The Bloom is Off the Muni Wi-Fi Rose

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

Biggs is the editor of TechCrunch Gadgets. Biggs has written for the New York Times, InSync, USA Weekend, Popular Mechanics, Popular Science, Money and a number of other outlets on technology and wristwatches. He is the former editor-in-chief of Gizmodo.com and lives in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn. You can Tweet him here and G+ him here. Email him directly at john@techcrunch.com. → Learn More

dead-rose-small-1.jpgSorry, Milwaukee, your municipal Wi-Fi is on hold. It seems that during the mad rush to announce municipal Wi-Fi implementations, people forgot one thing: muni Wi-Fi is really expensive.

Companies like AT&T and Earthlink have partnered with a number of cities to blanket denizens in a warm, downy coating of wireless Internet. However, because most cities can’t convince their citizens that Wi-Fi is a good thing, the contracts are failing and partners are finding that no one really wants muni Wi-Fi anyway.

This is the reverse of the last mile problem. If you really want Internet, chances are you already have DSL or cable. If you don’t want Internet or live in an area where the providers aren’t supplying data — the places Muni Wi-Fi is presumably designed to serve — chances are you’re not particularly interested. Add in WiMAX and cyber cafes and you’ve pretty much saturated all the areas that might pay for city-wide WiFi.

Is this a matter of uneducated consumers, stupid planning, or lazy city councils? Who knows. All I know is that Muni Wi-Fi might be already played out.

Why Wi-Fi Networks Are Floundering [BusinessWeek]

Sponsored Ads

blog comments powered by Disqus

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads