep your eye on the Google Enterprise blog. The next few months will give the data points you are looking for...real ROI, and evidence of a tipping point being approached.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are falling like dominos now, shutting off exchange, notes, etc. First year cost savings are massive across the board, especially in the 5K employee and up accounts. Keep your eye on the Google Enterprise blog. The next few months will give the data points you are looking for&#8230;real ROI, and evidence of a tipping point being approached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MS Business Productivity Online Suite = B.P.O.S....Big - Piece - Of - S*&amp;T. BPOS is a weak attempt to compete with Google Apps. Take a look at it, you&#039;ll be disappointed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS Business Productivity Online Suite = B.P.O.S&#8230;.Big &#8211; Piece &#8211; Of &#8211; S*&amp;T. BPOS is a weak attempt to compete with Google Apps. Take a look at it, you&#8217;ll be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Chalkley</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Chalkley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 08:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your right :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Cammer</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Cammer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YOUR, andrew. YOUR. NOT You&#039;re.

that said, the m$ tools are out in full force this week, aren&#039;t they?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOUR, andrew. YOUR. NOT You&#8217;re.</p>
<p>that said, the m$ tools are out in full force this week, aren&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shirish</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shirish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 13:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its a good thing to have a change. Google, if competing with Microsoft its a good strategy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a good thing to have a change. Google, if competing with Microsoft its a good strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3D PERSPECTIVES &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cloud Watching</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3D PERSPECTIVES &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cloud Watching]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This morning I was reading Oleg’s post on Should PLM think about Google Aps?, and I have to tell you it got me almost NCAA Final Four-excited. Maybe I was helped into the sports feeling given the reference article’s title: Google Cloud: 1, MS Office: 0. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This morning I was reading Oleg’s post on Should PLM think about Google Aps?, and I have to tell you it got me almost NCAA Final Four-excited. Maybe I was helped into the sports feeling given the reference article’s title: Google Cloud: 1, MS Office: 0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ault</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Ault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 12:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real issues here are downtime and security. Ask Lockheed Martin about unsecured networks with the latest security problems. There is nothing Google can do to make it secure and companies after all are responsible for proprietary information to shareholders and customers. Cloud shmoud, Google is going to guarantee me throughput as fast as my workstation sitting on the desk in fron tof me? Time is money and Googles cloud would take large amounts of it from any company foolish enough to trust it in the form of lost data and snails pace ISP&#039;s. Go for it, the Chinese hackers need your help!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real issues here are downtime and security. Ask Lockheed Martin about unsecured networks with the latest security problems. There is nothing Google can do to make it secure and companies after all are responsible for proprietary information to shareholders and customers. Cloud shmoud, Google is going to guarantee me throughput as fast as my workstation sitting on the desk in fron tof me? Time is money and Googles cloud would take large amounts of it from any company foolish enough to trust it in the form of lost data and snails pace ISP&#8217;s. Go for it, the Chinese hackers need your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brutus, MS already did dropped prices.

In order to compare apple to apples:
MS Business Productivity Online Suite = $180/user/year vs Google Apps = $50/seat/year]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brutus, MS already did dropped prices.</p>
<p>In order to compare apple to apples:<br />
MS Business Productivity Online Suite = $180/user/year vs Google Apps = $50/seat/year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLM Prompt: Should PLM think about Google Apps? &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PLM Prompt: Should PLM think about Google Apps? &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.techcrunchit.com/2009/05/13/google-cloud-1-ms-office-0/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.techcrunchit.com/2009/05/13/google-cloud-1-ms-office-0/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunchit.com/2009/05/13/google-cloud-1-ms-office-0/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valeo unveils officially its Google Apps strategy &#124; Kimind Consulting</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valeo unveils officially its Google Apps strategy &#124; Kimind Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Lotus Notes/Domino platform within Valeo. TechCrunch noticed it this morning with its &#8220;Google Cloud: 1 - MS Office: 0&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lotus Notes/Domino platform within Valeo. TechCrunch noticed it this morning with its &#8220;Google Cloud: 1 &#8211; MS Office: 0&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PKelly</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PKelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can tell you after working extensively in both platforms that there is absolutely no comparison. Google Apps is far superior and now I feel like I&#039;m riding a bike through sand anytime I work in Office. Mainframe, Client/Server, Cloud - different game, different players. There is nothing overly complicated about cloud computing and the enormous benefits of multitenancy but it puts MSFT in the pure innovator&#039;s dilemma. They sell server and desktop software - period. No servers, no desktop, no revenue. They have to completely redevelop Office from the ground up to make it a multitenant app - they are 5 to 10 years behind the true cloud vendors.

We use Office only because our old bosses don&#039;t get the Cloud and it does require a more agile partner community but make no doubt this shift is happening right now and it is just going to gain momentum.

Google, Amazon, and Salesforce are the new big boys on the block. Disruptive technologies by definition first grow in the least profitable customer base but this trend is going to take the enterprise by storm.

As an end user I can&#039;t wait until I can stop waiting for Outlook and Word to boot up just so I can do my job.

Office isn&#039;t multitenant. It won&#039;t be multitenant in the 2010 version. Just because MSFT builds data centers and hosts Office doesn&#039;t make Office a cloud app.

Is it reasonable to think just because Office is so popular now it always will be ... most end users don&#039;t even know what the h*ll we&#039;re even talking about. Google Apps is cheaper and provides a better user experience.

Change is good. Don&#039;t be scared. Get your head in the clouds and enjoy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can tell you after working extensively in both platforms that there is absolutely no comparison. Google Apps is far superior and now I feel like I&#8217;m riding a bike through sand anytime I work in Office. Mainframe, Client/Server, Cloud &#8211; different game, different players. There is nothing overly complicated about cloud computing and the enormous benefits of multitenancy but it puts MSFT in the pure innovator&#8217;s dilemma. They sell server and desktop software &#8211; period. No servers, no desktop, no revenue. They have to completely redevelop Office from the ground up to make it a multitenant app &#8211; they are 5 to 10 years behind the true cloud vendors.</p>
<p>We use Office only because our old bosses don&#8217;t get the Cloud and it does require a more agile partner community but make no doubt this shift is happening right now and it is just going to gain momentum.</p>
<p>Google, Amazon, and Salesforce are the new big boys on the block. Disruptive technologies by definition first grow in the least profitable customer base but this trend is going to take the enterprise by storm.</p>
<p>As an end user I can&#8217;t wait until I can stop waiting for Outlook and Word to boot up just so I can do my job.</p>
<p>Office isn&#8217;t multitenant. It won&#8217;t be multitenant in the 2010 version. Just because MSFT builds data centers and hosts Office doesn&#8217;t make Office a cloud app.</p>
<p>Is it reasonable to think just because Office is so popular now it always will be &#8230; most end users don&#8217;t even know what the h*ll we&#8217;re even talking about. Google Apps is cheaper and provides a better user experience.</p>
<p>Change is good. Don&#8217;t be scared. Get your head in the clouds and enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is one thing to license software, it&#039;s a totally different thing to imply that they actually use it.  For all the headlines of companies buying gApps, very few actually describe the end user experience in terms of productivity gains, interoperability or even the training costs.  And, there&#039;s nothing said of the IT costs involved or whether the numerous FAILS of gMail and the general cloud infrastucture has had an impact on their business.  Why?  Because I think that, like OpenOffice, once the crowd dissipates, most (all?) organizations look at the time, expense and risks of their investment and realize they&#039;ve made a huge mistake.

Will gApps cause Microsoft to act differently?  Most assuredly; it&#039;s in their nature to seek out competitors and pummel them into the ground.  But I wouldn&#039;t mistake their latency in getting into enterprise-class cloud computing as a sign of failure.  Rather, with hundreds of millions of users and hundreds of thousands of customers that depend daily on their platform, there&#039;s a higher bar for them than Google, and dumping things into the online domain with a Beta moniker slapped on them and thinking that&#039;s ok.

The bottom line: I&#039;m still waiting for any of these companies that have licensed gApps to truly demonstrate cost savings over time, end user productivity gains, and positive impact to their ability to be competitive in their markets.

It&#039;s not about hating Google or loving Microsoft.  It&#039;s about holding both companies accountable for demonstrating ROI, TCO, etc. and to date Google has been getting a pass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is one thing to license software, it&#8217;s a totally different thing to imply that they actually use it.  For all the headlines of companies buying gApps, very few actually describe the end user experience in terms of productivity gains, interoperability or even the training costs.  And, there&#8217;s nothing said of the IT costs involved or whether the numerous FAILS of gMail and the general cloud infrastucture has had an impact on their business.  Why?  Because I think that, like OpenOffice, once the crowd dissipates, most (all?) organizations look at the time, expense and risks of their investment and realize they&#8217;ve made a huge mistake.</p>
<p>Will gApps cause Microsoft to act differently?  Most assuredly; it&#8217;s in their nature to seek out competitors and pummel them into the ground.  But I wouldn&#8217;t mistake their latency in getting into enterprise-class cloud computing as a sign of failure.  Rather, with hundreds of millions of users and hundreds of thousands of customers that depend daily on their platform, there&#8217;s a higher bar for them than Google, and dumping things into the online domain with a Beta moniker slapped on them and thinking that&#8217;s ok.</p>
<p>The bottom line: I&#8217;m still waiting for any of these companies that have licensed gApps to truly demonstrate cost savings over time, end user productivity gains, and positive impact to their ability to be competitive in their markets.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about hating Google or loving Microsoft.  It&#8217;s about holding both companies accountable for demonstrating ROI, TCO, etc. and to date Google has been getting a pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valeo dévoile officiellement sa stratégie Google Apps &#124; Kimind Consulting</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valeo dévoile officiellement sa stratégie Google Apps &#124; Kimind Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Il s&#8217;agit d&#8217;une première mondiale pour Google, puisque c&#8217;est la première fois qu&#8217;un groupe d&#8217;une telle envergure fait le choix complet de la suite collaborative Google Apps, aussi bien pour la dimension messagerie que pour la dimension bureautique. Il est important de noter que Google Apps va progressivement remplacer aussi bien la suite bureautique Microsoft Office que la suite collaborative Lotus Note/Domino. D&#8217;ailleurs TechCrunch l&#8217;a bien remarqué, en titrant ce matin sur &#8220;Google Cloud: 1 MS Office: 0&#8220;. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Il s&#8217;agit d&#8217;une première mondiale pour Google, puisque c&#8217;est la première fois qu&#8217;un groupe d&#8217;une telle envergure fait le choix complet de la suite collaborative Google Apps, aussi bien pour la dimension messagerie que pour la dimension bureautique. Il est important de noter que Google Apps va progressivement remplacer aussi bien la suite bureautique Microsoft Office que la suite collaborative Lotus Note/Domino. D&#8217;ailleurs TechCrunch l&#8217;a bien remarqué, en titrant ce matin sur &#8220;Google Cloud: 1 MS Office: 0&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Chalkley</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Chalkley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re a Microsoft Certified network administrator ain&#039;t ya, admit it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a Microsoft Certified network administrator ain&#8217;t ya, admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealitySpeak</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RealitySpeak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[get real pal.  google apps is a pathetic business.  good thing they have TechCrunch to write up their PR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>get real pal.  google apps is a pathetic business.  good thing they have TechCrunch to write up their PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Kandzuba</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Kandzuba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, actually I don&#039;t believe that MS Office ever die, just b/c too many people tied to it already. On other hands Clouds solutions are growing but general trend is not exited. Compare 500 M of MS Office users with only 4 M of only unique users of Google Docs.

Next year, when MS will unviel MS Office 2010 with Online Version many people will just forget about Google or Open Office.

But at the same time I&#039;m doing intergration between Office 2003/2007 and Google Docs (www.upriseapps.com) , b/c I believe that these is no be a majority of those who&#039;ll move to Office 2010 imidiatelly after release.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, actually I don&#8217;t believe that MS Office ever die, just b/c too many people tied to it already. On other hands Clouds solutions are growing but general trend is not exited. Compare 500 M of MS Office users with only 4 M of only unique users of Google Docs.</p>
<p>Next year, when MS will unviel MS Office 2010 with Online Version many people will just forget about Google or Open Office.</p>
<p>But at the same time I&#8217;m doing intergration between Office 2003/2007 and Google Docs (www.upriseapps.com) , b/c I believe that these is no be a majority of those who&#8217;ll move to Office 2010 imidiatelly after release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-05-13 &#171; Ex Orbite</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2009-05-13 &#171; Ex Orbite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/01/14/china-mobile-drops-iphone/#comment-9282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Google Adds 30,000 App Users In Biggest Enterprise Deal Yet (tags: enterprise20 google microsoft cloudcomputing valeo) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Adds 30,000 App Users In Biggest Enterprise Deal Yet (tags: enterprise20 google microsoft cloudcomputing valeo) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

