More Details on Attention Trust

Wednesday, October 5th, 2005

J. Michael Arrington (born March 13, 1970 in Huntington Beach, California) is a serial entrepreneur and the founder of TechCrunch, a blog covering startups and technology news. Arrington attended Claremont McKenna College (BA Economics, 1992) and Stanford Law School (JD, 1995), and practiced as a corporate and securities lawyer at two law firms: O’Melveny & Myers and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich... → Learn More

I’m sitting in the Attention Trust public board meeting at the Web 2.0 conference and getting more details on their announcements discussed below.

Everything is centered around the Attention Trust Recorder Firefox extension (they’re calling it ATX). Once installed, if you turn it on, it monitors your click stream. ATX also tells you if the site you are on is Attention Trust approved, and has controls to turn the recorder on and off.

The data can be stored locally and/or shared with any number of trusted parties if you so choose. Attention Trust insists that companies using the data adhere to the Attention Trust principles.

This information is incredibly valuable, of course, particularly when aggregated with others. Virtually any online company will be interested in this data, and will invent creative ways to incentivize customers to share their attention data with them.

Search engines are the obvious example…knowing what sitex you’ve been to, and how long you’ve stayed, is extraordinarily useful in creating more relevant search results.

So once again, the basic flow:

  1. companies agree to principles (users own their own data and attention)
  2. consumers download recorder (firefox extension) that tracks clickstream
  3. recorder can be turned on or off at any time
  4. consumers may share data with any or no approved companies
  5. companies will incentivize users to share data

Sponsored Ads

  • http://www.sexywidget.com lawrence

    I think that’s an apt comparison, and I think it’s a good move for Facebook.

    One thing that bugs me about their implementation of aggregation functionality is that they limit you to one RSS feed to include in your activity stream – really irritating, and I can’t tell if it’s intentional, or if it was a screw up.

  • http://www.creativecomponent.com Alan Houser

    I’d say it’s closer to Pownce than FriendFeed.

  • http://api-madness.com/post/finished-setting-up-pingfm-accounts/ Finished Setting up Ping.FM Accounts -Api-Madness.com

    [...] Facebook Introduces FriendFeed-like Features [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads